Critical legal thinks case study | BUL 3130 | Florida State College at Jacksonville

/in /by

1. Two and three substantial pages. DUE BY NOON ON SATURDAY EASTERN TIME

2. Your assignment must be prepared using APA format. You must use the in the example’s headings, arguments and counterarguments in the analysis, and bold all in‐text citations. No Plagiarism, and two citations.

3.  Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive content. Your analysis and solutions must be based on the principles of law, ethics, and business – not on your opinions. You MUST describe how application of the principles to the key facts support your determination of the issues, in other words, you need to show the reasoning behind your decision. Critical Legal Thinking Case Rubric.

2. Recognize the applicable areas of law

3. Identify the applicable principles of law

4. Identify the key facts

5. Apply the law to the facts to resolve the issue

6. APA Format; Organization; and grammar, punctuation, and spelling

Case Study

Sterling, Inc. is a manufacturer of state-of-the-art computers. For the past ten years, Sterling has acquired all of its microchips from NoBugs Corporation, the only producer of chips meeting Sterling’s high specifications. The relationship has been mutually profitable. Sterling could not have built its reputation as an industry leader without NoBugs’s reliable and consistently high-quality products; Sterling’s business has enabled NoBugs to grow rapidly while providing its investors with an attractive rate of return.

Some months ago, several of Sterling’s computers exploded shortly after installation. Upon investigation, Sterling discovered that tiny imperfections in NoBugs’s microchips had aggravated a dormant design defect in the computers, causing the explosions. Analysis of the chips indicated that they were indeed below specifications and that the imperfections were caused by a slight miscalibration of NoBugs’s encoding equipment. NoBugs recalibrated the equipment and promptly resumed production of perfect chips.

Sterling’s losses from the explosions – lost profits, out-of-pocket costs associated with compensating customers for the explosions, and injury to business reputation – are estimated to exceed $20 million. Sterling and NoBugs disagree on the amount of the loss for which NoBugs should be responsible. Sterling has a strong legal case for breach of contract against NoBugs. Sterling’s CEO is considering a lawsuit. She asks you to prepare a report discussing litigation strategy and the advantages and disadvantages of litigation; and discussing pretrial planning should the company opt for litigation.

See attached format example 

Textbook Title: Managers and the Legal Environment: Strategies for Business Edition #: 9
Author: Constance E. Bagley
Publisher: Cengage 

Year: 2019

can you help me with this writing

/in /by

In 1,000-1,300 words, write a two-part theological analysis as outlined below:

Focusing on the doctrine of salvation, summarize the key New Testament texts identified in the course readings:

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post can you help me with this writing appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

The concepts of knowledge and knowing are necessary aspects of inquiring. The classical formulation of knowledge is as justified true belief. What are the difficulties applying this definition to knowledge claims in psychological research?

/in /by

Unit 2:This is a 2 Part Assignment. 2 Discussions and 1 Project
Discussion Board
Due 08/98/17
1) The concepts of knowledge and knowing are necessary aspects of inquiring. The classical formulation of knowledge is as justified true belief. What are the difficulties applying this definition to knowledge claims in psychological research?
Due 08/98/17
2) The case of hypnosis research is a good example of how psychological theories can produce competing claims and lead to confusion about phenomena. How might understanding the epistemological commitments in a psychological theory be helpful in clarifying agreements or disagreements between competing theories?
Individual Project
Due Date: Aug 14, 2017
Topic: Epistemology and Justification of Knowledge
10 Strategic Points Quantitative Study Extraction #1
Details:
In the prospectus, proposal, and dissertation there are 10 strategic points that need to be clear, simple, correct, and aligned to ensure the research is doable, valuable, and credible. These points, which provide a guide or vision for the research, are present in almost any research study. The ability to identify these points is one of the first skills required in the creation of a viable doctoral dissertation. In this assignment, you will identify and evaluate 10 strategic points in a published quantitative research study.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Review the Casteel dissertation.
Locate and download “Modified 10 Points Template.”
APA style is required for this assignment.
Directions:
Using the “Modified 10 Points Template,” identify each of the 10 strategic points in this quantitative dissertation.
Complete the “Evaluation” section of the template by addressing the following questions (250-500 words) with regard to the 10 strategic points in the study:
· Discuss the key points in the literature review and how the author used this section to identify the gap or problem addressed in the study.
· Describe the variables under study and how they are a key component in this quantitative research study. You are not expected to understand the differences between variables at this point, but should be able to identify how they inform the problem, purpose, research questions and data collection instruments.
· Describe the problem and how it informed the research questions under study.
· Describe the quantitative design used and why it is appropriate for the identified problem and research questions. Support your response with a peer-reviewed citation from a research source.
· Assess the appropriateness of the instruments used to collect data and answer the research questions as well as to address the stated problem.
· Discuss how the problem statement informed the development of the purpose statement in this study.
Resources
1. Evidence, Ontology, and Psychological Science: The Lesson of Hypnosis
Vandenberg, B. R. (2010). Evidence, ontology, and psychological science: The lesson of hypnosis. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30(1), 51-65. doi:10.1037/a0016665
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2010-08959-004&site=ehost-live&scope=site
2. Knowledge and Knowing: The Journey From Philosophy and Psychology to Human Learning
Murphy, P. K., Alexander, P. A., & Muis, K. R. (2012). Knowledge and knowing: The journey from philosophy and psychology to human learning. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, J. Sweller, … J. Sweller (Eds.) , APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 189-226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13273-008
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-11701-008&site=ehost-live&scope=site
3. Psychology: The Empirical Study of Epistemology and Phenomenology
Charles, E. P. (2013). Psychology: The empirical study of epistemology and phenomenology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 140-144. doi:10.1037/a0032920
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2013-18051-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
4. The Fragmented Object: Building Disciplinary Coherence Through a Contextual Unit of Analysis
Clegg, J. W. (2013). The fragmented object: Building disciplinary coherence through a contextual unit of analysis. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 151-155. doi:10.1037/a0032926
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2013-19344-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site

State’s Mandated Reporter Statute

/in /by

Review your state’s mandated reporter statute. Provide details about this in your post. If faced with a mandated reporter issue, what are the steps in reporting the issue? Create a mandated reporter scenario and post it. Respond to one of your peer’s scenarios using the guidelines for submission/reporting in your state. Be sure to include a reference to your state’s website related to mandated reporting.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post State’s Mandated Reporter Statute appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.