How Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) empowers organizations to both avoid loss and capitalize on opportunity.

Your final research paper assignment is to write a research paper that explains how Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) empowers organizations to both avoid loss and capitalize on opportunity. You must provide specific examples.
To complete this assignment, upload a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) that contains your complete paper.

Remember that your paper, including your list of sources, must be in APA format, and you MUST cite your reference in the body of the paper using APA in-text citation format. A source is any paper or article that you will reference in your paper. If you need more information on APA format (for references list AND in-text citations), visit this reference:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

This assignment must be YOUR OWN WORK!  This is an individual assignment. Plagiarism detected in your work will result in a grade of zero for the entire paper.

Here are a few details about the overall research paper Please look at the attached rubric for details on how the paper will be graded.

You must reference two (2) peer-reviewed articles or papers that support your thesis statement. One of these papers may be from your annotated bibliography assignment. The final paper must be at least 500 words in length. (DO NOT exceed 500 words by a material amount. Excessive words or too many references will NOT impress me.)

So in summary, here are the research paper requirements:

2 peer reviewed resources (articles or papers) (1 may be from your annotated bibliography assignment)
Paper MUST address: How Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) empowers organizations to both avoid loss and capitalize on opportunity. You must provide specific examples

Cited sources must directly support your paper (i.e. not incidental references)
At least 500 words in length (but NOT longer than 1000 words)
If you are not sure how to identify peer reviewed papers or articles, please visit the following resources:

http://diy.library.oregonstate.edu/using-google-scholar-find-peer-reviewed-articleshttp://libguides.gwu.edu/education/peer-reviewed-articles

Finally, find attached the rubrics/ creteria that your Professor will use to grade your work.

 Summarize in your own words Schwartz’s proposal for “career and family women.”  Do you agree with it?  Briefly explain.  (You may want to discuss one of the criticisms of this proposal made by Ehrenreich and English – either way, make sure to assess Schwartz’s proposal in your own words.)

Please choose ONE of the FIRST TWO questions to answer, and then answer question 3.  Your total answer should be around a page or so.  (Just to be clear: I’m asking for a total of two answers in this RRP.)

1.  Summarize in your own words Schwartz’s proposal for “career and family women.”  Do you agree with it?  Briefly explain.  (You may want to discuss one of the criticisms of this proposal made by Ehrenreich and English – either way, make sure to assess Schwartz’s proposal in your own words.)

reading is attached

2.  In her essay, Anita Superson defends what she calls the “controversial” view that “only men can sexually harass women” and not the other way around.  What – in a nutshell – is her argument on this point?  Do you agree with her?  Briefly explain.

Pg366

3.  What, in brief, is Tibor Machan’s view about truth in advertising?  (I.e. what is his view, and what is his main reason in support of this view? You do not need to summarize the entire essay or itemize everything he says – just identify his main point and basic reasoning in support of it.) Do you agree?  Briefly explain.

Pg584

Identify three resources the U.S. Government is using towards Weapons of Mass Destruction Counter Proliferation efforts?

Assignment Instructions

This assignment is an essay assignment of five questions to test knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. You may use any of the texts, readings from this course and outside material that is academic in nature.

1. Using two references and in your words, define Weapons of Mass Destruction?

2. Explain Sanctions against Foreign Persons as presented in Executive Order EO 12938?

3. Define,  then compare and contrast Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) using at least two scholarly references.

4. Identify three resources the U.S. Government is using towards Weapons of Mass Destruction Counter Proliferation efforts?

5. Do Weapons of Mass Destruction pose a threat to the United States? If so, where does the greatest threat stem from?

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE:

  • Your answers should be approximately 4-5 pages total for the body of your work (the Title Page and References page will be additional pages).
  • Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space. Please have the question and then answer the question below the question. At the end of your work, include a reference page noting your references for all five questions.  Yes, I know this is not the APA standard, but for this test it is easier for me to grade…
  • Students will follow the APA 6 Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
  • Use scholarly or other relevant sources for each question.
  • Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize: books, peer reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc. (may be electronic of course and the APA manual lists all the types of possible resources and reference formats, hint…hint), and valid web sites (use caution with these).
  • Save your work as a Microsoft Word document

Determine what would be the most likely sales revenue and the associated margins, both for if the store does bring in the private label and if it doesn’t. – 15.0 pts

1. Determine what would be the most likely sales revenue and the associated margins, both for if the store does bring in the private label and if it doesn’t. – 15.0 pts

2. What type of information from the research and the memo from the controller would you suggest be carefully evaluated in order to make the decision. – 20.0 pts

3. A clear, actionable recommendation is proposed and the justification for its choice is well–supported through the examination and analysis information from both your work on the sales and margins and your analysis of the research created for the firm. – 15.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0