Review the two case studies in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the subjects’ specific identities related to sex, gender, and sexual orientation.

Sexual behavior is a highly controversial topic. Different cultural groups have varying beliefs regarding the appropriateness and morality of various sexual behaviors, when these behaviors should occur and with whom, the age at which sexual behavior should occur, and so forth. Sexual behavior is a common topic in religion, politics, and education. It is so grounded in cultural and religious belief systems that accepting differences in others’ sexual behavior is difficult, if not impossible, for some.

Not only are there differing religious and cultural views on sexuality, but there are also different views and perceptions of gender-related aspects of sexuality within cultural groups. For example, in some cultures, prepubescent, same-sex experimentation is expected and encouraged prior to adulthood, whereas this behavior is perceived as abnormal in most Western societies. In some cultures, women are perceived as having a much lower sex drive than men, and older adults may be perceived as having no sex drive at all. As with any perception, when society acts on an assumption, people are impacted. As a simple example, if you assume that older adults do not have sex and construct barriers for sexual activity in assisted living facilities, the psychological well being of the residents in that facility may be affected. Understanding the differences in sexuality in different cultural groups is an important aspect of understanding the whole person and the person’s behavior.

For this Discussion, you analyze two case studies of individuals who have multiple identities related to sex, gender, and sexual orientation and consider how these identities would affect aspects of their lives if they lived in your culture.

To prepare

  • Review the two case studies in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the subjects’ specific identities related to sex, gender, and sexual orientation.
  • Think about how Alberto and Jeanette would experience life in your culture given their specific identities.
  • Consider the advantages and challenges that Alberto and Jeanette may face regarding friendships, romantic relationship, and sexuality within your culture.

By Day 4

Post a brief description of your culture. Then explain the advantages and challenges that Alberto and Jeanette would encounter related to friendships, romantic relationships, and sexuality in your culture.

Two case studies: Case Study: Alberto Alberto is an 18-year-old genetically born male. He is the eldest of four siblings; he has two brothers (ages 17 and 14) and a sister (age 12). From the time Alberto was a young child, his parents noticed that he was quiet and shy compared to other boys his age. He learned to read at a very young age and was content to curl up with a book rather than play with other children. Several of Alberto’s early grade school teachers referred to him as “sensitive” and “gentle” for a boy. Alberto was very close to his siblings growing up, often acting as caregiver or babysitter when needed, and he generally helped out a great deal at home with chores. When he showed a keen interest in science and creative writing during middle school, Alberto was encouraged by several teachers to join school academic clubs to foster these interests. Alberto did so, and he built a small but close group of friends. Alberto’s father, hoping to “toughen him up,” tried to encourage Alberto to participate in sports, such as football or basketball, but Alberto showed no interest. During 10th grade, Alberto became the target of bullying by several older boys at school. They frequently verbally harassed him, calling him names like “sissy” and “Alberta” and using slurs related to his mixed-ethnic heritage. Occasionally, one of the boys would shove Alberto into the hallway lockers or spit at him in the cafeteria. Subsequently, Alberto struggled both academically and socially in 11th and 12th grades. He started to have sexual and romantic thoughts about other boys. Although he was close to his group of friends, he did not feel comfortable sharing these feelings with anyone. He had a girlfriend through part of his senior year; although he found her attractive, he was confused about his romantic and sexual feelings toward her. They spent most weekend evenings together, but they limited their physical relationship to mostly kissing, holding hands, and cuddling. Alberto recently graduated high school and is planning to attend college. Although he is close with his mother and would like to talk to her about his feelings, he has not shared any of his confusion about his sexuality with her, as she is very religious and he fears she would become angry and reject him.

Case Study: Jeanette Jeanette is a 34-year-old genetically born female. She is an only child who was raised by her father and grandparents. When Jeanette was eight years old, her mother died as a result of a car accident. As a young woman, Jeanette was very successful in school, often advancing far more quickly than her peers with normal academic milestones. She was able to maintain very high grades despite occasional experimentation with drugs and alcohol. Jeanette was well liked and well regarded by both her classmates and her teachers. Jeanette attended an elite private college on a partial scholarship; she worked part time on campus to supplement her scholarship funds.

It was during college that Jeanette realized she was attracted to both men and women. After a brief “coming out” period, she was fairly open about her sexuality. She also realized she was interested in a career in law and pursued her juris doctorate immediately upon completion of her bachelor’s degree. Now a successful criminal prosecutor, Jeanette loves her job and has aspirations to advance in the law firm where she works and then pursue a career in local politics. She enjoys the demanding pace and the challenging and unpredictable nature of prosecuting criminal defendants. In addition to her career, Jeanette enjoys a wide range of physical activities as an outlet for stress. She is particularly drawn to highly competitive and risky sports, such as martial arts and large wave surfing. She has participated in various marathons and is currently training for an Ironman triathlon competition. She takes great pride in her athletic ability and stamina, and she frequently visits the gym. Jeanette has remained, for the most part, single. She has had several relationships with both men and women; these relationships lasted a few months.

