Assignment Instructions For this assignment, write 3–4 pages in which you examine factors that build team success. Overview Perhaps, the best predictor of team success is its clarity of purpose and the team’s commitment to achieving it. To support that purpose, a team needs a process that moves smoothly from vision and mission to goals and tasks in order to achieve the desired outcomes. The foundation of both purpose and process is leadership. Any form of collaboration is an inherently human process. The culture of an organization can dramatically affect team efficacy and performance. The glue that holds teams together is trust. Three factors can help build trust in collaborative environments: performance and competence, integrity, and concern for the well–being of others. Preparation Search the Capella library for scholarly articles on leadership styles and qualities of effective team leaders. These articles may or may not also discuss the importance of trust within collaborative teams. Requirements Examine two critical components for interprofessional team success: leadership and trust. Address the following: •Identify at least three leadership behaviors that build trust within a team. •Identify at least three leadership behaviors that undermine trust within a team. •Explain the consequences of a team that does not trust its leader in terms of patient safety. •Describe strategies team members can use to build trust among one another in terms of skill, knowledge, and responsibility. •Describe principles of effective interprofessional team leadership. In other words, what skills and qualities should a good team leader possess? Is there a difference between being a good leader and being an effective leader? Your completed assignment should be 3–4 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Support your statements and opinions with references to and citations from at least 3 scholarly or professional resources. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style. In addition: •Include a title page and reference page. •Use Times New Roman font, 12 point. •Double–space.

THE CASE OF THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE

Jared, age ninety, had a very valuable violin collection consisting of 10 violins, cases and bows. He was frail and was helped by a niece Sally, who was an excellent violinist. Just prior to making a new will, Jared told his niece that he was going to give her the violin collection. “It’s yours,” he said, adding that he would temporarily hold on to the collection for safekeeping. That same day he also sent Sally a letter in which he said, “I give you my violin collection, and when I die, it will be yours.”

Jared died four weeks later. In his will, which did not refer to the violins, he left his entire estate to his two children. Sally brought suit against the estate to have the violin collection declared her property.

The Trial

Sally testified at the trial about the help she had given her uncle over a period of fifteen years. She produced the letter her uncle had sent her and recalled their many conversations during which her uncle had promised to give her the violins. There was additional testimony that Jared’s children had never even picked up a violin and had been estranged from their father for years.

The Arguments at Trial

Sally’s attorney argued that the collection belonged to Sally because Jared had gifted the violins to her during his lifetime and that there was symbolic delivery. He further argued that Jared’s keeping possession of the violins was solely to protect them and in no way invalidated the gift. He also argued that to deprive Sally of the collection that her uncle obviously wanted to give her would be unfair.

The children’s attorney argued that the will was validly executed after the letter was sent and promises made orally or in writing do not constitute valid gifts. They further argued that actual and not symbolic delivery is an essential requirement for a gift to be deemed valid.

Questions to Discuss

1. Who has the stronger argument, Sally or Jared’s children? Why?
2. If you were the jury hearing this case, for whom would you decide? Why?
3. Should considerations of fairness and the intentions of the person making the will take precedence over a validly executed will?
4. What problems do you think could arise if oral or written promises were considered under the circumstances of this case?

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post the case of the unfulfilled promise 1 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.