Universal is not a(n) (individual) substance
Why does Aristotle think that a universal is not a(n) (individual) substance (Categories) or (but not both) that primary substance is the composite of form and matter (Physics)? How can he think that when he is willing to say that substance is essence (Metaphysics)? How does Aristotle account for change in the excerpts we read from the Physics and Metaphysics? What is a conceptual thread you can run through Aristotle’s Physics and Ethics?
Sample Solution
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowThe post Universal is not a(n) (individual) substance appeared first on homework handlers.
