Describe what these best-practice companies do in the field of strategic management and competitive globalization.

Please click here to view the criteria by which you will be assessed for the achievement of the CLO for this unit.  You must upload the videos to YouTube or Vimeo and then share the URL for the assignment. You may find the instructions at this site helpful. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/10263-powerpoint-upload-youtube.html    Presentation should be no more than 20 slides (excluding title and reference page)   1.            Each slide should include an oral presentation. Each slide needs to be narrated meaning that the total presentation needs an audio component, with each slide addressed.   a.            For the cover page slide, introduce yourself and on the references slide, thank the audience.   b.            If you have not done this before, here is some information to help you add narration to a PowerPoint presentation: Record a slide show with narration and slide timings located at https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Record-a-slide-show-with-narration-and-slide-timings-0b9502c6-5f6c-40ae-b1e7-e47d8741161c           2.        Include at least three in-text references in proper APA format.   Prepare your slides to cover the following topics or questions described for this assignment. Be sure that you address the concepts of cost leadership, product differentiation, vertical integration, and corporate diversification strategy in the project. Choose one of the following options and complete the following:   Option 1 – Best Practices   Conduct an Internet search to find companies noted for best practices in Strategic Management and Competitive Globalization.   Describe what these best-practice companies do in the field of strategic management and competitive globalization. What are the similarities across companies? Describe any major differences. Critique the best practices. State how you would implement the best practices in your organization. Provide a rationale for your conclusions using relevant concepts from the text and peer reviewed articles.   Option 2 – Organization Comparison   Identify two organizations with different Strategic Management and Competitive Globalization processes. Describe these differences. Indicate how the strategic management and competitive globalization strategies of these companies might be similar or different. Provide a rationale for your conclusions using relevant concepts from the text and peer reviewed articles.   Option 3 – Create your own project.   This option provides an opportunity for you to create your own project. The project must include the learning objectives of the current course. Provide a rationale for your conclusions using relevant concepts from the text and peer reviewed articles. This option requires the instructor’s approval. Note that if you choose this option, the submission must still be a slide presentation with oral narration.  Please include only the URL for the YouTube or Vimeo uploaded presentation. You will not be able to submit a file to this assignment.

Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper).

This “Assignment 2” writing assignment is a comparative essay focused on topics encountered in our HUM 111 class. The project will be based on research but will reflect your views and interpretation of the topic. This project is designed to help you stretch your mind and your abilities as an organized, innovative, and critical thinker. If approached properly, it should also be fun!

Choose one (1) of the topics from the list of topic choices below. Read the topic carefully. Write a three to four (3-4) page paper (750-1,000 words) that follows instructions and covers each part of the topic. (The title page and References list do not get included in this word count).

Note: Your instructor may require you to submit your topic choice for approval before the end of Week 5.

For the topic you choose:

  1. Establish a clear thesis about your topic as part of the introductory paragraph (often the thesis is the last thing one determines after doing the basic research and outline; however it will be placed in the first paragraph of your paper).
  2. This is a comparative essay. Comparison approached properly will require some critical thinking on your part. Use a point-by-point approach for the essay. That means, if comparing subject A with subject B, don’t do the first half of the essay on subject A and then the second half on subject B–that will seem like two (2) separate essays and comparisons will tend to get lost. Instead, you should be mentioning both subjects in most of your paragraphs as you compare them throughout the essay. Comparisons will identify similarities as well as contrasts.
  3. Do not try to do everything on your two (2) subjects. You should end up narrowing your focus to a few insights and issues about the subjects being compared. And, from those fairly specific points of comparison, you will develop a thesis and glean some lessons.
  4. Follow closely the instructions below for your specific topic.
  5. Include a concluding paragraph at the end. This paragraph will, in some way, refer back to the thesis established in your first paragraph, since now you have demonstrated and supported it. It may be here that you also include your observations relating your study to the modern workplace or society (see your topic). Try to finish with flair!
  6. Use at least three (3) good quality academic sources, with one (1) source being the class text. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. You are highly encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your Blackboard page.

