Informatics Week 5 replies with 2 references

reply 1

Key Lashawn Harper

 

 

 

Big Data in Healthcare: Navigating the Potential Rewards and Inherent Risks

 

 

One of the most important benefits of using big data within clinical systems is improving patient care through predictive analytics. Analyzing massive datasets in healthcare allows for identifying typical patterns and predicting trends associated with disease outbreaks and potential health crises before they occur (Del Giorgio Solfa & Simonato, 2023). For example, big data analytics can assist in predicting which patients are susceptible to developing certain conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease, allowing for early intervention and personalized treatment plans. Based on these initiative-taking measures, it is possible to cut healthcare costs.

Key issues and challenges concern data privacy and security associated with big data use in healthcare systems. The special concern in this regard is that the extensive storage and processing of delicate health data of patients can be subject to security breaches and unauthorized access to PHI, or personal health information (Shojaei et al., 2024). Additionally, the complexity of healthcare data systems makes it a time-consuming and arduous task for care providers to apply and interpret data, which can eventually lead to patients being incorrectly diagnosed, which can ultimately cause harm.

Remediating the problem of handling extremely substantial amounts of data requires the establishment of a more rigorous approach toward data governance and administration. According to Glassman (2017), a working strategy could be the implementation of cybersecurity architecture that includes encryption, access control, and regular security audits to ensure the privacy of patient data. In addition, investing in doctors’ and nurses’ education on how to use and interpret big data is key for the proper and effective utilization of patient information. Another way to minimize the risks posed by big data use in clinical systems is the employment of identification techniques for conducting data analysis (Thew, 2016). By encrypting identifiable information, healthcare institutions can process customer data for deriving trends and patterns without putting individual privacy at stake.

 

Reply 2

 

Hillary 

Main Post

Potential Benefit of Using Big Data

Big data is a large complex data set which can be analyzed using various techniques such as mining and predictive analytics to yield significantly more data than smaller sets of data or data sets that are not integrated (Wang et al., 2018; Thew, 2016). By analyzing huge volumes of data across a range of healthcare networks big data analytics can support clinical decision making through predictive analytics (Wang et al., 2018). Predictive capability is created when organizations utilize generative platforms to combine data warehouses with predictive algorithms which help users make optimal decisions (Wang et al., 2018). For instance, large genetic and clinical datasets may be analyzed using big data predictive analytics to determine the most effective therapies for individuals, as demonstrated in a study examining personalized therapy for individuals with hypertension (Saini & Kanna, 2023). Through the analysis of a dataset including data from more than a million individuals the research was able to group patients based on clinical or genetic traits and ultimately personalize treatment strategies for each subgroup which led to improved outcomes when compared to conventional approaches (Saini & Kanna, 2023). The use of predictive analytics in the healthcare setting can lead to early identification of disease, identification of specific subgroups who benefit from personalized care, and optimizing clinical processes by improving patient flow and efficiently allocating resources (Saini & Kanna, 2023). Big data analytics and predictive analytics can be used to facilitate clinician decision support by giving clinicians timely and relevant information, personalized suggestions, and alerts or reminders (Saini & Kanna, 2023).

Potential Challenge of Using Big Data

The use of big data in healthcare poses several challenges including information security and privacy, data management, regulatory compliance, cost, system compatibility, and scalability. The lack of standardization of data systems is a potential challenge to big data analytics, which may impact and undermine the reliability of datasets used to generate predictive analysis and clinical decision-making support (Thew, 2016). For example, in a healthcare system with multiple data sources, including EMRs, wearable devices, medical imaging and medical sensors all of the data may be coming from different, possibly incompatible systems. If the different sources are using different data formats or definitions for variables it could lead to inconsistencies and errors in the analysis. The integration of data from various sources is key to creating well informed datasets or data-warehouses (Saini & Kanna, 2023). However, disparate data sources can use different coding schemes or data structures which make it difficult to integrate data effectively. To combat this an organization might hope to create an operating system to support big data use integration and the storage options but this can be yet another issue (Thew, 2016; Wang et al., 2018). Even when creating an in-house system for big data storage and analytics healthcare systems need to consider the issue of data sharing agreements for integrating patient records from previous providers, as well as system compatibilities (Frey, 2018). To facilitate data system standardization, as well as the creation and storage of data-warehouses a large-scale storage solution and a way to integrate previously collected data is necessary (Wang et al., 2018; Frey, 2018).

Mitigation Strategy

To mitigate the challenge posed by the lack of data system standardization healthcare organizations could implement a comprehensive data governance framework. The data governance framework should establish clear protocols, standards and procedures for data management (Wang et al., 2018). Data governance is an extension of IT governance and focuses on utilizing data resources to create business value and is essential to supporting the use of big data analytics (Wang et al., 2018). To establish a strong data governance protocol the organization must first create clear missions, goals, procedures and metrics. This ensures that the data will be understood, trusted and accessible which will allow the data to be used effectively for analysis and decision making (Wang et al., 2018). Health care organizations should review the data gathered in all areas of their system to determine the data’s value and prioritize it in their analytics framework, this will minimize the cost and complexity as well as reducing redundance (Wang et al., 2018). The University of Kansas Hospital showed how establishing a successful data governance committee can facilitate the management of data availability, usability, integrity and security, therefore ensuring the success of big data analytic initiatives (Wang et al., 2018). With strong data governance practices healthcare organizations can achieve standardized data definitions, data quality and create a roadmap for future organizational intelligence and data governance (Wang et al., 20

Patho Assignment week 5

Please make sure this done on a Nurse Practitioner level

 

 

 

GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS

In this exercise, you will complete a Mind Map Template to gauge your understanding of this week’s content. Select one of the possible topics provided to complete your MindMap Template.