However, she finds it difficult to maintain a relationship given the demands of her job and sporting interests. She prefers to casually date and enjoys an active sexual life. Recently, she has begun to experience some challenges at work with regard to advancement and her direct supervisor. On several occasions, he has made vague comments about women who are not “feminine” and jokes about how the “old boys club” at the office is disappearing. Despite having a very successful prosecution record, Jeanette received a very lukewarm annual performance evaluation. Her supervisor commented specifically about his concerns regarding  © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. her leadership ability, and he wondered aloud if she might “soften” her approach a bit.

Readings for this week;

Helgeson, V. S. (2017). Psychology of gender (5th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Chapter 9, “Romantic Relationships” (pp. 377–428)

Lehmiller, J. J. (2013). Psychology of human sexuality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Chapter 1, “Theoretical Perspectives on Human Sexuality” (pp. 2–26)
Chapter 6, “Sexual Orientation” (pp. 144–170)

Please incorporate readings and case studies in answer.

What is the argument Luban offers for the hybrid war-law model? What is the argument he offers against it? Which side of the argument is more compatible with respect for human rights?

1. What is the argument Luban offers for the hybrid war-law model? What is the argument he offers against it? Which side of the argument is more compatible with respect for human rights? What do you mean when you say ‘right?” Does it matter which side is more compatible with respect for human rights? Explain.

Cite all the texts you employ. This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.

2. Why does Marquis think abortion is immoral? What is his argument? Thomson argues that abortion is permissible, at least in a wide range of cases. What are those cases and what is/are her arguments?

Do Marquis’s arguments challenge those of Thomson, or can one endorse both positions without contradiction? Justify your answer in either case.

Cite all the texts you employ. This is at 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.

3. HCC says the following: “We will be the opportunity institution for every student we serve – essential to our community’s success.”Broadly – and incompletely –  ‘success’ can be interpreted in two ways here. What might they be? Is there a notion of ‘success’ that our community could achieve that is somehow not worth achieving?

Use the ideas from Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham to explicate the two potential meanings of ‘success’. Then, explain how those meanings might yield different interpretations of the passage quoted at the beginning of this prompt. Which notion of ‘success’ is it proper for us to seek to achieve? Or, is there one that it is proper for us to seek to achieve? Defend your answer.

Cite all the texts you employ. This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts.

Grading Rubric 1. Does this paper identify have a clear thesis? (5%) 2. Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly? (5%) 3. Does the paper attribute the correct view to the philosophers in question? (10%) 4. Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail? (For example, does the author explain concepts and arguments in a tight manner, or are the arguments and concepts merely sketched?) (25%) 5. Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion? (15%) 6. Does the paper cohere? Or, is the paper a hodgepodge of disparate ideas? (10%) 7. Does the conclusion tie together the different phases of the paper? Or, is the conclusion a non-sequitur? (5%) 8. Are the spelling, grammar and syntax on the college level? (5%) 9. Does the author make appropriate and accurate use of course concepts in constructing his or her discussion? (20%) Intangibles: Is the paper on the assigned topic? Is it the author’s own work?

 

 

 

 

Examine the specific sections in ACA’s ethical guidelines regarding these issues and answer the following questions: Looking at the ACA Code of Ethics, collect information about ethical violations related to multicultural counseling, ethics in marital and family therapy, and group counseling. Identify the ethical code numbers and definitions. Analyze how the counselor in the case study violated these specific codes

Assignment 2: Case Study: Multicultural, Couples and Family, and Group Counseling For this assignment you will refer to the Course Case Study and the ACA Code of Ethics. Visit the ACA Web site at: http://www.counseling.org/Resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf Reread the case study, looking specifically at issues related to multicultural counseling, ethics in marital and family therapy, and group counseling. Examine the specific sections in ACA’s ethical guidelines regarding these issues and answer the following questions: Looking at the ACA Code of Ethics, collect information about ethical violations related to multicultural counseling, ethics in marital and family therapy, and group counseling. Identify the ethical code numbers and definitions. Analyze how the counselor in the case study violated these specific codes. Examine the influence of your own personal values as it relates to diversity issues presented in the case.

 

Your response should be at least three pages long.

 

PSY430 Ethics in Psychology Case Study

 

Joe, a 35-year-old, male mental-health counselor, received a client referral, 35- year-old Jill, from a community-counseling clinic. He began providing counseling services to her. Jill’s problem was that she was unsatisfied with her current job as a bank teller and was experiencing mild anxiety and depression. Joe had been providing services to Jill for three weeks when she disclosed that she was confused about her sexuality because she was sexually attracted toward women. Joe immediately responded to Jill with wide eyes and a shocked look. He told Jill that he was a traditional Catholic, who felt that this type of feeling was immoral and wrong. He informed her that she should avoid thinking about this and pray for forgiveness. He also told her that he felt uncomfortable talking about the issue any further. Jill continued to talk to Joe about dealing with her family issues.

