Choose at least two learners who saw things differently from you and explore their approaches to this scenario. Please try to choose posts that have not yet had responses

Applying the Ethics Code

For this discussion, review the first two Case Study Scenario media pieces linked in Resources.

  1. After reviewing Case Study Scenario 1: Multiculturalism, respond to the following:
    • What ethical and legal concerns are raised in this scenario?
      • Identify the applicable ethical standards.
    • Which ethical principles is the chair violating?
    • What are the pros and cons of teaching the class?
      • Support your observations with scholarly sources.
  2. After reviewing Case Study Scenario 2, respond to the following:
    • What are two additional ethical or legal issues related to the scenario?
      • In light of the new ethical concerns, propose a solution.

Your initial discussion post should be at least 200 words. Remember to cite the sources you use to support your initial posts and responses.

Response Guidelines

Choose at least two learners who saw things differently from you and explore their approaches to this scenario. Please try to choose posts that have not yet had responses. Compare and contrast your responses to those of your peers. Discuss how your perspectives have changed based on the information you learned. Where do you agree? Differ?

Learning Components

This activity will help you achieve the following learning components:

  • Apply ethical theory to practice.
  • Employ ethical decision-making models to practice.
  • Brainstorm potential solutions for ethical challenges.

Resources

  • Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.
  • Case Study Scenario 1: Multiculturalism | Transcript.
  • Case Study Scenario Part 2 | Transcript.
  • Capella University Library.
  • APA Style and Format.

Evaluate your selected test based on the strengths and weaknesses, and advantages and disadvantages of the test items, materials, and their appropriateness.

For this assignment, locate a minimum of five resources (a minimum three peer-reviewed journal articles) pertaining to your test’s construction { Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-2nd Edition [ABAS-2]}

, item development, procedures utilized in construction to minimize offensive content, and provisions of modifications and accommodations for test takers. You will not be required or need to have a copy of your test to complete this assignment. You may use many different types of references and sources to obtain this information about your test. These references may include journal articles, literature reviews, Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) reviews, reviews, and publisher Web sites.

Information gathering and evaluation of these elements may require a keyword search within each relevant review and research article. It may be helpful to do keyword searches within those documents with the following words: formatfairfairnessbiasappropriateaccommodationsmodifications, and computer or computer assisted. Subsequently, this particular assignment requires a deeper search and provides a broader range of sources to fulfill the minimum references. In almost all cases, you will be able to locate some level of information on these elements.

For some newer test editions, literature may be scarce. Refer back to the Lists of Tests by Type resource to see which tests are approved for supplementation with articles that address earlier editions of the tests. If the “Combined Review Allowed” column is marked “Yes,” you can supplement your review with articles addressing the designated prior version of the test.

Note: In future courses you may use the library’s Interlibrary Loan service to obtain articles outside of the collection, but you should not have to use the service for PSY7610. In the event that you cannot find articles covering a newer test edition, please refer to the List of Tests by Type in the Resources area. Note which tests have been designated as acceptable for searching prior test editions.

If you are struggling with locating sufficient information about a particular test in regard to an element in this assignment, then you will need to cite the references or reviews involved in your search and identify this element as problematic for your selected test as it lacks sufficient documentation in the literature for this code or standard.

Compose your findings into a paper using the following outline (please use these headings):

1. Title Page (required).

2. Abstract (optional).

3. Introduction: Identify the standardized test you selected in Unit 2, and its stated purpose.

4. Test items and format.

o Identify type or format of test items.

o Identify formats of the test that are available (including alternate forms, audio, computer, et cetera).

o Identify the types of scores obtained from the test. (Include information about norms.)

o Evaluate and identify or cite positive aspects of test items and formats, directions, answer sheets, and score reports.

o Evaluate and identify or cite negative aspects of test items and formats, directions, answer sheets, and score reports.

o Summarize the quality and appropriateness of the test items and formats, directions, answer sheets, and score reports.

5. Fair and appropriate materials.

o Identify or cite positive and negative aspects of test materials that minimize potentially offensive content or language. Explain.

o Identify or cite if the test allows appropriate modifications or accommodations. Explain how or why it does not allow such modifications or accommodations.

o Cite at least one AERA standard for Supporting Documentation for Tests (see Chapter 7 of your Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing text) that are implicated in either the positive or negative aspects of your selected test.

