Coding Methods

PLEASE READ REQUIREMENTS BEFORE PLACING A BID.

Must be familiar with these four coding methods (In Vivo, Process, Values, or Emotion Coding) and qualitative research.  Must review the articles to code, find the themes   Please note this assignment does not involve any software. This is to be done manually using the coding schemes within the textbook in Ch. 15.

1. First article- Your goal is to condense the interview from 1,501 words to about 500 words. This should be a summary of the transcript, not just repeating the same words, condensing to 500 words.

2. Second article-Choose a section of about 300 words from the interview transcript you selected.

3. Consider which two of the following four coding methods (In Vivo, Process, Values, or Emotion Coding) would be most appropriate for analyzing the text.

4.Code the text using each method you selected. Note: You must code the selected section of text twice—once for each method you choose.

5.Compare the results and prepare a 150- to 300-word summary discussing how the different coding methods employed helped reinforc

Saldaña, Qualitative Research

SAGE Publishing, 2018

RES/724: Qualitative Methods And Design

Wk 3 – Analysis Exercise

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Assignment Content

1.

Top of Form

Complete Parts 1 and 2 below. Remember there are two parts – use headings to present each part.

Remember to include a title page with your name, date and name of assignment. Remember to include citations (at least 3) from your readings to support the information you include in the worksheet and add a reference list to support the citations. Citations and references are to follow APA 7th ed.

Note: Please note this assignment does not involve any software. This is to be done manually using the coding schemes within your textbook in Ch. 15.

Part 1: Insert headings for each section noted below to present an organize flow of your discussion.

0. Download the “Sarah: Diabetes Interview” transcript from the Saldaña and Omasta (2018) Student Resources webpage.

0. Read the transcript beginning with the question, “Going back to how you learned about diabetes, what sources did you learn about the condition from? Where did you learn about diabetes once you were diagnosed?” on page 3. Read the section a second time. This time, look for specific words that are repeated or stand out. List the specific words you identified. When you think about coding you are looking for overall themes. What specific words provide meaning of the transcript? Not all words—specific ones.

0. Condense the transcript beginning with the question, “Going back to how you learned about diabetes, what sources did you learn about the condition from? Where did you learn about diabetes once you were diagnosed?” on page 3 and continuing through the end. Your goal is to condense the interview from 1,501 words to about 500 words. This should be a summary of the transcript, not just repeating the same words, condensing to 500 words.

Part 2: Insert headings for each section noted below to present an organize flow of your discussion.

0. Download one of the transcripts from the Saldaña and Omasta (2018) Student Resources webpage.

0. Choose a section of about 300 words from the interview transcript you selected.

0. Consider which two of the following four coding methods (In Vivo, Process, Values, or Emotion Coding) would be most appropriate for analyzing the text.

0. Code the text using each method you selected. Note: You must code the selected section of text twice—once for each method you choose.

0. Compare the results and prepare a 150- to 300-word summary discussing how the different coding methods employed helped reinforce each other or provided divergent analytic insights.

Provide the actual text you are coding and how you coded it. Remember to cite and reference the sources for coding. 

Submit your assignment in a word document.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interview Transcripts

Interview with Sarah (Pseudonym)

Selected Data from Pre-interview Survey

Participant ID: A-67

Pseudonym: Sarah

Diabetes Type: Type 1

Gender: Female

Age: 33

Age Diagnosed: 27

Interview Transcript (Full)

 

INTERVIEWER: Hello, my name is Matt. Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today. Before we begin, do you have any questions about the informed consent form that you completed earlier?

 

SARAH: No, thank you.

 

INTERVIEWER: To be sure that we have an accurate record of today’s conversation, I am going to supplement my notes by audio-recording our interview, is this okay?

 

SARAH: Yes.

 

INTERVIEWER: Thank you. Today is March 26, 2015 at 4:30 p.m., and I am speaking with Sarah. Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today. I am going to be asking you a few general questions. If there is anything you do not feel comfortable answering or that you do not know the answer to, that is not a problem; just let me know, and we can skip that question.

 

SARAH: Excellent.

 

INTERVIEWER: First, in your own words, how would you describe diabetes to someone with no experience and limited knowledge of the condition?

 

SARAH: So, Type I diabetes is when your pancreas no longer makes insulin, and you need insulin to open up your cells to allow sugar to be processed by your cells. So if you don’t have insulin, your cells can’t process sugar, and basically you kind of end up where you don’t have any energy, and it affects your brain, and that sort of a thing. So you have to take insulin. They have synthetic insulin you can take, so you sort of have to operate as your own pancreas to administer insulin to yourself, to process food and to get energy.

 

INTERVIEWER: Thank you. You indicated you were diagnosed with diabetes six years ago at age 33…

 

SARAH: Yes.

 

INTERVIEWER: What do you recall (if anything) knowing about diabetes before you were diagnosed?

 

SARAH: I knew very little about it. So—yeah, I’d—Typically, in the past, it’d be something you’d be diagnosed with as a child or in adolescence, so I knew, you know, that it was something people had, and you had to take shots, but that was about all I knew about it.

 

INTERVIEWER: How do you recall feeling and reacting when you were first diagnosed with diabetes? What questions did you have?

 

SARAH: I was—First I was relieved because it explained a lot of the—unusual sort of feelings I had been having. The usual symptoms, you know.

 

INTERVIEWER: What were some of those feelings or symptoms?

 

SARAH: I was losing a ton of weight, I was going to the bathroom all the time, I was constantly thirsty—I had all the classic symptoms, and I was really tired. So, all of a sudden, all of that made sense. And yeah, it was a little bit of a learning curve. I had a lot to learn. But it was also—so yeah. It was unexpected, but not devastating, or anything like that.

 

INTERVIEWER: What were some the questions you remember having when you first learned you had diabetes?

 

SARAH: My first question was, so what is the treatment going to be? Are there any, sort of, long-term negative effects? Those were sort of the main—the main questions.

 

INTERVIEWER: What did you learn about those questions? The treatment and any long-term negative effects?

 

SARAH: I learned that it’s pretty easy; it’s a pretty treatable disease. And basically, you have to learn how to manage how much insulin you need to take based on your food, so you learn how many carbs—you have to learn to count how many carbs are in any meal you eat. Basically, you also learn it’s very treatable and that you just—if you eat a healthy diet and exercise, it’s pretty easy to keep a handle on. It’s not a particularly disruptive disease, at least in my experience. And then, long-term effects are if you don’t take care of it—yeah, you’ll have long-term effects. You can go blind, you can get neuropathy where you can’t feel your fingers or toes, and that can be dangerous if you don’t take care of it. Basically, it’s just a disease you need to keep on top of.

 

INTERVIEWER: How do you learn to do some of the things, like counting carbohydrates?

 

SARAH: So, there’s all kind of books that you can get that give you the carb counts of basic foods, fast foods, those sorts of things. Then you just get really good at reading labels. Luckily, there’s labels on pretty much everything. And then, after a couple of months, you pretty much—I’ve discovered most people eat the same things most of the time. When you’re not eating the same things, you can always look it up, and there’s all kinds of apps on phones now, and stuff. So it’s pretty easy to look things up and develop a sort of working knowledge of how many carbs there are and stuff. It takes time. It’s doable.

 

INTERVIEWER: You mentioned maintaining a healthy diet and exercise. Are those things you have to make changes in your life to accommodate?

 

SARAH: No. I was already pretty good about getting exercise, and then, like everybody else, I go through phases where I’m lazier than others, but on the whole that wasn’t necessarily a big change.

 

INTERVIEWER: Going back to how you learned about diabetes, what sources did you learn about the condition from? Where did you learn about diabetes once you were diagnosed?

 

SARAH: So, when I got diagnosed, the doctor’s office and the hospital gave me a big pack of, you know, “Your first year with diabetes.” “Tips about diabetes.” There’s a lot of great websites. The American Diabetes Association has a great website. There’s a—Shoot. I think it’s called Juvenile Diabetes Research—has a really good website. And they refer you. They have all kinds of exhaustive lists on information from the website and books you can read. And then there’s—American Diabetes puts out a magazine called Diabetes Forecast, and you can get all kinds of information there. Finding information was pretty easy.

 

INTERVIEWER: How many of those resources do you think you actually looked at when you were…

 

SARAH: Did I look at? A lot of them, just because I’m academic, so you know, I do the research. So, I would say for sure the American Diabetes website and the one that starts with a “J” that I can’t remember off the top of my head. And then there were a couple of really good books. I looked at one that had a really good title called, like, Being Your Own Pancreas, or something like that. And then there’s a Diabetes for Dummies book. My mom also loaded me up with books. So, yeah, I had no end to books. In fact, there were almost too many of these sources. You reach a certain point where you—they’re all sort of repeating the same things and answering the same questions.

 

INTERVIEWER: Actually, brings me to my next question. Do you ever recall receiving conflicting information from different sources?

 

SARAH: Nope. It was pretty consistent across the board. The thing I found to be wary of were there’s a lot of websites I found that were support group websites where you’d get people talking their own experiences, and sometimes those could get a little questionable, sometimes. Again, those are just individuals, not doctors, talking about it, so I kind of steered clear of some of those. But yeah, on the whole it was consistent, reliable, and yeah.

 

INTERVIEWER: In your experience, how much do people who do not have diabetes understand about the condition?

 

SARAH: I find it varies. It’s a little bit confusing because there’s Type I diabetes and Type II diabetes, and there’s not a lot of understanding what the difference is. To be honest, since I don’t have Type II, I’m not sure I even understand Type II, though Type II is often caused by, you know, if you’re overweight, or you don’t exercise, or you’re older. That’s where Type II is more associated with that. So there’s confusion that there are different types, and some people think that if you have diabetes you can’t ever eat any sugar. That seems to be the other big misconception. You can eat sugar. You just have to dose, give yourself more insulin if you eat a lot of sugar. And yeah, like any person should be eating a ton of sugar anyway. So that seems to be the main—I think people know more about it, but what they know about is Type II, which is different from Type I.

