Statistical Methods For Criminal Justice

What I need help on the most would be the following sections: This entire section is also in the attachment called Instructions

1. data management,

2. data analysis,

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

3. discussion.

Just those parts would be only about 3 to 4 pages double space of writing. The document titled treatment satisfaction final draft has all the work I have done so far. I have highlighted and sort of color-coordinated the sections of the paper that you will need to do.

Here are some specifics you need to know:

I had to pick 4 variable (3 independent 1 Dependent variables) which was pulled from the same Data which is called Cathy’s data ( is attached to the homeworkmarket post )

My picks were:

· Treatment Satisfaction (TS)

· Desire for Help(DH)

· Treatment Readiness(TR)

· Treatment participation(TP)

Each indicator had there own data  sets which were:

TS

Cest 007 Time schedule is convenient

Cest 0011 Program expects responsibility/self

Cest 020 Program organized /run well

Cest 030 Satisfied with program

Cest 080 Staff efficient with Job

Cest 115 Personal Counseling

Cest 112 Location is convenient

DH

Cest 003

Cest 032

Cest 039

Cest 065

Cest 86

Cest 116

TR

Cest006  TR Need to stay in treatment

Cest 013  TR Solve Problems in treatment

Cest 014 TR Treatment is not helping  ( this one had to be removed because it failed reliability test)

Cest 054 TR Treatment gives you hope

Cest 056 TR Want to be in drug treatment

TP

Cest 019

Cest 026

Cest 031

Cest 035

Cest 037

Cest 066

Cest 067

Cest 077

Cest 083

Cest 104

Cest 127

The sample template example paper is exactly how the paper needs to read so really you would need to just copy and paste most of it and plug in my variables and maybe change some words around so that it will fit my data set.

when it comes to interpreting the data for the finding section my professor has a specific way which she wants it to be written. I will give you some homework examples that we have done to give you an idea for the univariate and bivariate analysis but for the Mutlvariates you have to go off the final paper example because i do not have HW examples for them.

Data Management:

For the Data management just simply give a detailed summary of what methods/steps i used. Use Appendix A for your reference. To make it easy for you i made a table of contents

page 6: Ran Frequencies

Page 23: Computations

page 30: Factor Analysis

Page 44: Reliability Analysis

Page 53: Computation

Try to word it like it is for the example paper

Data Analysis: 

For Data Analysis use Appendix B info I highlighted or colored the different tables so you could easily find them.

Lastly, I have attached Cathy’s Data set for you in case you wanted to go in replicate my steps so you could get a better understanding of the data

Running head: [Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 1

[Shortened Title up to 50 Characters] 8

Treatment Satisfaction

Student Name

Institution

Instructor

Treatment Satisfaction

[The body of your paper uses a half-inch first line indent and is double-spaced. APA style provides for up to five heading levels, shown in the paragraphs that follow. Note that the word Introduction should not be used as an initial heading, as it’s assumed that your paper begins with an introduction.]

Literature Review

[The first two heading levels get their own paragraph, as shown here. Headings 3, 4, and 5 are run-in headings used at the beginning of the paragraph.]

Treatment Satisfaction

[To add a table of contents (TOC), apply the appropriate heading style to just the heading text at the start of a paragraph and it will show up in your TOC. To do this, select the text for your heading. Then, on the Home tab, in the Styles gallery, click the style you need.]

Desire to Help.

[Include a period at the end of a run-in heading. Note that you can include consecutive paragraphs with their own headings, where appropriate.]

Treatment Readiness

[When using headings, don’t skip levels. If you need a heading 3, 4, or 5 with no text following it before the next heading, just add a period at the end of the heading and then start a new paragraph for the subheading and its text.] (Last Name, Year)

Treatment Participation

[Like all sections of your paper, references start on their own page. The references page that follows is created using the Citations & Bibliography feature, available on the References tab. This feature includes a style option that formats your references for APA 6th Edition. You can also use this feature to add in-text citations that are linked to your source, such as those shown at the end of this paragraph and the preceding paragraph. To customize a citation, right-click it and then click Edit Citation.] (Last Name, Year)

Methodology

Model

 

Figure 1. Building Relationships

 

 

 

Desire for Help

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment Satisfaction (DV)

Treatment Participation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment Readiness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypotheses

H1: There is an association between Desire for help and Treatment satisfaction

H2: There is an association between Treatment Participation and Treatment satisfaction.

H3: There is an association between Treatment Readiness and Treatment satisfaction.

H4: There is an association between Desire for Help and Treatment Participation.

H5: There is an association between Treatment readiness and Treatment participation

H6: There is an association between Desire for Help and Treatment Readiness

Data Management

Data Analysis

Findings

Univariate Findings

Table 1: No table yet

Table 2: No tables yet

 

Bivariate Findings

Correlation Matrix

Multi Variate Findings

Table 4 t- Test

Study Variables Gender t
  Males (M/SD) Females(M/SD)  
Treatment Satisfaction 21.83(SD=5.883) 22.41(SD=5.339) -1.976
Desire to Help 22.76(SD=4.377) 25.18(SD=3.707) -11.387
Treatment Readiness 13.46(SD=4.220) 15.04(SD=3.603) -7.733
Treatment Participation 48.75(SD=6.977) 50.86(SD=5.659) -6.257

 

 

Table 5: ANOVA

Study variables Very

unhappy

(M/SD)

Somewhat Unhappy

(M/SD)

