Class 1 Unit 3 COMMENT 1

The guidance and coaching from the RN role and advanced practice role are equally important and each have their advantages. For the RN role, the RN can teach the patient at the bedside and spend more time offering guidance and coaching. One of the most important things nurses can do to improve outcomes is to educate patients about their self-care needs before discharge (London, 2016). For the advanced practice role, there are two types of experiences that refine their coaching abilities. According to Spross and Babine (2014), these two experiences are continuous contact with patients over time that shows APNs to see how illnesses evolve over time, and one time episodic encounters that teach the APN how to communicate appropriately in certain situations, such as sad news situations. I believe it is the continuous contact with patients over time that makes the APN most competent because this gives the opportunity to observe trends in coaching and chronic illnesses to better coach the next patients. 

Teaching and coaching go hand in hand with the wellness model as the wellness model emphasizes maintaining health not only of the body; but also of the mind, soul, and context. For a care provider to maintain health of the mind, soul, and context of the individual, teaching and coaching are both necessary. The holistic approach of the wellness model depends on coaching and education to prevent the disease process in a patient before it occurs. The holistic approach of the wellness versus sickness model also depends on the APN adjusting guidance and coaching style to fit each individual patient, which is something that is not a focus in the medical model. “The learning style (e.g., visual), personalities (e.g., defensive) and educational needs (e.g., communication skills) require coaching flexibility” (LeBlanc & Sherbino, 2010). Coaching flexibility is a crucial factor in coaching and guidance to be successful, and APNs understand this and adjust accordingly. 

References

LeBlanc, C., & Sherbino, J. (2010). Coaching in emergency medicine. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(6), 520-524. accession number: 57163745.

London, F. (2016). No time to teach: The essence of patient and family education for health care providers (2nd ed). Atlanta, GA: Pritchett & Hull Associates

Spross, J., & Babine, R. (2014). Guidance and coaching. In A. B. Hamric, C.M. Hanson, M.F. Tracy & E.T. O’Grady (Ed.), Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach (5th ed., p. 45). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

 

“. WITH THE NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Keras

We need your expertise:

A) 1/3 of the work, 5 pages. Please give us a detailed, scientific(!) description of HOW keras workes, how it is designed and how Tensor Flow gets into the field

B) 2/3 of the work, 15 pages. Please give a RESERACH paper reference to each section of KERAS and its technology used. Please target a MINMUM of 20 Research papers of HIGH quality that really EXACTLY are referenced by Keras as source of the method and technology used by Keras.

https://keras.io/getting_started/intro_to_keras_for_researchers/

Health Community media

View the scenario called “Critical Decision Making for Providers” found in the Allied Health Community media (https://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt307v/allied-health-community/home.html).

In a 7501,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the lab technician, and answer the following questions:

1.) What were the consequences of a failure to report?

2.) What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk for litigation, on the organization’s quality metrics, and on the workload of other hospital departments?

3.) As Mike’s manager, what will you do to address the issue with him and ensure other staff members do not repeat the same mistakes?

A minimum of three academic references from credible sources are required for this assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

theatre

Response to Play 2 (MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING)
Here’s the link to the video:  https://www.pbs.org/wnet/gperf/much-ado-about-nothing-full-episode/10194/

WHEN YOU ARE READY TO RESPOND ONLINE

You are not graded on your opinion, but rather how you express your opinioncan you give specific examples from the production that will illustrate your point.

The online responses for the plays will be longer than your previous discussion responses.  However, try to be brief if you can between three to five paragraphs.  Youll be hitting those points you think are most pertinent to your experience.

Here are the basic points you might touch on

What is this play trying to say about the human condition?
Remember, all plays are meant to entertain. But even the lightest, silliest comedy is saying something about people (as individuals and/or a collective)
Did this production succeed? What were its strengths?  What were its weaknesses?
This is where you break down and analyze the various elements to see what works or doesnt. Consider the following elements and discuss ones you feel are most pertinent:
Text
Plot
Dialogue/language
Acting
Sets, costumes, lights and other design elements
Pacing of the play
Moments that stood out in the play
Special performance or production elements that stood out in the play
The audience. YES, the audience does have an affect on the experience.
Was the experience worthwhile? Why or why not?
Maybe a production was good and temporarily entertaining, but the subject matter was mediocre or is not relevant to us today.
Or, maybe the play was not executed well, but something about the themes are very relevant today and it made you ponder on the world or your life.
Or maybe just one element was soooooo good, it was enough to hold you and make you glad you went.
Or maybe just one element was soooooo bad, it didnt matter how good everything else was.
Or, maybe it was somewhat worthwhile for various reasons.
Or, maybe it was very worthwhile to you, but not for some other person. Or vica versa.  Why might that be the case?