 

INTERVIEWER: What are some different ways that people react if they find out you have diabetes?

 

SARAH: They’re usually afraid about dietary restrictions, or they don’t want to give me something that I can’t eat. That’s usually the reaction I get. “I’m so sorry. I served you dessert with dinner.” But, yeah I’m pretty—I don’t have any food restrictions. I just have to just know how many carbs are in something, so that’s usually the main concern.

 

INTERVIEWER: How do you respond to these reactions?

 

SARAH: I usually just try to put them at ease, you know. It’s ultimately my responsibility to take care of it, not you. And if I eat sugar I’m not going to die, so that kind of thing.

 

INTERVIEWER: Since you were diagnosed six years ago, are there any ways in which diabetes has affected the way you live your life?

 

SARAH: Yeah, I just have to be more aware of what I eat, is the main concern. You know, the main thing you have to be worried about is having a low blood sugar. That’s when you can have effects, and that can affect your driving, and it can affect your judgment, and that sort of thing. I just have to make sure I always have a snack in my bag to ward off—luckily, if you have a low blood sugar, all you have to do is eat something with carbs in it, so it’s really easy to treat. Those would be sort of—yeah, being aware of food, and always having a snack.

 

INTERVIEWER: Have there been any other tangible tasks that are part of your life that weren’t before?

 

SARAH: Yeah, again, it’s mostly just I have to be aware, double check my blood sugar if I’m going to go exercise really strenuously or if I’m going on a long roadtrip, or something. It’s just making sure I check my sugar level.

 

INTERVIEWER: How do you do that?

 

SARAH: You just stick your finger and draw some blood. And then you’ve got this blood sugar reader that you have to test. So you’ve always got your little testers with you. So, I guess you have to be a little more organized and aware, which is a challenge for me as a disorganized person. Again, it’s a pretty manageable disease.

 

INTERVIEWER: Do you imagine that your life would be significantly different if you didn’t have diabetes, or do you think that it would be fairly similar?

 

SARAH: It would be pretty similar. The one thing it does is that it’s another kick to the butt to eat healthy and be active, and that sort of thing, so I’m probably better about that than if I didn’t, but I wouldn’t say it’s super—that it changed my life in radical ways.

 

INTERVIEWER: Is there anything you think the general public does not know about diabetes, or living with diabetes, that they should?

 

SARAH: I think it’s probably good to know about the dangers of having a low because sometimes if I’m having a low blood sugar I can’t always tell. The people who I spend a lot of time with, if I’m going on a trip or something, I’ll usually alert them to what the—but I don’t think that’s something the general public needs to know. Type II diabetes, it’s more important for people to have an awareness of, you know, not eating a lot of sugar and trying to be generally active, and I think with Type II it’s a lot more important because that’s something—No one knows what causes Type I. It’s sort of luck of the draw. It can’t be avoided, but Type II can be avoided. So that one I think is a little bit more important for the public to be aware of.

 

INTERVIEWER: Is there any specific information that you think would be useful for people to know?

 

SARAH: And I think it’s stuff that’s out there already, you know. Like, don’t eat a ton of sugar, and, you know, try to be active. All that sort of stuff that goes with being a healthy person. And I think that there’s—I think that people have a pretty good awareness about, you know, that those are things to avoid. So yeah, once you get Type I, if you get Type I, it’s pretty easy, like I said. It’s pretty easy to educate yourself about that.

 

INTERVIEWER: Thanks very much. My last question is: is there anything else you would like to share about diabetes?

 

SARAH: No. I guess it’s more of an issue with little kids who have Type I diabetes because, once again, there are so many other factors that come into play with—Again, if you’re teaching or babysitting or something, just knowing how to treat a low, or things like that. Those things are more important with little kids because at a certain point you’re old enough where, you know, it’s your own responsibility, but where you’re a kid I think it’s, maybe a little bit, you’re not entirely responsible for all of the things that are happening. That’s a whole different ballgame. Not one I really have experience with. I don’t have kids with diabetes. I can just imagine it’s a tougher ballgame. That’s probably it.

 

INTERVIEWER: Thank you so much for taking the time to talk with me today. I and everyone on our research team really appreciate your help. If you have any questions in the future, please feel free to contact us using the information on the paperwork we gave you earlier. Thank you again!

 

SARAH: Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interview with Colin (Pseudonym)

 

INTERVIEWER: Today is March 31, 2015. It’s 12:07 p.m., and I’m speaking with Colin. Thank you for taking the time to talk to me. First, can you tell me a little bit about your employer? What line of business were they in? What kind of goods or services did they offer their customers or patrons?

 

COLIN: So I worked for a movie theatre, for a little bit over five years, split up of course. It was [Company A]. We sold popcorn, drinks, candy. We sold movie tickets. We even had a restaurant attached to it that sold burgers and anything in between.

 

INTERVIEWER: To the best of your knowledge, how big was your employer, based on the number of people that they employed at your specific location?

 

COLIN: There were probably about forty other employees. It was a pretty big movie theatre. We had seven assistant managers and then, of course, the general manager.

 

INTERVIEWER: And then the forty includes everyone else that worked there?

 

COLIN: Yeah, any janitor, cleaner, box office worker, concessions, restaurant worker.

 

INTERVIEWER: Did they have any other locations as well, besides the one that you worked at?

 

COLIN: [Company A] has movie theatres throughout America, but the general manager just oversaw the actual movie theatre.

 

INTERVIEWER: What was your specific role with the company? What sort of work did you do, what were your responsibilities?

 

COLIN: So, it started off as just cleaning, but slowly as I kept working there I moved up to concessions, to box office, I even helped with moving projectors, and then worked with the restaurant maybe the last six months. So I learned pretty much everything but the management.

 

INTERVIEWER: What percentage of your time would you say you were working with patrons or customers?

 

COLIN: Probably, except for when we were cleaning theatres, maybe eighty-five percent of the time.

 

INTERVIEWER: Do you remember if your movie theatre had any major policies that they publicly promoted in their advertising related to customer service? Was that something that they advertised?

 

COLIN: I mean, I don’t know if it was clearly advertised, but we always talked about customer service first. It was always a statement that our managers told us continually, but I don’t know if it was publicly announced that customer service first.

 

INTERVIEWER: So, for example, some stores have big signs out front that say things like “100% satisfaction guarantee.” Was that the type of thing that you recall them having?

 

COLIN: No. no.

 

INTERVIEWER: So, even though if they didn’t necessarily have some, an advertised public policy, in your own words, what were the official policies of the theatre regarding customer service to the best of your knowledge?

 

COLIN: The official policy would be, “Clean, efficient, fun, movie theatre experience for every guest.” Or customer. We called them “guests” because that was just what they told us to call them instead of “customers.” But yeah, no. Clean, fast, easy, fun.

 

INTERVIEWER: Were there any policies specifically on how you should interact with customers—or guests, in your case?

 

COLIN: Very cordially, of course. One of the things in training was always be the first to apologize if anything goes wrong. Never blame the guest—or customer—be concise and clear with them about what they have to offer.

 

INTERVIEWER: In your view, did your employer’s official policies on customer service align with their actual practice in terms of customer service?

 

COLIN: That’s a good question. Probably, for the most part, no. I think, for the most part, we were true in word, but when it came to application, I’d guess only about forty percent of the employees or managers actually took that part of the policy serious.

 

INTERVIEWER: Can you give me any specific examples of a time when your employer—not you, personally—but when a member of management clearly behaved in a way that did or did not meet a policy?

 

COLIN: Let me think. Well, one of our big things that our movie theatre had that we were trying really hard to push was “Clean movie theatres for everyone.” And there were some assistant managers—I won’t name them—that didn’t mind garbage on the ground and came in, went up and down, cleaned the big stuff and left lots of the little stuff, and just that stigma of if the assistant managers don’t care, it slowly turned into the employees realizing that we didn’t care about cleanliness. And it was a big issue for awhile of assistant managers just not caring about cleanliness, even though they were constantly telling us to be clean and to be efficient in cleaning.

 

INTERVIEWER: Do you remember any times when there was an interaction directly between an employee and a customer that did or didn’t comply with the things you were saying earlier about courtesy, and being the first to apologize, and some of those policies you talked about?

 

COLIN: That’s a good question. I don’t know if I ever saw it. It was very . . . Even the assistant managers that were complacent in other areas, as soon as they were in front of a guest, they were extremely cordial. So I don’t know if I saw any of the non-cordialness between managers or assistant managers to guests. It was more the behind the scenes where the lacking occurred.

 

INTERVIEWER: And would you consider cleanliness a type of customer service?

 

COLIN: Absolutely. Absolutely.

 

INTERVIEWER: Did your employer have any other policies that sometimes conflicted with, created tensions with, or made it hard to comply with their policies regarding customer service?

 

COLIN: Well, that’s a really good question. They pushed us very much that we needed to sell large popcorn, large drinks with every single transaction, but then they said, “Don’t push merchandise.” And there was times that a child would come and order a small drink, and I remember getting, not scolded necessarily, but told I should have tried to get them to buy candy or popcorn. But I was trying to be polite and kind to the fact that this is a child with only four dollars, and they’re getting a four dollar small drink. So, sometimes there was conflicting in the sense that they wanted us to push sales, but they also didn’t want us to push and be impolite to guests, so I think sometimes those two kind of conflicted.

 

INTERVIEWER: How did you handle that situation, with the child?

