Discuss the ethical concerns and considerations that were or were not included in these statements

Find five hospital or health care organization’s mission, vision and value statements. Discuss the ethical concerns and considerations that were or were not included in these statements. Explain what elements should have been included or excluded. Use at least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library to support your explanation. Your original post must be a minimum of 250 words.

 

1.) St. Vincent Hospital

 

  • Mission: To reveal and embody Christ’s healing love for all people through our high quality Franciscan health care ministry.

 

  • Vision: Providing Health, Healing and Hope to Eastern Wisconsin through One Family.

 

  • Values: Our core values of Respect, Care, Competence and joy will be lived by all who work here and felt by all who use our services.

 

2.) Rideout Memorial Hospital

 

  • Mission: To provide compassionate and superior health care to everyone in our community and region.

 

  • Vision: A regional medical center offering advanced medicine and a full continuum of health care services.

 

  • Values: We will fairly and accurately represent our capabilities and ourselves. We will not misrepresent our capabilities to the public. We will provide services to meet the identified needs of our patients and will constantly seek to avoid the provision of those services that are unnecessary or inefficient.

 

3.) Aurora BayCare Medical Center

 

  • Mission: Aurora BayCare Medical Center is committed to providing the highest quality comprehensive healthcare through superior personalized service, the advancement of medical education and research, and the most efficient use of resources.

 

  • Vision: Aurora BayCare Medical Center will be the recognized leader for quality comprehensive healthcare, medical education and research in Wisconsin and Upper Michigan.

 

  • Values: Quality: I will provide the highest quality healthcare. Service: I will exceed the expectations of patients, visitors, and caregivers. Respect: I will create a healing partnership with our patients, their families and caregivers through privacy, dignity, and collaboration. Stewardship: I will maximize community and stakeholder benefit through the efficient use of our resources.

 

4.) Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation

 

  • Mission: We Care. We Innovate. We Excel.
  • Vision: Our vision is to deliver the future of medicine — today.

 

5.) Shriners Hospitals for Children

 

  • Mission: Provide the highest quality care to children with neuromusculoskeletal conditions, burn injuries and other special healthcare needs within a compassionate, family-centered and collaborative care environment. Provide for the education of physicians and other healthcare professionals. Conduct research to discover new knowledge that improves the quality of care and quality of life of children and families. This mission is carried out without regard to race, color, creed, sex or sect, disability, national origin or ability of a patient or family to pay.

 

  • Vision: Become the best at transforming children’s lives by providing exceptional healthcare through innovative research, in a patient and family centered environment.

why humans should worry about water and food

need a 5 page essay written about why humans should worry about water and food. The class is writing and communication. I am a foreign student so the grammar doesn’t have to be perfect. I just need it by 5 oclock ASAP. This essay is so easy but I’m just so lazy and my brain is fried to write 5 pg essay. I already completed 3pgs. I’m gonna upload it and you can use that to write 2 more pgs. Work Cited please. I need 2 sources. Give it to me as PDF please because I don’t have Microsoft Word. It is MLA format.

Rought Draft #1 : Food & Water

Food and water is the most important things in human life. We eat food and drink water to survive in the world. A lot of people know that food and water is really important to them but they don’t really care about throwing away food and water. Because most people think that the society has enough food and water, they always throw away their leftover food and water. Although, people thinks that we have an unlimited sources for food and water, world clearly shows that not just America, but other countries are struggling with drought situations and they are slowly running out of food. This is not the only problem. A lot of people in this society is having trouble with obese because of food and water. Although, people can eat whatever they want to eat, they should have a limit because United States’ obesity problem is getting worse than before and a lot of people dies every year because of obesity.

What makes reductionist (and “human nature”) theories/explanations so hard to resist? 

 a) How would you explain to someone else, another college student say, what reductionism means? b) What makes some forms of reductionist explanation moreextreme (more heavily reductionistic) than others? c) Looking at the two-sided, one page handout by Neville, “Neuroscience exposes..” and “Race Gap..”, how would you argue that “genes are not destiny.”  Why aren’t they?  e) What accounts for gaps in test scores between blacks and whites?  What would have to happen in order to erase (or reverse) these gaps?

10. a) What makes reductionist (and “human nature”) theories/explanations so hard to resist?  How does our cultural/historical emphasis on machines play into this fatal attraction? b) What does this essay suggest is wrong with (or suspect about) “expertise,” and with reliance on our beloved technical (or technological) solutions to current pressing human problems?

11. a) How might the recent dramatic rise in the incidence of ADHD, as well as other childhood personality or developmental disorders be explained?  (Remember, slow to change factors like DNA or psychological properties can’t explain more rapid changes in behavior or diagnoses.)  Would your explanation be in some degree holistic?  How so?  What contexts, or social units would you include to explain the rise?

12. In the Neville “Neuroscience exposes..” article, it is theorized that poverty affects things like memory, language skills, and I.Q. scores.  a) By what processes do you think this might happen?  Be specific.  b) Can cognitive (or brain) function be improved after birth, and after environmental damage has been done?  How?

What is Gabor Mate’s alternative explanation for the problems of children like Isabelle?

 a) What is Gabor Mate’s alternative explanation for the problems of children like Isabelle?

 b) Show how Mate’s theory/explanation can be applied to Isabelle’s specific case (in other words, translate his general theory into what we know about Isabelle’s social context (meaning her relation to other people and groups, and the history of those relations.)  c)  Give some features, or processes at work in the social world (social context) in which Isabelle’s parents and relatives operate which might create pressures and stresses on them, pressures that are easily communicated to children.  So should we put all blame on the parents?

6. What is your own list of the most pressing problems of our time (my list is on page 18)?

Why do these (sometimes ponderous sounding) issues matter?

7.  Throughout this essay (especially section V and VI), a number of other issues or problems are referred to (like the housing bubble, schizophrenia, etc. etc.) which could be explained either reductionistically, or more holistically (by social context.)  a) Pick  any one of these issues, or one of your own. Explain what the issue or problem is.  Show what an explanation that reduces the answer to a biological factor, or to some form of biological determinism, would look like.

b) Where would you look for a more holistic explanation?

8. a) Pick one other issue or problem that is often explained not by something biological this time, but by putting all the weight of explanation on the individual, or to individual or group mental characteristics (or to some other partof a larger social whole, like those shown in the circles just before page 9.  What issue have you chosen?  b) What would, or does, a more reductionistic explanation look like?  What part of what whole is being used to explain something?  What is missing from such an explanation?  What would a more holistic explanation look like and include?  c) What is wrong with explaining our huge wealth gaps in the US by “greed,” or with explaining Iran’s governmental actions by religion (see especially pages 12, 13, and 14)?