Personal Reflection/Resources Paper
This is a personal reflection paper outlining your strengths and weaknesses in performing a clinical write up and diagnosing disorders. Reflect on this semester, and your experiences interviewing someone.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
Some guiding questions include:
As a clinician what are your strengths?
What are your weaknesses?
When would you seek help from your supervisor or refer a client?
What areas of psychopathology interest you?
What treatment modalities interest you?
What disorders are you hesitant to work with?
What population would you like to work with?
Please include in your reflection two additional resources(empirical journals, websites, further training opportunities, ect.) that you could utilize to strengthen your skill set, and learn more about performing a clinical interview, writing a clinical write up, and/or diagnosing a client. Compare and contrast the two resources, and state how it would help you strengthen your clinical skill set.
I need 3 papers APA format
please see how this work will be graded :
| Organization |
| Information is very organized with well constructed paragraphs.
10 pts |
Information is organized with well constructed paragraphs.
9 pts |
Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well constructed.
8 pts |
The information appears to be disorganized.
7 pts |
The information is disorganized.
6 pts |
|
|
|
|
10 pts |
| |
| Quality of Information |
| Information clearly relates to the main topic. A very thorough reflection on the clinician’s skill set.
10 pts
|
Information clearly relates to the main topic. A good reflection on the clinician’s skill set.
9 pts |
Information relates to the main topic. A decent reflection on the clinician’s skill set.
8 pts |
Information has little to do with the topic. Little insight into the clinician’s skill set.
7 pts |
Information has nothing to do with the topic, and there is no insight into the clinician’s skill set.
6 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Mechanics |
| No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
8 pts
|
|
A few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
6 pts |
Numerous grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
6 pts |
Many grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
5 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Quality of the Compare and Contrast Two Additional Resources |
| A very thorough compare and contrast of two resources, and a very thorough evaluation of how it would enhance the clinician’s skill set.
10 pts |
|
There are two resources that were compared and contrasted, but it was not a thorough evaluation of how it would enhance the clinician’s skill set.
8 pts |
There were two resources identified, but little evidence of a compare and contrast. Little to no evaluation of how the resources would enhance the clinician’s skill set.
7 pts |
Two resources were identified, but there was no compare and contrast. Little to no evaluation of how the resources would enhance the clinician’s skill set.
6 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Description of criterion |