 

COLIN: Well, with the child pretty much all I did was I got them the small drink. It was more of the assistant manager who was near when I was getting the drink for him said, “Is that all you sold?” And when I explained it, they still said, “Well, you should have pushed the sales.” And of course, as an employee I saw, “Oh, I’m sorry. I’ll work on that,” even though that manager didn’t always direct sale anyway too. It was kind of weird.

 

INTERVIEWER: Can you think of any other policies or situations where one policy made it difficult for you to follow the customer service policies? Or to provide what you would say is good customer service?

 

COLIN: Not that comes to mind.

 

INTERVIEWER: In general, at that particular job, how did you personally approach customer service? In terms of policies and what you actually did, what were your mind-set and actions in terms of customer service?

 

COLIN: Sure. I am very adamant on customer service. Cleanliness is a big thing. I mean, they trained us on all these things, but even my own values and practices kind of seep through. I was always very apologetic. I like to keep the policies, and even though there were managers that had conflicting thoughts, I tried hard to be accommodating to whoever was supervising me.

 

INTERVIEWER: Was there ever a time when you were unable to give a customer something they wanted or meet a request of theirs because it conflicted with a policy? A time where somebody wanted something and you were not able to provide that?

 

COLIN: Absolutely. Absolutely. So, our drinks specifically were nonrefillable, and there were many guests who came back and said, “Can I have a refill?” or, “Oops. I spilled this drink. Could I get a refill?,” and because of policy we can’t. Because that’s just what they tell us to do. We can’t give refills on drinks, even if they spill them.

 

INTERVIEWER: Can you think of any specific examples of a time where somebody came back and said that, and how you responded?

 

COLIN: Sure. What comes to mind, actually, was it was a group of teenage girls, and they had bought a large drink and a large popcorn—and large popcorns get refills, but not drinks—and right after ordering it, almost three feet away, the girl dropped her drink, and it went scattering. And they came up, and they were like, “Oh my goodness. Can I get a refill?” Because of policy, I had to say, “Unfortunately, we don’t do refills. I could sell you another drink.” And they were a little discouraged because they were rethinking about the drink on the ground, and they felt like it was an accident. They luckily didn’t push anything too much. I think they got a medium drink after that, but they were a little discouraged by the fact that I couldn’t just refill their spilled drink.

 

INTERVIEWER: Any other times? Any other situations where somebody asked way beyond that? Where a customer was more dissatisfied by that?

 

COLIN: I mean, it was a policy that lots of employees had issues with because it wasn’t consistent. Some employees let them have it, and so there was one time when—not with me, but the person next to me—where he came back for a refill, and he made this big fuss about how, “The last time I was here, I had refills. This is garbage. Let me talk to your assistant manager.” And we went and got the manager, and the manager explained and apologized, saying they couldn’t give them a refill. But it never got violent. It was just very loud noises. It was very disgruntled kind of yelling.

 

INTERVIEWER: How did the customer feel at the end of the situation, do you think? What did they express?

 

COLIN: That’s a good question. I do not know the ending of that story. All I know is that they didn’t get what they wanted, and they made a big fuss, and then they went back to the theatre. That’s all I’ve heard. They might have done more afterwards, but . . .

 

INTERVIEWER: In general, do you have any thoughts on how you personally might have navigated any differences between a customer’s expectation—what they wanted—and the policies? What were some of your thoughts on that topic?

 

COLIN: Well, that’s tough because they advertise customer service first, but then some of the policies are more on the business side and less on the customer’s side. So how I, I always try to be cordial. I always try to approach the circumstances, try to do everything I possibly could, based on the policies, but due to the fact that I am employed and getting paid by them, I made sure to keep the policies of selling, and not giving refills, and making sure that you’re checking ID for seventeen and younger, and so forth.

 

INTERVIEWER: What do you think about policies like that? For example, the girls who spilled their drink in front of you, and it was clear they spilled it and didn’t drink it. How do you think if you were the employer, if you were the person making the decision, how would you have handled that?

 

COLIN: That’s a good question. I would first have to analyze the situation. I’d have to see how many people are around because, like, if there were lots of people around and you gave out a free refill, even though it went against your policy normally, other people might use that excuse to get more drinks, which I could see on the business end not being good. But, in their scenario, where nobody was around, I don’t think it would have taken that much just to refill them, or even get a new cup and just not charge them, considering it was an accident. It was a clear accident. You saw it happen, and, you know, things like that happen.

 

INTERVIEWER: Was there ever a time you can recall where someone has come back to you and said, “Look, your policy says ‘customer first,’ and I don’t feel that that’s happening here?”

 

COLIN: No. I never had that scenario.

 

INTERVIEWER: Okay, great. My last question is: are there any other thoughts on customer service in retail that you would share in anecdotes or just thoughts that you might have on the subject of customer service from the perspective of an employee?

 

COLIN: From that of an employee’s, specifically of a movie theatre, it was hard, particularly towards the end. What disgruntled me as an employee the most was the fact that we were selling and trying . . . not to take advantage of guests—but getting money from them and charging really expensive—the business side—but also trying to be accommodating and the face of customer service. You might gripe about a guest, but as soon as a guest is there we put on this facade that things are good. It just seems kind of two faced and kind of cheesy. I understand why it happens, but it’s just unfortunate that that has to be the case, that we have to play two fronts, that of a business making money and ripping people off, and then also making sure they are happy and that they are coming back for more.

 

INTERVIEWER: Any thoughts on what you would do? If you could make any changes that you wanted, how might you approach that?

 

COLIN: Just be a little bit more forthright. I think just some of the backwardness behind the scenes isn’t really appropriate, and I think it’s . . . Not many people know about it unless they’ve done customer service, and so I think being forthright about it is something that the public wants, in fact.

 

INTERVIEWER: Any other thoughts?

 

COLIN: No.

 

INTERVIEWER: Thank you so much for your time. I really appreciate it.

e each other or provided divergent analytic insights.

Uncollectible Accounts

Uncollectible Accounts

Using your text and at least one scholarly source, prepare a two to three page paper (excluding title and reference page), in APA format, on the following:

  • Explain the difference between Charity Care and Bad Debt in a healthcare environment.
  • Explain how the patient financial services personnel assist in determining which category the uncollectible account should be placed.
  • Discuss the financial implications of gross uncollectibles on the bottom line of the healthcare institution, and explain how these are recorded on the financial statements.

    Uncollectible Accounts

    Using your text and at least one scholarly source, prepare a two to three page paper (excluding title and reference page), in APA format, on the following:

    • Explain the difference between Charity Care and Bad Debt in a healthcare environment.
    • Explain how the patient financial services personnel assist in determining which category the uncollectible account should be placed.
    • Discuss the financial implications of gross uncollectibles on the bottom line of the healthcare institution, and explain how these are recorded on the financial statements.

NCAA Case Study

Playing Field at Sunshine State University  Read the case study, Here’s the Pitch: The Dilemma of Selecting a New Outdoor Playing Field for Sunshine State University (Simmons, Popp, & Greenhalgh, 2015). The case  study investigates the challenges of deciding between natural or synthetic surface for the new fields. This decision is complex because cost, maintenance, durability, player safety, and player preference must all be considered. Both surfaces have their advantages and disadvantages. In the end, Rodriguez must decide which surface is right for Sunshine State University. 1. Make a list of all the factors Rodriguez needs to consider in this case. Which of these factors are the most important for an NCAA Division-II athletic department? Why? 2. Conduct a 10-year cost–benefit analysis for the fields. In your analysis, be sure to include installation costs, annual maintenance costs, and equipment costs. Which surface provides a better long-term value from a financial perspective? Conduct a 20-year cost–benefit analysis. Assume costs remain the same, but you must now account for a replacement synthetic field after 10 years. Which surface provides a better financial value after 20 years? 3. What additional information would Rodriguez want/need prior to making this decision? 4. What surface should Rodriguez choose to install at SSU? What are the two most significant factors that contributed to your decision? Once a surface is selected, decide on a specific product. Justify your selection, both for the surface and product choices. Answer the questions in APA format (please modify each question into a header); each paper should be at least 3-5 pages in length in addition to a cover page and bibliography. References Simmons, J., Popp, N., Greenhalgh, G. (2015). Here’s the pitch: The dilemma of selecting a new outdoor playing field for Sunshine State University. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

1

Volume 4 Case Study 12 IN SPORT MANAGEMENT Case STUDIES

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

Jason Simmons is with Sport Administration, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Nels Popp is with the Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Greg Greenhalgh is with the Center for Sport Leadership, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. Address author correspondence to Jason Simmons at jason.simmons@uc.edu.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/cssm.2015-0009

Here’s the Pitch: The Dilemma of Selecting a New Outdoor Playing Field for Sunshine State University

Jason Simmons University of Cincinnati

Nels Popp University of North Carolina

Greg Greenhalgh Virginia Commonwealth University

The outdoor athletic fields of Sunshine State University are in poor condition. Overuse, insufficient drain- age, and a lack of human and financial resources have contributed to the fields’ deterioration. Sunshine State University’s director of athletics, Emily Rodriguez, has decided to replace the existing fields, but that decision is just the tip of the iceberg. Rodriguez now must decide on a natural or synthetic surface for the new fields. This decision is complex because cost, maintenance, durability, player safety, and player preference must all be considered. Both surfaces have their advantages and disadvantages. In the end, Rodriguez must decide which surface is right for Sunshine State University.

Keywords: facility management, decision making, natural grass, synthetic turf, college athletics

As director of athletics at NCAA Division-II Sunshine State University (SSU), Emily Rodriguez oversees facility and event operations for a 14-sport athletic department. One of Rodriguez’s most pressing concerns is the condition of SSU’s outdoor athletic fields, which consistently garner negative feedback from coaches, players, and fellow Gulf Coast Athletic Conference (GCAC) administrators. The campus currently has two natural grass fields, one for varsity competition (with seating for roughly 1,500 spectators) and one practice field, which is used by men’s and women’s soccer (in-season fall), women’s lacrosse (in-season spring), and outdoor men’s and women’s track and field (in-season spring). In addition to varsity sports, the fields are used for intramurals, club sports, SSU summer sports camps, and youth tournaments. In total, the fields are used on 220 to 240 dates per year.

