Evaluating Assessment Instruments

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 11 in the textbook, the article by Baez (2013), the assigned chapters in the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (2006) guide (Links to an external site.), and view the video Psychometric testing and employment. (Links to an external site.).

8/26/2019 Print

https://content.ashford.edu/print/Gregory.8055.17.1?sections=ch11,ch11lev1sec1,ch11lev1sec2,ch11lev1sec3,ch11lev1sec4,ch11lev1sec5,ch11lev1s… 1/68

CHAPTER 11 Industrial, Occupational, and Career Assessment

TOPIC 11A Industrial and Organizational Assessment

11.1 The Role of Testing in Personnel Selection (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec1#ch11lev1sec1)

11.2 Autobiographical Data (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec2#ch11lev1sec2)

11.3 The Employment Interview (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec3#ch11lev1sec3)

11.4 Cognitive Ability Tests (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec4#ch11lev1sec4)

11.5 Personality Tests (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec5#ch11lev1sec5)

11.6 Paper-and-Pencil Integrity Tests (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec6#ch11lev1sec6)

11.7 Work Sample and Situational Exercises (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec7#ch11lev1sec7)

11.8 Appraisal of Work Performance (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec8#ch11lev1sec8)

11.9 Approaches to Performance Appraisal (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec9#ch11lev1sec9)

11.10 Sources of Error in Performance Appraisal (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec10#ch11lev1sec10)

In this chapter we explore the specialized applications of testing within two distinctive environments— occupational settings and vocational settings. Although disparate in many respects, these two �ields of assessment share essential features. For example, legal guidelines exert a powerful and constraining in�luence upon the practice of testing in both arenas. Moreover, issues of empirical validation of methods are especially pertinent in occupational and areas of practice. In Topic 11A (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11#ch11box1) , Industrial and Organizational Assessment, we review the role of psychological tests in making decisions about personnel such as hiring, placement, promotion, and evaluation. In Topic 11B

 

https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec1#ch11lev1sec1
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec2#ch11lev1sec2
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec3#ch11lev1sec3
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec4#ch11lev1sec4
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec5#ch11lev1sec5
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec6#ch11lev1sec6
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec7#ch11lev1sec7
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec8#ch11lev1sec8
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec9#ch11lev1sec9
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec10#ch11lev1sec10
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11#ch11box1
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec10#ch11box2

 

8/26/2019 Print

https://content.ashford.edu/print/Gregory.8055.17.1?sections=ch11,ch11lev1sec1,ch11lev1sec2,ch11lev1sec3,ch11lev1sec4,ch11lev1sec5,ch11lev1s… 2/68

(http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec10#ch11box2) , Assessment for Career Development in a Global Economy, we analyze the unique challenges encountered by vocational psychologists who provide career guidance and assessment. Of course, relevant tests are surveyed and catalogued throughout. But more important, we focus upon the special issues and challenges encountered within these distinctive milieus.

Industrial and organizational psychology (I/O psychology) is the subspecialty of psychology that deals with behavior in work situations (Borman, Ilgen, Klimoski, & Weiner, 2003 (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib182) ). In its broadest sense, I/O psychology includes diverse applications in business, advertising, and the military. For example, corporations typically consult I/O psychologists to help design and evaluate hiring procedures; businesses may ask I/O psychologists to appraise the effectiveness of advertising; and military leaders rely heavily upon I/O psychologists in the testing and placement of recruits. Psychological testing in the service of decision making about personnel is, thus, a prominent focus of this profession. Of course, specialists in I/O psychology possess broad skills and often handle many corporate responsibilities not previously mentioned. Nonetheless, there is no denying the centrality of assessment to their profession.

We begin our review of assessment in the occupational arena by surveying the role of testing in personnel selection. This is followed by a discussion of ways that psychological measurement is used in the appraisal of work performance.

