Why have negotiations so far failed to result in an agreement?
Address the following questions FROM THE CASE ATTACHED:
- Why have negotiations so far failed to result in an agreement? Is the formation of the JV between Nora and Sakari the best option for both companies to achieve their respective objectives?
- As Zainal, what would you do to ensure that Nora fulfills the TMB contract?
- If Zainal decides to renegotiate (and assuming that Kuusisto agreed), how should he restructure the terms of the deal?
MAN4633 MNC Strategy- Discussion Board Rubrics
Introduce Yourself Rubric: 5 Points Total Unacceptable Acceptable Excellent
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowSubmission Promptness 0 points: No introduction post, or post was submitted late.
1 points: Post was submitted and is on-time.
1 points: Post was submitted and is on-time.
Content
0 points: No introduction post, or has minimal information, ie 1-2 pieces of data
1 points: Student states name and general information, but does not address all the questions requested in post. There is no picture or video of the student (or no explanation why there is no picture of student)
2 points: Student states all information included in assignment, includes picture, includes video. Post is engaging eliciting others to respond to posting.
Formatting & Grammar 0 points: No introduction post.
1 points: Post is done with incomplete sentences, a few (1-2) grammar and/or spelling mistakes. Post is disorganized, hard to read.
2 points: Post contains grammatically correct sentences with little to no spelling errors. Post is formatted well so that it is easy to read
Case Discussion Rubric: 3.75 Points Each Unacceptable Acceptable Excellent
Submission Promptness 0 points: No case discussion
0.25 points: Case discussion was submitted and is on- time
0.25 points: Case discussion was submitted and is on- time.
Formatting & Grammar
0 points: No case discussion or discussion contains many sentences with grammatical errors, spelling mistakes. Discussion is difficult to read
0.25 points: Case discussion has few grammatical errors and/or spelling errors. Discussion is organized loosely so while one can follow along, it is somewhat hard to read. Discussion post is very wordy, not concise- repeats items
0.5 points: Case discussion has little to no grammatical errors or spelling mistakes. Discussion is easy to read because it is organized well, formatting makes content easy to read: tables, bullets, images, etc. Discussion is long enough to cover the topic, but concise.
Identification of Main Issues/Problems & Analysis
0 points: Identifies few of the issues in the case or none at all, incomplete analysis to case issues
1 points: Identifies most of the main issues of the case study, provides thorough analysis to most of the issues
1.5 points: Identifies all of the issues of the case study, provides thorough analysis to all of the issues
Links to Course Readings/Additional Research
0 points: Incomplete research, no links to class reading
1 points: Good research, documented links to material read
1.5 points: Excellent research into the issues, information cited and/or links to outside readings
Water Cooler Discussion & Debate Rubric: 10 Points Total Unacceptable Acceptable Excellent
Submission Promptness
0 points: Five or less posts in discussion forum, and/or most if all posts are submitted late.
1.25 points: At least 10 posts in discussion forum, posts are submitted on-time.
2 points: Ten or more posts are made in the discussion forum, all of them are submitted on-time.
Formatting & Grammar
0 points: Posts are very difficult to read, nearly all posts have many grammatical errors and/or spelling mistakes
1.25 points: Posts can be read without much difficulty, have few grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.
2 points: Posts can be read easily, concise writing with little to no spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. Formatting makes information easier to read: tables, bullets, images etc.
Content & Relevance
0 points: Most, if not all, posts are not relevant to class material. Items are repetitions of other classmate’s postings. Student never responds to other students posts
4.25 points: Most of the posts are on-topic and relevant to course materials. Content is from reputable sources. Contains explanation of how materials relate to items discussed in class- ie not just a link to an outside video/article. Student rarely responds to other students postings
6 points: All post topics are relevant to course materials. Content is from reputable sources. Materials from outside sources are cited or documented. Contains discussion on how materials relate to course materials, ie not just a link to an outside video/article. Posts encourage discussion, ask questions of classmates. Student often responds to other classmates postings
- MAN4633 MNC Strategy- Discussion Board Rubrics
- Introduce Yourself Rubric: 5 Points Total
- Case Discussion Rubric: 3.75 Points Each
- Water Cooler Discussion & Debate Rubric: 10 Points Total
- MAN4633 MNC Strategy- Discussion Board Rubrics