Both fields are experiencing overuse, which has worn away much of the grass in certain spots, such as the area in front of the goals. Sunshine State University’s maintenance staff has limited human and financial resources, which has contributed to the fields’ deterioration. The fields were not designed with adequate drainage systems, so when it rains, water pools in depressions in the surface for an extended period of time after the storm passes. These depressions have also made it difficult for Rodriguez’s coaches to schedule out-of-conference games, as some opposing coaches have expressed an unwillingness to play on the field. While the GCAC has never suggested Rodriguez’s fields are unsuit- able for conference games, the inability to attract prominent out-of-conference opponents has significantly increased the travel budgets for her outdoor teams. If that weren’t enough, Rodriguez’s own coaches have also said the facilities have hurt their ability to recruit top student-athletes.

 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/cssm.2015-0009

 

2 Simmons, Popp, and Greenhalgh

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

Rodriguez has been in consultation with administrators from other schools and knows that a handful of SSU’s com- petitors have transitioned to synthetic turf for their outdoor fields. After pleading her case to university administration about improving athletic facilities, the athletic department has been approved for a 1-year capital improvement increase of $350,000 from university funds to improve the outdoor fields. In addition to that allotment, the athletic department can generate additional dollars through private gifts, sponsorship sales, and outside rentals.

Despite the fundraising challenges ahead, Rodriguez has made the decision to replace both fields, but she is unsure which direction to go: natural grass or synthetic turf. Brent O’Toole, SSU’s director of grounds and landscape mainte- nance, is a purist and prefers a natural surface; however, he has insisted that if Rodriguez goes with natural grass, she needs to invest in a sand-based field to address drainage and compaction issues plaguing the existing fields. Sand-based fields are a bit more expensive than those that incorporate native soil.

In the past, SSU has issued requests for proposals (RFPs) for capital projects, such as when the gymnasium roof needed to be replaced and when permanent seating fixtures were added to the baseball and softball stadiums. In each case, three to five firms bid on the projects, with cost being the most important factor. Money is tight in the department, but from her own research and conversations with colleagues at other institutions, Rodriguez has learned that unlike other capital improvement projects, cost is just one of many factors to consider when it comes to turf replacement. Other issues Rodriguez has encountered include maintenance requirements, durability, player safety, and coach/player preference. This is not a decision to be taken lightly. The decision Rodriguez makes today will affect the athletic department and campus for at least the next 10 to 15 years.

Costs

Rodriguez invited a turf specialist, Dave Acker, to campus to examine the existing fields and help her estimate how much it would cost to replace the competition field and the practice field. The cheapest option would be to simply replace the current fields with new grass on top of the existing soil. Acker told her she could probably stay under an installation cost of $200,000 going this route, but she would likely run into the same problems she is facing now in the not too distant future, as the existing soil has percolation and drainage problems. The sand-based fields that O’Toole recommended would cost roughly $700,000 to install, but they drain at a significantly faster rate and should have fewer compaction problems (Turfgrass Producers International, n.d.).

Acker is an advocate for synthetic fields, particularly for fields receiving a lot of use. One of the biggest issues that Director of Grounds and Landscape Maintenance O’Toole has with maintaining the existing fields is that they are constantly being utilized. Even in the summer, the soccer and lacrosse teams hold youth camps and tournaments, and practices start up in early August. The fields are given very little time to recover, resulting in bare spots all over the field. The installation costs for synthetic fields can be substantial, and somewhat difficulty to determine. Rodriguez spoke with representatives from several different synthetic turf providers and the quotes she was given varied drastically, with some only covering the cost of installation, and others including the cost of maintenance and equipment as well. A salesperson from DreamFields, Inc., gave Rodriguez an installation estimate of $450,000 per playing field. Acker felt the estimate was on the low end, noting a synthetic surface would likely range from $600,000 to $1,000,000 for a single field (Adamson, 2008; Simon, 2010; SportsTurf Managers Association, n.d.a.). These latter numbers are more in line with what Rodriguez heard from other synthetic turf companies she contacted.

Rodriguez also consulted with Christian Goldberg, the athletic director from fellow GCAC-member Eastern Florida Shore University (EFSU), who recently made a similar decision and opted for synthetic turf. For Goldberg, the constant use and harsh summer and fall rains made the decision easy. He did admit it was a more costly option, but an EFSU alum, who has had a notable career in the NFL, made a sizeable donation to the athletic department 3 years ago, offsetting the installation costs. Eastern Florida Shore University installed Green 24/7’s Pro-Series synthetic turf for $1,360,000 on both their football and soccer/lacrosse fields. Green 24/7 does offer an Elite-Series synthetic, but it costs just over $1,000,000 for a single field.

Maintenance

One thing Goldberg said that caught Rodriguez by surprise was the maintenance costs associated with synthetic turf. When she spoke to the DreamFields, Inc. salesperson, he made it sound like maintenance on an artificial surface would be minimal, especially when compared to a natural grass field. Grass fields require mowing, fertilizing, weed and pest

 

 

Outdoor Playing Field Surface 3

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

control, seeding, aeration, watering, and line painting. O’Toole and his crew are usually out working on the fields 4–5 days a week—maintenance that currently costs the department $30,000–$35,000 per year. This figure includes only maintenance supplies and equipment, not labor. The Dreamfields representative suggested their product costs approxi- mately $5,000 per field to maintain annually. Goldberg said that estimate was on the low side, as he is spending in the neighborhood of $12,000 to $14,000 annually to maintain EFSU’s new fields.

Goldberg’s numbers seemed fairly accurate to Acker, Rodriguez’s turf specialist consulting on the project. Whereas natural grass fields are like living organisms requiring regular maintenance, synthetic surfaces must be maintained to avoid unnecessary wear and tear. As Acker explained, third-generation synthetic surfaces use a crumb rubber infill to create a resilient surface that has a consistent feel across the field (Synthetic Turf Council, n.d.). The infill can become compacted with heavy use and the rubber granules can harden if they mix with surrounding clay and dirt, something that can occur after heavy winds and rain. To reduce compaction and extend the life of the field, Acker recommends regular grooming, which involves brushing the field to redistribute compacted infill. For severely compacted fields, an aeration tine may be necessary, in which high-pressure air is blasted into the surface to loosen the rubber granules (Steinbach, 2014). Additional maintenance issues include periodically adding additional infill, minor tear repairs, disinfecting the field when it comes in contact with bodily fluids (i.e., blood), removing foreign debris, and even watering the field on extremely hot days to cool the playing surface (SportsTurf Managers Association, n.d.b).

There will be some start-up equipment costs if Rodriguez opts for a synthetic surface, expenses she would not have if SSU continued with natural grass fields. O’Toole already has a utility cart, but grooming and cleaning equip- ment, as well a vacuum and field magnet to remove debris, will likely run upwards of $5,000. Even though this is a costly expense, Acker agrees with Goldberg that Rodriguez can expect to trim the annual field maintenance budget by roughly 50–60% going the synthetic route.

Durability

Aside from cost, surface durability is among Rodriguez’s chief concerns. Despite O’Toole’s best efforts over the summer months, the fields deteriorate very quickly once the fall semester begins. According to O’Toole, poor drainage and overuse are the primary culprits. One soccer game on a drenched field is enough to cause significant damage (Miller, 2010). O’Toole estimates the fields logged 1,600 hr of use last year. That is inclusive of games, practices, intramurals, university events, and summer camps. Regardless of drainage rates, Acker says any grass field is going to struggle to hold up under those conditions, especially if the field is wet (Miller, 2010).

Everything Rodriguez has read indicates a synthetic surface is going to hold up much better under constant use than natural grass (City of San Diego, 2011; FieldTurf, n.d.; Simon, 2010; SportsTurf Managers Association, n.d.b; Turfgrass Producers International, n.d.). The Synthetic Turf Council (n.d.) states that artificial fields can withstand 3,000 hr of use each year no matter the weather conditions. It is for this reason Acker is a proponent of synthetic fields. He said most synthetic turf providers offer an 8- to 10-year warranty. In his experience, most fields last that long, some even longer, provided they are properly maintained.

The warranty was something Goldberg and EFSU’s legal team went through thoroughly before settling on Green 24/7. Their warranty is for 8 years and only covers manufacturing defects, installation-related issues, drainage, and surface firmness. Any issues arising from weather, vandalism, improper cleaning, improper maintenance, or improper equipment are not covered and can actually void the warranty. For example, Goldberg noted metal spikes or any cleat longer than half an inch are not permitted on the field. The grounds crew is also required to keep a maintenance log and follow Green 24/7’s maintenance protocol for the life of the warranty. Acker added that most synthetic turf warranties also prohibit food, tobacco, cigarettes, and chewing gum from being consumed on or near the field.

Rodriguez is somewhat familiar with the complex nature of synthetic turf warranties. A few months ago, Rodriguez met with Sturgis Winslow, the athletic director at Shoreline Preparatory Academy, a local private high school. Shoreline replaced their football field 4 years ago, opting for a synthetic field installed by NeverMow, a discount turf provider. Winslow said cost was the biggest factor in his decision to choose NeverMow, as they were able to replace the field for $300,000. The school raised funds through private gifts, and sold naming rights to the field to a dental practice owned by an alumnus. The field also came with a 15-year warranty.

