Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis for Sam. For any diagnosis that you choose, be sure to concisely explain how Sam fits that diagnostic criteria.

What is it truly like to have a mental illness? By considering clients’ lived experiences, a social worker becomes more empathetic and therefore better equipped to treat them. In this Discussion, you analyze a case study focused on a depressive disorder or bipolar disorder using the steps of differential diagnosis. You also describe lived experiences of depression.

To prepare: View the TED Talk “Depression, the Secret We Share” (TED Conferences, LLC, 2013) and compare the description of Andrew Solomon’s symptoms to the criteria for depressive disorders in the DSM-5. Next review the steps in diagnosis detailed in the Morrison (2014) reading, and then read “The Case of Sam,” considering Sam against the various DSM-5 criteria for depressive disorders and bipolar disorders.

By Day 3

Post a 300- to 500-word response in which you address the following:

  • Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis for Sam. For any diagnosis that you choose, be sure to concisely explain how Sam fits that diagnostic criteria. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, medical needs, and the Z codes (other conditions that may be a focus of clinical attention). Keep in mind a diagnosis covers the most recent 12 months.
  • Explain the diagnosis by matching the symptoms identified in the case to the specific criteria for the diagnosis.
  • Recommend a specific evidence-based measurement instrument to validate the diagnosis and assess outcomes of treatment.
  • Describe your treatment recommendations, including the type of treatment modality and whether or not you would refer the client to a medical provider for psychotropic medications.

Describe the Identifying Information; Reason for Referral/Presenting Concern; Medical/psych History; Presentation of Self/ MSE; Social History & Family History; Diagnostic Impressions, Treatment Recommendations; and, Summary of Findings.

Do not respond to do this if you cant meet the qualifications. I will know by looking at the assessment and if you used the clinician’s thesaurus per assignment.

In order to do this assignmjent you must have knowledge on doing a child/adolescent initial assessment.

Must also have a clinician’s thesaurus to do assignment its a must. Pages in assignment need to be 8-9 pgs.

 

Select a child or adolescent character from a major motion picture with an identifiable diagnosis or syndrome (Which I chose the movie What’s Eating Gilbert Grape- Character Arnie).

 

  • Identify the character and context.
  • Describe the Identifying Information; Reason for Referral/Presenting Concern; Medical/psych History; Presentation of Self/ MSE; Social History & Family History; Diagnostic Impressions, Treatment Recommendations; and, Summary of Findings.
  • Other headings that address unique aspects of your client should be added. By reading the report one needs get a clear idea of contributing factors, how it affects the client’s interpersonal relationships, daily functioning, general approach in life, etc.
  • If you were the therapist how would you intervene? What treatment goals would you recommend? What intervention would you recommend meeting these goals? (Use the Clinician’s Thesaurus!)See attached for furthur instructions on what professor wants in this assignment

    No grammar errors or plagerism and read over paper so it makes sense and followed guidelines..

    Any questions please ask

Describe the implementation of a research study and address various elements of the methodology such as description of the target population, recruitment strategies, ethical considerations, procedures for data collection and steps planned for data analysis.

In this section of the methodology, you will describe how you will collect data, the instruments used to collect the data, and how the data once collected will be prepared for interpretation and analysis

Note: Developing a research proposal requires specific steps that need to be executed in a sequence. The assessments in this course are presented in sequence and must be completed in order. You cannot submit more than one assignment at a time. Subsequent submissions should include highlighted changes.

SHOW LESS

It is the job of the scientific investigator to identify new areas of inquiry and to identify ways that we can go about gaining new knowledge about these questions.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 2: Apply theoretical and research findings from the discipline of psychology to professional and academic activities.

Describe the methodology and expected findings of a proposed research study and determine whether it is a qualitative or a quantitative method in relation to the research question.

Describe the purpose of a research study and connect the purpose to the research question.

Describe a target population that represents a sample of the general population in a way that respects diversity (for example, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, gender, et cetera).

Describe a recruitment strategy that balances natural diversity against the need for data simplification.

Discuss the potential contribution of the proposed research study considering pertinent stakeholders and support argument of expected results with current literature.

Describe the application of theoretical and research knowledge to the evaluation of a proposed research study outcomes.

Describe the implementation of a research study and address various elements of the methodology such as description of the target population, recruitment strategies, ethical considerations, procedures for data collection and steps planned for data analysis.

