In your opinion, how does the theory of what was written into these papers compare and contrast from public administration then to public administration now?

/in /by

The final paper will be due in Unit 8. The paper shall be posted in the appropriate area as a Word attachment. The body of the papers shall be 2000-2,200 words excluding cover page and reference page, double spaced in 12-pitch font, with numbered pages, and must contain a title page and reference page. At least 5 academic references, must be cited in APA documentation style. Appropriate references may include books, journal articles, magazine articles, other online references, and court case citations. The body of the paper should contain an identifiable introduction, analysis and discussion on the given topic, and a clear conclusion. The papers should be written in the third person.

The topic for the Final Paper will be on the Federalist Papers No. 10 and 51. Points of interest which your paper should be based on are as follows:

  1. What are Federal Papers about?
  2. What is the view point of the author
  3. In your opinion, how does the theory of what was written into these papers compare and contrast from public administration then to public administration now?
  4. Does public involvement play into the thoughts and writings of the Federalist Papers?
  5. Was public involvement a consideration in the Federalist papers when written?
  6. Conclusion, what is your view point on these writings?

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post In your opinion, how does the theory of what was written into these papers compare and contrast from public administration then to public administration now? appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Assignment Vargas Family Case Study: Narrative Therapy (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2)

/in /by

Read “Topic 7: Vargas Family Case Study.”

Identify one member of the Vargas family whose dominant story could use some rewriting. Read the workshop notes on Reauthoring Conversations.

Part 1: In 250-300 words, write a counseling note for the client’s file. In this note, describe any exceptions to the problem that you have identified and develop scaffolding questions to ask the client in your next session, one in their landscape of action and one in their landscape of identity.

Part 2: Put yourself in the client’s shoes and, as the client, write a reauthoring version of their story that is 500-750 words in length. It should incorporate the exceptions and responses to the scaffolding questions from Part 1. Use narrative language when applying this reauthoring technique.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. 

REFERENCE

 

Michael White Workshop Notes 

Published on www.dulwichcentre.com.au

 https://www.dulwichcentre.com.au/michael-white-workshop-notes.pdf

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Assignment Vargas Family Case Study: Narrative Therapy (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) appeared first on Psychology Homework.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Why is international cooperation relevant

/in /by

Argumentative essay
Why is international cooperation relevant
use concepts relevant to the field of study
Come up with a relevant research question
Methodology
The major argument must be explained clearly
Proper references
The essay must be original for turn it in

Phyllis Young are you able to complete this assignment tonight?

/in /by

Based on the PICO question that you stated in week 2, utilize two studies that apply to the clinical question. Cite the studies based on APA format. 

  • Describe if these findings could be applied to your practice and what aspect of the studies should be applied.
  • Your decision regarding whether this research should be applied should be based on your assessment of the studies. 
  • Discuss your evaluation of the studies and cite your rationale. Your assessment should be based on information discussed in Ch. 20.
  • This assignment should be limited to tHree pages.

This assignment counts for two normal assignments.

Here is the PICO question:

 1.    In pediatric patients aged 2months to 5 years who receive the MMR vaccination, is there an increased risk of autism against those who do not receive the vaccination?

                P= Children aged 2months to 5years.

                I= MMR vaccination

                C= No MMR vaccination

                O= Autism 

REFERENCE MATERIAL 

 

“. WITH THE NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”