 

 

4

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

After two full seasons of year-round use (football, boys and girls soccer, track and field, and marching band), Shoreline’s field began to show wear. The manufacturer repaired a few minor tears and holes around the seams, but over the last year, more seams are coming undone and the turf blades in high traffic areas of the field are beginning to deteriorate. Winslow sought a replacement field under the warranty, but NeverMow said the warranty had been voided when the golf team held practices on the field when the driving range at their home course was being renovated in the fall. Shoreline is challenging NeverMow’s claim in court, but for the time being, the school’s field is in a state of disrepair and Winslow is not confident he can secure another half a million dollars in funding to replace the field with an upgraded product.

Winslow told Rodriguez his biggest regret was focusing solely on the financial side of the decision. Colleagues at other schools warned him that low-end synthetic turf products have a much shorter life than advertised. Durability and drainage are two things he wished he had researched more. The NeverMow field was never quite level, even shortly after installation, and it held water in shallow pockets during and after heavy rains. The two products Rodriguez is considering, Dreamfields, Inc. and Green 24/7, both advertise their fields will drain at a rate of 10 inches per hour, which is consistent with the sand-based grass field estimate Acker provided. Even so, any natural grass surface is going to require weather-based restrictions and creative scheduling and management solutions to ensure the longevity of the fields, which is a challenge not present should Rodriguez opt for a synthetic surface.

Player Safety

Upon hearing about the possibility of new athletic fields, SSU’s head athletic trainer, Desiree Robinson, scheduled a meeting to talk with Rodriguez about safety concerns she had with artificial turf. Prior to coming to SSU, Robinson worked for 4 years with a semi-pro soccer team who practiced and played their home games exclusively on a synthetic field. While there, she regularly treated ankle and knee injuries that seemed to occur with more frequency at home than on road matches played on natural grass. After the meeting, Robinson emailed Rodriguez a study conducted by researchers from Stanford University that found the rate of ACL injuries among NCAA football players was significantly greater on artificial turf than natural grass surfaces, with 90% of ACL injuries in the sample occurring on third-generation infill fields (Dragoo, Braun, & Harris, 2013). Concerns over player safety were the impetus behind SSU administration’s decision to increase the athletic department’s budget to replace the existing fields; therefore, Rodriguez decided to research this issue herself so she could make a more informed decision.

She came across two studies indicating ankle injuries were more common on artificial surfaces as opposed to grass (Ekstrand, Hägglund, & Fuller, 2011; Williams, Hume, & Kara, 2011), and one from the American Journal of Sports Medicine suggesting a correlation between concussions and artificial surfaces, although the sample size was small (Guskiewicz, Weaver, Padua, & Garrett, 2000). Another study looked at knee and ankle injuries among NFL players from 2000 to 2009, and found a significantly higher incidence of ACL sprains and eversion ankle sprains on artificial turf compared to natural grass (Hershman et al., 2012). Conversely, Almutawa, Scott, George, and Drust (2014) found injury rates were higher on grass than third-generation synthetic surfaces among members of the Saudi National Foot- ball (soccer) Team. By and large, however, most of the articles that Rodriguez came across suggested essentially no difference between artificial and natural grass surfaces in terms of injury risk (Aoki et al., 2010; Ekstrand et al., 2011; Fuller, Dick, Corlette, & Schmalz, 2007; Soligard, Bahr, & Andersen, 2012; State of New York Department of Health, 2008; Williams et al., 2011).

Rodriguez asked Acker about the risk of injury associated with the different surfaces, and he said it is really dif- ficult to say definitively that one surface causes more injuries than the other because or variations in shoe and cleat type, player skill level, prior injury history, individual physical characteristics, the presence of field moisture, and the time in the game when the injury occurred (Balazs et al., 2014; State of New York Department of Health, 2008). He did say, though, that heat-related issues are a concern with synthetic fields. In his experience, synthetic turf fields are much hotter than natural grass fields because they absorb heat (State of New York Department of Health, 2008; Turfgrass Producers International, 2010). Acker recalled a study conducted at the University of Missouri showing a 68-degree surface temperature difference between synthetic and natural surfaces. On a 98-degree day, the field-level tempera- ture of the synthetic surface was 173 degrees, compared to 105 degrees on the natural grass field (Adamson, 2005).

 

 

Outdoor Playing Field Surface 5

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

A similar study was conducted at BYU where average surface temperatures for synthetic fields were 117 degrees, 39 degrees warmer than the average natural grass surface temperature (Williams & Pulley, 2002). Acker said that watering synthetic fields has been shown to reduce surface temperatures, but the fields do begin to warm up again rather quickly (Serensits, McNitt, & Petrunak, 2011).

In her research, Rodriguez also came across a few articles discussing potentially hazardous effects of synthetic surfaces caused by the chemicals used in tires, which are recycled for use in crumb rubber infill fields. Tires contain a host of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) that could poten- tially enter the body through skin abrasions or inhalation (Simon, 2010). An NBC News story even drew an anecdotal correlation between playing on artificial turf and cancer after a University of Washington soccer coach identified 38 soccer players who had been diagnosed with cancer after playing on artificial turf fields (Rappleye, 2014). Most of what Rodriguez read, though, seems to suggest that while carcinogens, metals, and VOCs are present in crumb rubber, the health risks of playing on crumb rubber infill surfaces are minimal (Beausoleil, Price, & Muller, 2009; California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, 2010; Pavilonis, Weisel, Buckley, & Lioy, 2013; Simon, 2010). A study conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency did find traces of metals and VOCs in a very limited sampling of synthetic surfaces; however, the presence of components analyzed were “below levels of concern” (Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, p. vi).

There are alternative options to crumb rubber infill, but they add to the overall cost of the project. One of Acker’s previous clients went with a plastic infill substitute, and a few others have opted for an organic infill material. Both eliminate any risk posed by potentially hazardous chemicals present in crumb rubber, but they do have drawbacks of their own, most notably cost (Charwick, 2014). Acker estimates a plastic infill will add $300,000 to the overall project cost for both fields. The organic infill could be double that.

Preference

For the most part, student-athletes and coaches at SSU are in favor of a synthetic field. The players love road games at EFSU, citing how consistent the field plays compared to their home surface and how “cool” the artificial field looks with the EFSU logo in the middle. Even the coaches are attracted to the aesthetic appeal of the artificial surface. The lacrosse coach says a pristine artificial field will really help with recruiting, as it will create a lasting impression in the minds of prospective student-athletes. The women’s soccer coach was more concerned with how the field plays. For her, if intramurals are going to use the fields in addition to athletics, the new fields need to be able to withstand the constant use. Divots (torn-up pieces of turf) and uneven play wreak havoc on a soccer game.

Rodriguez was surprised to learn that her student-athletes and coaches felt this way. From what she read, it seems players preferred a natural grass field. For example, a 2010 survey of National Football League players indicated 69.4% of players preferred playing on natural grass. Perhaps more importantly, 82.4% of players felt an artificial turf field was more likely to contribute to injuries, 89.1% said playing on artificial fields led to more soreness and fatigue, and 89.7% think artificial fields are more likely than natural grass to shorten their careers (NFL Players Association, 2010). These perceptions are not limited to football players. Elite soccer players have also expressed concerns over playing on artificial turf (Andersson, Ekblom, & Krustrup, 2008; Geier, 2014). The University of Minnesota even had to temporarily install sod on top of their synthetic football field prior to an exhibition soccer game played by European league champions at TCF Bank Stadium in 2014. The cumulative effect of artificial turf on the legs of players over the course of a game was cited as the primary reason for installing the natural surface (Sheild, 2014).

Conclusion

Emily Rodriguez has a tough decision to make. Sunshine State University’s existing fields need to be replaced, but several factors must be taken into consideration when deciding on the new surface. The athletic department did receive a one- time budget increase from the university to help pay for the fields, and Rodriguez is confident another $150,000 can be raised through fundraising efforts, but cost is still a concern—in terms of both field installation and maintenance. At a school like SSU, revenues will never outweigh expenses in this decision. If finances were the only concern, Rodriguez’s

 

 

6 Simmons, Popp, and Greenhalgh

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

choice would be easy. A natural grass surface with native soil is the cheapest option in the short term and the long term. Unfortunately, as Rodriguez learned from Shoreline’s Athletic Director Sturgis Winslow, making a decision like this based solely on cost is probably not the best approach. Beyond cost, Rodriguez must also consider how well the new surfaces will hold up given the number of hours the fields will be in use, as well as the maintenance considerations necessary to extend the life of the fields. Player safety and player preference must also factor into Rodriguez’s decision. Clearly, there are advantages and disadvantages to each surface. Rodriguez has consulted with experts, sought advice from peers, spoken with coaches and players, and conducted research on her own. She has heard from representatives of Green 24/7 and DreamFields, Inc., as well as her own director of grounds, who has suggested sticking with natural grass, but with a new subterranean base and drainage system installed. Now she must decide: natural grass or synthetic turf?

Discussion Questions

1. Make a list of all the factors Rodriguez needs to consider in this case. Which of these factors are the most important for an NCAA Division-II athletic department? Why?

2. Would it be beneficial for Rodriguez to hold a meeting with current stakeholders to gather their input on this decision? What are the benefits and drawbacks of holding such a meeting? Who should be invited to this meeting? What case would each of those individuals make? Do certain perspectives carry more weight than others? Why?

3. If Rodriguez opts for natural grass, what strategies could she employ to reduce the wear and tear on the field, aside from limiting the number of hours the field is in use?

4. Conduct a 10-year cost–benefit analysis for the fields. In your analysis, be sure to include installation costs, annual maintenance costs, and equipment costs. Which surface provides a better long-term value from a financial perspective? Conduct a 20-year cost–benefit analysis. Assume costs remain the same, but you must now account for a replacement synthetic field after 10 years. Which surface provides a better financial value after 20 years?

5. What additional information would Rodriguez want/need prior to making this decision?

6. What surface should Rodriguez choose to install at SSU? What are the two most significant factors that contributed to your decision? Once a surface is selected, decide on a specific product. Justify your selection, both for the surface and product choices.

