relationship between budgeting and cost planning and strategic allocation of financial resources

/in /by

Relationship between Budgeting and Cost Planning and Strategic allocation of Financial Resources

After reading Chapters 9, 10, 11, 12, 19 in the Blocher Text, select 2 techniques/concepts of interest to you. Submit a thread of at least 1000 words examining the relationship between the selected techniques/concepts and strategic allocation of financial resources with respect to capital budgeting decisions. Support your thread by citing at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles. Your thread must be in current APA format and must include a reference list.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post relationship between budgeting and cost planning and strategic allocation of financial resources appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

mba 705 milestone two implementation plan

/in /by

In Milestone Two, you will submit an implementation plan, which is a clear and comprehensive plan for implementing and managing the concept from inception to completion. Although the details of your plan will necessarily depend upon your concept, at a minimum, your plan should include the following critical elements:

Critical Elements:

 Physical and technological resources needed for the concept, including where these will come from and how they will be used to reduce cost or improve operations. Be sure to discuss why one resource option is better than another where appropriate.

• A detailed implementation schedule covering what needs to be done, by when, and, tentatively, by whom. (Note that key personnel will be covered in more depth in Milestone Three.) The schedule should identify the critical path to success and outline the dependencies between tasks

• Project review processes and indicators of success to ensure that the project stays on target

• An explanation of how intrapreneurship or entrepreneurship factor in to the implementation of your plan and how you will protect intangible assets, such as intellectual property or brand.

Guidelines for Submission: Your draft must contain all of the elements listed above. It should be 5 to 8 pages in length (excluding the title page, references, and appendices) using 12-point Times New Roman font, with one-inch margins. You may include summary pictures, charts, graphs, or other explanatory diagrams as needed to successfully explain the concept and implementation, but should use appendices for detailed supporting documentation. Your paper should follow APA guidelines. You must include at least 5 scholarly sources. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.

Please make sure you include at least 5 scholarly sources in this paper.

Please see attached for a PDF of the paper guidelines and rubric, and also see attached for previous papers for reference. Make sure that each critical element is a bolded header in the paper.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post mba 705 milestone two implementation plan appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities

/in /by

Week 6 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Change Process (graded) Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 225 Submitting a file upload Updated 09/2019 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is: To apply a change process using the ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation and a systematic review after identifying a clinical topic of concern and related nursing practice issue. The information from the ‘Illustration’ part of our lessons in Weeks 1-6 will mentor you through this process. Your change process is to be set up as a pilot project. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO#2) CO8: Selects evidence for best practices when planning professional nursing care involving systems, processes, and devices for individuals, families, aggregates and communities. (PO#8) Points The assignment is worth 225 points. Due Date Submit your completed assignment by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT. Directions Please do not use any of the Nurse Daniel information for your own topic, nursing intervention, or change project. Nurse Daniel serves as an example only to illustrate the change process. Please review the infographic as way to guide you in getting started with your assignment: Developing an Assignment with Integrity (Links to an external site.) A short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed below or by reading the transcript (Links to an external site.). EBP Change Process (form) Download the EBP Change Process form (Links to an external site.) during Week 1. The use of this specific form is REQUIRED and is due at the end of Week 6. A short tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed in the short video above. Identify a clinical topic and related nursing practice issue you think needs to be changed. Locate a systematic review on your topic from the CCN Library databases. Be sure this involves nursing actions. Work through each step of the ACE Star Model as outlined on the assignment form (Star Points 1-5: Discovery, Summary, Translation, Implementation, and Evaluation). Respond to the instructions provided on the form. Follow the activities and thinking of Nurse Daniel in Weeks 1-6 in the ‘Illustration’ part of each lesson. He will be working through a clinical topic and nursing practice issue to demonstrate a change (ACE Star Model and systematic review). Work on a portion of the process each week, as the illustration unfolds. Please reach out to your instructor for feedback or assistance with your PICOT question as needed. Required and Additional Background Reading in Weeks 1 and 2 under Readings is available for more information on the ACE Star Model and the use of systematic reviews. Please cite any references (in APA format) of your systematic review or other scholarly document (optional) as needed. Paraphrasing information, rather than quoting, is expected. No quotes for this assignment please! For questions about this assignment, please contact your instructor. Use the grading rubric as a final way to check that all components of the form have been completed. The rubric is the tool your instructor will use to assess your content. Reminder Before preparing your assignment, please review this “Crediting Sources Made Simple (Links to an external site.)” resource. This tool is intended to help you understand scholarly writing, APA, referencing, and crediting. Please reach out to your instructor with any questions as you prepare your assignment. **Academic Integrity** Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page. NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page. Rubric Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading Rubric Week 6: EBP Change Process Assignment Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelected Systematic Review A systematic review from the CCN Library databases was selected, identified, and was appropriate for the selected nursing change process. 25.0 pts One systematic review from the CCN Library databases was identified and was clearly appropriate. 22.0 pts A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was mostly appropriate for a nursing change process. 20.0 pts A systematic review was selected from the CCN Library databases and was fairly appropriate for a nursing change process. 10.0 pts A systematic review was selected, but not from the CCN Library databases and/or was not appropriate for this assignment. 0.0 pts No systematic review selected or used. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 1 (Discovery) The topic, nursing practice issue, rationale and scope of the problem were clearly identified and described. 25.0 pts Star Point 1 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. 22.0 pts Star Point 1 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed. 20.0 pts Star Point 1 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. 10.0 pts Star Point 1 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. 0.0 pts The ACE Star Model Star Point 1 was not completed. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 2 (Summary) The NURSING practice problem, NURSING related PICOT question, a systematic review from any database in the Chamberlain Library, and other optional references, evidence summary, strength, and solutions, are listed and described. 35.0 pts Star Point 2 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. 31.0 pts Star Point 2 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed. 28.0 pts Star Point 2 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. 13.0 pts Star Point 2 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. or were inappropriate. 0.0 pts The ACE Star Model Star Point 2 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 3 (Translation) Care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols; stakeholders and their roles and responsibilities; the nursing role; rationale for including certain stakeholders, and cost analysis plan are addressed. 35.0 pts Star Point 3 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. 31.0 pts Star Point 3 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed. 28.0 pts Star Point 3. was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. 13.0 pts Star Point 3 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. 0.0 pts The ACE Star Model Star Point 3 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 4 (Implementation) Permission process, education plan, timeline, measurable outcomes, forms, resources, and stakeholder meetings, are addressed. 35.0 pts Star Point 4 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. 31.0 pts Star Point 4 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed 28.0 pts Star Point 4 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. 13.0 pts Star Point 4 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. 0.0 pts The ACE Star Model Star Point 4 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStar Point 5 (Evaluation) Reporting results, process and next steps are addressed. 35.0 pts Star Point 5 elements in the first column were thoroughly addressed. 31.0 pts Star Point 5 elements in the first column were mostly well addressed 28.0 pts Star Point 5 was missing one element in the first column or one lacked detail. 13.0 pts Star Point 5 was missing more than one element in the first column and others lacked detail. 0.0 pts The ACE Star Model Star Point 5 was not completed. 35.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical. 20.0 pts Information was presented clearly and thoughts were well organized and logical throughout. 18.0 pts Information was presented clearly and thoughts were mainly organized and logical throughout. 16.0 pts Information was presented clearly and thoughts were somewhat organized and logical throughout. 8.0 pts Information was not consistently clear and/or was not consistently organized and logical. 0.0 pts Information was disorganized and difficult to understand. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/APA The systematic review and any other scholarly resources were properly listed in APA format. The writing includes error free grammar and spelling, and complete sentence structure. 15.0 pts Excellent mechanics and APA formatting with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. 13.0 pts Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column 12.0 pts Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column 6.0 pts Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements listed in the first column 0.0 pts Very poor mechanics and formatting such that information is difficult to read. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Form Used 0.0 pts 0 points deducted Correct assignment form used 0.0 pts 22.5 points (10%) deducted Incorrect form used resulting in point deduction 0.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction 0.0 pts 0 points deducted Submitted on time 0.0 pts Not submitted on time – Point deduction 1 day late =11.25 deduction; 2 days=22.5 deduction; 3 days=33.75 deduction; 4 days =45 deduction; 5 days = 56.25 deduction; 6 days =67.5 deduction; 7 days =78.75 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late 0.0 pts Total Points: 225.0

