Implementation Of Performance Initiative

IHP 430 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric

In the final phase of this project, you will implement your performance improvement initiative. Additionally, you will discuss what success of the performance improvement plan will look like after implementation. If you chose a problem in your workplace, be sure to utilize data from that healthcare organization; if you have created a hypothetical healthcare organization, you may use a public domain database with instructor permission. As this is a scholarly initiative, this assignment must adhere to all APA requirements and formatting, and include peer-reviewed and evidence-based sources to support any and all claims. As you develop this final part of the assignment, consider the following prompts to formulate your paper.

V. Success of the Performance Improvement Plan

A. If this initiative is successful, what would be the financial implications for the healthcare organization? B. How would the existing information management systems contribute to the success of your proposal? C. What organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative, if it is successful?

D. Analyze interdepartmental communication that would be necessary for continued engagement in the proposed initiative. Guidelines for Submission: This paper should be one to two pages in length, not including the cover page or reference page. Use APA format for the reference list and all internal citations.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (80%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Success: Financial Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers reasoning pertaining to the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful

Comprehensively describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful

Describes the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful, but description is cursory

Does not describe the hypothetical financial implications for the healthcare organization if this initiative is successful

20

Success: Information Meets “Proficient” criteria and hypothesis demonstrates nuanced insight into the relationship between information management systems and performance improvement initiatives

Logically hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal

Hypothesizes how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal but hypothesis is illogical

Does not hypothesize how the existing information management systems would contribute to the success of this proposal

20

 

 

 

 

Success: Processes Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides nuanced insight into the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative

Accurately describes the organizational processes that will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative

Describes what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative but description is inaccurate

Does not describe what organizational processes will permit continued viability of the performance improvement initiative

20

Success: Communication

Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides keen insight into interdisciplinary communication patterns typically present in a healthcare organization

Comprehensively analyzes interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative

Analyzes communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative, but patterns are not interdepartmental or analysis is cursory

Does not analyze interdepartmental communication patterns that would be necessary for ongoing engagement in the proposed initiative

20

Scholarly Research Meets “Proficient” criteria by including three or more scholarly research articles that give in- depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue

Includes two scholarly research articles that give in-depth details supporting identified interdepartmental issue

Includes some scholarly research but does not give in-depth support to identified interdepartmental issue

Does not include scholarly research

10

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Earned Total 100%