DEBATE TOPIC: Class is a form of open stratification in which the position a person has by birth can be changed through his or her achievements or luck. Do you still agree with this statement given the current trends in terms of globalization and inequality?
I (the con team) will provide a different perspective and will criticize this statement => write the write-up base on this perspective
See instruction in the attachment
Create an brief lesson plan and Annotated Bibliography on the topic : ” The First Crusade”
Your deliverable includes a brief lesson plan for your topic, an annotated bibliography of resources for your classmates
**You need ten recommended resources** (It is highly recommended that you have a mix of resources from a university library and the Internet)
Follow this format example:
Topic: [a short title for this project].
Author(s): [student or students who created this project].
Target audience: [one paragraph that describes the demographics of your expected audience for this project].
Description: [one paragraph that describes your topic and how it fits into our course].
Annotated bibliography:
Suzuki, M. (2007). Rewriting the odyssey in the twenty-first century: Mary zimmerman’s odyssey and margaret atwood’s penelopiad. College Literature, 34(2), 263-0_10.
This article can be found in Bellevue University’s online library in the Proquest database. The article discusses … [put your summary paragraph here].
The author helps high school students understand both the similarities and differences between … [put your analysis paragraph here].
Boilen, B. (2018, March 12). John Prine: NPR Music Tiny Desk Concert [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOg7mAkrKJw
John Prine, a legendary song writer in the USA, performs three songs … [put your summary paragraph here].
High school students might not know John Prine, but National Public Radio chooses various artists … [put your analysis paragraph here].
[Have ten recommended resources, and remember to have a good mix of library, web, multimedia, and print resources which are appropriate for your target audience].
Part One: Draft Submission.
Post a link to complete drafts of at least two of your articles. (Three articles are required in the final Project 4).
Part Two: Peer Feedback. Provide peer feedback on drafts.
Your instructor will assign peer partners. The following prompts should guide your peer review, an important step in drafting. You don’t necessarily have to respond to each and every prompt, but you should respond, in one way or another, to a majority of them. Don’t be limited by these prompts, though: Share any and all feedback you have for your peers.
If you’d like, you can also download the questions as a Word file that you can then fill out and return to your partner(s): Project 4 Peer Feedback Questions.docx attached below
Are the topics for the articles interesting, up-to-date and relevant? Do they work to increase the professional authorship of the writer? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Are the articles written according to the writing for the web guidelines in our course, including front-loaded content, obvious signposts, links to outside sources, etc.? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Comment on the design of the articles. Are the articles attractively designed and eye-catching? Are visuals effective and appropriate? Do they include captions and links where appropriate? Offer suggestions for improvement.
Is the title informative and interesting? Are there informative headings in addition to the title?
Is the writing conversational? Is it also correct? Make suggestions for improvement.
Most online article and blog writing utilizes even shorter paragraphs (usually around 25-35 words). Articles should also be between 300-600 words.
Use APA 6th edition style including 12pt font, Times New Roman, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, page numbers. Each paper will have7 references from the original textbook (at least 4) and other course material or approved academic resources (at least 2).
Be sure to structure your paper as follows:
A title page (1 page),
Reference page (1 page) and
4 pages of analysis and reflection = 6 page paper.
Each paper will use a personal example of a conflict or difficult conversation or negotiation that you participated in or observed. The narrative of the example is applied to course content to illustrate your analysis for what worked or could be done differently to achieve a better outcome in the future.
Using the text, Getting to Yes, analyze a negotiation you have personally experienced in the last 12-18 months. Include the following in your analysis:
Introduction
What are principled negotiations?
What are the characteristics of a negotiation that is both efficient and effective?
Describe your negotiation.
Use the framework of the 4 keys of principled negotiation (as outlined in the textbook).
Analyze your example of a negotiation. Answer the following questions in your paper:
o How could you separate people from the problem?
o What are the interests v. positions in this negotiation?
o What options for mutual gain are available?
o What are objective criteria that could be used in this negotiation?
Does your MVS give you any insights as to patterns you have when it comes to handling negotiations?
What would you do differently in the future to produce a better negotiation?
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