 

https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch11lev1sec10#ch11box2
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib182

 

8/26/2019 Print

For this discussion, you will use the PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests (Links to an external site.) document to compare two assessment instruments used in industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology assessment. Based on the information in your text and assigned readings, select and evaluate two psychological tests used in industrial-organizational psychological assessment. You may not evaluate any of the tests you evaluated in the Week Four Applications in Personality Testing discussion.

In addition to the text, locate a minimum of two appropriate scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources to aid you in the analysis of the psychometric properties of the instruments based on published data. In your initial post, provide the names of the two tests you evaluated, and attach your completed PSY640 Checklist for Evaluating Tests document (Links to an external site.). You must maintain the original format of the document and include the textbook and two additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources in the references section.

Forensic Assessment Cases

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 12 in the textbook and the required articles for this week. For this discussion you will take on the role of a psychologist assigned a case in which the client has a legal concern.

Forensic Scenario Three, Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit): Ms. X was referred for a forensic neuropsychological evaluation in connection with a personal injury lawsuit she had filed. Review the Case Description: Ms. X—Forensic, Neuropsychological Score Report (Links to an external site.), and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of additio

9/2/2019 Print

https://content.ashford.edu/print/Gregory.8055.17.1?sections=ch12,ch12lev1sec1,ch12lev1sec2,ch12lev1sec3,ch12lev1sec4,ch12lev1sec5,ch12lev1… 1/60

CHAPTER 12 Legal Issues and the Future of Testing

TOPIC 12A Psychological Testing and the Law

12.1 The Sources and Nature of Law (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec1#ch12lev1sec1)

12.2 Testing in School Systems and the Law (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec2#ch12lev1sec2)

12.3 Disability Assessment and the Law (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec3#ch12lev1sec3)

12.14 Legal Issues in Employment Testing (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12lev1sec4)

Case Exhibit 12.1 (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12box2) Unwise Testing Practices in Employee Screening (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12box2)

12.5 Forensic Applications of Assessment (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec5#ch12lev1sec5)

In the previous chapters we have outlined the myriad of ways in which tests are used in decision making. Furthermore, we have established that psychological testing is not only pervasive, but it is also consequential. Test results matter. Test findings may warrant a passage to privilege. Conversely, test findings may sanction the denial of opportunity. For many reasons, then, it is appropriate to close the book with two special topics that bear upon the potential repercussions of psychological testing. In Topic 12A (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12#ch12box1) , Psychological Testing and the Law, we review critical legal issues pertaining to the use of psychological tests. In this topic, we survey the essential laws that regulate the use of tests in a variety of settings—schools, employment situations, medical settings, to name just a few arenas in which the law constrains psychological testing. We also examine several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment. In Topic 12B (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec5#ch12box3) , Computerized Assessment and the Future of Testing, contemporary applications of the computer in psychological assessment are surveyed, and then the professional and social issues raised by this practice are discussed. The book closes with thoughts on the future of testing—which will be forged in large measure by increasingly sophisticated applications of computer technology but also greatly affected by legal standards.

 

https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec1#ch12lev1sec1
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec2#ch12lev1sec2
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec3#ch12lev1sec3
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12lev1sec4
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12box2
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec4#ch12box2
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec5#ch12lev1sec5
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12#ch12box1
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/ch12lev1sec5#ch12box3

 

9/2/2019 Print

https://content.ashford.edu/print/Gregory.8055.17.1?sections=ch12,ch12lev1sec1,ch12lev1sec2,ch12lev1sec3,ch12lev1sec4,ch12lev1sec5,ch12lev1… 2/60

12.1 THE SOURCES AND NATURE OF LAW The law establishes a number of guidelines that define the permissible scope and applications of psychological testing. However, before investigating the key legal guidelines that impact testing, it will be helpful to understand the sources and nature of law. Broadly speaking, there are three sources of law: constitutional provisions, legislative edicts, and judicial opinions. We examine each briefly.

