Identify the purpose of analysis, the targeted level of policy (i.e., clinical practice, health care systems, or public/social health) & significance of topic

Policy Analysis Paper
Purpose: To investigate & integrate knowledge of advanced nursing practice, scholarly
inquiry, & leadership by examining a policy at the level of clinical practice, health care
systems, or public/social health policy. Submit a paper between 7-10 pages
long excluding title page and reference pages. Paper must be organized according to the
guidelines below and should include all the identified sections as required. Paper must be
completed in APA format and contain current scholarly sources dated from 2010 until
current.
Introduction
3 points
▪ Generally define & describe the policy issue to be addressed.
▪ Identify the purpose of analysis, the targeted level of policy (i.e., clinical
practice, health care systems, or public/social health) & significance of topic.
▪ Identify questions the policy analysis is intended to address.
Background
3 points
▪ Provide details of the issue or problem, including its nature/scope, relevant
literature & history, & the context within which the issue exists.
▪ Describe existing policy addressing the issue, if any.
▪ Discuss strengths & shortcomings in existing policy.
▪ Identify & describe key stakeholders (individuals & groups) that are or will
be affected by the policy & why.
Analysis
9 points
▪ Identify alternative policies to achieve objectives.
▪ Establish/identify criteria that will be used for selection of “best” policy.
▪ Evaluate each alternative & its potential impact relative to the healthcare &
patient outcomes.
▪ Assess the trade-offs between alternatives.
Recommendations
6 points
▪ Based on the analysis, identify the “best” alternative to address the current
issue & policy situation.
▪ Provide rationale forselection.
▪ Describe possible strategies to implement selected alternative.
▪ Identify barriers to implementation of selected alternative.
▪ Describe methods to evaluate policy implementation.
Discussion
6 points
▪ Discuss analysis & recommendations relative to the original questions
identified, & the level of policy it is intended to address (i.e., clinical
practice, health care systems, or public).
▪ Identify limitations of analysis.
▪ Discuss implications for practice, education, research, & policy-making.
Conclusion
1.5 points
▪ Summarize findings & recommendations of analysis
▪ Identify questions to be addressed in future studies or policy analyses.
References
1.5 points
▪ List all references cited in paper. Must be completed in APA format.
Appendices ▪ Table displaying results of analysis, including, for example, a list of
alternatives & the degree to which each alternative may be most
effective. Other tables & appendices as needed to support analysis.
Must pass through TURNIT IN

describe any public program that serves as a source to finance the U.S. healthcare system

Science:
In two paragraphs, describe any public program that serves as a source to finance the U.S. healthcare system. Describe the specific policy and the program that occurred as a result of the policy and the intended target population.

Application
Consider your readings on the challenges, debates and successes of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010. Using figure 3 (located in week 1 resources) “How a bill becomes a law,” and this weeks’ scholarly readings, select any area within this diagram to describe any issue(s) that may have occurred during or after the process of the PPACA transforming from a bill to an actual law. For example, you can describe:
● How did “the people” influence the passage of this healthcare bill? (What evidence
supports this?)
● Describe a specific state legislature that supported or opposed the bill? (Offer details)
● Describe the “Committee” in the legislative body who was responsible for reviewing
health care bills.
● Describe one debate or amendment to the ACA bill prior to its adoption into law.
● Were there any issues with the budgets associated with the ACA bill?
● Were there any public hearings during the Committee sessions? If so, provide a
description
● Describe any debates to overturn the ACA

the medical causes of infant mortality

This week, you will study research into the medical causes of infant
mortality.

Using reputable article from any source, select and read five articles in
peer-reviewed journals such as Journal ofEpidemiology, Journal of
Environment Health, and the Journal of Applied Epidemiologyregarding
medical causes of infant mortality.

Write an annotated bibliography of the five articles, which should include a
one-page summary of each article. Write an original summary; do not merely copy
the abstract. In your summary, include the following:

  1. The study’s hypothesis or objective.
  1. The study’s methodological approach.
  1. The study’s pertinent findings.
  1. The study’s conclusions.

In another two pages, bring together what you learned about the causes of
infant mortality. Rank the causes by order of importance as you see it.

Present all your work in a Word document formatted in the APA style. Cite the
articles in the correct format.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria Maximum
Points
Stated the hypothesis or objective
of each study.
5
Described the
methodological approach of each study.
5
Summarized the findings of each
study.
10
Summarized the
conclusions of each study.
10
Synthesized the
conclusions of all studies to describe and rank causes of infant mortality.
20
Presented a structured document
free of spelling and grammatical errors.
5
Properly cited sources
using the APA format.
5
Total: 60

Critical Issue (Oral Health) in Public Health describing how you would identify and address the critical issue

Oral Health

Write a 5 page case study on a Critical Issue (Oral Health) in Public Health describing how you would identify and address the critical issue.

Document Preview:

Case Study Format:
The following format must be used for case study!!
A. Introduction
The introduction is a brief summary of what the critical public health issue is. The introduction should identify how far along the case has progressed: what is being planned to address the critical issue. Has a plan been developed? What would you do to develop a plan as a public health professional? Has a plan been pilot-tested, implemented, or evaluated,? If so explain. If not, describe how you would do so.
B. Problem Statement
B.1 The Institution. The problem statement begins with a brief description of the institution (size, location, governance, etc.)
B.2 The Situation. A narrative and brief analysis of the situation or the presenting problem follows. This deals specifically with the information needs and requirements of the institution, and describes the circumstances that make this a critical issue in public health.
C. Objectives: Desired Outcomes
The statement of objectives describes what your chosen agency/institution is expecting to achieve through the information described in this case. This will most likely be directly linked to the critical issue described in the problem statement.
D. Approach
In this section the details of the strategy of tackling your chosen critical public health issue and its implementation are described. How are/were financial resources of the institution allocated (or reallocated) to implement what you are doing to address this critical public health issue?
How are/were human resources allocated or reallocated? Were new positions created, or existing positions redefined? Were job descriptions rewritten? Were new duties assigned to existing staff?
Were/are any new policies/procedures developed?
E. Results
In this section the outcomes of the information strategy are described. Some participants in the IWIS initiative have taken their work through to implementation and evaluation, others are in the planning stages, and still…

Attachments: