What model(s) will you use for testing (i.e., animal, cell cultures, computer simulations)? Explain the choice of model, and provide support for the reliability of the model. Discuss the pros and cons of your choice. 

Recent studies support the potential of a drug that is derived from the metal iridium to effectively treat cancer. This experimental drug, Drug ZL105, has not been tested for efficacy and toxicity. Imagine that you are the one responsible for approving or denying the use of this drug within the United States. Your job is to propose the testing that is needed for this drug to be determined as safe and effective for the treatment of cancer in humans.

In your research and discussion, you should address the questions below.

1. What model(s) will you use for testing (i.e., animal, cell cultures, computer simulations)? Explain the choice of model, and provide support for the reliability of the model. Discuss the pros and cons of your choice.

2. In determining the safety and effectiveness of the drug, would it be necessary to test efficacy, toxicity, and lethality? Explain what each of these tests are for and whether or not one or more of the tests are necessary for your determination.

3. Provide your thoughts on what information you hope to gather from your tests and whether or not the same protocol should be used for various categories of products such as drugs, cosmetics, and herbal medicines.

Your case study assignment should be three to four pages in length and utilize at least three reliable references. Use APA style guidelines in writing this assignment, following APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and referencing.

How did the structure of cities begin to change after World War II? What factors were responsible for that change?

Background Information

 

 

In Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future, you will read Chapter 16, “Renewable Energy”; and Chapter 23, “Sustainable Communities and Lifestyles.”  In Biology through the Eyes of Faith, you will read Chapter 13, “When Earth and Heaven Are One.”

collapse Background Information

 

Instructions

 

 

  1. Read Chapters 16 and 23 in Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future.
  2. Read Chapter 13 in Biology through the Eyes of Faith.
  3. Choose one question from each chapter, listed in the Workshop Five Post-Reading Questions handout.
  4. Write a short essay to answer each question you selected.  The essays are to be typed, double spaced, and each should be approximately one-half to a full page long.  Many of the questions contain several parts, so make sure that you have answered all parts of the question and have done any drawings requested.
  5. When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself and submit a copy to your instructor using the Dropbox by the end of the workshop.

Workshop Five Post-Reading Questions  Pick One from each chapter

 

 

 

Chapter 16: Renewable Energy (Environmental Science)

 

  1. Why is it important for renewable energy sources to replace fossil fuels? What are the prospects for getting it done?
  2. What are some ways of converting biomass to useful energy? What is the potential environmental impact of each?

 

 

 

Chapter 23: Sustainable Communities and Lifestyles (Environmental Science)

 

  1. How did the structure of cities begin to change after World War II? What factors were responsible for that change?
  2. What is smart growth? What are four smart-growth strategies that address urban sprawl?

 

 

 

Chapter 13: When Heaven and Earth Are One (Biology)

 

  1. What is kingdom work?  What is not kingdom work?  Do you think there is anything in between? Explain your answer.
  2. Select one cultural development and describe the good and evil forms taken by human activity in that area. Apply the concept of shalom to your analysis.

Discuss three main points from each of the four participants in the debate. Specifically name the participant when you discuss his or her argument

Listen to the following debate on genetically modified organisms (GMOs). You will hear four experts debate the safety of GMOs. Robert Fraley and Alison Van Eenennaam argue the case for GMOs, and Charles Benbrook and Margaret Mellon argue against.

Follow the link below to listen to the podcast Debate: Should We Genetically Modify Food

http://www.npr.org/2014/12/10/367842658/debate-should-we-genetically-modify-food

Be sure to take notes on the main points of each debater as you listen! You will write a 1 1/2-page essay on the debate. Your essay should address the following elements:

Create an introduction that provides background on the topic and includes a clear thesis statement.

Discuss three main points from each of the four participants in the debate. Specifically name the participant when you discuss his or her argument.

Explain your position on the issue. What was your opinion before you listened to the debate and read this unit’s articles?

Did your position change, or was it reinforced by what you read and heard ?

Provide an APA-formatted reference for the podcast and any other sources used.

APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources

are to be followed. Title page and reference page are not included in the page-length requirement.

Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.