Constitutional Sources of Law The United States has a constitutional form of government, meaning that the U.S. Constitution is the final authority for all legal matters in the country. All other forms of law must be consistent with this seminal document. Thus, the Constitution places limits on legislative actions and judicial activity. The United States is also a federation of states, which means that each state retains its own government and system of laws, while ceding some powers to the central government. For example, the power to regulate interstate commerce and the responsibility to provide for the national defense both reside with the federal government. Each state has its own constitution as well, which is another source of laws that affects citizens living in a state. Of course, state constitutions cannot contradict the U.S. Constitution and, in most cases, they are highly similar to the federal document.

Three provisions of the U.S. Constitution potentially bear upon the practice of psychological testing: the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution (Melton et al., 1998 (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib1128) ). The Fifth Amendment provides a privilege against self-incrimination, which impacts the nature of psychological assessment in forensic evaluations. For example, as discussed previously, a forensic practitioner might be asked by the court to evaluate an alleged offender for competency to stand trial. In many states, self-incriminating disclosures made during an evaluation of competency to stand trial cannot be used to determine guilt (i.e., they are inadmissible as evidence during trial).

The Sixth Amendment states that every person accused of a crime has the right to counsel (i.e., the right to a lawyer). This is understood to mean both the presence of counsel during legal proceedings and also the right to effective assistance from counsel. Does this mean that counsel must be present during a pretrial assessment, such as a court- ordered evaluation for competency to stand trial? This will depend upon the state and jurisdiction in which the proceedings occur. Although most courts have held that the defendant does not have a right to the presence of counsel during pretrial psychological evaluations, a minority of courts have held that the Sixth Amendment guarantee does apply to such pretrial assessments (Melton et al., 1998 (http://content.thuzelearning.com/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib1128) ). In these jurisdictions, the defendant’s lawyer can be present during any psychological testing or evaluation. This raises difficult questions as to the validity of assessments undertaken in the presence of a third party. For example, what if the client asks his or her lawyer for advice on how to answer certain questions? Surely, this is not standard protocol in psychological assessment and might drastically affect the validity of the results. Fortunately, most courts favor alternative methods for protecting the rights of defendants during pretrial evaluations, such as tape-recording the session, having a defense psychologist observe the evaluation, or providing for an independent evaluation.

The Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deprive any U.S. citizen of life, liberty, or property without “due process of law.” The amendment also specifies “equal protection of the laws.” The relevant section reads:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

It is mainly the “due process” feature of this amendment that has impacted psychological practice. This influence is limited largely to forensic practitioners who deal with competency to stand trial, civil and criminal commitment, or the right to refuse treatment. For example, psychologists who are involved in the civil commitment of an individual who needs treatment typically must show—as a direct consequence of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment—that several stringent criteria are fulfilled:

 

https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib1128
https://content.ashford.edu/books/Gregory.8055.17.1/sections/bm02#bm02bib1128

 

9/2/2019 Print

https://content.ashford.edu/print/Gregory.8055.17.1?sections=ch12,ch12lev1sec1,ch12lev1sec2,ch12lev1sec3,ch12lev1sec4,ch12lev1sec5,ch12lev1… 3/60

ur assessment choices by providing an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Psychiatry -Topic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Chapter 7 – Posttraumatic Stress from book Crisis Intervention Strategies .(7th ed.)  Richard K. James

Chapter Seven: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

 

 

 

 

 

Background of PTSD

Psychic trauma is the result of experiencing an acute overwhelming threat in which disequilibrium occurs.

Most people are extremely resilient and will quickly return to a state of mental and physical homeostasis.

Acute stress disorder is when symptoms continue for a period of 2 days to 1 month and have an onset within 1 month of the traumatic event.

 

 

 

 

Background Cont.

If acute stress disorder symptoms develop, they will typically diminish in 1 to 3 months.

Delayed PTSD is when symptoms disappear for a period of time and then reemerge in a variety of symptomatic forms months or years after the event.