Topic ChoicesChoose just one (1) of the topics below:

  • Qualities of the Hero: Comparing Gilgamesh and Odysseus. Write an essay comparing these two (2) heroic figures from ancient epics of different cultures, especially focusing your analysis on the sources about their encounters with monsters: Gilgamesh encounters the monster guarding the forest, Humbaba, in Tablets 3-5 of the Epic of Gilgamesh (see http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/mesopotamian/gilgamesh/; scroll down to the Tablet links; think of “Tablet” numbers like chapter numbers).” Odysseus encounters Polyphemus the Cyclops in Book 9 of The Odyssey(see http://www.theoi.com/Text/HomerOdyssey9.html; from line 105 to the end). Your paper should:

a) Compare Gilgamesh and Odysseus as to their heroic qualities, noting similarities and differences, using specific examples from the epics.

b) Summarize what this indicates about differences between ancient Mesopotamian and Greek cultures in their ideals and expectations.

c) From this comparison, suggest ways that current cultural ideals and expectations shape modern notions about role models and heroes.

  • Confucius and Aristotle on Virtue. Write an essay comparing these two (2) ancient thinkers on the concept of virtue or good ethical character and conduct. Stay focused on the issue; keep any biographical or other information short or limited. As much as possible, analyze their writings (in translation, of course), using Confucius’ Analects (at http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/analects.html ) and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html ). Your paper should:

a) Compare the teachings of Confucius and Aristotle on what constitutes virtue or good ethical character and conduct, noting similarities and differences in specific ideas or emphasis.

b) Consider what your findings suggest about differences between ancient Chinese and ancient Greek culture.

c) From this comparison, suggest ideas of virtue that can apply to ethics in a modern setting, such as a diverse workplace.

  • Comparing Sculptures of Ancient India and Greece. Write an essay comparing the way gods and humans were depicted in sculpture in ancient India and Greece, and identify the cultural values and ideals that these art works reflect in each case. Your paper should:

a) Using specific examples, compare the way gods and people were depicted in the sculptures of ancient India and Greece, noting similarities and differences.

b) Identify the cultural values and ideals that these art works reflect for each society.

c) From this comparison, suggest a modern situation of artistic expression and the ways it reflects or counters prevailing cultural values.

  • Comparing Ancient Skeptics. Write an essay comparing Lucretius and Wang Chong (=Wang Ch’ung), skeptical philosophers of ancient Rome and China. They were skeptical about popular religious and spiritual beliefs and widely-held superstitions. Lucretius was an Epicurean philosopher of Roman culture (Chapter 6). Wang Ch’ung was a thinker in ancient Chinese culture (Chapter 7). For Lucretius, focus on Book 5 of his On the Nature of Things as found at  http://johnstoniatexts.x10host.com/lucretius/lucretius5html.html (good helpful commentary at the end of this web page). For Wang Ch’ung (=Wang Chong), focus on the segments of his On Spirits as found at https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gems_of_Chinese_Literature/Wang_Ch‘ung-On_Spirits  .

a)  Using examples from their writings, compare these two (2) thinkers on their views about  specific subjects and on their approach in explaining and expressing their

skepticism.

b)  From this comparison, identify popular beliefs in each culture that seem similar and

those that seem different.

c)  From this comparison, suggest any modern situation in which materialist skeptics

confront spiritual and religious beliefs, and comment on the considerations of free

expression and cultural respect.

  • Comparing Ancient Male Rulers. Take any two (2) of these rulers and write an essay comparing them: Ramses II, Shihuangdi, Constantine, Ashoka, Pericles, or Charlemagne. Select rulers from different cultures. You may also propose (for approval or not) a ruler not listed. Avoid lengthy quoting or lengthy close paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative analysis. Your paper should:

a) Compare the two (2) rulers in terms of their situation and methods of rule and their apparent ideals and practices, noting similarities and differences. Use specific examples.

b) Consider what your study suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, identifying any similarities and differences between the cultures.

c) From this comparison, suggest lessons about different types of effective leadership in the world of modern business and / or modern politics.

