Values & Ethical Choices

Week 5: Discussion Board (Values & Ethical Choices)
Integrity can be described as a congruence (match) between what we think, say and do in our personal lives and our professional lives. It is indicative of honesty, moral strength, and courage. The concept of “core values” can be described as those values that guide our behaviors and serve as a vision for our life. As noted in this week’s course material: “When you are able to identify your core values, you have a clear picture of the kind of person you want to be and the kind of life you want to have”.
This week’s topic challenges us to gain greater clarity and awareness of our personal values and how they align with our career and life choices. For this week’s discussion board, please review the 10 Core Values of Zappos Company Culture (Week 5: Required Resources) and pick two of the Zappos core values that resonate with your own personal values. Discuss why you picked those two and how they could play out in the workplace.
Next, provide two examples of how your selected core values can support ethical behavior in the workplace.

https://hbr.org/2010/05/how-zappos-infuses-culture-using-core-values

https://berkeleycollege.kanopy.com/product/happiness-matters

Zappos Company Culture:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CcLIPaUz3E

BPH

Use APA 6th Edition Format and support your work with at least 3 peer-reviewed references within 5 years of publication. Remember that you need a cover page and a reference page. All paragraphs need to be cited properly. All responses must be in a narrative format and each paragraph must have at least 4 sentences. Lastly, you must have at least 2 pages of content, no greater than 3 pages, excluding cover page and reference page.

Case Study is Due 5/31/2020 by 12 Midnight. If Any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Case Study

L.L. is a 67-year-old male who has been diagnosed with BPH. He is having difficulty with urination. He is currently on Cozaar 100 mg for HTN and his BP is well controlled. He is taking no other medications. The doctor has recommended medication for his BPH, but he would like to try a herbal supplement before taking a prescription medication.

1. Would you recommend a herbal supplement in L.Ls case?

2. If so, what herbal supplement would he take?

3. What is the recommended dosage?

4. What are possible side effects of the herbal supplement?

5. What warnings should you give L.L. before he starts the herbal supplement.

American Women

Assignment Details
The Workplace: 1960 to Present

For this Assignment, you will consider the impact of the second and third waves of feminism on womens opportunities in the public sector. In some cases, the impact could be the opportunities for promotion and/or management roles; in others, this could be the ability to enter fields in which women were less likely to be present, such as scientific research, IT, the military, etc.

For this Assignment, you will explore the experiences of women in the public sector by conducting an interview with a woman who is currently employed. After conducting your interview, you will share your own workplace experiences as well as those of your interview subject, in combination with connections to the Unit 8 Reading. The goal of this Assignment is to determine how individual experiences in the public sector reflect the challenges and successes of the second and third waves of feminism between 1960 and present.

Interviews:

Select one woman employed (in any field) and ask her about her workplace experiences. Your interview subject could be a female coworker, family member, friend, neighbor, or a total stranger, who is currently employed, and interview this woman about her experiences in the workplace. You should create at least 5 interview questions to ask your interview subject. Be prepared to ask follow-up questions if you would like additional information. For example, you may wish to ask questions related to your interview subjects career history, impressions of upward mobility, or pay scales.

Essay:

Begin with an introduction in which you address the significance of improved opportunities in the public sector for women between 1960 and present, including employment legislation and entrance into previously off-limit fields.
Introduce the individual you are interviewing and explain why you chose her for the interview. Then, you will summarize her replies and highlight her experiences in the workforce. *You are not required to submit the interview transcript for this Unit 8 assignment. Consider the following when you address her experiences: What were your interview subjects observations regarding changes in the workforce in recent decades? How have these changes impacted her personally? How have these changes impacted her family?
Address your own experiences in the workforce and address the same considerations you addressed for the assessment of both interviews. Compare your experiences in the workforce with those of your interview subject. How are your experiences different from, or similar to, those of your interview subject?
Connect the Unit 8 reading. What has been the impact of employment legislation, in your perspective, on the workplace between 1960 and present? Address why learning about the history of womens experiences in the workforce is useful.
Include a conclusion to summarize your points.
Word Count:

The Assignment should be at least 500 words and should employ connections to the Unit 8 Reading material. You should follow the Unit 8 Assignment template in Course Documents.

APA formatting:
Connections to the Unit 8 Reading material are required for this Assignment. Be sure to include APA parenthetical citations and references; formatting for citations and reference entries should follow the APA 6th edition style guide, which is available under Content / Academic Tools via the Academic Writer link.

Submit the Assignment to the Unit 8 Dropbox when it is complete.

standford prison experiment discussion post

watch the following documentary, after reading https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_2018_chapter1-chapitre1.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_LKzEqlPto

The documentary is a BBC film depicting the Stanford Prison Experiment. It includes original footage of the study, and more current interviews with select mock ‘prisoners’, ‘guards’, and the researcher, Dr. Zimbardo. It provides a very good overview of the purpose of the study, and the methods employed.

As you watch, please think about the ethical policies reviewed in Chapter 1 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement.

Discussion post:
1) Please post to the Discussion Board any general comments you have on the study, and the behaviour exhibited by the mock prisoners and mock guards. Did the events depicted in the footage surprise you? Why or why not?

2) Then, please comment on the ethics of the study (as depicted in the film) applying the core underlying value of the Tri-Council Policy, ‘Respect for Human Dignity’. (Think about how ‘Respect for Human Dignity’ might be expressed through the three core principles of respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice.)

3) The Zimbardo experiment was conducted in 1971. Imagine that you are a member of an ethics review board, and receive a proposal to replicate the study in 2020. Would you allow it? Why or why not?

4) If you do approve the study, what changes would you request to the study (as depicted in the film) to ensure that the ethical principles of the Tri-Council Policy (respect for persons, concern for welfare, and justice) are respected?

please follow the rubic and read the instruction carefully