 

 

 

 

Benchmarks

Railway train accidents

“Railway spine”

Freud’s research on trauma cases of young Victorian women

“Hysterical neurosis”

Traumatized combat veterans (especially veterans of the Vietnam Conflict)

“Shell shock”

“Combat fatigue”

 

 

 

 

Benchmarks Cont.

Recognition of domestic violence and rape via the women’s movement

“Battered women’s syndrome”

All came together to be defined as posttraumatic stress disorder in the third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (1980).

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnostic Criteria

Exposure to a trauma that involves:

Actual or perceived threat of serious injury or death to self or others

Response to the trauma was intense fear, helplessness, or horror

Symptoms arise that were not evident before the event

Persistent re-experiencing of the trauma in at least ONE of the following ways:

Recurrent and distressing recollections

Recurrent nightmares

Flashback episodes

Distress related to internal or external cues that symbolize the event

Physiological reactions to events that symbolize the trauma

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnostic Criteria Cont.

Behaviors consistent with at least THREE of the following:

Persistently avoiding related thoughts, dialogues, or feelings

Persistently avoiding related activities, people, or situations

Inability to recall important details of the trauma

Markedly diminished interest in significant activities

Emotionally detached from others

Restricted range of affect

Sense of foreshortened future

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnostic Criteria Cont.

Persistent symptoms of increased nervous system arousal that were not present prior to the trauma, as indicated by at least TWO of the following:

Difficulty falling or staying asleep

Irritability or outbursts of anger

Difficulty concentrating

Hyper-vigilance

Exaggerated startle reactions to minimal stimuli

The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other critical areas of living.

 

 

 

 

PTSD in Children

Bus kidnapping in Chowchilla, CA

30-50% of children will experience at least one traumatic event by the age of 18.

3-16% of boys and 1-6% of girls will develop PTSD.

The type of trauma will impact the likelihood of developing PTSD.

Nearly 100% if they see a parent killed or sexually assaulted.

Approximately 90% if the child is sexually assaulted.

77% if the child witnesses a school shooting.

35% if the child witnesses violence in their neighborhood.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diagnostic Criteria for Children

Must experience disorganized or agitated behavior

May demonstrate regressive behaviors

May relive the trauma through repetitive play

Generalized nightmares (i.e., monsters)

May believe that they can see into the future

Somatic complaints of headaches and stomachaches

 

 

 

 

Types of Trauma

Type I Trauma

Sudden and distinct traumatic experience

Type II Trauma (aka “complex PTSD”)

Persistent and derives from repeated traumatic events

Has three cardinal symptoms:

Somatization (Physical ailments)

Dissociation (Divisions of personality)

Affect dysregulation (Changes in impulse control, attention, perception, and significant relationships)

 

 

 

 

Incidence, Impact, and Trauma Type

Incidence

Approximately 20% of people will experience a trauma

Higher in adolescents, employees of hazardous occupations, victims of severe burns and sexual assault, refugees, and combat veterans

Residual Impact

Can happen even when someone has excellent coping skills and a positive support system

Example of Chris (veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps who served in the Vietnam Conflict)

Importance of Trauma Type

Marked distinction between natural and human-made catastrophes

 

 

 

 

 

Vietnam, The Archetype

Hyper-vigilance

Lack of goals

Individual/Individualizer

Bonding, debriefing, and guilt

Civilian adjustment

Substance abuse

Attitude

Antiwar sentiment

 

 

 

 

 

10 Predisposing Variables of PTSD

Degree of threat

Degree of bereavement

Speed of onset

Duration of the trauma

Degree of displacement in home continuity

Potential for recurrence

Degree of exposure to death and destruction

Degree of moral conflict inherent in the situation

Role of the person in the trauma

Proportion of the community affected

 

 

 

 

Symptoms of PTSD

Intrusive-repetitive ideation

Visual images triggered by sights, sounds, smells, or tactile cues

Denial/numbing

Emotions of guilt, sadness, anger, and rage

Increased nervous symptom arousal

Acoustic startle response

Dissociation

Possibly the most important long-term predictive variable for PTSD and is connected to “complex PTSD”