How would you act, what actions should you take, and what would you do

SCENARIO # 1: An Unannounced Inspection The Situation: An OSHA inspector arrives at your worksite requesting to talk with you about an inspection based on the health and safety complaints of a worker. You are in your office and the OSHA inspector is at the reception office. You know this worker to be a highly disgruntled individual who is constantly questioning all aspects of his job and the work environment. The area he works in is currently undergoing a major renovation for a process change for the product in the line, but it is still trying to produce the older version of the product at a lower volume than before. Your area supervisor is a competent individual, but they are working under a lot of stress with the changeover; therefore, you are only 80% sure that the claims listed in the complaint are groundless and without merit. The worker is also heavily involved in an effort to unionize the plant employees. In addition, your plant manager is in another state at corporate headquarters for some important meetings. The Questions: How would you act, what actions should you take, and what would you do? Should you challenge the validity of the OSHA inspector’s request, or their right to enter the workplace? Or should you request a warrant to enter the workplace, and thereby gain some time to make sure everything is in order back in the plant? Can you gain any time to check with your in-area safety supervisor first? Or, should you immediately comply with the request for the inspection? Explain your answers. SCENARIO # 2: Serious Near-Miss Crane Incident The Situation: You are the EH&S professional at your company’s shipyard. You have just received a call from a production supervisor that there has been a very serious near miss accident out in the assembly area. Your company is manufacturing the second Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) for the US Navy. This new generation high speed, trimaran design warship has been designed to carry out a wide range of tactical, combat, and support operations in the near-shore (littoral) environment. The project is severally over budget and has received a considerable amount of criticism for it. Successful completion of the project at this phase will be a prime determinant in your companies securing the very lucrative follow-up contracts for more LCS’s. Everyone in the shipyard feels the pressure to complete this project ASAP. Apparently a very large 20 ton overhead crane had some cables snap and has partially collapsed while trying to hoist a large section of the vessel into place for its final welding operation. When you arrive on scene, you see the section wedged overhead between some support beams and walkways. About a dozen hourly workers are scattered about as they leaped to safety after hearing the cables snap. There are many bumps, bruises and scratches on the workers, but they all are able to be treated internally at your nurse’s office. In this initial assessment, there appears to be no need for, or request on the part of the employees, to go to any outside medical consultant or hospital emergency room. Almost immediately you can hear the men complaining that the first attempt to lift the unit did not work and then the production engineer’s decided to “jury rig” some extra cables to lift the unit in place. In addition, one individual said that they were trying to hoist about 28-30 tons, and that was just too much for the old crane. Another offered that the cables themselves had not been changed out in a couple of years and that was against OSHA regulations. Everyone said that they could hear the unit groan and screech before the cables snapped and the crane partially collapsed. Before you walk off with the supervisors to inspect the damage one of the workers offers the opinion that this is an “imminent danger” situation. About 30 minutes later, you are meeting with the engineers and supervisors on one the overhead platforms continuing your inspection of the damage: when a supervisor comes up and tells you that he has heard that an hourly employee has just called OSHA and told them of the situation and that they used the term “imminent danger” in their conversation. The Questions: What are your most important concerns? What should you do next? What information is the most critical for you to have right away? What directions would you give to the supervisors and engineers? When should you inform your facility manager and what should you tell him/her? Should you meet with the hourly employees and what will you discuss with them? How will you handle the OSHA inspector should one show up in the next few hours? Instructions: For Scenario # 1 AND # 2, you are required to discuss a sequential Action Plan on your part that addresses all of the issues presented. It should be a minimum of about 500-600 words (that’s about two pages when double spaced, 12 pt type, 1” margins) and must follow the APA formatting guidelines. The paper should be a minimum of 500 to 600 words. You will likely find that the paper will be longer than 600 words (or two pages) in order to adequately address both of the Case Scenarios. Pay special attention to the “The Questions” at the end of each scenario. Make sure that you address all of the questions. The key to a good grade on this paper is to address all of these questions. Your paper is to be professionally written. Check your paper for proper grammar, spelling, and sentence structure before you submit it. I would suggest writing your paper in a WORD document and check for grammar and spelling before submitting it.