Summarize the expected results.

Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and standards of psychology to academic and professional activities.

Apply ethical principles and standards of psychology to the research proposal.

Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological profession.

Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines; writing is concise and well-organized.

Preparation

As the project develops, the research question and theory of method and theory of content should be highlighted in the chapter submissions.

In this section of the methodology, you will describe how you will collect data, the instruments used to collect the data, and how the data once collected will be prepared for interpretation and analysis. Refer to the APA manual, pages 29–32, for detailed instructions as to how to complete this section.

Instructions

Use the appropriate template (qualitative or quantitative) to complete this assessment.

Submit CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY and CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED RESULTS for feedback and grading. As you draft your methodology, make sure that you articulate the guidelines of the profession that are applicable to the ethical conduct in research practice. The following components should be included because they provide context for the grading of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4:

Table of Contents.

Title Page.

Chapter headings (should start on new page). Subheadings.

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.

CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW in draft form.

Note: Including these first two chapters is optional, but you may include them for the sake of formatting.

CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY. (Refer to the appropriate template for required subheadings.)

CHAPTER 4. EXPECTED RESULTS.

Subheadings.

Additional Requirements

Format your assessment as follows, using the appropriate template:

Font and spacing: Times New Roman, 12 point font, double-spaced pages. Title Page.

Style and format: Follow the current APA guidelines for style and format.

Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on similarities and differences among the five types of group counseling. 

Please no plagiarism and make sure you are able to access all resource on your own before you bid. One of the references must come from Corey, M. S., Corey, G., & Corey, C. (2018). You are expected to include at least one scholarly and peer-reviewed resource outside of those provided in the readings for each discussion post. I need this completed by 06/07/18 at 6pm.

Assignment: Types of Groups

Groups are an excellent choice for helping people change. Some groups are relatively short term and designed to meet the needs of specific populations, while others are focused on interpersonal learning and may be less structured. The group leader must be knowledgeable about the various types of groups, the strengths and limitations of each, and the unique leadership skills and training required to lead each type of group. Unlike a classroom setting, where the emphasis is on the acquisition of knowledge, a counseling group is organized to help people solve problems and make personal changes. While psychoeducation groups typically include a curriculum and an educational component, the interpersonal relationships formed during the group are an integral part of the process. Strategies and interventions for the work of the group are based on a scholar-practitioner model and utilize empirical evidence from the research.

For this Assignment, you will compare and contrast the five types of counseling groups presented in this week’s Learning Resources.

To prepare:

· Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on similarities and differences among the five types of group counseling.

· Download the document Types of Group Work from the Learning Resources and use this document to complete this Assignment.

The Assignment:

· Complete the chart in the Types of Group Work document, comparing the five types of group work along the criteria presented. Be sure to include an APA cover page with your table.

Required Resources

Readings

Corey, M. S., Corey, G., & Corey, C. (2018). Groups: Process and practice (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.

· Chapter 1, “Introduction to Group Work: A Multicultural Perspective”

· Please read the entire chapter this week including a review of pp. 6–12, which you read in Week 1.

Champe, J., & Rubel, D. J. (2012). Application of focal conflict theory to psychoeducational groups: Implications for process, content, and leadership. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 37(1), 71–90. doi:10.1080/01933922.2011.632811

Furr, S. R. (2000). Structuring the group experience: A format for designing psychoeducational groups, The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25(1), 29–49. doi: 10.1080/01933920008411450

Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018d). Differentiating group counseling [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 5 minutes.

In this video, Walden faculty discuss how group work differs from individual counseling.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018b). Cohort group proposal project part I [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.

In this video, faculty members Dr. Jeannie Falkner and Dr. Tomeka McGee introduce the course project, a group proposal. They also provide personal context and experience on the challenges and opportunities of working in cohort groups.

Accessible player  –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

Optional Resources

· Orht, J. H., Ener, E., Porter, J., & Young, T. L. (2014). Group leader reflections on their training and experience: Implications for group counselor educators and supervisors. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 39(2), J 95–124. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2014.883004

· Rubel, D. J. & Kline, W. B. (2008). An exploratory study of expert group leadership. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 33(2), 138–160.

· Stockton, R. (2010). The art and science of group counseling. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 35(4), 324–330. doi: 10.1080/01933922.2010.515904