Family responses

Possible discrepancy of reaction based on the type of trauma

May “turn on” the victim if they can not deal with the trauma

 

 

 

 

Maladaptive Patterns Characteristic of PTSD

Death imprint

Clear vision of one’s own death in concrete terms

Survivor’s guilt

Guilt over surviving, not preventing another’s death, not having been braver, or complaining when other’s have suffered more

Desensitization

Contradictory emotions within the person may lead to hostile, defensive, anxious, or depressive states

Estrangement

Feelings that any future relationships will be insignificant in the greater scheme of things

Emotional enmeshment

Continuous struggle to progress (emotional fixation)

 

 

 

 

 

Impact of Iraq and Afghanistan

Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program

Integrated, proactive approach to developing psychological resilience in soldiers, family members, and the Army’s civilian workforce.

Components:

The Global Assessment Tool

Master Resilience Trainer course

Family skills component

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment of Adults

Assessment

Structured interview

Self-reports

Empirically derived scales

Overview of assessment

Phases of recovery

Emergency/outcry

Emotional numbing/denial

Intrusive-repetitive

Reflective-transition

Integration

 

 

 

 

Treatment of Adults Cont.

Initiating intervention

Victims may refuse early intervention

It is too difficult to talk about the trauma

They believe that people of good character should be able to cope with traumatic events.

Importance of acceptance

Disclosure is difficult because the events of the trauma may seem horrifying and socially unacceptable.

 

 

 

 

Treatment of Adults Cont.

Risks of treatment

No magical cures

Intensity of treatment may impact occupations or relationships

May get worse before you get better

Re-experiencing the traumatic event is very painful

Difficult to give up thoughts of revenge related to the trauma

Pain associated with accepting the world as it is

Difficult to accept one’s own limitations

Multiphasic/multimodal treatment

Eclectic Therapy

Behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, emotion-focused

Psychotropic medication

No fixed pharmaceutical regimen; results vary per the individual

 

 

 

 

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)

Basic technique is to have the client visualize the trauma or experience thoughts and feelings related to the trauma while watching the therapist’s finger as it moves rapidly back and forth in front of the client’s face.

Controversial

Is effective with some people and is not intrusive

 

 

 

 

EMDR Cont.

History Taking and Treatment Planning

Preparation

Assessment

Desensitization

Installation

Body Scan

Closure

Reevaluation

 

Please answer the questions in 700 words. Time New Roman, Font 12, APA format. Please be sure it is Not plagiarism

 Question(s):

1. Name the DSM-IV-TR indicators necessary for a diagnosis of PTSD? (full criteria for diagnosis) five of condition/symptoms, with at least two in each category.

2. Please, include specific symptoms in children (PTSD symptoms in children that are different than in adults). Note: (DSM-5 will be accepted).

Guidelines:

a. The answer should be based on the knowledge obtained from reading the book, no just your opinion. I Attached 3 files from where to take the answer. I summary PowerPoint, PTSD Adults, and PTSD Children. 

b. There are 2 questions in the discussion, you must answer both of them. 

c. If other References are used in addition to the book must have :

Serial/journal articles 

  • Volume number, in italics.
  • Issue number. This is bracketed immediately after the volume number but not italicized. 
  • Month, season or other designation of publication if there is no volume or issue number.
  • Include all page numbers. Ex: 7(1),24 Sergiev, P. V., Dontsova, O. A., & Berezkin, G. V. (2015).

Differentiating Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resource on your own before you bid. Main references come from Balkin, R. S., & Kleist, D. M. (2017) and/or American Psychological Association (2014). You need to have scholarly support for any claim of fact or recommendation regarding treatment. APA format also requires headings. Use the prompt each week to guide your heading titles and organize the content of your initial post under the appropriate headings. Remember to use scholarly research from peer-reviewed articles that is current. Please follow the instructions to get full credit for the discussion. I need this completed by 10/01/19 at 6pm.

Discussion – Week 6

Differentiating Between Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Learning how to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative research methodology is a critical skill necessary for analyzing empirical research. For this Discussion, you will analyze the similarities and differences between qualitative and quantitative methodology. Also, you will critically examine a research question to determine the best method to investigate the question.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week and consider the      differences between qualitative and quantitative methods.
  • Consider the question, “How does music impact mood?”
  • Think about ways you could research this question      quantitatively and qualitatively.

Note: You are required to post your response to the Discussion thread before you are able to view others’ responses.

By Day 3

Based on the question, “How does music impact mood?”:

  • Explain how you could quantitatively investigate how music      impacts mood.
  • Explain how you could qualitatively investigate how music      impacts mood.
  • Which do you think is better for investigating this question?      Support your answer with scholarly sources.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Required Resources

Balkin, R. S., & Kleist, D. M. (2017). Counseling research: A practitioner-scholar approach. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

  • Chapter 4, “Types of Research”
  • Chapter 5, “Fundamental Concepts in Quantitative      Research”
  • Chapter 10, “Fundamental Concepts in Qualitative      Research”

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2017e). Introduction to research design [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 14 minutes.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2017m). Roundtable: Research methods [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 26 minutes.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

Optional Resources

Laureate Education (Producer). (2017). Quantitative methods: An example [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Credit: Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2017). Qualitative methods: An example [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 11 minutes.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 1

Introduction to Research Design Program Transcript

NARRATOR: Doctor Michael Patton begins this course on research design by introducing the topic of research and contextualizing it in the scholar practitioner model. He concludes the program with a discussion of two terms he believes should be in the vocabulary and consciousness of a scholar practitioner– epistemology and ontology.

MICHAEL PATTON: I want to welcome you into the world of the scholar practitioner. So let’s talk about that world and what it means to be a scholar practitioner. A scholar is someone who studies how the world is to learn about the world, to contribute to knowledge about the world. And part of what distinguishes research from our ordinary walking through the world and being in the world is not only paying attention to it more systematically, but the commitment to record how we do that, to publish for others to review what our findings are and in particular, what methods we used to come up with those findings.

What you’ll find in the world of scholarship is that the controversies are actually not so much about the findings. The controversies are about the methods. How did you find out what you found out? The method finding linkage is key. And so as a scholar, you have an obligation and a commitment to record not only your findings, but to document in great detail where those findings came from.

How did you arrive at those conclusions? What instruments did you use? What was your sample? What was your relationship to the thing that you were studying? It is that commitment to studying the world, to understand how it unfolds that makes you a scholar. A practitioner is someone who is trying to make a difference in the world, trying to help people, trying to change systems, trying to improve programs.

And that linkage then between the scholar and a practitioner is that a scholar practitioner is someone who uses the skills and the knowledge that comes out of scholarship to inform their action in the world, to inform their practice. Let me give you a favorite example. My daughter was born without one ear. And as she became a teenager, we began talking with their about whether or not she wanted to have reconstructive surgery to have an ear built.

And we located one of the world’s, by reputation, best reconstructive surgeons and went to see him. And he talked to my daughter and showed her what he would do. But in addition to that, he had followed up all of the people on whom he had performed reconstructive surgery. He had interviews with them, and he was able to show my daughter satisfaction rates of different people who have had their ears rebuilt, and was able to show her data from teenage girls who were the

 

 

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 2

least satisfied of his clientele, because they had such high expectations about how this would change their lives.

So as a part of his practice, a skilled reconstructive surgeon, he provided her with data about how people like her responded to this surgery, the impact on their lives, and was able to gather data from her and help her think about what her life was like now, how it might be different, what her expectations were, and compare that to data from other people like her.