 

The post Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.

different types of insulins | nursingessayswriters.com

/in /by

BACHELOR OF NURSING SCIENCE OR MIDWIFERY DUAL DEGREENUR 231 – Drug Therapy Case Study – SEMESTER 1, 2018Copyright USC @2010LL“”Updated”:”J.Hanson”/Marc”Broadbent”December”2017“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””2″|”P a g e ””NUR 231 DRUG THERAPY – ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – CASE STUDYThis case study assignment is designed for nursing students undertaking the Bachelor of Sciencedegree or midwifery students undertaking the dual degree. Dual degree student may complete thiscase study or choose the midwifery pregnancy case study. This case scenario is based on theory,concepts and professional practice principles covered in lectures, tutorials and associated resources. Itis designed to develop knowledge and problem-solving skills that apply to decision-making and safedrug administration in complex health care settings.Assessment requirements:Submission: Submit your assessment to blackboard online via safe assignFormatting: Format using 1.5 line spacing and Times New Roman 12.Word Count: 2,500 words +/- 10% (includes in-text references and excludes reference list)Marking Criteria: All questions must be completed according to the marking criteria to achieve asatisfactory grade.References: In-text references are included in the word count. (The reference list is not included inthe word count). Please use academic sources of information such as the texts used in this course andpeer reviewed journal articles to support all your answers. Other trustworthy sites includeGovernment-operated websites and NPS MedicineWise.Completion GuidelinesThe case study assignment is an Individual Assessment Item.You may work collaboratively with other students to understand concepts in this course butyour answers must be your individual research, interpretation and application of thematerials. All answers must be supported by relevant references to the literature.Answers that show evidence of deliberate copying from other student’s work will beinvestigated as collusion. Answers that show evidence of deliberate copying from authors willbe investigated as plagiarism. Collusion and plagiarism are considered to be academicmisconduct and academic penalties apply. For more information see the Bb+ assessment area,course outline or USC policy at https://www.usc.edu.au/explore/policies-andprocedures/student-academic-integrity-governing-policy*Remember to save a copy of your work on an external drive or USB.“”Updated”:”J.Hanson”/Marc”Broadbent”December”2017“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””3″|”P a g e ””INTEGRETED PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC CONCEPTS – GLUCOSE,INSULIN, ENERGY AND THE PANCREAS!Consider the patient SituationTony Barrett is a newly diagnosed insulin-dependent diabetic. Tony is 14 years old, weighs 51 kg(non-obese) and has always been very active. He usually plays football at weekends and enjoysswimming. He regularly goes to the beach to surf with his friends enjoys and is a member of the localsurf lifesaving club. Over the last month, Tony has been constantly thirsty and often hungry. He hasbeen passing urine frequently and having to get up to the toilet in the night. His father becameconcerned when he noticed that Tony lost interest in sports and being with his friends because he wascomplaining of headaches and felt tired all the time.Five days ago, Tony was reviewed by an endocrinologist and diagnosed with Type 1 DiabetesMellitus. The endocrinologist prescribed a ‘basal-bolus’ regime of insulin consisting of Insulin aspart(Novorapid) before each meal and Insulin glargine (Lantus) flexipen before bedtime. Yesterday, Tonyhad a hypoglycaemic episode at school (BGL 3.0 mmol/L) and was transferred to hospital. Hesuffered a further hypoglycaemic episode on waking this morning but 15 minutes after drinking ½ cupof fruit juice his BGL was 4.4 mmol/L. Tony and his family are anxious to learn how to manage hisblood