Select two large competing multinational organisations and gather evidence on the people management philosophies and strategies of each to enable you to assess and compare the overall contribution of the ‘people resource’ in each to the organisation’s performance and success.

Select two large competing multinational organisations and gather evidence on the people management

philosophies and strategies of each to enable you to assess and compare the overall contribution of the

‘people resource’ in each to the organisation’s performance and success. It is suggested that, in selecting the competing organisations, you access the Fortune’s Most Admired Companies Listing in Google, The Data Monitor Report in the Business Source Complete and the Yahoo Finance or CNBC websites. Information on the selected companies may be obtained from the organisations’ websites, from case studies or by searching for articles on the organisations in texts and websites such as Glassdoor or Indeed.

In comparing the organisations’ performance, metrics such as their respective P:E ratios, their Revenue

per Employee and their Profit per Employee should be calculated and commented upon. All sources used must be fully referenced and a copy of the final report must be submitted via Turnitin.

The report grade is based on three components: (33%) breadth and depth of research; (33%) quality of

analysis; (33%) quality of presentation. The first component reflects the quantity and quality of material you find on the organization selected. Use as many sources as possible: newspapers, journal articles,

the websites etc. The second component reflects the coherence of your arguments and the

insightfulness of your analysis. The third component reflects the quality of your writing. For example, are thoughts well developed and presented in a logical order? Are spelling and grammar errors avoided? Are figures and tables clear?

Review “Case Studies: Focusing on Fluency Strategies.”

Review “Case Studies: Focusing on Fluency Strategies.”

For each case scenario, write a separate 250-500 word analysis that:

  1. States the academic goal for the case study student.
  2. Identifies an approach to build fluency skills for reading based on the needs of the student in the case study.
  3. Describes how you would implement the approach, including the number of sessions and length of time required for the sessions.
  4. Justifies why that approach is beneficial for the student and provides a rationale for the amount of sessions and time needed for the activities.

Review “Case Studies: Focusing on Fluency Strategies.”

For each case scenario, write a separate 250-500 word analysis that:

  1. States the academic goal for the case study student.
  2. Identifies an approach to build fluency skills for reading based on the needs of the student in the case study.
  3. Describes how you would implement the approach, including the number of sessions and length of time required for the sessions.
  4. Justifies why that approach is beneficial for the student and provides a rationale for the amount of sessions and time needed for the activities.

In 500-750 words, design a brochure for general education teachers and families detailing the following about assessment and eligibility:

IDEA requires IEP teams to notify parents of their rights and procedural safeguards when informing parents about the need for assessment to determine eligibility or to re-evaluate to show growth. IEP teams must describe the purpose of assessments and describe the assessments that will be used when securing permission to evaluate from parents. Providing an informational brochure can help parents understand assessment and document the team’s attempts to inform parents and involve them in the decision making process.

In 500-750 words, design a brochure for general education teachers and families detailing the following about assessment and eligibility:

The process of reviewing existing data to determine the need to conduct further assessment.

Different assessment methods, their purpose, and how the data will be used to make educational decisions related to eligibility or intervention to include:

  1. Norm referenced, standardized testing
  2. Language sampling
  3. Dynamic assessment and criterion-referenced assessment
  4. Intelligence testing

Support your findings with 2-3 scholarly resources.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is exp

Use the following learning schemes to analyze the zoo data (in zoo.arff): OneR – weka.classifiers.OneR Decision table – weka.classifiers.DecisionTable -R C4.5 –

  1. Use the following learning schemes to analyze the zoo data (in zoo.arff):

OneR

– weka.classifiers.OneR

Decision table

– weka.classifiers.DecisionTable -R

C4.5

– weka.classifiers.j48.J48

K-means

– weka.clusterers.SimpleKMeans

Try using reduced error pruning for the C4.5.  Did it change the produced model? Why? 

For K-means, for the first run, set k=10.  Adjust as needed.  What was the final number of k? Why?

  1. Use the following learning schemes to analyze the breast tumor data.

Linear regression

– weka.classifiers.LinearRegression

M5′

– weka.classifiers.M5′

Regression Tree

– weka.classifiers.M5′

K-means clustering

– weka.clusterers.SimpleKMeans

A) How many leaves did the Model tree produce? Regression Tree? What happens if you change the pruning factor?

How many clusters did you choose for the K-means method? Was that a good choice? Did you try a different value for k?

B) Now perform the same analysis on the bodyfat.arff data set.

  1. Use a k-means clustering technique to analyze the iris data set. What did you set the k value to be? Try several different values.  What was the random seed value? Experiment with different random seed values.  How did changing of these values influence the produced models?
  2. Produce a hierarchical clustering (COBWEB) model for iris data.  How many clusters did it produce? Why? Does it make sense? What did you expect?