He was a scholar practitioner as a reconstructive surgeon. If you’re in psychological practice, if you’re in a clinic, if you’re in education, part of being a scholar practitioner is to follow up the impact of your work and find out, are you making the difference you want to make? We call that reality testing.

A scholar practitioner is careful not to fool themselves about the impact they have. We know from psychology that we all have rose colored glasses. We all have selective perception. As basically animals, we prefer pleasure to pain. And so we’d like to think that we’re doing good, that we’re making a difference. The scholar practitioner brings to that desire to make the world a better place a commitment to empirically validate whether or not those hopes are actually being realized.

Are you making a difference? That can be a scary question because it’s easier in some ways to live the unexamined life, to engage in the unexamined practice. The commitment of a scholar practitioner is to say, here’s what I hope to accomplish. This is the difference I hope to make. This is the contribution I hope to make, and then to employ the methods of research to find out is that how it turned out.

How do you know that you’re doing good? Not just that you hope to do good, but how do you know? And that requires having criteria. That requires having data. That requires being willing to ask that hard questions about what difference you’re making. The scholar practitioner is committed to changing what’s going on to get a better result.

And that means using the methods of research in systematic inquiry to examine the effects of your practice to improve your practice. Now, many of you are unlikely to be full-time researchers, full-time scholars. You will, however, throughout your life as a practitioner, be a lifetime consumer of research. We live in the knowledge age.

Knowledge is the currency of our time. To be an effective citizen, to be an effective participant in democracy, to be an effective practitioner, to be an effective parent, to be an effective colleague, to be an effective spouse, there is knowledge about what works and doesn’t work in those arenas. There’s also a

 

 

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 3

huge amount of garbage out there, especially with the internet spewing garbage all the time.

One of the commitments of a scholar practitioner is to be able to tell knowledge from junk, is to be able to distinguish stuff that is true and validated and reliable from the stuff that people make up, where they assert things on the basis of their values and hopes that simply aren’t true. So regardless of whether or not you conduct a great deal of research, you will always be consuming research.

What diets work? What foods should you consume and not consume? What’s the effect of red wine? What’s the effect of caffeine? What kind of exercise programs work? What statements do politicians make that are true and not true?

It’s important for you to know those things. As a consumer, you need to be concerned about knowledge, about facts, about what’s going on in the world. That makes you a sophisticated consumer. And learning how to tell solid research, learning how to tell cumulative research becomes a part of that practice. The scholar practitioner brings to their own practice an attitude of skepticism, an attitude that you need evidence to make claims.

This is one of the areas where I find students get in the most difficulty, especially in psychology, but in the social sciences in general is many people who come to adult education come with a lot of experience and with strong beliefs about what works and doesn’t work. Many psychologists are involved in a form of practice where they’re in a particular tradition of psychology or operating at a particular model, or doing some techniques that they’ve been using for a while.

And I work with those students and ask them why they’ve come into a master’s program or a doctoral program. And what they often say is, I want to prove that my model works. That’s not the mindset of a scholar practitioner. That’s public relations. That’s advertising. To try to convince people that something you believe is true is PR, is advertising, is persuasion.

What a scholar practitioner wants to do is inquire into whether or not what you’re doing works. You bring then an openness to it, a reality testing attitude to it. Research is not about proving you’re right. Research is about studying how the world is.

And you may or may not be effective in what you’re doing. That is what this gives you an opportunity to do, to learn about what works and doesn’t work, not to try to prove a prejudice, not to prove a pre-disposition, not to support your biases, but to find out how the world works. Now, the beauty of that is– and I want to speak directly to the anxiety that students often have when they come to research– the beauty of that is that you cannot fail.

 

 

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 4

To find out that your model doesn’t work is not failure. That’s knowledge. That’s learning. The world is the way it is. Our task is to find out how it is. That’s the challenge. To discover that the way we thought it is isn’t the way it is not failure. It’s knowledge. Our history as a species is filled with propositions that turned out to be false.

