Planning Reports And Proposals Job Aid

Develop a one-page job aid that highlights best practices and provides procedural steps for planning reports and proposals.

Choose a format for the job aid that is easy to read and reference, such as a list of steps, a flow chart, an infographic, or other appropriate format.

Include information, with approximately 60-word explanations, about the following in your job aid:

  • Types of reports and proposals
  • Role of primary research and secondary research
  • Writing process
  • Choosing the appropriate medium
  • Organization strategies
  • Graphic design strategies

Creating A Standards-Based Lesson Plan

Professional growth in developing effective lessons and lesson plans comes with practice. This assignment provides the opportunity to connect the multiple elements of lesson planning into a single document.

For this benchmark, use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to create a standards-based lesson plan for a K-8 grade level. Complete all sections of the lesson plan template. You may use previous work from this course as a starting point for this lesson plan, incorporating feedback received from your mentor teacher.

Your lesson plan should include the following:

  • Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping: Summarize the “Class Profile” and use this information to direct the differentiation throughout the lesson plan.
  • National/State Learning Standards: May be based on the standard selected for the Topic 2 assignment.
  • Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives: Objective written in Topic 2 to inform this section may be used.
  • Academic Language: List any vocabulary students will need to learn for full understanding of the lesson.
  • Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology: Lesson must integrate digital tools and resources into the instruction and assessments.
  • Anticipatory Set: Include pre-assessment or required knowledge student will need to be prepared to learn.
  • Multiple Means of Representation: Include at least two of the models or strategies previously discussed, along with a thorough explanation of how the chosen model/strategy would apply to the lesson. The Topic 4 assignment may be used to inform this section.
  • Multiple Means of Engagement: Topic 5 assignment may be used to inform this section. Specify how instruction would be adapted to diverse students, based on an understanding of how elementary students differ in their development and approaches to learning.
  • Multiple Means of Expression: Include formative and summative assessments to plan, evaluate, and strengthen your instruction. Include technology resources in at least one assessment. Label each assessment as formative or summative as indicated in the lesson plan template.
  • Extension Activity and/or Homework: Topic 5 assignment may be used to inform this section.

Rationale/Reflection: In 250-500 words, answer the following questions:

  • How do the instructional models you chose for the lesson meet the diverse learning needs of the students on the “Class Profile”?
  • How does the instruction and assessment meet the developmental needs of students and strengthen future instructional decisions?
  • How do the technological resources you selected engage students and support your assessment practices?

Support your reflection with 2-3 resources.

Running head: Aligned learning activities and differentiation 1

 

Aligned learning activities and differentiation 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aligned learning activities and differentiation

ELM-210

Vanessa Gonzalez

11.17.19

 

 

 

 

 

Learning activity – Group learning activity.

 

Student #1  
Class Grade: Grade level 3 Academic Standard: Solve mathematical problems and problems in the actual world that involve the perimeter of polygons.
Learning Objective: Students should be able to calculate the perimeter of different polygons when all the side lengths are given. In addition, students should be able to find the side length of a polygon when the perimeter is given.  
Aligned Learning Activity Divide students into small groups and issuing questions that they are supposed to collaboratively solve. Ensure that the student is actively engaging in the group discussion to ensure he better understands the topic. This should be kind of a cross age peer tutoring whereby the student that is proficient on perimeter teaches the one that is not (Goldenfeld, 2016).  
Student from Class Profile and

Brief Description of

Differentiation

Based on the class profile, the student is a slow leaner and therefore he requires much more time to comprehend what is taught in class. As result, he needs more practice in order to be at par with other fellow students.  
Home Extension Activity Watch the a video using the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CA5O69Fv9NY and answer the six questions that will be provided at the end of the lesson.