glucose levels (BGLs) before he is discharged home.Section 1 – Pathophysiologic and pharmacologic conceptsCollect information: PathophysiologyQ1. Outline the pathophysiology of type I (Insulin –dependent) diabetes.Process information: Pharmacologic concepts in glycaemic managementQ2. What specific information do Tony and his family need to know about insulin absorption in orderto manage the insulin regime at home? Discuss your answer in relation to:a) The ‘Time-course of formulations’ of insulin and the effect on absorption ofinsulinb) The appearance of different types of insulinsc) The principles underpinning a ‘basal-bolus’ regime of insulind) The practical skills and knowledge Tony needs to self-administer insulin“”Updated”:”J.Hanson”/Marc”Broadbent”December”2017“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””4″|”P a g e ””INTEGRATED PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC CONCEPTS – GLUCOSE,INSULIN, ENERGY AND THE PANCREASQ3. From your knowledge of pharmacodynamics, explain how insulin works to reduce blood glucoselevel.Q4. Identify 3 objective tests that may be used to assess Tony’s current glycaemic status ie. howwould you know if Tony was stable or unstable?Section 2 – Decision-makingSynthesise the informationQ5. Examine the information that you have about Tony’s presentation to hospital and identify twopossible nursing diagnoses from the following options. Tony has:a) hypoglycaemia possibly related to excessive carbohydrate intakeb) hyperglycaemia possibly related to inadequate carbohydrate intakec) hyperglycaemia possibly related to excessive carbohydrate intaked) hypoglycaemia possibly related to inadequate carbohydrate intakee) hypoglycaemia possibly related to inadequate insulin administrationf) hypoglycaemia possibly related to inappropriate insulin administration”Establish goalsQ6. Before initiating any actions, it is important to be clear about your goals for Tony.(i) What goal would you set regarding Tony’s Blood Glucose Levels (BGLs)?(ii) What goals would you set regarding Tony’s knowledge deficit?”Take actionQ7. What are your nursing actions in the event that Tony is found to be:(a) hypoglycaemic (BGL <3.5mmol/L) and conscious?(b) hypoglycaemic (BGL <3.5mmol/L) and unconscious/altered consciousness?Give a rationale for your clinical decisions and actions in Q7a and Q7b.“”Updated”:”J.Hanson”/Marc”Broadbent”December”2017“”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””5″|”P a g e ””INTEGRATED PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC CONCEPTS – GLUCOSE,INSULIN, ENERGY AND THE PANCREASSection 3 – Professional standardsQ8. Choose 2 ethical value statements and 2 standards for practice that will guide your nursing care ofTony and his family whilst in hospital and/or in discharge planning activities. Give examples of howthe 2 value statements and the 2 standards apply to this case.Q9. The central principles of social justice in the health care context are self-determination, equity,access and rights and, participation. Health professionals have an ethical obligation to ensure thatpatients are treated fairly. Discuss how psycho-social factors in Tony’s life might impact on how heparticipates in his own health care (including medication adherence), and interacts with healthprofessionals?Q10. Write down what actions will you take in your future practice because of what have learnedfrom this scenario?Section 4 – Conveys scientific informationCheck your answers and ensure that you have used professional language throughout yourassignment. Proof read for logical structure, accuracy and clarity.Section 5 – Sources of evidenceThere are 2 parts to section 5 of the marking criteria: (i) ensure that you have examined academicsources of information and used them in support of all your answers. Avoid websites designed forpatient information and check that any websites you do use are directed towards health professionals,and are current and peer reviewed (ii) ensure that you have a minimum of 8 references.SUBMIT TO BLACKBOARD ONLINE VIA SAFE ASSIGN. THANK YOU