That’s how we build knowledge. So you can’t fail at this unless you come to it with a closed mind, manipulating the data to try to make it come out the way you want to make it come out. To be genuinely open to the way the world is, and to find out how it is, and to record your methods of inquiry so that others can see how you arrived at your conclusions, and to use those conclusions to inform your practice, that’s what makes you a scholar practitioner. As you enter the world of scholarship, you’re going to encounter jargon.

There are words that scholars have used that laypeople often make fun of or don’t understand or are intimidated by. And of course, as practitioners, you know about jargon in your areas of practice. Every discipline has jargon that is language it creates for its own use to distinguish things that it thinks are important. In science and research in general, two important words that you will encounter in this journey are epistemology and ontology.

And I encourage you as a scholar practitioner to practice those words so that they roll off your tongue and you can share them with people or respond to them when you encounter somebody who may ask you, what’s your epistemological prospective? Epistemology is the study of knowledge. How do we know what we know?

And this is an important distinction within the scholar practitioner framework, because the framing of a scholar practitioner has a particular epistemology. One kind of epistemology, the one that’s dominant in much of research and traditional social science that’s called values-free social science is that the way to study the world, the way to know the world is to be separated from the world, is to be outside, is to be independent, is to be objective, is to not be involved in what’s going on in the world. That’s in that epistemological stance. It says you can best know the world by being separate from it.

The scholar practitioner epistemology asserts that you could best know the world by being engaged in it, that by being engaged, by being part of the world, you get access to things through your direct experience with lived experience that by understanding what’s happening to you as a part of your engagement, you get deeper insight into how the world is.

So that’s an epistemological stance, one that you will have the opportunity to deepen throughout this scholar practitioner journey. And I simply introduce that term to you now so that you can pay attention to it and ask yourself, how do I

 

 

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 5

know what I know? What are my sources of knowledge? How do I deal with my own biases? How do I try to acknowledge bias? How do I control bias?

What are different sources of knowledge? How do I establish the credibility of these different sources of knowledge? Those are epistemological questions. Ontology, about the nature of reality, is especially important in psychological research because it addresses the issue of, what is it that we’re studying? What is the world made up of?

Clearly, there is a physical world. There is the world that is made up of tables and chairs and roads and trees. There’s a world of living things. One of the ontological issues in psychology and in the social sciences is whether the nature of reality for human beings is different in some way than that physical world. For example, there is the constructivist perspective that says our language and our participation in a particular culture and a particular society conditions our experience of the world so that what we think is real is actually a matter of perception. It’s not real.

It’s what we’ve learned from our culture. We’ve been taught to think of certain things as real. And that makes them real because we think that they are real. The very notion of a table is a cultural construct from that point of view.

In the physical world, there is simply this structure, but we know certain structures as something we call a table. One of the classic examples of constructivism is the difference between a hamburger and a cheeseburger in American culture. Here are these two things they can have all kinds of condiments and different kinds of bread and different degrees of fat in the meat and it can be made on the grill or some other way. But we decided that adding a piece of cheese to this thing is in a different category than everything else that we may do to a burger.

Well, that’s a construction. And looking at how we’ve constructed reality is one version of ontology. In this scholar practitioner journey then, you’ll be invited to think about, how do you know what you know? And what do you think about, what are your assumptions about what it is you’re studying, the very nature of reality itself? Those are big time jargony words, and over the course of this journey, they will hopefully become more real to you, because as a scholar practitioner, you will be expected to have an epistemological and ontological point of view.

So I welcome you and invite you into the world of the scholar practitioner. It’s going to be a wonderful journey. You’ll learn ways of inquiring into how the world is and how your practice is to improve that practice. And that will serve you well, both in being a participant in this world and in changing it in the ways that you want to change it.

 

 

Introduction to Research Design

© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. 6

 

Introduction to Research Design Additional Content Attribution MUSIC: Creative Support Services Los Angeles, CA Dimension Sound Effects Library Newnan, GA Narrator Tracks Music Library Stevens Point, WI Signature Music, Inc Chesterton, IN St