Developmental Psychology Response to classmate 125 words minimum

ORIGINALQUESTION:
Developmental Psychology
STUDENTRESPONSE:
Professor and fellow classmates
Threw unit one developmental psychology and the importance of the field withthe many areas are discussed. In this week’s discussion board questions expandon these topics.
1. Why is it important for psychology professionals to have an understanding ofdevelopmental psychology even if they do not work specifically with children?
Psychology professionals have to have an understanding of developmentalpsychology scientific study of changes in human behaviors and mentalactivities as they occur over a lifetime (Bukatko 2008 p.4) weatherthey work with children or adults since every single person starts out thesame way no matter the cultural background. This information helps psychologyprofessionals form treatment plans for their clients threw out theirtreatment.
2. Piaget Erikson and Vygotsky are important theorists in developmentalpsychology. In your own words describe briefly the focal point that eachtheorist places on childhood development.
Piaget’s focal points placed on childhood development include four stagesSensorimotor (Birth until 12 years) Preoperational (17 years)Concrete operational (7-11 years) and Formal Operational (11 years andabove) (Bukatko 2008 p.22). During each stage the child develops at thesame rate and stages threw out differing cultures.
Erikson focused on psychosocial theory that includes eight stages ofdevelopment basic trust vs. mistrust (birth-1 year) autonomy vs. shameand doubt (1-3)Initiativevs. guilt (3-6) industry vs. inferiority(6 years topuberty) indentity vs. indentity confusion (puberty toadulthood) Intimacy vs. isolation (young adulthood) generativity vs.stagnation (middle adulthood) and integrity vs. despair (old age)(Bukatko 2008 p.26). Erikson theorized that people deal with the demands onthem from society threw each of these stages threw out life.
Vygotsky forced his work in childhood development on sociohistorical theoryemphasizes the unique collective wisdom compiled by a culture andtransmitted to the child through ongoing daily interactions with the moreknowledgeable members of that society (Bukatko 2008 p.30); as well thedynamic systems theory and ethological theory.
Each Piaget Erikson and Vygotsky has points in each of their work withindevelopmental psychology on childhood development. Taken together the greatestunderstanding of how and why a person develops in to the person they are helpsprofessionals in all fields of social services such as psychology psychiatry andothers.
Thank you for reviewing this first discussion board post. I look forward toreading your feedback and continuing the discussion.
References
Bukatko D. (2008). Child and adolescentdevelopment. A chronological approach. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.

What are your thoughts on introducing language teaching into American early education (elementary grades)?

What are your thoughts on introducing language teaching into American early education (elementary grades)? Do you think that children today consider knowing another language beneficial? Why or why not? What are the advantages of knowing another language? Also think about how the world is changing in terms of career opportunities.
*Be sure to support your posting with empirical (peer-reviewed) research and provide the appropriate APA citation
*Minimum word requirement for initial posts is 250 words
* will reflect proper grammar spelling organization length citations content of the knowledge reasoning and APA citation and referencing

Describe a scenario where a BACB Disciplinary Ethical Standard was violated psychology homework help

Describe a scenario where a BACB Disciplinary and Ethical Standard may have been violated. Provide the context of the situation the events that lead to the situation and the steps you would take to help resolve the situation. Make specific reference to the BACB Disciplinary and Ethical Standards and support your resolution to the situation using the BACB Guidelines for Responsible Conduct.

Considering your I/O psychology research interests identify two IVs (each with 2 categories) and three DVs that are measured on continuous scales.

Considering your I/O psychology research interests identify two IVs (each with 2 categories) and three DVs that are measured on continuous scales. Think of DV measures that probably are moderately correlated with each other because they are measuring different components of the same or similar concepts (e.g. three different measures of academic performance). Given these variables and design what information would a factorial MANOVA provide you? What more would you want to know if you get significant results in the factorial MANOVA? Why would this be significant
to your research? (Research support is not required for this question.)
I have provided and example of how the questions needs to be answered.
IV : Gender IV 1 = Male Veteran and IV 2 = Female Veteran in the following 2 groups
Category 1 – level of experience (entry mid experienced)
Category 2 – college degree (none Bachelors Masters)
DVis: Hiring data for:
– Veteranhiring rateand
-number of monthstaken to get hired
-average salary rangereceived
________________________________________________________________________
What information would a factorial MANOVA provide you?
A factorial MANOVA design can look at the relationships between the main effects of each of the IVs and their interaction with the DV. With the Factorial MANOVA the interaction effect is how the combinations of levels of the IVs influence the dependent variables. The MANOVA can identify main effect as well as interaction effects between the IV’s and the DV. The main effect would tell us if there is a difference between our IV and all of DV’s. Since we have two IV’s with two levels each the factorial MANOVA can
examine effects across all other variables and evaluate significant effects. The interaction effect can exist between factors such as there an effect between gender with college
degree and level of experience effect hiring rate or any of the other DV’s; determining significant effects on all of the dimensions. Thus we can identify the relationships with the most significant influence. This helps us to answer if the IV has a significant impact on the DV how does the IV relate to the DVs and what are the separate relationships for each variable and the power of the effect on each.
What more would you want to know if you getsignificant results in the factorial MANOVA?
A significant result can be seen in a factorial MANOVA in through the separateF-valuesgenerated for the main effect and the interaction effect between IV we are using such as
with the Wilks or Pillai’s trace criterion to evaluate the significance level. When we look at the significance level and find it to be statistically significant we reject our null hypothesis since the DV was significantly affected. We can also look at the partial eta square and see if the effect had a large or small effect on the variable. In my example I could have a significant effect between the IV level of experience and the DV salary range with a small effect as where I may have a statistically significant effect on IV with
college degree and salary range with a large effect size. I would then see that both effected the DV but that college degree has more influence on salary then does level of
experience.
Why would this be significant to your research?
When there are several similar (correlated) DV’s the MANOVA allows me to analyze single variables without running multiple individual test and causing type I errors. It also allows me to investigate how the IV’s influence each of DV singularly and collectively. However additional Post Hoc test need to be run for this level of comparison.Understanding how each variable differs from each other and how they may overlap in their influence we can see to what degree they correlate and how much one may affect the other or how the combination effects it.