References Adamson, C. (2005). Synthetic turf playing fields present unique dangers. Retrieved from http://cafnr.missouri.edu/research/turfgrass.

php Adamson, C. (2008). Synthetic turfgrass costs far exceed natural grass playing fields. Retrieved from http://cafnr.missouri.edu/

research/turfgrass-costs.php Almutawa, M., Scott, M., George, K.P., & Drust, B. (2014). The incidence and nature of injuries sustained on grass and 3rd genera-

tion artificial turf: A pilot study in elite Saudi National Team footballers. Physical Therapy in Sport, 15(1), 47–52. Andersson, H., Ekblom, B., & Krustrup, P. (2008). Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: Movement patterns, technical

standards, and player impressions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(2), 113–122. Aoki, H., Terushige, K., Fujiya, H., Kato, H., Yatabe, K., Morikawa, T., & Seki, J. (2010). Incidence of injury among adolescent

soccer players: A comparative study of artificial and natural grass turfs. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 20(1), 1–7. Balazs, G.C., Pavey, G.J., Brelin, A.M., Pickett, A., Keblish, D.J., & Rue, J.P.H. (2014). Risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in athletes

on synthetic playing surfaces: A systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. doi:10.1177/0363546514545864 Beausoleil, M., Price, K., & Muller, C. (2009, June). Chemicals in outdoor artificial turf: A health risk for users. Retrieved from

http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Outdoor_Artificial_Turf.pdf California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. (2010, October). Safety study of artificial turf containing crumb rubber

infill made from recycled tires: Measurements of chemicals and particulates in the air, bacteria in the turf, and skin abrasions caused by contact with the surface. Retrieved from http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/publications/Documents/Tires/2010009.pdf

City of San Diego. (2011). Guidelines on the use of synthetic turf within the city park system. Retrieved from http://www.sandiego. gov/park-and-recreation/pdf/parkdesign/11syntheticturfuseguidelinesreport.pdf

 

http://cafnr.missouri.edu/research/turfgrass.php
http://cafnr.missouri.edu/research/turfgrass.php
http://cafnr.missouri.edu/research/turfgrass-costs.php
http://cafnr.missouri.edu/research/turfgrass-costs.php
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0363546514545864
http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Outdoor_Artificial_Turf.pdf
http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/publications/Documents/Tires/2010009.pdf
http://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/pdf/parkdesign/11syntheticturfuseguidelinesreport.pdf
http://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/pdf/parkdesign/11syntheticturfuseguidelinesreport.pdf

 

Outdoor Playing Field Surface 7

This content is copyright © 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc. and is not to be distributed, disseminated, or reproduced without permission.

Charwick, J. (2014, December 4). Marlborough turf study. Retrieved from http://marlborough.wickedlocal.com/assets/pdf/ WL265181224.pdf

Dragoo, J.L., Braun, H.J., & Harris, A.H.S. (2013). The effect of playing surface on the incidence of ACL injuries in National Col- legiate Athletic Association American football. The Knee, 20(3), 191–195.

Ekstrand, J., Hägglund, M., & Fuller, C.W. (2011). Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female elite football players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21(6), 824–832.

Environmental Protection Agency. (2009, November). A scoping-level field monitoring study of synthetic turf fields and playgrounds. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/nerl/download_files/documents/tire_crumbs.pdf

FieldTurf. (n.d.). Turf talk: Cost comparison (vol. 4). Retrieved from http://www.fieldturf.com/ru/artificial-turf/downloads?page=2 Fuller, C.W., Dick, R.W., Corlette, J., & Schmalz, R. (2007). Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained

on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(Suppl. 1), i20–i26.

Geier, D. (2014, October). Suit filed against FIFA over Women’s World Cup turf. Retrieved from http://www.athleticbusiness.com/ more-news/soccer-players-file-lawsuit-against-fifa-over-women-s-world-cup-turf.html

Guskiewicz, K.M., Weaver, N.L., Padua, D.A., & Garrett, D.A. (2000). Epidemiology of concussion in collegiate and high school football players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(5), 643–650.

Hershman, E.B., Anderson, R., Bergfeld, J.A., Bradley, J.P., Coughlin, M.J., Johnson, R.J., . . . Powell, J.W. (2012). An analysis of specific lower extremity injury rates on grass and FieldTurf playing surfaces in National Football League game. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(10), 2200–2205.

Miller, G. (2010, March 3). Maximizing the durability of athletic fields. Retrieved from http://turffiles.ncsu.edu/PDFFiles/005037/ AG-726_Maximizing_the_Durability_of_Athletic_Fields.pdf

NFL Players Association (2010). 2010 NFL players playing surfaces opinion survey. Retrieved from http://www.stma.org/sites/ stma/files/pdfs/2010_NFL_Survey.pdf

Pavilonis, B.T., Weisel, C.P., Buckley, B., Lioy, P.J. (2014). Bioaccessibility and risk exposure to metals and SVOCs in artificial turf field fill materials and fibers. Risk Analysis, 34(1), 44–55.

Rappleye, H. (2014, October 8). How safe is the artificial turf your child plays on? NBC News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcnews. com/news/investigations/how-safe-artificial-turf-your-child-plays-n220166

Serensits, T.J., McNitt, A.S., & Petrunak, D.M. (2011). Human health issues on synthetic turf in the USA. Proceedings of the Institu- tion of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 225(3), 139–146.

Sheild, R. (2014, July). TCF Bank Stadium switches to grass for soccer match. Athletic Business. Retrieved from http://www. athleticbusiness.com/sports-media/tcf-bank-stadium-switches-to-grass-for-soccer-match.html

Simon, R. (2010, February). Review of the impacts of crumb rubber in artificial turf applications. University of California, Berke- ley, Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.syntheticturfcouncil.org/ resource/resmgr/docs/manex-uc_berkeley_crumb_rubb.pdf

Soligard, T., Bahr, R., & Andersen, T. E. (2010). Injury risk on artificial turf and grass in youth tournament football. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 22(3), 356–361.

Sportsturf Managers Association. (n.d.a). A guide to synthetic and natural turfgrass for sports fields. Retrieved from http://www. stma.org/natural-grass-resources

Sportsturf Managers Association. (n.d.b). Natural grass athletic fields. Retrieved from http://www.stma.org/natural-grass-resources State of New York Department of Health. (2008, August). Fact sheet: Crumb-rubber infilled synthetic turf athletic fields. Retrieved

from https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/outdoors/synthetic_turf/crumb-rubber_infilled/fact_sheet.htm Steinbach, P. (2014). Regular maintenance ensures synthetic turf performance. Athletic Business. Retrieved from http://www.

athleticbusiness.com/outdoor/regular-maintenance-ensures-synthetic-turf-performance.html Synthetic Turf Council. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.syntheticturfcouncil.org/?page=FAQs Turfgrass Producers International. (n.d.). Natural grass and artificial turf: Separating myths and facts. Retrieved from http://

turfgrasssod.org/pages/resources/natural-grass-vs-artificial-turf-information/?professional-resources Turfgrass Producers International. (2010, August). For artificial turf: The heat is on! Retrieved from http://www.turfgrasssod.org/

pages/professional-resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues Williams, S., Hume, P.A., & Kara, S. (2011). A review of football injuries on third and fourth generation artificial turfs compared

with natural grass. Sports Medicine, 41(11), 903–923. Williams, C.F. & Pulley, G.E. (2002). Synthetic surface heat studies. Retrieved from http://www.turfgrasssod.org/pages/professional-

resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues

 

http://marlborough.wickedlocal.com/assets/pdf/WL265181224.pdf
http://marlborough.wickedlocal.com/assets/pdf/WL265181224.pdf
http://www.epa.gov/nerl/download_files/documents/tire_crumbs.pdf
http://www.fieldturf.com/ru/artificial-turf/downloads?page=2
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/more-news/soccer-players-file-lawsuit-against-fifa-over-women-s-world-cup-turf.html
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/more-news/soccer-players-file-lawsuit-against-fifa-over-women-s-world-cup-turf.html
http://turffiles.ncsu.edu/PDFFiles/005037/AG-726_Maximizing_the_Durability_of_Athletic_Fields.pdf
http://turffiles.ncsu.edu/PDFFiles/005037/AG-726_Maximizing_the_Durability_of_Athletic_Fields.pdf
http://www.stma.org/sites/stma/files/pdfs/2010_NFL_Survey.pdf
http://www.stma.org/sites/stma/files/pdfs/2010_NFL_Survey.pdf
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/how-safe-artificial-turf-your-child-plays-n220166
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/how-safe-artificial-turf-your-child-plays-n220166
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/sports-media/tcf-bank-stadium-switches-to-grass-for-soccer-match.html
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/sports-media/tcf-bank-stadium-switches-to-grass-for-soccer-match.html
http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.syntheticturfcouncil.org/resource/resmgr/docs/manex-uc_berkeley_crumb_rubb.pdf
http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.syntheticturfcouncil.org/resource/resmgr/docs/manex-uc_berkeley_crumb_rubb.pdf
http://www.stma.org/natural-grass-resources
http://www.stma.org/natural-grass-resources
http://www.stma.org/natural-grass-resources
https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/outdoors/synthetic_turf/crumb-rubber_infilled/fact_sheet.htm
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/outdoor/regular-maintenance-ensures-synthetic-turf-performance.html
http://www.athleticbusiness.com/outdoor/regular-maintenance-ensures-synthetic-turf-performance.html
http://www.syntheticturfcouncil.org/?page=FAQs
http://turfgrasssod.org/pages/resources/natural-grass-vs-artificial-turf-information/?professional-resources
http://turfgrasssod.org/pages/resources/natural-grass-vs-artificial-turf-information/?professional-resources
http://www.turfgrasssod.org/pages/professional-resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues
http://www.turfgrasssod.org/pages/professional-resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues
http://www.turfgrasssod.org/pages/professional-resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues
http://www.turfgrasssod.org/pages/professional-resources/artificial-turf-heat-issues

Organizational Issues And Solutions

Organization: State Government Agencies

Area of Interest: Economy and Job

Why this issue hinders organizational efficiency: pay decreases performances, diversity is decrease. Less people willing to accept pay because of the workload

Organizational behavior is really the combination of four areas of study – psychology, social psychology, sociology, and anthropology.