 

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 

Student #2  
Class Grade: Grade level 3 Academic Standard: Solve mathematical problems and problems in the actual world that involve the perimeter of polygons.
Learning Objective: Students should be able to calculate the perimeter of different polygons when all the side lengths are given. In addition, students should be able to find the side length of a polygon when the perimeter is given.  
Aligned Learning Activity Grouping the student with other gifted students. Extensive research indicates that when gifted students work together in groups, their academic achievement is boosted because they are able to challenge themselves in ways that are unexpected (Plucker, 2016).  
Student from Class Profile and

Brief Description of

Differentiation

This is a gifted student that has high performance capability. She is a fast learner and she requires greater challenging tasks to enhance her knowledge.  
Home Extension Activity Construct compound shapes and measure the side lengths then find the perimeter. The compound shapes should have more than seven side lengths.

 

 

Student #3  
Class Grade: Grade level 3 Academic Standard: Solve mathematical problems and problems in the actual world that involve the perimeter of polygons.
Learning Objective: Students should be able to calculate the perimeter of different polygons when all the side lengths are given. In addition, students should be able to find the side length of a polygon when the perimeter is given.  
Aligned Learning Activity The student should be allowed to choose a group where he is comfortable. Through, this he will be able to pick a group whereby he is comfortable in engaging. After the group work, the student should be asked to present what was discussed during the group time.  
Student from Class Profile and

Brief Description of

Differentiation

The student is neither a gifted student or a slow learner but he is an introvert and shy thus he rarely participates in group work.  
Home Extension Activity Watch the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sQ3dqhLsIw in order to understand how the side lengths are found when the perimeter is given. The student should present his findings at the beginning of the next class.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Goldenfeld, N. (2018). Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group. CRC Press.

Plucker, J. A., & Peters, S. J. (2016). Excellence Gaps in Education: Expanding Opportunities for Talented Students. Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Modern Dance Techniques

this is due in 12 hours….. must have done in 12 hours…..

Please read all the info below:

 

Modern Dance Techniques

03GRAHAMSS-slide-JZCQ-superJumbo.jpg

Although modern dance was born out of rebellion against ballet, several modern dance artists and teachers codified their movement vocabulary much like ballet had hundred of years before. Codification means a group of movement exercises and phrases were to developed to teach in a class-like structure that had set choreography and counts in a progression that would prepare you for performance in that style of dance. Here are the major classical modern techniques to give you a clearer idea of what this means:

Duncan technique (Isadora Duncan)

Duncan dance actually has strong technique.  Much time is devoted to learning technique.  Duncan dancers are trained to move in a particular way.  As Julia Levien recalled of her own training, “Your knee must be turned out.  Your hips must be thrust forward.  Your breathing must be in certain cadence.  Nothing was left to chance.”  One must have strong and flexible ankles, mobility of the pelvis, and fluidity of the arms.

The difference between ballet and Duncan dance is that, in ballet, the audience is supposed to see the technique.  The technique and the style become one.  In Duncan dance — when performed properly — the technique is invisible.  As Isadora wrote, technique is a means rather than an end in itself.  Technique functions as a support for style.  Hortense Kooluris put it simply, “If you can see the technique, it is not Duncan dance.”  Duncan dance appears free flowing, natural, and spontaneous (a style based upon classical Greek art), but it is only long practice with the underlying technique that allows it to do so.

Duncan Dance Principles: Duncan dance is free-flowing and appears spontaneous; has a sense of energy and grace that radiates from the solar plexus; reflects the rhythms of nature; is danced to the great classical music; and is a state of mind as much as a style of movement.

Humphrey technique (Doris Humphrey)

Doris Humphrey, like her contemporary Martha Graham, was interested in making dance more reflective of modern times. In collaboration with Charles Weidman, she developed the concept of fall and recovery—using the pattern of breath to inform movement. She was José Limón’s teacher and mentor, and though she wasn’t interested in creating a technique, her ideas became part of what is today known as Limón technique.

