creating an faq for a website 1

/in /by

If you are using the Blackboard Mobile Learn App, please click “View in Browser”.
Click the link above to submit your assignment.

Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 2: “Creating an FAQ for a Website”

Review the Strayer University Website to find an opportunity to write a FAQ that does not exist but would be useful to an intended audience. You will format the document as if it would be going on the Website, but you will write the document in Microsoft Word or equivalent word processing software.

Write a one to two (1-2) page FAQ sheet for the intended audience and purpose. On a separate page within the same document, write a paragraph that identifies the intended audience and purpose of the FAQ sheet you have created. (Submit one document in total with both components included.) Your assignment cannot be graded without this analysis. In your document, you should:

  1. Match the intended audience and purpose for situation and tone.
  2. Format FAQ Web page(s) accurately and according to the details in the textbook.
  3. Ensure that content is measured, concise, and applicable.
  4. Craft a document that is easy to read.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Illustrate the relationship between how audience characteristics match the context of technical writing.
  • Explain ideas in proper format using accurate details and relevant examples.
  • Use syntax, tone, and word choice appropriate to technical communications.
  • Employ correct Edited Standard Written English (ESWE).
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in technical writing.
  • Write clearly and concisely about technical writing using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Please click here to view the grading rubric.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post creating an faq for a website 1 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

A good hypothesis starts with a clear research question. What is the role of abduction in arriving at clear research questions?

/in /by

Unit 4:This is also in 2 Parts- A Discussion & A Project
Due 08/22/17
Heuristic approaches to thinking about thinking involve employing rules of thumb to arrive at conclusions. These starting points are the inductive process, but deduction is also involved in reasoning on a topic. Dewey called this the “double movement of reflection.” If Dewey is correct, what are the difficulties in isolating either induction or deduction within scientific reasoning? What are the benefits of such isolation? What are some alternatives that we have not yet explored?
Due 08/22/17
A good hypothesis starts with a clear research question. What is the role of abduction in arriving at clear research questions? Are there any inherent dangers in using this approach, strategic guessing, to explore research questions for inquiry? What are the main assumptions behind abductive reasoning?
Individual Project
Topic: Scientific Reasoning, Reflecting on Heuristics and Developing Hypotheses
10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #3
Due Date: Aug 28, 2017
Details:
In the prospectus, proposal, and dissertation there are 10 strategic points that need to be clear, simple, correct, and aligned to ensure the research is doable, valuable, and credible. These points, which provide a guide or vision for the research, are present in almost any research study. The ability to identify these points is one of the first skills required in the creation of a viable doctoral dissertation. In this assignment, you will identify and evaluate 10 strategic points in a published quantitative research study.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Review the Wallace, Johnson, Mathe, and Paul article.Locate and download “Modified 10 Points Template.”This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.APA style is required for this assignment.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.Directions:
Using the “Modified 10 Points Template,” identify each of the 10 strategic points in this quantitative research study.
Complete the “Evaluation” section of the template by addressing the following questions (250-500 words) with regard to the 10 strategic points in the study:
Discuss the key points in the literature review and how the author used this section to identify the gap or problem addressed in the study.Describe the variables under study and how they are a key component in this quantitative research study. You are not expected to understand the differences between variables at this point, but should be able to identify how they inform the problem, purpose, research questions and data collection instruments.Describe the problem and how it informed the research questions under study.Describe the quantitative design used and why it is appropriate for the identified problem and research questions. Support your response with a peer-reviewed citation from a research source.Assess the appropriateness of the instruments used to collect data and answer the research questions as well as to address the stated problem.Discuss how the problem statement informed the development of the purpose statement in this study.
Resources
1. From Ugly Duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, Abduction, and the Pursuit of Scientific Theories
McKaughan, D. J. (2008). From ugly duckling to swan: C. S. Peirce, abduction, and the pursuit of scientific theories. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 44(3), 446-468.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=35013866&site=ehost-live&scope=site
2. Structural and Psychological Empowerment Climates, Performance, and the Moderating Role of Shared Felt Accountability: A Managerial Perspective
Wallace, J. C., Johnson, P. D., Mathe, K., & Paul, J. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 840-850. doi:10.1037/a0022227
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2011-04648-001&site=eds-live&scope=site
3. Systematic Inference: Induction and Deduction
Dewey, J. (1910). Systematic inference: Induction and deduction. In How we think (pp. 79-100). Lexington, MA: D C Heath. doi:10.1037/10903-007
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2006-03523-007&site=ehost-live&scope=site
4. Testing the Null Hypothesis: The Forgotten Legacy of Karl Popper?
Wilkinson, M. (2013). Testing the null hypothesis: The forgotten legacy of Karl Popper? Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(9), 919-920.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=87568223&site=ehost-live&scope=site
5. The Meaning of Ecologically Oriented Inquiry in Contemporary Psychology
Gibbs, J. C. (1979). The meaning of ecologically oriented inquiry in contemporary psychology. American Psychologist, 34(2), 127-140. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.2.127
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1979-25029-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

see the attachment and choose one of the three phases and answer the questions for that phase

/in /by

Choose one of the three phases, and answer the questions for that phase.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post see the attachment and choose one of the three phases and answer the questions for that phase appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

reflection assignment 12

/in /by

The reflections should be 750 words and your write-up should have three sections:

1) In the first section please provide a brief overview of each of the videos in the module

(~300 words).

2) In the second section please provide a brief overview of each of the readings in the module

(~300 words).

3) Finally, write a short paragraph about what you learned from the videos and the readings;

this can be about one or two of the content pieces or overall reflection on the module

content (~150 words).

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post reflection assignment 12 appeared first on The Nursing Hub.