How might giving feedback to the subject during the testing session influence test performance? Is it ever appropriate to give a subject feedback during the testing session? What type of feedback might you be giving without intending to do so? 

/in /by

Attached are the two chapter power points to choose from. Study them and then create a question coming from your thoughts for me to post as his instructions ask for. Also, be sure it has to do with the chapters and you give me follow-up information on your question as other students will be chiming in to my question and I need to have something to say in return.

If you have access to online books, the book chapters are from this book:

Essentials of Testing and Assessment: A Practical Guide for Counselors, Social Workers, and Psychologists by – Edward S. Neukrug

 

Instructor’s instructions: Please post a thoughtful question in this forum from one of the chapters assigned for this week. You will be evaluated on your ability to discuss topics, give examples, and explain the information covered in the chapter.

Your response may also involve asking follow-up questions. It is expected that you will have read the chapters.

Your writing should illustrate knowledge of the concepts through an original personal and/or professional integration of the assigned text material. All assignments MUST be typed, double-spaced, in APA style, and must be written at graduate level English. The content, conciseness, and clarity of your answers will be considered in the evaluation of your work. These answers should be 2-4 pages each. You must integrate the material presented in the text and cite your work according to APA format.

1.How might giving feedback to the subject during the testing session influence test performance? Is it ever appropriate to give a subject feedback during the testing session? What type of feedback might you be giving without intending to do so?

2.What should you do if your subject asks to see his or her scores? What ethical and legal factors might you consider when making this decision? Would it matter if she/he were your client? When should you omit raw test data in a report?

2. As a result of your intervention, as mentioned in question 1, what specific behavioral changes might you expect in Ethan as a result of employing these techniques? Again, be specific and detailed in your response.

/in /by

Behavior Therapy and Cognitive behavior Therapy ALL WORK MUST BE COMPLETED ON TIME AND MUST BE ALL ORIGINAL AS IT GOES THROUGH A TURNITIN PROGRAM ALSO  ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED IN FULL DETAIL  AND ALL PAPERS MUST BE OF QUALITY OR IT WILL NEED TO BE REDONE AND OR REFUNDED

By Saturday, May 14, 2016, respond to the discussion questions assigned

In this discussion we examine the principles and techniques of both behavior therapy and cognitive behavior therapy.

Use the following scenario to develop your responses to the next two questions: Assume that you work in a day care center and take care of four 6-year-olds. One of the boys, Ethan, frequently disrupts the classroom. He disobeys your orders, bullies and pushes the other children in your care, and throws tantrums when he does not get what he wants.

1. Using operant conditioning principles, how might you structure a behavioral approach to working with Ethan in a way that directly addresses his problematic behaviors?  What techniques would you use? Be specific and explain your rationale thoroughly.

2. As a result of your intervention, as mentioned in question 1, what specific behavioral changes might you expect in Ethan as a result of employing these techniques? Again, be specific and detailed in your response.

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

3.  Using the rational-emotive behavior approach to therapy, apply the A-B-C method mentioned in the course lecture notes to either a real life situation that you have experienced or create a scenario to illustrate how the realization of beliefs influence the consequences of behavior. Be sure to clearly label each component (A)ctivating event, (B)elief, and (C)onsequence in your example to show how they relate and the progression of the behaviors.  Then take the ABC model full circle and include the (D)isputing and the (E)ffect of the  disputing process. Clearly explain in detail how each step in the ABCDE process is playing out in your scenario.

 

Write an additional 1,500-1,750 words in which you identify three theories that could potentially serve as the theoretical foundation for your dissertation study.

/in /by

TOPIC: I/O Project Part 2

This is a 2 part assignment

This second part of the assignment allows you to further explore the key points that are included in a research study. You will present three possible theories or models that may serve as the theoretical foundation for the research study and a rationale for considering each theory.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Refer to the Topic 3 assignment, “I/O Project Part 1” as well as any related feedback from the instructor.

· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments.

· Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.

· This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

· You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Part 1

Present a revised version (2,000-2,300 words total) of the paper “I/O Project Part 1” that makes improvements in the caliber of the writing and incorporates instructor feedback regarding content and writing. Include the following in your submission:

1. A reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated your instructor’s feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.

2. The revised paper that incorporates instructor feedback; clarifies the thesis statement and solidifies supporting arguments; edits for grammar, spelling, and punctuation; adjusts word choice to display professional and scholarly language; and adjusts sentence structure for improved readability.

Part 2

Write an additional 1,500-1,750 words in which you identify three theories that could potentially serve as the theoretical foundation for your dissertation study. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. So, you may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the ideas to connect. Include the following in your paper for each of the three theories you select:

1. A description of the primary components of the theory.

2. A research-supported discussion of common applications of the theory.

3. A research-supported defense of why the theory might be viable for your proposed dissertation study.

4. A discussion of the limitations of applying the theory as a foundation for your proposed dissertation study.