Describe two or more other ways to disseminate the findings, discussion, and implications of your DNP Project (electronic health record).

As noted in previous weeks of the course, collegial collaboration can broaden your perspective and help you to generate new ideas. How might this be true for the development of a scholarly product for dissemination?

In this Discussion, you and your colleagues share insights related to dissemination, including how dissemination relates to your development as a scholar-practitioner and as a nurse leader.

To prepare:

  • Reflect      on the process you engaged in (with your Instructor or committee chair) of      selecting the journal or other format for your DNP Project scholarly      product for dissemination. What are the strengths and limitations of the      forum you selected?
  • What      insights have you gained through developing this product? (You may also      wish to reflect on insights gained through your oral presentations.)
  • What      other forums could be appropriate for disseminating the findings of your      DNP Project? (Consider involvement in professional organizations, for      instance.)
  • How      does dissemination relate to your development as a scholar-practitioner      and a nurse leader?

By tomorrow Tuesday 7/30 6 pm write a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references. Include the level one headers as numbered below: 

Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

1) Describe the format/ forum you selected for your DNP Project (electronic health record) scholarly product for dissemination.

2) Discuss the strengths and limitations of the approach you selected.

3) Describe two or more other ways to disseminate the findings, discussion, and implications of your DNP Project (electronic health record).

4) Explain how dissemination relates to your development as a scholar-practitioner and a nurse leader.

Required Readings

Ousley, A. L., Swarz, J. A., Milliken, E. L., & Ellis, S. (2010). Cancer education and effective dissemination: Information access is not enough. Journal of Cancer Education, 25(2), 196–205.

This article details the results of a Practitioner Information Needs survey that was administered to five different types of practitioners involved in cancer care.

 

Walsh, N. (2010). Dissemination of evidence into practice: Opportunities and threats. Primary Health Care, 20(3), 26–30.

This article reports on research into the perceived barriers that may impede the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Required Media

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012a). Developing a scholarly product for dissemination. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 6 minutes.

In this media presentation, Dr. Kris Mauk shares her DNP Project poster created for a presentation at the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses National Conference.

Identify and discuss the four mechanisms that have been implemented by the PPACA. 

Health Care Reform/ Integration and Reflection

The overall goal of the Session Long Project is to examine health  care delivery in the United States. Read the article “Remaking the  American health care system: A positive reflection on the Affordable  Care Act with emphasis on mental health care” by Ogundipe, Alam, Gazula,  Olagbemiro, Osiezagha, Rahn, and Richie (2015). After reading the  article and conducting your own research, please respond to the  following questions.

  1. What is the intended purpose of the PPACA that was signed into law  in 2010? Will it meet its intended purpose based on what you’ve read in  this article and from your own research on the topic?
  2. Has PPACA met its intended purpose based on what you’ve read in this article and from your own research on the topic?
  3. What do the authors state are the issues with the quality of care being provided?
  4. Identify and discuss the four mechanisms that have been implemented by the PPACA.

Length: Submit a 3-page paper, not including the cover page and the reference list.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Assessment and Grading: Your paper will be assessed based on the performance assessment rubric. You can view it under Assessments at the top of the page. Review it before you begin working on the assignment. Your work should also follow these Assignment Expectations.

Provide three evidence-based examples demonstrating the application of the theory selected and support for current practice.(one example for my part)

CLC –  Florence nightingale enviornmentalTheory .

1. YES – the presentation is 10-15 slides. (my part initial 4-5 slides)

2. There are 3 critical elements that need to be discussed:

3. Overview and efficacy for the model selected.(my part of topic)

4. How the four metaparadigm concepts can be explained using the selected model.

5. Provide three evidence-based examples demonstrating the application of the theory selected and support for current practice.(one example for my part)

6. PRESENTATION:

· Slides should be clear and concise. A rule of thumb is “No more than 7 bullets of 7 words per slide”

· Yes, slide content should be cited (slides and speaker notes)

· Speaker Notes are written in the space under each slide. Speaker notes should look like a formal paper. They are in paragraph form and include intext citations. (They will look like you took a paragraph out of a document and pasted it into the speaker notes section….with the exception that they will be single spaced).

1. Layout – see suggestion regarding bullets. Images are acceptable

2. Language & mechanics – see rubric

3. Sources: USE APA to cite intext sources and references

PARTICIPATION:

At the end of the project, each submission will receive a score. Based on the assessment of participation from the other members of the group, I will determine if a person will earn full credit or partial credit related to participation. In other words, people on the same team may have different scores. I will request participation information at the end of Week 3 when the presentations are due.

Items to consider: Did each member of the group complete the duty designated or agreed upon by the group members? Was communication clear and respectful? Did each member complete the duty by the date decided on by the group?

What nursing considerations should be made for Mr. Edwards related to his disability?

Case Study, Chapter 9, Chronic Illness and Disability

1. Mr. Edwards is 20-year-old male patient who is admitted for treatment of recurring pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and surgical treatment of a urinary stricture, which has decreased the urinary stream. Mr. Edwards has paraplegia; he is paralyzed from the waist down secondary to an automobile accident when he was 16. He came by ambulance to the hospital, leaving his wheelchair and wheelchair pressure-relieving cushion at home. According to the nursing history, the patient is a nonsmoker and he does not drink alcohol or take any illegal drugs.

  1. What nursing considerations should be made for Mr. Edwards related to his disability?
  2. What health promotion and prevention education does Mr. Edwards need?

2. Ms. Fulton is a 38-year-old mother who was recently diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, a chronic disease of the neuromuscular system. Management of this disease process requires strict adherence to a medication regimen. The disease also affects ADLs for the patient and her family. Additionally, because myasthenia gravis is characterized by exacerbations that may require hospitalizations, Ms. Fulton has had to resign from her position as president of a marketing firm. She has remained as an employee of the same company, but now serves as a consultant with more flexible work hours.

  1. In discussing management of her chronic disease, the nurse focuses on what types of strategies?
  2. Describe supportive nursing care that may be helpful to Ms. Fulton.