While each of these areas involves an examination of people and their interactions, the focuses are quite different:

Psychology – studies the mind and how people make decisions.
Social Psychology – examines how people work in groups.
Sociology – explores how systems work within the organization.
Anthropology – examines how culture works within the organization.

Now, assume that you are an organizational consultant and have been asked by a new CEO to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the organization.

  • Of      the four areas of study listed above, which would you focus on first?
  • Make      sure to explain why you chose this area, and why it would take precedence      over the other areas

    ASSIGNMENT PREP

    COMPANY SELECTION

    AND SOURCES Due Week 3: 60 points

    There are three written assignments in the course, in which you will use the

    same organization to analyze the culture and make recommendations.

    Therefore, it is essential you start to think now about your company

    selection.

    Consider selecting a company you work for, a company a family member or

    friend works for, or a civic organization. To ensure your selection sets you

    up for success in all three assignments, be sure that your company:

    ▪ is one you are familiar and can draw on internal processes the public

    (outsider) is unaware

    ▪ has true issues that need to be resolved

    ▪ allows for realistic and enforceable solutions for the organization to

    be successful

     

    INSTRUCTIONS

    To complete this assignment, use the provided textbox in which you:

    1) Identify the company that you want to research for the three written

    assignments in the course.

    2) Describe the organizational issue in your chosen company.

    3) Explain why the issue hinders organizational efficiency.

     

     

    ASSIGNMENT 1

    ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES

    AND SOLUTIONS Due Week 4: 240 points

    Leaders address issues and propose solutions. As a leader, you’ll need to

    stay on top of events that may facilitate or hinder productivity. You must

    create and implement solutions to address these issues.

    This assignment exposes you to complex modern organizational

    challenges. The solutions you devise should reflect your learning and

    research of organizational and individual influences in the workplace.

     

    INSTRUCTIONS

    The new CEO has selected your consulting firm to give him/her an analysis

    of the organizational efficiency.

    Write a double-spaced 2 to 3 page paper in which you will present to the CEO

    your findings during your research steps. You must propose strategic

    solutions in your paper to include the following:

    1) Describe the Organization and the Issue to Resolve

    • Provide a brief description of the organization you selected.

    • Present the organizational issue that adversely affected

    productivity and that you, the consultant, will review and

    resolve.

    2) Analyze Current Corporate Culture

    • How has the current corporate culture facilitated the

    development of the current issue? Research the organization,

    dig into the culture, and analyze how it contributed to this issue.

    Hint: Review the mission and vision statements as well as the

    corporate website.

    3) Identify Areas of Weakness

    • What are the organization’s areas of weakness? Use your

    research on organizational behavior approaches to corporate

    culture, diversity, teamwork, and motivational strategies.

     

     

    4) Propose Solutions

    • What organizational practices would you modify? What

    solutions would you recommend to management? As the

    consultant you will identify the suggestions and solutions you

    would present to the organization’s leadership with regard to

    modifying current organizational practices to resolve the issue.

    5) References and Citations

    • Provide at least 2 quality resources such as the course

    textbook, company website, business websites (CNBC,

    Bloomberg, etc.), resources from the Strayer Library, and/or

    outside sources. Note: Wikipedia and web-based blogs do not

    qualify as credible resources.

    • In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting

    another source.

    6) Formatting and Writing Standards

    • Formatting and writing standards are part of your grade. Align

    your formatting to the Strayer Writing Standards.

     

    https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/STANDARDIZED/StrayerWritingStandards/Strayer_Writing_Standards.pdf

     

    *Grading for this assignment will be based on the following criteria and evaluation standards:

    POINTS: 240 ASSIGNMENT 1: ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS

    Criteria

    Exemplary

    100% – A

    Proficient

    85% – B

    Fair

    75% – C

    Unacceptable

    0% – F

    1. Describe the

    Organization and

    the Issue to

    Resolve

     

    Weight: 20%

    Fully describes the

    organization by providing a

    relevant and robust but

    concise overview of the

    company (e.g. when they

    were established, what

    service(s) or products they

    provide, and other relevant

    information). Additionally,

    the author fully describes the

    issue he/she has identified;

    what he/she knows about it

    and how it has impacted the

    company.

    Sufficiently describes the

    organization and provides

    details about the company.

    The issue is identified and

    the author sufficiently

    describes what he/she

    knows about it and its

    impact on the company.

    Partially describes the

    organization and provides

    some details about the

    company, but additional

    details would improve the

    description. The issue and

    its impact on the company

    are not clearly articulated.

    Does not describe the

    organization or provide

    details about the company.

    The issue and its impact on

    the company are not

    provided.

    2. Analyze

    Current Corporate

    Culture

    Weight: 20%

    Completely describes the

    company’s culture by

    detailing how the company

    positions itself from internal

    and external perspectives.

    Draws strong, logical

    connections about how the

    culture did or could have

    supported/facilitated the

    challenge. Makes direct

    connections and supports

    points with source material.

    Satisfactorily describes

    the company culture by

    drawing on and

    synthesizing corporate

    information about the

    company. Makes logical

    and realistic connections

    that are supported by

    source material.

    Partially describes the

    company’s culture. Lacks

    details and/or multiple

    sources are not utilized to

    provide a well-rounded

    perspective. Makes loose

    connections that were not

    supported by sources or

    that were not fully

    articulated.

    The culture is not

    described or the company

    is not differentiated

    completely from others.

    Poses unsupported

    connections or

    connections are not

    included.

    3. Identify Areas

    of Weakness

    Weight 20%

    Completely identifies areas

    of weakness and provides

    strong details with logical

    connections and supporting

    source material.

    Satisfactorily identifies

    areas of weakness and

    provides valid details

    supported by source

    material.

    Partially identifies areas of

    weakness and makes loose

    connections between the

    weaknesses and supporting

    material.

    Does not identify areas of

    weakness or does not

    provide supporting source

    material.

    4. Propose

    Solutions

    Weight 25%

    Completely describes

    modifications to

    organizational practices and

    provides solutions with

    strong connections and

    supporting source material.

    Logically details how the

    solutions will resolve issue.

    Satisfactorily describes

    modifications to

    organizational practices.

    Provides solutions that

    make some connections

    with supporting source

    material to indicate how

    the solutions will resolve

    the issue.

    Partially describes

    modifications to

    organizational practices and

    solutions to resolve the

    issues. Lacks supporting

    details and source material.

    Does not describe

    modifications to

    organizational practices,

    or does not identify

    solutions that would

    resolve the issue. No

    source material is

    provided.

    5. Reference

    minimums;

    Reference quality

    Weight 5%

    Meets or exceeds number of

    required references; all

    references high quality

    choices.

    Meets number of

    required references;

    some references may be

    poor quality choices.

    Does not meet the required

    number of references; some

    references may be poor

    quality choices.

    No references provided or

    all references poor quality

    choices.

    6. Follows writing

    standards;

    Meets page

    minimums

    Weight 10%

    Followed all writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed most writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed few writing

    standards.

    May not have met page

    minimums.

    Followed few to no writing

    standards.

    Did not meet page

    minimums.

     

     

    ASSIGNMENT 2

    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

    PROGRAM PROPOSAL Due Week 6: 240 points

    As you continue your consulting role, the next task is to deliver a

    professional development program to the CEO of your chosen organization.

    It is important that your program’s proposal be based on your research of

    emotional intelligence (EI) and specifically detail how a new incentive

    program, based on an EI management approach, will:

    ▪ foster teamwork,

    ▪ strengthen interpersonal relationships,

    ▪ enhance communication,

    ▪ increase overall performance, and

    ▪ benefit not only managers but the bottom-line.

     

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Create a double-spaced 5 to 7 page proposal that includes the following components:

    1) EI and Motivation

    • Which of the EI building blocks would impact management’s ability to

    enhance employee performance and job satisfaction?

    • Based on your research on motivational theory, describe how you

    would utilize positive or negative reinforcement to influence the

    members of the organization and resolve the issue. Provide examples

    to support your solution.

    2) EI and Social Skills and Decision Making

    • Explain how the core concepts of emotional intelligence would

    enhance the social skills and the decision-making efficacy of the

    management team.

    3) Effective Teams

    • Describe the core attributes of an effective team and the strategies

    you would implement to develop team dynamics that will benefit the

    organization.

     

     

    4) Reward Systems

    • Create an effective reward system for this organization. Determine

    the strategies you would incorporate to motivate employees and

    influence behavior.

    5) References and Citations

    • Provide at least 2 quality resources.

    • In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting another

    source.

    6) Formatting and Writing Standards

    • Formatting and writing standards are part of your grade. Align your

    formatting to the Strayer Writing Standards.

     

    https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/STANDARDIZED/StrayerWritingStandards/Strayer_Writing_Standards.pdf

     

    *Grading for this assignment will be based on the following criteria and evaluation standards:

    POINTS: 240 ASSIGNMENT 2: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL

    Criteria

    Exemplary

    100% – A

    Proficient

    85% – B

    Fair

    75% – C

    Unacceptable

    0% – F

    1. EI and

    Motivation

    Weight: 20%

    Fully describes how

    motivation and

    reinforcement would be

    used to influence members

    of the organization to

    resolve the issue. Draws

    compelling, logical

    connections between theory

    and solution. Examples are

    strong and support solution.

