Evaluate executive compensation. Is it too much? Is it justified? Is it equitable?

Multiple publications regularly report on CEO compensation. The themes in those reports are usually similar including (a) CEO pay rates tended to grow more rapidly than other executives during the last three decades, (b) CEOs are often paid 250 times (or more!) than their average employee, and (c) CEO pay may not be dependent upon company performance. 

  • Evaluate executive compensation. Is it too much? Is it justified? Is it equitable?
  • What are the potential factors that contribute to how executives are compensated?
  • The final paragraph (three or four sentences) of your initial post should summarize the one or two key points that you are making in your initial response. 

What information did the authors provide about establishing reliability and validity?

Write a 2page critique of the research you found in the Library that includes responses to the following prompts: Answer in paper

  • Did the authors construct scales in a clear, concise manner?
  • Were the authors’ explanations clear regarding the reliability and validity of their measures?
  • What information did the authors provide about establishing reliability and validity?

journal

This journal assignment has two parts. Label these A and B in your journal and write 150 words or more for each one.

A –  Choose two heuristics discussed in the article in this module and explain how these have affected your thinking in the past. Next, explain at least two key points you learned from the videos in this module.

B – What is the most interesting thing(s) you learned from the book Thinking Fast, Thinking Slow (see two links below in this module)?

Remember:

  • Type the Journal in a Word document and save it all semester until you have completed the 10 assignments.
  • Student writing is expected to be coherent, grammatically correct, and mechanically-sound.  Points will be deducted for poor writing. 
  • All journal entries should be a minimum of 300 words in essay form

1. Describe the key elements of the Disaster Recovery Plan to be used in case of a disaster and the plan for testing the DRP.


Report Issue

  Please select a Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) for any selected scenario.  You can choose any organization’s plan or create your own.

1. Describe the key elements of the Disaster Recovery Plan to be used in case of a disaster and the plan for testing the DRP.

2.  Briefly discuss the internal, external, and environmental risks, which  might be likely to affect the business and result in loss of the  facility, loss of life, or loss of assets. Threats could include  weather, fire or chemical, earth movement, structural failure, energy,  biological, or human.

3. Of the strategies of shared-site  agreements, alternate sites, hot sites, cold sites, and warm sites,  identify which of these recovery strategies is most appropriate for your  selected scenario and why.

4. For each testing method listed,  briefly describe each method and your rationale for why it will or will  not be included in your DRP test plan.

• Include at least Four (4) reputable sources.

• Please make sure your submission is 2 – 3 pages in length and APA format with in text citation