  • Comparing Ancient Female Rulers. Compare the Tang Empress Wu Zetian (also known as Empress Wu or as Wu Zhao; ruled China around 690-705 AD) with either the Pharaoh Cleopatra (ruled Egypt around 51-31 BC) or the Pharaoh Hatshepsut (ruled Egypt around 1478-1458 BC). You may also propose (for approval or not) a female ruler not listed. Avoid lengthy quoting or lengthy close paraphrasing from biographical sources. Make it YOUR comparative analysis. Your paper should:

a) Compare the two (2) rulers in terms of their situation and ascent to power, their methods of rule, and their achievements and resourcefulness, noting similarities and differences. Use specific examples.

b) Consider what your study suggests about the cultures over which they ruled, identifying any similarities and differences between the cultures.

c) From this comparison, suggest lessons about different types of effective leadership by a female in the world of modern business and / or modern politics.

  • Other topic choice using a comparative approach (proposed by student or instructor) and approved by the professor and supported by the grading rubric.

The Project Paper will be graded on:

  1. The level to which the instructions were followed for the paper generally and for the specific topic.
  2. The establishment of a clear thesis about your topic.
  3. The adequacy and relevance of information, examples, and details which support the general thesis.
  4. Covering each part of the topic as instructed, including the comparisons, the consideration of ancient cultural differences, and the reflection on lessons for modern society or the modern workplace.
  5. The quality of your research and your persuasiveness using critical reasoning.
  6. The use and acknowledgement of a minimum of three (3) required references (the class textbook plus at least two (2) other quality academic sources) documented using the SWS style –including both the use of a proper References list and the use of proper in-text citations.
  7. Adherence to standard rules of grammar, punctuation, paragraphing, and mechanics, and general clarity of presentation.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Explain how key social, cultural, and artistic contributions contribute to historical changes.
  • Explain the importance of situating a society’s cultural and artistic expressions within a historical context.
  • Examine the influences of intellectual, religious, political, and socio-economic forces on social, cultural, and artistic expressions.
  • Identify major historical developments in world cultures during the eras of antiquity to the Renaissance.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in the study of world cultures.
  • Write clearly and concisely about world cultures using proper writing mechanics.

Research Paper Draft

Deliverable 3: Research Paper Draft

You may submit the draft of your final paper so I can read it and get back to you with some feedback before the final submission. This will help you overcome some common mistakes that might lower your grade if found on the final submission.

I have posted the IEEE_journal_template.docx if you want to follow this format for potential publication. I also posted the Guidelines for Writing a Research Paper for Publication.It will help you learn the basics of the common aspects of a well constructed research paper. You can also check the Research Paper Guidelines resources. Hope it helps,

Research Paper Guidelines

https://explorable.com/research-paper-outline

Determine what you believe to be the current and potential future impacts of each threat on the global environment.

Congratulations! The members of the United Nations found great value in the two analyses you provided. They are now asking you to develop a PowerPoint presentation that addresses the four most critical threats to the global environment. They are listed in the table below.

Energy sources

Civil war

Globalization

Poor health of entire populations

Lack of educational opportunities

Cultural taboos

Inappropriate uses of technology

Climate change

To complete this task, you must do the following:

Step I. Narrow the List from Eight to the Four Most Critical Threats

To complete this step, complete the following tasks in order:

  • Review research on each of the eight threats listed in the table.
  • Determine what you believe to be the current and potential future impacts of each threat on the global environment.
  • Choose the four threats that you see as the most critical by considering which pose the greatest or most immediate risk to us.

Step II. Create the PowerPoint Presentation

The completed version of this presentation will include a minimum of 19 slides. Your audience consists of the United Nations General Assembly.

PPT Content and Structure

1.  A Title Slide: Include your name, course title, current date, and the name of your instructor.

2.  An Introduction Slide: List the four threats you chose, and in the Notes section offer a brief narrative justifying these choices

3.  Body Slides: The slide content is listed in the outline below. For each body slide you develop, please include a paragraph in the Notes section explaining how the details you have provided in the slide are pertinent to the United Nations’ discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

I.  For your first threat (this is the threat you consider to be the greatest risk/highest priority)

a.  One slide on a brief history and assessment of the threat

b.  One slide on the countries most affected by the threat, and how those countries are affected (please give examples)

c.  One slide on the effects of this threat on the world population as a whole

d.  One slide including a chart, graph, or compelling visual that relates to the content you present in body slides a–c

II.  For your second threat (this is the threat you consider to be the second greatest risk/second highest priority)

  1. One slide on a brief history and assessment of the threat
  2. One slide on the countries most affected by the threat, and how those countries are affected (please give examples)
  3. One slide on the effects of this threat on the world population as a whole
  4. One slide including a chart, graph, or compelling visual that relates to the content you present in body slides a–c