Community Dance Class, Limon/Humphrey Principles, 8-30-15 (Links to an external site.) from Rachel Carrico (Links to an external site.) on Vimeo (Links to an external site.).

Limon technique (Jose Limon)

The technique is based on principles of weight, fall, and recovery as established by Jose lemon and his mentors, Doris Humphrey and Charles Weidman. It focuses on the movement of breath through the body, the dynamic use of weight in each body part, and the fluid succession of one movement into the next.

Graham technique (Martha Graham)

Since the purpose of dance is to translate emotional experience in physical form, in the Graham technique, every movement must have a clear and perceivable meaning. This does not mean the movements must be realistic, only that the stylization must be meaningful and recognizable to the viewer as well as to the performer. Graham was clear on this principle: “Everything that a dancer does, even in the most lyrical thing, has a definite and prescribed meaning” (Mazo, 1977, p. 189). Further, she believed that the clear training of the dancer gave a freedom to the dancer’s ability to express the emotions and ideas of the choreographer. In Graham’s own words, training was the key to articulation: “If you have no form, after a certain length of time you become inarticulate. Your training only gives you freedom” (Mazo, 1977, p. 157). Thus the rigor of your training was all part of the purpose of the art form – and Graham believed in rigorous training! Her demand for total discipline and attention during class, and her anger when this was not accorded her, are well documented. While the movements in the technique itself are not natural gestures, they are artificial ones; the inner commitment to them and the emotional sincerity of the dancers presenting them are entirely real.

According to Martha Graham’s philosophy, movement is generated from three places: the action of contraction and release, the pelvis, and the emotional inner self. The contraction, or strong pulling back and curving of the torso, and the release of this movement by returning to a straight torso are symbolic of the dichotomies in life. It is the contrast between desire and duty, between fear and courage, between weakness and strength.

Horton technique (Lester Horton)

In the 1920s, ’30s and ’40s, dancer/choreographer Lester Horton developed a dance technique based on Native American dances, anatomical studies and other movement influences. Horton’s technique isn’t limited to a concept of one or two movements and their contrasts. The technique is dynamic and dramatic, develops both strength and flexibility, and works with an energy that is constantly in motion. The primary focus of many beginner-level Horton studies is creating length in the spine and hamstrings. There is also an emphasis throughout all levels on developing musicality and performance qualities. As students progress, exercises become longer and more complex. Horton uses flat backs and lateral stretches, tilt lines and lunges, all movements that could be found in a jazz warm-up. (Horton technique also incorporates lyrical, circular movements focusing on stretching in opposite directions.)
Outside of the classroom, students can look to graphic design, typography and architecture for a sense of the clean, clear lines emphasized in Horton technique. For example, there is a body position titled ‘Lateral T’ that looks like a big, block letter T: Fernando-7-Latreral-T-Horton-tech.jpgEnjoy this video of a fellow dancer, Iquail, who I danced with in undergraduate school, talk about teaching Horton to any and every BODY.

Dunham technique (Katherine Dunham)

Katherine Dunham, anthropologist and dancer, was a pioneer in both the modern and jazz dance genres. Dunham was a rebel among rebels. Unlike other modern dance creators who eschewed classical ballet, Dunham embraced it as a foundation for her technique. But what set her work even further apart from Martha Graham and José Limón was her fusion of that foundation with Afro-Caribbean styles. This created an entirely original technique characterized by classical lines, a torso capable of both isolations and undulations, and utilization of a wider range of tempos and rhythmical styles than most other Western concert dance forms of the time. In addition, Dunham made great strides for African American entertainers and artists on the Hollywood film stage, which will be discussed in a later module.

The video below shows diverse dancing bodies practicing Dunham technique

Cunningham technique (Merce Cunningham)

This technique is rigorous, and is designed to create strength and flexibility—of both body and mind,” he says. “You have to be alert and focused in class.” Cunningham technique challenges a dancer’s ability to change direction within the body and in space, so explore your internal sense of direction as you move through a day. Observe the sensations that occur in the body as you round corners and make sudden changes of direction. Take note of how those changes impact your sense of self and your relationship to the space around you.

