Write a 800-word essay with three main sections: a) summarize the article and problem, b) discuss your thoughts on any management or motivation theory you think could be applied to the issue.

/in /by

 

Case Studies: Find a real world  article related to a healthcare issue.

Trade Magazines and Journals are preferred as the source for your articles. Check your professional trade journal for ideas: Journal of the American Medical Association, American Public Health Journal, etc. Another example is the trade magazine for Long Term Care is “The Provider,” their website ishttp://www.providermagazine.com/Links to an external site.

You can also download articles from news websites such as the Wall Street Journal or PBS (health sections). The IU library available through SHARC (link under Course Home) may also be a good source. A good source for discussion of health issues is the journal Health Affairs.

Write a 800-word essay with three main sections: a) summarize the article and problem, b) discuss your thoughts on any management or motivation theory you think could be applied to the issue.  For example, you may think that Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs could apply to the situation, or the Hawthorne effect, etc. You can also cite theories from contemporary management books, for example Steven Covey’s “7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” or Switzer’s “Crucial Conversations,” etc. c) and discuss the course or courses that you have taken in your program which provided theories, practices or application for this real world situation.   

Use 6th edition APA formatting and cite your sources according to APA requirements.

Using Figure 1.2 in Ch. 1 of Exploring Research, create a flowchart using Microsoft® Word  that helps you identify what research design to use for your research question.  Research question attached in previous assignment!!!!!!!

/in /by

This is a two part assignment so I would like to combine them becuase they build on each other. It must follow these exact guidelines, be an APA format and be graduate level quality. Anything else will not be accepted. It seems like a lot  but after you do the Literature review the position paper will be effortless. I also have access to some scholarly  resources if you need them. I will ask for a refund if the assignment is plagiarized. Make sure you can meet the deadline before you commit.

 

1st Assignment: Literature Review on Position Paper

Minimum 6 pages

Debate: Employee Satisfaction vs. The Bottom Line

Position on Debate: Employee Satisfaction 

For details and requirements see attachment labeled “PSY 614 Literature Review Rubric”

Feel Free to Use parts of the literature review I started: Employee Satisfaction vs Bottom Line 

 


2nd Assignment: The Position Paper

Minimum 12 pages

ebate: Employee Satisfaction vs. The Bottom Line

Position on Debate: Employee Satisfaction 

For details and requirements see attachment labeled “PSY 614 Position Paper Guidelines and Rubric”

This will co-inside with a previouse asinment I have attached and a paper amd propsal to follow.  Only accept if you are willing to do next two assignmnets and understand that I need all to co-inside with each other..  I have attached the chapter needed to do flowchart and also my previous assignmet that goes with this one and the next two.

 

Using Figure 1.2 in Ch. 1 of Exploring Research, create a flowchart using Microsoft® Word  that helps you identify what research design to use for your research question.  Research question attached in previous assignment!!!!!!!

 

I also attached the chapter needed for flowchart

 

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. 

/in /by

You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date. 

This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade. 

DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.

YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.

Learning Objectives:

Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.

Assessment:

Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument.

Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:

The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author’s main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers’ insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.

A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.

Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned. 

Please use MLA format.

Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:

Grading Rubric:

The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.

1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student’s independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction.

95 points

2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the analysis.

95 points

3.Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations.

40 points

4.Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing: the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed.

40 points

5.Essay is technically correct: The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and punctuation.

 30 points

Identify a public figure whose death you remember. Give some background on this individual. This individual can be a politician, religious leader, entertainer, or other prominent individual.

/in /by

How Does Society Mourn the Loss of a Public Figure?

Identify a public figure whose death you remember. Give some background on this individual. This individual can be a politician, religious leader, entertainer, or other prominent individual.

  1. Describe the public mourning ritual that surrounded this person’s death.
  2. Do you have flashbulb memories— very clear, detailed memories—of the time, place, and circumstances of the death.
  3. Did the public figure’s image change after death?
  4. How is the anniversary of the death memorialized?
  5. Were you surprised at the depth of your grief or the grief of others at the loss of the public figure? Why or why not?

Due Date-Wednesday, December 8th before 11:59 pm EST.  Point value-10 pts.

 

The answer to each DB must be at least 250 words – that is the minimum required to fully answer the questions. Each answer must demonstrate critical thinking and writing at a college level. Good grammar and spelling are important. The answer must completely address all issues raised in the activity description and information from another source must be cited in APA format. Responses to classmates must be at least 3-4 sentences and must demonstrate that you have read the posting. Merely saying “good point” or “I agree” will not earn any response points.