  • Ulcers
  • After HP shots
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • Pancreatitis
  • Liver failure—acute and chronic
  • Gall bladder disease
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Diverticulitis
  • Jaundice
  • Bilirubin
  • Gastrointestinal bleed – upper and lower
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Intra-abdominal infections (e.g., appendicitis)

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 5

Submityour MindMap Template by Day 7 of Week 5.

 

Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 3, 5, 7, 9_Mind Map Assignment_Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect one of the possible topics provided and complete the MindMap Template.

1) Describe the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in your own words. What are the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

A thoroughly completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

A completed MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

An inaccurately complete or vague MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

An incomplete MindMap Template with a selected topic was submitted, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the pathophysiology of the primary diagnosis in the student’s own words, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s risk factors for this diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2) What are the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis? How does the diagnosis impact other body systems and what are the possible complications?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response accurately describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes how this diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the patient’s signs and symptoms for this diagnosis, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes how the diagnosis might impact other body systems and their possible complications, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3) What are other potential diagnosis that present in a similar way to this diagnosis (differentials)?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and completely describes in detail the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the potential diagnoses that present in a similar way to the diagnosis provided, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4) What diagnostic tests or labs would you order to rule out the differentials for this patient or confirm the primary diagnosis?

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the diagnostic tests and labs they would order to rule out the differentials for this patient, and in confirming the primary diagnosis, or is missing.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5) What treatment options would you consider? Include possible referrals and medications.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the treatment options they would consider. The response accurately and thoroughly describes potential referrals and medications.

17 to >14.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes the treatment options they would consider. They response accurately describes potential referrals and medications.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider. The response inaccurately or vaguely describes potential referrals and medications.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the treatment options they would consider, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely describes possible referrals and medications, or is missing.

 

Supplementary Resources

Note:These readings are intended to serve as supplementary to the Lecturio content provided in this course. Please refer/review these supplementary resources should you need help in reinforcing concepts and in preparation for completing this week’s Assessments.

  • McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
    • Chapter 38: Structure and Function of the Renal and Urological Systems including Summary Review
    • Chapter 39: Alteration of Renal and Urinary Function (stop at Fluids and electrolytes); Summary Review
    • Chapter 41: Structure and Function of the Digestive System (stop at Tests of digestive function); Summary Review
    • Chapter 42: Alterations of Digestive Function (stop at Cancer of the digestive track); Summary Review

Skills Inventory and Development Plan

  • This assignment requires the inclusion of at least two scholarly research sources related to this topic and at least one in-text citation from each source

Directions:Locate and download “Skills Inventory and Development Plan” worksheet attached to this assignment.Complete the tables as directed in the document.

Treatment Plans for Edmund Kemper

An understanding of client need assists you in creating an individualized treatment plan. A treatment plan is designed to reduce symptomology while restoring mental health and promoting wellness. To support client success, a mental health plan provides opportunities for the client to change and grow. The ability to identify need and individualize a treatment plan will assist in career development and increase client success.

Assignment Directions

For this assignment, you will select one of the Suggested Case Studies and create two separate treatment plans from different perspectives (e.g., corrections, policing, courts). You will compare and contrast these two subspecialties in forensic psychology, noting areas of need for the identified client.

Include the following in your discussion and support your responses with relevant details, explanations, references to the case, and/or research-based evidence:

  • Identify the forensic psychology subspecialty selected for each treatment plan.
  • Create a forensic treatment plan for each subspecialty (1–2 pages each) based on at least two or three needs/issues of the client in the selected case.
    • Be sure to evaluate each need from a correctional, policing, and/or courts perspective.
    • Identify treatment goals and activities for each.
  • In 2–3 paragraphs, compare and contrast the different subspecialties used to create the treatment plans.

Your assignment should be 3–5 pages, not including the title and reference pages, and should include the following elements:

  • Title page: Provide your name, title of assignment, course and section number, and date.
  • Body: Answer all the questions in complete sentences and paragraphs.
    • Be sure to include an introductory paragraph, thesis sentence, and summary paragraph.
    • Your responses should reflect professional writing standards, using proper tone and language. The writing and writing style should be correct, accurate, and reflect knowledge of the principles of forensic psychology.
  • Reference page: Sources listed in APA format.
    • Include a minimum of two scholarly or academic sources, such as empirical research and peer-reviewed journal articles that were published within the last 5 years to support your responses and conclusions.
    • Be sure to carefully select sources after reviewing the literature and evaluating the credibility, relevance, quality, and research merit of each source.
  • Use Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and left aligned.
  • Use standard 1″ margins on all sides.
  • Use current APA formatting and citation style.

This assignment assesses the following Course Outcome:

PS550-4: Create a treatment plan to assess client needs from the perspective of two forensic psychology subspecialties.