    Satisfactorily describes

    how motivation and

    reinforcement would be

    used to influence members

    of the organization to

    resolve the issue. Makes

    logical connections

    between theory and

    solution. Examples support

    solution.

    Partially describes how

    motivation and

    reinforcement would be

    used to influence members

    of the organization to

    resolve the issue. Makes

    loose connections between

    theory and solution.

    Examples do not fully

    support solution.

    The description does not

    address how motivation

    and reinforcement would

    be used to influence

    members of the

    organization to resolve the

    issue. Examples are not

    provided.

    2. EI and Social

    Skills and

    Decision Making

     

    Weight: 20%

    Fully describes how

    motivation and

    reinforcement would be

    used to influence members

    of the organization to

    resolve the issue. Draws

    compelling, logical

    connections between theory

    and solution. Examples are

    strong and support solution.

    Satisfactorily describes

    how motivation and

    reinforcement would be

    used to influence

    members of the

    organization to resolve

    the issue. Makes logical

    connections between

    theory and solution.

    Examples support

    solution.

    Partially explains how core

    concepts of emotional

    intelligence would enhance

    the social skills and the

    decision-making efficacy of

    the management team.

    Loose connections are

    made to support the

    relationship between EI and

    management’s skills.

    Application of research is

    minimal.

    The description does not

    explain how the core

    concepts of emotional

    intelligence would

    enhance the social skills

    and the decision-making

    efficacy of the

    management team.

    3. Effective

    Teams

    Weight 25%

    Completely describes the

    core attributes of an

    effective team. Strategies to

    develop team dynamics are

    strongly articulated and

    detailed. Benefits to the

    organization are logical and

    well supported.

    Satisfactorily describes

    the core attributes of an

    effective team.

    Strategies to develop

    team dynamics are

    articulated. Benefits to

    the organization are

    stated. Additional details

    and source support

    would improve the

    description.

    Partially describes the core

    attributes of an effective

    team. Strategies to develop

    team dynamics lack details

    and source support or are

    not fully articulated. Benefits

    to the organization are

    unclear.

    Does not describe the core

    attributes of an effective

    team or strategies to

    develop team dynamics.

    Benefits to organization

    are not presented.

    4. Reward

    Systems

    Weight 20%

    Creates an effective reward

    system and articulates well-

    thoughtout strategies to

    motivate employees to

    influence behavior. The

    connection between strategy

    and influence is strong and

    supported by source

    material.

    Creates an effective

    reward system and

    provides motivational

    strategies. Details and

    source material support

    how behavior would be

    influenced.

    Partially creates an effective

    reward system and

    articulates some

    motivational strategies.

    Supporting details are given

    but could be expanded to

    describe how behavior

    would be influenced.

    Application of research is minimal.

    Did not create an effective

    reward system or

    determine strategies to

    motivate employees to

    influence behavior.

    5. Reference

    minimums;

    Reference quality

    Weight 5%

    Meets or exceeds number of

    required references; all

    references high quality

    choices.

    Meets number of

    required references;

    some references may be

    poor quality choices.

    Does not meet the required

    number of references; some

    references may be poor

    quality choices.

    No references provided or

    all references poor quality

    choices.

    6. Follows writing

    standards;

    Meets page

    minimums

    Weight 10%

    Followed all writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed most writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed few writing

    standards.

    May not have met page

    minimums.

    Followed few to no writing

    standards.

    Did not meet page

    minimums.

     

     

    ASSIGNMENT 3

    POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE Due Week 9: 240 points

    In business, power and politics greatly influence an organizational

    culture in turn hinder organizational productivity. In your role as

    consultant you observed power and politics influence on the corporate

    culture.

     

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Create a double-spaced 5 to 7 page report that addresses the following:

    1) Influence of Politics and Power

    • Explain how politics and power-play may have influenced the

    organization’s culture.

    2) Sources of Power

    • Explore the sources of power and describe how management

    could use this influence to benefit your department and improve

    organizational performance.

    3) Leadership Behavior and Culture

    • Make recommendations that support how the study of power

    and politics could influence leadership behavior and improve

    the organization’s culture.

    4) Leadership Influence

    • Discuss the importance and complexity of leadership behavior.

    How does it influence organizational structure and

    performance?

    5) References and Citations

    • Provide at least 2 quality resources.

    • In-text citations are required when paraphrasing or quoting

    another source.

    6) Formatting and Writing Standards

    • Formatting and writing standards are part of your grade. Align

    your formatting to the Strayer Writing Standards.

     

    https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/STANDARDIZED/StrayerWritingStandards/Strayer_Writing_Standards.pdf

     

    *Grading for this assignment will be based on the following criteria and evaluation standards:

    POINTS: 240 ASSIGNMENT 3: POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE

    Criteria

    Exemplary

    100% – A

    Proficient

    85% – B

    Fair

    75% – C

    Unacceptable

    0% – F

    1. Influence of

    Politics and Power

    Weight: 20%

    Completely explains how

    politics and power-play may

    have influenced the

    organization’s culture.

    Accurately identifies the core

    issues and strongly

    connects them to the impact

    on culture. The explanation

    is well-supported by research.

    Satisfactorily explains how

    politics and power-play

    may have influenced the

    organization’s culture.

    Identifies some core

    issues and connects them

    to the impact on the

    culture. The explanation

    uses research support.

    Partially explains how

    politics and power-play may

    have influenced the

    organization’s culture.

    Identifies some issues but

    does not fully explore them

    or make a strong

    connection to their impact.

    Uses little research support.

    Does not explain how

    politics and power-play may

    have influenced the

    organization’s culture.

    2. Sources of

    Power

    Weight: 20%

    Completely identifies the

    sources of power and

    describes how management

    could use this influence to

    enhance organizational

    performance. Uses relevant

    key concepts and makes

    valid connections to

    enhanced performance that

    are well-supported by

    research.

    Satisfactorily identifies

    the sources of power

    and describes how

    management could use

    this influence to enhance

    organizational

    performance. Most key

    concepts are accurately

    identified and there is a

    connection to enhanced

    performance with

    research support.

    Partially identifies the

    sources of power and

    describes how management

    could use this influence to

    enhance organizational

    performance. Not all key

    concepts are identified and

    there is a loose connection

    to performance. There is

    little research support.

    Does not identify the

    sources of power or

    describe how

    management could use

    this influence to enhance

    organizational

    performance. There is no

    reference to research.

    3. Leadership

    Behavior and

    Culture

    Weight 25%

    Provides excellent

    recommendations as to how

    the study of power and

    politics could influence

    leadership behavior and

    impact the organization’s

    culture. Recommendations

    are credible and relevant

    with a strong connection to

    the impact on culture backed

    by well-supported research.

    Satisfactorily

    recommends how the

    study of power and

    politics could influence

    leadership behavior and

    impact the organization’s

    culture. Recommenda-

    tions are clear and

    mostly realistic; there is a

    connection to the impact

    on culture. Research

    support is evident.

    Partially recommends how

    the study of power and

    politics could influence

    leadership behavior and

    impact the organization’s

    culture, but the

    recommendations are

    unclear or unrealistic. There

    is no clear connection to the

    impact on culture. There is

    little or no research support.

    Does not recommend how

    the study of power and

    politics could influence

    leadership behavior and

    impact the organization’s

    culture. There is no

    reference to research.

    4. Leadership

    Influence

    Weight 20%

    Thoroughly discusses how

    the importance and

    complexity of leadership

    behavior influences

    organizational structure and

    performance. Relevant key

    concepts are presented with

    strong research support.

    Satisfactorily discusses

    how the importance and

    complexity of leadership

    behavior influences

    organizational structure

    and performance. Most

    key concepts are

    presented with research

    support.

    Partially discusses how the

    importance and complexity

    of leadership behavior

    influences organizational

    structure and performance.

    Some key concepts are

    missing and there is little or

    no research support.

    Does not discuss how the

    importance and

    complexity of leadership

    behavior influences

    organizational structure

    and performance. There is

    no reference to research.

    5. Reference

    minimums;

    Reference quality

    Weight 5%

    Meets or exceeds number of

    required references; all

    references high quality

    choices.

    Meets number of

    required references;

    some references may be

    poor quality choices.

    Does not meet the required

    number of references; some

    references may be poor

    quality choices.

    No references provided or

    all references poor quality

    choices.

    6. Follows writing

    standards;

    Meets page

    minimums

    Weight 10%

    Followed all writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed most writing

    standards.

    Met page minimums.

    Followed few writing

    standards.

    May not have met page

    minimums.

    Followed few to no writing

    standards.

    Did not meet page

    minimums.

     

     

    • ASSIGNMENT PREP
      • COMPANY SELECTION AND SOURCES
        • INSTRUCTIONS
    • ASSIGNMENT 1
      • ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS
        • INSTRUCTIONS
          • 1) Describe the Organization and the Issue to Resolve
          • 2) Analyze Current Corporate Culture
          • 3) Identify Areas of Weakness
          • 4) Propose Solutions
          • 5) References and Citations
          • 6) Formatting and Writing Standards
    • ASSIGNMENT 2
      • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROPOSAL
        • INSTRUCTIONS
          • 1) EI and Motivation
          • 2) EI and Social Skills and Decision Making
          • 3) Effective Teams
          • 4) Reward Systems
          • 5) References and Citations
          • 6) Formatting and Writing Standards
    • ASSIGNMENT 3
      • POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE
        • INSTRUCTIONS
          • 1) Influence of Politics and Power
          • 2) Sources of Power
          • 3) Leadership Behavior and Culture
          • 4) Leadership Influence
          • 5) References and Citations
          • 6) Formatting and Writing Standards