6. Use of technology.

o Discuss and evaluate how advances in technology have been utilized or incorporated with your selected test to address test items and format.

o Discuss and evaluate how advances in technology have been utilized or incorporate with your selected test to address fair and appropriate materials.

7. Synthesis of findings.

o Identify any major strengths you identified for your test in terms of test items and materials.

o Identify any weaknesses, even if they are relative, regarding your test in terms of test items and materials.

8. Conclusions and recommendations.

o Evaluate your selected test based on the strengths and weaknesses, and advantages and disadvantages of the test items, materials, and their appropriateness.

o Make at least three recommendations about improvements that could be considered to improve the test, if applicable. Cite standards (AERA) to support each recommendation.

9. References (required, use current APA format and style).

Additional Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

· References: A minimum of five references (a minimum of three peer-reviewed journal articles among the five).

· Length of paper: At least five pages (not including title page, abstract, or references).

The writing assignment this week is the second part of the Weekly Review activity.

Week 2 – Weekly Review 2

Week 2 Review Part 2: Essay Question

[WLOs: 1, 2, 5, 6] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4]

The writing assignment this week is the second part of the Weekly Review activity. You have received your randomized essay question as the final part of your Week 2 Review Part 1: Objective Questions activity. You will copy and paste this prompt into a word document and write a short essay that addresses the prompt. The prompts will be associated with real-life scenarios; however you will use your Study Guide to prepare. This portion of your Weekly Review cannot be retaken as you were able to retake the Part 1 Objective Questions. The essay question will be graded by the instructor and not automatically. Feedback will be given so you can improve your performance throughout the course.

Your essay

  • Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including the reference page) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)
  • No title page is required.
  • Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a distinct thesis statement.
    • A thesis statement is required because it is important to tell your reader what you are going to inform them about. It should clearly state the topic and the stance you are taking about this topic. This can also help you to make sure you stay on topic within your paper.
    • Not sure how to write a clear thesis? Try using the Ashford University Writing Center’s Thesis Generator (Links to an external site.) or Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.)
  • Must end with a conclusion that summarizes your thought.
    • Tell your reader why or how you have proven your position on the topic.
    • For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must address the topic of the essay with critical thought.
  • Must use at least one scholarly source in addition to your required course text, citing also within the body of writing as support for your stance.
    • The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
  • Must document, in APA style, any information used from sources with citations and as a list of references, at the end of the essay. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications.

Review the Writing Center’s Grammarly (Links to an external site.) page, which includes a link to The Grammarly Guide (Links to an external site.), before you submit your essay; set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then, carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Waypoint Assignment Submission

The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint.  Please refer to the instructions below to submit your assignment.

  1. Click on the Assignment Submission button below. The Waypoint “Student Dashboard” will open in a new browser window.
  2. Browse for your assignment.
  3. Click Upload.
  4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by viewing the appropriate week’s assignment tab in Waypoint.

For more detailed instructions, refer to the Waypoint Tutorial (Links to an external site.)Preview the document.

Provide additional clarification to illustrate your understanding of the four different levels of measurement when presenting this information.

Prepare a voice-over PowerPoint presentation to present to an undergraduate class on research methods and begin by briefly describing the four different scales of quantitative research measurement that scientists use (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio). Provide additional clarification to illustrate your understanding of the four different levels of measurement when presenting this information. Then,  provide one example for each of these types of measures for your chosen topic of research. Which measures might you want to use here, and why?  Briefly explain how each variable that you select fits within the four different scales of measurement.

Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as speaker notes for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists and should cite material appropriately.

Support your presentation with at least three scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.

Length: 12-15 slides (with a separate reference slide)
Notes Length: 100-150 words for each slide

Be sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases with references in APA format and style where appropriate.

You are required to write an essay of at least 500 words in response to a provided promptly. You must support your assertions with at least 3 citations in current APA format. You may use the course textbooks, scholarly articles and the Bible as sources.  Please include a title page and reference page.

Kepler saw astronomers as “priests of Almighty God” who have “the honor of standing guard…at the door of the shrine at whose high altar Copernicus performs divine service.” How might this sentiment apply to all of us who study the book of God’s Works? How can we heed Kepler’s warning to “not consider the glory of our intellects, but the glory of God” in our academic and disciplinary pursuits?