The Constitution of the United States
The last topic brings us full circle to where class began – whether the Constitution is a “living document.”
Originalists like the late Antonin Scalia and current Justice Clarence Thomas say “no!” Their view is that
the Constitution should be strictly interpreted according to the intent of the framers. Doing otherwise, they
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Nowargue, just opens the door for any judge to make it up and substitute their own preferences for
constitutional law.
On the other side, there is a whole legion of mostly liberal Justices like RBG or the late William Brennan
who have argued that the Constitution must be interpreted as a living document for it is too dated and too
sparse to do otherwise.
Which side is right? Is either side more likely to render purely impartial justice or are both sides equally
likely to produce decisions that conform with their preferred outcomes? Why or why not
Sample Solution
The post The Constitution of the United States appeared first on homework handlers.