A strong sense of one’s spine is an integral part of Cunningham technique, which explores the way that the back works either in opposition to the legs or in unison with them. Space is also an important factor, as is a sense of direction. In his choreography and class exercises, Cunningham developed a way of referencing “front” so that dancers don’t think about movement in terms of moving toward a point in space (most often, facing the audience), but rather in terms of where each individual body is facing.

(Watch as much as you’d like)

——————————————————————-

Assignment from the above info and info from the web

Briefly describe the key concepts/principles of each of the techniques listed in the lecture.

Choose two technique creators (Duncan, Humphrey, Limon, Horton, Dunham, or Cunningham) and, via a YouTube search, find a piece choreographed by each of them (i.e: “Mother” choreographed by Duncan” and “The Beloved” by Lester Horton). Name the choreographers, title of the pieces, and the year in which they were choreographed in your writing. You will discuss how the creation of their techniques are reflected in their creative work. Are the defining principles of the technique obvious in their choreography? Do these technical concepts aid in the emotional quality of the performance or no? Compare and contrast the two choreographies/pioneers.

*Please use movement analysis support from watching the videos along with the lecture information.

Presentation Of Assessment Plan

Presentation of Assessment Plan

Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan

What can you accomplish with your new knowledge of assessment and evaluation in higher education?

Upon completion of this course, you will be able to utilize your knowledge of assessment and evaluation in a position in higher or adult education, either now or in the future. Those who can plan and implement assessment effectively are in demand, for assessment is necessary to establish accountability and to generate improvement in education. Accordingly, your course project is to consist of two components. The first is a real-world, on-the-job presentation of a practical plan that you are encouraged to propose for implementation either in your current position or in the future. The second component of your course project is a paper that explains your rationale for the decisions you made as you designed your plan.

For the presentation of your Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan, convert the plan, compiled from your Unit 6 and Unit 8 assignments and Units 8 and 9 discussions, into a PowerPoint or a Kaltura presentation. Create the presentation for a specific audience, such as a committee, an advisory board or a board of directors, or staff or faculty attending a department meeting. Be sure to follow the instructions for constructing the presentation carefully, for this is to be a professional presentation.

In the second component of your course project, the Rationale Paper, you will explain and support the decisions you made for your Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan. This Rationale Paper should begin with an introduction that explains the meaning and value of assessment, examines common misconceptions about assessment, and presents strategies for engaging faculty or staff members in assessment efforts. You will use your Unit 3 assignment to create the content of this introduction. The remaining sections of the paper will align with the sections of the Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan, providing a rationale for what you propose in each section of your plan. Remember that the purpose of presenting your plan is to convince the decision-makers in your audience to consider implementing your plan. Both components of your course project are to be well supported by the required course readings, because when we develop assessment, we establish our credibility by using and citing authoritative sources.

Instructions

Submit the following as your course project:

Component 1: Presentation of Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan

Create slides to present the content below. You have already developed most content throughout this course; be sure to incorporate instructor feedback on previous assignments as you make needed revisions and convert the content to PowerPoint slides. Include talking points, either by posting them in the comments section under each slide OR by recording them directly on the slides, to represent what you will be speaking during the presentation. Use a format appropriate for a PowerPoint presentation (see the Resources) as you develop the following content:

  • An introduction of the program, course, department, or experience for which you are proposing this assessment plan. The introduction is also to present an explanation of the Assessment and Evaluation Cycle for your plan to assess learning outcomes.
  • The learning goals that students or trainees are to achieve.
  • The means of measuring achievement of the goals (assessment instruments, each of which is clearly related to the respective goals that they are intended to measure).
  • The standards and/or targets used to define successful achievement.
  • The internal and external stakeholders and their roles in the assessment effort.
  • The steps needed to plan and develop the assessment effort before its actual implementation (the action plan).
  • Proposed strategies to disseminate the results of the assessment.
  • The connection of the assessment effort to the effectiveness of the program, department, or institution and its applicability to accreditation.
  • Proposed strategies to use the results of the assessment to create improvements.
  • Proposed strategies to build a culture of assessment.
  • References used and cited in the presentation. Please note: List only references which were cited in the presentation, either on the slides or in the talking points.
Component 2: Rationale Paper

The paper, the second of the two major components of your course project, is to include the sections below. You have already developed most of the content throughout the units of this course. Your explanations must be well supported by the required course readings, because when we develop assessment, we establish our credibility by using and citing authoritative sources.

  • Title page. For a refresher on how to format the title page, if needed, refer to the APA Style and Format Campus page (linked in the Resources).
  • Table of Contents.
  • An introduction that explains the meaning and value of assessment, examines common misconceptions about assessment, and presents strategies for engaging faculty or staff members in assessment efforts. (Use your Unit 3 assignment as the basis for the content of this introduction.)
  • The remaining sections of the paper are to use the same headings as you used for the sections of your presentation of your Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan. Each section is to provide a rationale for what you propose in each section of your plan.
  • References used and cited in the paper (minimum of six sources). Please note: List only references that were cited in the presentation, either on the slides or in the talking points.

Review both components of your course project for writing and APA formatting errors prior to submission. Errors should not appear in graduate-level assignments. Moreover, be sure to review the instructions and scoring guide to self-assess your work prior to submission.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Submission Requirements

Your final assignment is to meet the following requirements:

  • PowerPoint presentation:Effectively designed slides to present the components of the Assessment and Evaluation of Learning Plan. Refer to Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations (provided in the Resources) for best practices.
  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • Length:
    • Presentation: 12–15 slides, each with talking points suitable for an audience during a live presentation, and an additional slide containing references. Handouts are optional.
    • Rationale paper: 7–10 pages.
  • Font and font size:
    • Presentation: Appropriate for a PowerPoint presentation to the intended audience.
    • Rationale paper: Times New Roman, 12 points.Running head: STAKEHOLDERS AND ACTION PLAN 1

       

       

      STAKEHOLDERS AND ACTION PLAN 6

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Stakeholders and Action Plan

      Student’s name

      Institution

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      Stakeholders and Action Plan

      Stakeholders are people involved in the assessment process, and this case, they could be involved in the testing process, test-takers, admission process, administrations, guiding, as well as learning. During the assessment, the stakeholders are divided into two, and that is internal and external. External stakeholders are those that work outside the firm, while internal are those found within the firm.

      Internal stakeholders

      Internal stakeholders mean those people working or directly involved in the assessment within the institution. The assessment mainly deals with admission at Strayer University, and therefore, those working in the institution, and are facilitating admission. Some of the internal stakeholders involved in the assessment include institution management, learners, and teachers. The management assesses if all activities carried out according to the plans while evaluating the success of the program. Besides, the administration play critical role since it does not only support but also deal with challenges that are likely to affect the process (Suskie, 2014).

      Additionally, during the assessment, the learners are also involved. The learners’ performance in their studies and behavioral conduct is used to gauge the level of assessment success. Teachers, on the other hand, play a vital role in assessment since they engage and looks at their progress in terms of influencing a difference towards the students. Therefore, the teachers at Stayer University conducts an assessment, and they use different strategies as well as processes for the evaluation. It’s upon the teachers to assess the learning goals, and this involves assessing if the students understand the school culture in terms of rules & regulations as well as relating with other students and teachers. The teachers need to assess if the admission was successful, and every admitted student is free from problems that come along when one is in a new environment.