III.  For your third threat (this is the threat you consider to be the third greatest threat/highest priority)

a.  One slide on a brief history and assessment of the threat

b.  One slide on the countries most affected by the threat, and how those countries are affected (please give examples)

c.  One slide on the effects of this threat on the world population as a whole

d.  One slide including a chart, graph, or compelling visual that relates to the content you present in body slides a–c

IV.  For your fourth threat (this is the threat you consider to be the fourth greatest threat/highest priority)

a.  One slide on a brief history and assessment of the threat

b.  One slide on the countries most affected by the threat, and how those countries are affected (please give examples)

c.  One slide on the effects of this threat on the world population as a whole

d.  One slide including a chart, graph, or compelling visual that relates to the content you present in body slides a–c

4.  A Conclusion Slide: Summarize your findings for the Assembly.

5.  Optional – Reference Slide: You can include full-text citations in the Notes section of each slide or provide a reference slide at the end of the presentation with the full citations of your sources.

Note: Please discuss the threats in order of priority as described above, so the threat you consider the greatest should be discussed first in the presentation and so on.

Note: Please use at least five credible sources to back up your discussion

Note: The body slides should summarize your key takeaways, whereas the Notes section of each body slide should discuss the evidence and the details that support your takeaways. The content in both the Notes and body sections requires citations and sources.

Formatting Guidelines

  • Adhere to guidelines for effective PowerPoint presentations discussed in the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS) documentation.

Success Tip: For more information and help in creating a PowerPoint, review the content found in the PowerPoint Essentials course on Lynda.com. (https://www.lynda.com/PowerPoint-tutorials/PowerPoint-2019-Essential-Training/740357-2.html?org=strayer.edu)

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

  • Examine the factors that account for why the growth in the world’s population can negatively affect the global society.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the presentation, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

Points: 150

Assignment 3a: Presentation on Threats to the Global Environment

Criteria

Exemplary

90–100% A

Proficient

80–89% B

Fair

70–79% C

Meets Minimum Expectations
60–69% D

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

From the given list, prioritized four of the eight global threats for the presentation.

Weight: 20%

Selected and prioritized four issues from the given list.

Selected and prioritized only three issues from the given list.

Selected only two issues from the given list.

Selected only one issue from the given list.

Did not select any issues from the given list.

Completed a minimum of four slides per threat (minimum of 16 total slides), addressing the following: the threat’s history, affected countries, and effects on the global population.  

Weight: 20%

Compiled 4 or more slides per threat and exceeded expectations explaining the threat’s history, affected countries, and effects on the global population.

Compiled 4 slides per issue and proficiently explained the threat’s history, affected countries, and effects on the global population.

Compiled 4 slides per issue and briefly addressed all of the required topics: the threat’s history, affected countries, and effects on the global population.

Compiled 2–3 slides per issue and did not adequately address all the required topics: the threat’s history, affected countries, and effects on the global population.

Compiled fewer than 2 slides per issue.

Incorporated a relevant visual for each threat and explained in the notes how the details provided in the slide are pertinent to the UN’s discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

Weight: 20%

Exceeded expectations in providing one relevant visual per threat and comprehensive notes that explain how the slide information is pertinent to the UN’s discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

Met expectations in providing one relevant visual per threat and notes that explain how the slide information is pertinent to the UN’s discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

Provided visuals for all threats and sufficient notes for most slides that explain how the slide information is pertinent to the UN’s discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

Provided visuals for 2–3 threats and some notes for most slides that explain how the slide information is pertinent to the UN’s discussion on selecting and prioritizing goals.

Provided fewer than 2 visuals and notes for fewer than 50% of the slides.

Met the minimum requirement of five credible sources/citations.

Weight: 20%

Met the minimum credible source and proper citation requirement.

Used 4 credible sources, with few citation errors.

Used at least 3 credible sources and properly cited sources.

Used at least 2 sources but did not properly cite sources.

Used 1 or fewer sources.

Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting.

Weight: 20%

0–2 errors present.

3–4 errors present.

5–6 errors present.

7–8 errors present.

More than 8 errors present.