Multi-Voting Process Tool

IHP 430 Module Three Group Discussion Guidelines and Rubric

Multi-voting Process Tool

1. Review the following scenario. Choose a multi-voting process tool you will use to complete the analysis of the scenario. Then, work through the scenario

to determine which project you will select.

2. Next, discuss the process and the tool you used to complete the multi-voting process analysis with your group on the discussion topic.

3. Finally, discuss the four criteria that should be considered when problem-solving: risk, economy, timing, and resources.

Using a multi-voting process tool, address the following problem:

Ten projects are being considered by the QM team. Based on team member preferences (below), if a single vote is held, Project D will be selected. The chair

wants to consider team member preferences beyond simply their first choices. Use a multi-voting process and assign three points to each member’s first choice,

two points to the second, and one point to the third. After the first vote, options that receive fewer than three points should be eliminated and the remaining

options re-voted. In subsequent rounds, two points will be given to the first choice and one point to the second. Continue to eliminate low vote-tallying options

until all but two options have been eliminated. On the final vote, each team member will get a single vote worth one point. Which option will be selected?

Jacob D, I, B, C, A, F, E, J, H, G

Isabella A, C, E, F, G, J, D, H, I, B

Ethan H, G, E, D, B, I, J, A, C, F

Emma D, I, F, A, E, G, B, C, H, J

Olivia B, G, A, J, H, C, F, E, I, D

Multi-voting Process Tool Peer Feedback: As healthcare managers, there are two important skills to master: working in groups or teams, and giving and receiving

constructive feedback. For this project, each team is composed of three to five team members. Individually, complete your multi-voting process analysis to select

the best approach in identifying problems and post it to your group’s discussion topic to share with your team members during Module Three. During Module

Three, you will go to the group discussion to review your team members’ multi-voting analysis responses. When reviewing your peers work, offer constructive

feedback (to at least two peers).

You are expected to provide feedback on the content of the multi-voting analysis and compare and contrast each peer approach with your own. The

communication tone of the critique must be professional and respectful, and contain a rationale that supports your critique. Make content recommendations

 

 

 

 

that are focused and relevant to the multi-voting process analysis, and use proper mechanics of writing. Be sure to use proper APA formatting and citation as

needed. This must be completed before the end of Module Three. Your final product will be graded individually.

Rubric

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Discussion of Process

and Tools Used in

Analysis

Meets or exceeds “Proficient”

criteria and demonstrates in-

depth knowledge of the process

and the tools used to complete

the multi-voting process

analysis

Effectively discusses the process

and the tools used to complete

the multi-voting process

analysis

Effectively discusses the multi-

voting analysis tool, but does not

evaluate the process

Does not discuss the tool or

process used to complete the

multi-voting process analysis

20

Discussion of the

Four Criteria

Meets or exceeds “Proficient”

criteria and demonstrates in-

depth knowledge of the four

criteria: risk, economy, timing,

and resources

Effectively discusses the four

criteria: risk, economy, timing,

and resources

Discusses at least two of the four

criteria: risk, economy, timing, and

resources

Does not discuss any of the four

criteria: risk, economy, timing,

and resources

20

Analyses of Problem

Using the Multi-

voting Process Tool

Meets or exceeds “Proficient”

criteria and demonstrates

exceptional knowledge of the

multi-voting tool used in

problem analysis

Analyzes problem using the

multi-voting tool

Partially completes analysis using

the multi-voting tool

Does not complete analysis

using the multi-voting tool

20

Critique of Content Exceeds “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates in-depth

knowledge of content to

provide peer with an exemplary

critique

Critique is clear, with concrete

information that could be acted

on for improvement, as well as

positive acknowledgement

when indicated

Critique is constructive, but may

lack clarity or indicate non-specific

action

Critique is superfluous, vague,

non-specific, and unclear

20

Content

Recommendations

Exceeds “Proficient” criteria by

providing exemplary

recommendations that are

focused and relevant to the

multi-voting process analysis

Makes recommendations that

are focused and relevant to the

multi-voting process analysis

Makes recommendations that are

focused on the analysis conducted,

but do not include feedback that is

relevant

Does not make

recommendations

20

Earned Total 100%