      External

      Apart from internal stakeholders, there are also external stakeholders involved in the assessment and evaluation plan. Some of the external stakeholders include curriculum assessment administrators. Curriculum assessment administrator is in charge of developing as well as improving school curriculum via the several assessments. An assessment administrator normally has experience in classroom teaching and working as an education administrator of a specific region. Therefore, the assessment administrator assesses the enrollment of the learners was conducted in the university and services delivered during the entire admission. In this case, he or she does not only focus on the work of the teachers or staff involved but also the role played by the institution management in the entire process.

      The assessment administrator focuses on improving the learning outcome, or the intended goal of the activity carried out by the school. In this, the intended outcome was to have a smooth enrollment of the students and ensure they are free from issues that could affect their relationship with the new environment. In most cases, the administrator already represents the curriculum assessment administrator works on behalf of the government, which acts as the external stakeholder. During the assessment, the administrator looks if the school or the institution utilized the outlined or specified way of enrolling the students. During the evaluation, both internal and external stakeholders must assess the risk of students dropping out after admission, and this will be achievable by looking at the self-concept and personality in general.

      Rationale for stakeholders

      The stakeholders play a vital role in the assessment process. Therefore all the involved stakeholders are included in the assessment process the criteria for selecting the stakeholders is by checking which people are directly affected by the activity carried out. Students, for instance, are the primary stakeholders since they are the ones admitted to the university. The curriculum assessment administrator, on the other hand, as external stakeholders are the only person who can confirm if indeed the institution is adhering to the standards set by the ministry of education in the country.

      Action Plan to Guide Implementation

      After identifying the stakeholders, it is critical to understand the steps that are followed during the assessment. Assessment is a continuous process, and it involves moving from one point to the other and a constant cycle of improvement. Therefore, it commences with identifying a conceptualization of the intended goal or objective. The individual or party carrying out the assessment must set their goal they wish to achieve before implementing the assessment (Braskamp & Engberg, 2014). The next activity or step is describing how the outcomes will be measured and assessed. The team or the person identifies the means of gauging the findings, and check if they have been achieved according to the plans or not. The next step will be description of the results obtained from the measures (Suskie, 2015). At this step, the party involved in the assessment needs to identify the best way of looking at the data obtained and identify the results that indicate the success of the assessment. Apart from that, the team must also describe how the results validate the practices carried out or point to the changes required to improve student learning.

      The team involved need to ask themselves what they want the students to know during the admission process and the next is how to identify the students are achieving the projected learning outcome. Before the implementation of the assessment, there is a need to develop a proper structure to guarantee the self-sustaining process (Missouri State, 2019).

      “Rationale for Action Plan,”

      The rationale for guiding the action plan is simply driven by the intended goal and the type of assessment. The steps address explicitly specific activity carried out by the individual or the team. The steps must be promising to address the intended goal, and the results need to be measured and analyzed.

      Closing loop

      The above assessment plan is quite effective since it looks it gives priority to the learning goal of the admission process. The stakeholders involved, therefore, need to keep on reexamining the end goal or intended objective admission. Assessment must consequently focus on measuring the learners learning outcomes after they enroll in the school program. Gathering of data is essential since it helps the assessment team to make meaning out of the obtained data. As a result, after the implementation of the assessment, the institution will be able to identify if the students admitted have accomplished or learned the intended goal.

       

       

       

       

       

       

      References

      Suskie, L. (2014, March 17). What is good assessment? A second look [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.lindasuskie.com/apps/blog/show/41934533-what-is-good-assessment-a-second-look

      Suskie, L. (2015, March 23). Setting meaningful benchmarks or standards [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.lindasuskie.com/apps/blog/show/43191428-setting-meaningful-benchmarks-or-standards

      Braskamp, L. A., & Engberg, M. E. (2014). Guidelines for judging the effectiveness of assessing student learning [PDF]. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/BraskampGuidelines.pdf

      Missouri State. (2019). The Assessment Process. Retrieved from https://www.missouristate.edu/assessment/the-assessment-process.htm