Communication is leadership is salient. This is the way the followers or team members can understand and learn from management. If this not done right, the followers are confused, and there is potential for various interpretations. It is the responsibility of the leadership to communicate all needed information to succeed strategically.

Question 1: Some senior executives believe they should rely on written information and computer reports because these yield more accurate data than face-to-face communications do. Do you agree? Discuss.

The communication path depends on the importance of the information that is being shared. Written information or computer reports give the sender responsibility to send an accurate statement. And once submitted, it is out there. When the information is communicated, since both parties are listening, there is more room for error. If the report is communicated the receiver should be actively listening, should restrict distractions and seek understanding in a limited time (Daft, 2018)

Redundant communication is using more channels to interact on a message, which is of high importance (Daft, 2018). While doing so, the sender can transfer and send the message across stronger, and the receiver has time to process. Hence, I feel redundant communication is the path to pursue.

Question 2: How might leaders use social media to create a sense of community among employees? What do you think are some advantages and disadvantages of a company using social media to communicate with employees?

Social media is an application that allows to create and share user-generated content with the public (Daft, 2018). In social media, there is a grey area of what and how much to share. This applies to both personal and organizational levels. Leaders can create private events on social media to have a company party. These events make employees feel included and special.

Using social media allows stakeholders to have a better understanding of their investment in the organization. Depending on the content shared, this might have an impact back to the organization if the stakeholders are not satisfied.

Question 3: The chapter suggests that very small teams (say, three to six members) perform better, and most people prefer to work in small teams. However, many companies use teams of 100 or more people to perform complex tasks, such as creating and developing a new product. Do you think a unit of that size can truly function as a team? Discuss.

There is some truth to the saying too many cooks spoil the soup. A group consists of 100 or more members means more variabilities. It is hard to coordinate by leadership, and within the team, lack of trust, commitment, and inattention to result can occur due to multiple people taking responsibility (Daft, 2018). A small group of people is more comfortable to track. However, if it is a small team, the company’s cream must be present in this team; otherwise, due to inadequate knowledge or talent, it would be a downfall. If the right members are in the team, the group organically will create team cohesiveness, norms. However, a journal article discusses that performance improved when teams focused solely on the quality of the team (Konradt, Oldeweme, & Otte, 2018).

Question 4: If you were the leader of a team developing a new computer game, how might you apply negotiation to resolve a conflict between two strong-willed members related to which features to include in the game?

Negotiation is people compromising various alternatives to reach an agreeable decision by both or all parties (Daft, 2018). In this scenario, I would request a distributive negotiation by doing consumer research on the features offered in the game. This would automatically help the team understand the product they are putting out to the market.

Sample Solution

The post Communication is leadership is salient. appeared first on homework handlers.

3. In The Spirit of Capitalism, Weber talks about how wasting time was a sin for many protestants, particularly Puritans. What was the basis of this belief? What does that belief promote? Give an example of how this way of thinking may still has influence today.
   In The Spirit of Capitalism Weber talks about The English puritans who grew out of Calvinism, which was heavily influenced by the ethical ideas of Richard Baxter. Baxter largely against all striving toward the procurement of temporal goods (Weber 197). In other words, according to Baxter’s asceticism, wealth and the pursuit of wealth are meaningless. What is truly reprehensible is dependence on personal property, and the enjoyment of wealth results in idleness and fleshly desire, especially in the pursuit of the divine life. It is only because property brings such a risk of rest that they are worthy of criticism (Weber 197). Therefore, on the basis of such beliefs as asceticism, wasting time is the most serious sin, because the period of life is very short and precious, while any waste of time, small talk, luxurious life or even extra sleep is a sin. Such beliefs were widely accepted by Protestants, especially Puritans because such asceticism was more in line with their norms of unclean living. The belief that wasting time is a sin further promotes the idea that people work hard and take pride in their work. Under this belief, the Puritans must make full use of their time to labor, which is the way to obtain the approval of God, only in this way can they not waste time. This way of thinking also has a profound impact on our current life. For example, we have a strict working time limit at work. If we are late for work every day, we will be morally punished by the company because of laziness and irresponsibility. It can be said that wasting time is a moral constraint on people.

Question: What exactly is the Puritan doctrine of asceticism? What are the positive effects?

Work Cited

Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and The “Spirit” Of Capitalism. Penguin Books, 2002

Response from Kha

5. What was the Peace of Westphalia? How did it change political systems in Europe? How were the political and religious systems created at this time not religiously tolerant? How did the power of the Holy Roman Emperor shift with the Peace of Westphalia? How did the economic and political power of the pope shift with the Peace of Westphalia? What characteristics of our current political systems and structures stem from these changes in Europe?
   The series of wars that broke out prior to the year 1648, notably the Thirty Years War, revolved around the issue of religion— religious group clashing an opposing religious group. The ultimate end of this specific war is credited to the string of peace treaties that were enacted amongst Westphalian towns, collectively known as the Peace of Westphalia. The results of its establishment include the cease of the Thirty Years War, a shift in power throughout Europe, and religious freedom within individual states. (Patton, The Peace of Westphalia). Prior to the Peace of Westphalia, discussing government decisions usually concerned a “dominant nation” forcing policy amongst the other nations. With the Peace of Westphalia, political systems changed for the negotiation’s goal was centered around the goal of reaching a compromise. It is one of the earliest historical moments in which diplomatic methods were utilized amongst many powers. (Patton, The Peace of Westphalia). The treaty did not mean that there was religious tolerance however, rather, it emphasized the concept of pluralism; there would be many different religions compared to one, almighty religion. Each state had sovereignty, in other words, complete power to uphold one religion. Any minority or exceptions to this were dealt with brutally. This shift in power was not only attributed to states, it was also the case for the Holy Roman Emperor. Logically, now with the states containing their own power to exercise their chosen religion, the role of the Holy Roman Emperor grew significantly unapparent. Almost identically, the Pope’s political and economic role was reduced tremendously as the princes were given the power to select their own religion (Sargent, What Was the Treaty of Westphalia). The changes which were implemented as a result of these peace treaties continue to play a role in the nature of our current political systems. As mentioned by scholars, the Peace of Westphalia was revolutionary for it provided guidelines behind international diplomacy. Not only this, but religious tolerance and individual state sovereignty (Patton, The Peace of Westphalia). What current world examples portray the changes that resulted from the peace of Westphalia?

Sample Solution

The post The Spirit of Capitalism appeared first on homework handlers.