Joe had recently read about a new technique and immediately became excited about trying it in therapy. He explained to her that he read an article in a magazine about a new technique called rebirthing. The new technique was being used in Europe to help people change their views about their relationships with their family. “It is supposed to be really effective in almost wiping out your memory of your family; it is like hypnosis” Joe said. “I would really like to try it on you today, what do you think?” Jill declined his offer and continued to talk about her family.

Joe thought to himself that even though Jill said no, he was still going to try to hypnotize her as they talked. He thought she could benefit from hypnosis. Jill disclosed that she was raised in a traditional Asian-American home with many cultural influences and culture-specific rules and behavior. Jill was struggling with balancing her individualism and her cultural heritage. Joe explained to her that because he was living and working in a rural community, mostly consisting of people of East European descent, he could not relate to Jill’s culture and the issues with which she was struggling. He apologized and explained that he was not required to study these cultural issues because of his geographical location. Jill moved on to talk about her depression. She began talking about feeling lonely and how it contributed to her depression.

During a counseling session, she revealed that she was attracted to Joe and would like a closer, intimate relationship with him. Joe, aware that he was also attracted to Jill, talked about his feelings toward her but explained that engaging in a relationship outside the established counseling relationship was unethical. He informed her that because of the mutual feelings of attraction, the counseling relationship would be ineffective and that he would refer her to another counselor for continued services. Jill agreed and they terminated the counseling relationship. Jill asked for time to think it over and left the office. Later, she contacted him to continue counseling and to discuss the referral. Joe agreed to meet her that evening at a restaurant and bring her the referral information.

That night they began an intimate sexual relationship. Page 1 of 2 PSY430 Ethics in Psychology © 2011 Argosy University Online Programs Joe never got around to providing the referral for Jill even though he was aware of her ongoing state of depression and anxiety. Joe stopped seeing Jill after a month of intimate sexual encounters. Joe enjoyed the relationship but felt guilty due to the unethical nature of the relationship. Because of his continued concern about Jill’s depression, Joe considered going to his current clinical supervisor to discuss the case.

However, he decided against it and never contacted her. This was because he and his supervisor had recently started a sexual relationship, and he knew it would hurt the supervisor’s feelings if she knew of his sexual relations with Jill. Joe decided to call Jill’s boss at the bank to check on her and see how she was doing. He called her boss and explained that he had been counseling her for anxiety and depression and wanted to check if she was feeling fine. Her boss informed Joe that Jill had quit her job and was in the county hospital undergoing treatment for severe depression. Joe quickly hung up and decided not to call or visit the bank again. After thinking it over, Joe decided that general counseling might not be for him.

He decided to begin marriage and family therapy. He ordered some business cards and advertised in the yellow pages. He thought, “after all, I am a health counselor and it can’t be hard to counsel a couple. You don’t need anything special. I already have one degree, and that’s enough!”

Summarize your thoughts regarding whether or not the method your peers chose are appropriate for the type of investigation they identified. If so, why? If not, which method would you suggest?

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapters 1 and 2 in your course textbook, and watch the Multicellular organisms and their nervous systems and Discovering the human brain: New pathways to neuroscience, with Susan Bookheimer, Ph.D videos. These materials examine various means of investigating neuropsychology, such as imaging technology, laboratory science techniques, and special studies that provide information about structure (nervous system anatomy and cellular structure) and function (nervous system and cellular function).

This discussion is an analysis of the various ways neuroscience investigators study the biological basis of psychological function.

In your discussion:

· Select one method you think is the most powerful or useful for examining the relationship between biology and behavior.

o Do not choose a category of investigational methods, but be sure to select one method (e.g., do not choose “imaging technology” but instead choose one type of imaging technology).

· Evaluate the method you have selected.

o Would this method be best used for basic research, initial diagnosis of a clinical condition, ongoing patient management, or a combination of these analytic practices?

o What part of the nervous system (anatomical structure, function, cellular chemistry and function) would most likely be studied using this method?

o What behavioral health or neurological condition could be studied by this method?

§ Make sure to use terminology from the DSM-5 for psychological/behavioral health conditions and current terminology from professional sources for neurological conditions.

Also in your discussion,

· Describe how knowledge of neuroscience investigational methods would assist someone in a career that uses a degree in psychology.

o Remember, a degree in psychology opens the door to many options regarding career choices. These include positions in human resources, the helping professions (e.g., medicine, counseling and behavioral health, teaching, social work, ministry, and nursing), science, marketing, law enforcement, and more.

o Some examples to consider might be sharing the information you’ve learned to help you educate a patient/client:

§ Regarding their diagnosed neuropsychological disorder and the need for medication.

§ Why we now evaluate psychological disorders from multiple aspects (biological, psychological, social).

§ Why their child is ready for specific developmental milestones due to neurological maturation.

The post should be a minimum of 3 paragraphs. You may cite and reference course materials such as the textbook, required or recommended reading, or multimedia, but these will not fulfill the source requirement.

Summarize your thoughts regarding whether or not the method your peers chose are appropriate for the type of investigation they identified. If so, why? If not, which method would you suggest?