Not

Sure

(M/SD)

Somewhat Happy

(M/SD)

Very Happy

(M/SD)

F
Treatment Satisfaction 22.04(SD=6.140) 22.32(SD=5.774) 21.94(SD=5.540) 22.43(SD=5.141) 22.06(SD=6.047) .385
Desire to Help 23.56(SD=4.855) 24.93(SD=3.978) 24.53(SD=4.347) 24.08(SD=3.994) 22.88(SD=4.367) 8.544
Treatment Readiness 13.78(SD=4.526) 14.85(SD3.797) 14.30(SD=3.844) 14.40(SD3.906) 13.74(SD4.139) 2.822
Treatment Participation 49.37 (SD=8.096) 50.06(SD=7.002) 49.23(SD=5.963) 49.59(SD=6.039) 49.91(SD=6.699) .515

 

 

Regression

Table 6 : Regression with Treatment Satisfaction as the Dependent Variable

Study Variable Standardized Beta t Significance
Desire to Help -.173 5.892 .000
Treatment Readiness .614 20.467 .000
Treatment Participation .226 9.198 .000

 

Discussion

Revised Model

Figure 2. Revised Model of Building Relationships

 

 

 

Desire for Help

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment Satisfaction (DV)

Treatment Participation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treatment Readiness

 

 

 

 

 

References Last Name, F. M. (Year). Article Title. Journal Title, Pages From – To. Last Name, F. M. (Year). Book Title. City Name: Publisher Name.

 

 

Appendix A

Data Management Output

1. Ran the Frequencies

Frequencies

Statistics
  CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment CEST014 TR treatment is not helping CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment
N Valid 1567 1567 1564 1565 1562
  Missing 22 22 25 24 27

 

 

 

Frequency Table

 

CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 351 22.1 22.4 22.4
  2 Disagree 350 22.0 22.3 44.7
  3 Uncertain 198 12.5 12.6 57.4
  4 Agree 450 28.3 28.7 86.1
  5 Agree Strongly 218 13.7 13.9 100.0
  Total 1567 98.6 100.0  
Missing System 22 1.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 121 7.6 7.7 7.7
  2 Disagree 121 7.6 7.7 15.4
  3 Uncertain 138 8.7 8.8 24.3
  4 Agree 646 40.7 41.2 65.5
  5 Agree Strongly 541 34.0 34.5 100.0
  Total 1567 98.6 100.0  
Missing System 22 1.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST014 TR treatment is not helping
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 419 26.4 26.8 26.8
  2 Disagree 548 34.5 35.0 61.8
  3 Uncertain 293 18.4 18.7 80.6
  4 Agree 169 10.6 10.8 91.4
  5 Agree Strongly 135 8.5 8.6 100.0
  Total 1564 98.4 100.0  
Missing System 25 1.6    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 95 6.0 6.1 6.1
  2 Disagree 96 6.0 6.1 12.2
  3 Uncertain 177 11.1 11.3 23.5
  4 Agree 601 37.8 38.4 61.9
  5 Agree Strongly 596 37.5 38.1 100.0
  Total 1565 98.5 100.0  
Missing System 24 1.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 238 15.0 15.2 15.2
  2 Disagree 220 13.8 14.1 29.3
  3 Uncertain 189 11.9 12.1 41.4
  4 Agree 549 34.6 35.1 76.6
  5 Agree Strongly 366 23.0 23.4 100.0
  Total 1562 98.3 100.0  
Missing System 27 1.7    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=CEST007 CEST011 CEST020 CEST030 CEST080 CEST115 CEST122

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

 

Frequencies

 

Statistics
  CEST007 TS time schedules convenient CEST011 TS program expects responsibility/self-discipline CEST020 TS program organized/run well CEST030 TS satisfied with program CEST080 TS staff efficient at job CEST115 TS personal counseling at program CEST122 TS location is convenient
N Valid 1569 1578 1569 1572 1563 1561 1555
  Missing 20 11 20 17 26 28 34

 

 

 

 

Frequency Table

 

CEST007 TS time schedules convenient
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 196 12.3 12.5 12.5
  2 Disagree 246 15.5 15.7 28.2
  3 Uncertain 221 13.9 14.1 42.3
  4 Agree 716 45.1 45.6 87.9
  5 Agree Strongly 190 12.0 12.1 100.0
  Total 1569 98.7 100.0  
Missing System 20 1.3    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST011 TS program expects responsibility/self-discipline
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 46 2.9 2.9 2.9
  2 Disagree 33 2.1 2.1 5.0
  3 Uncertain 87 5.5 5.5 10.5
  4 Agree 567 35.7 35.9 46.5
  5 Agree Strongly 845 53.2 53.5 100.0
  Total 1578 99.3 100.0  
Missing System 11 .7    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST020 TS program organized/run well
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 333 21.0 21.2 21.2
  2 Disagree 362 22.8 23.1 44.3
  3 Uncertain 309 19.4 19.7 64.0
  4 Agree 437 27.5 27.9 91.8
  5 Agree Strongly 128 8.1 8.2 100.0
  Total 1569 98.7 100.0  
Missing System 20 1.3    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST030 TS satisfied with program
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 262 16.5 16.7 16.7
  2 Disagree 254 16.0 16.2 32.8
  3 Uncertain 327 20.6 20.8 53.6
  4 Agree 553 34.8 35.2 88.8
  5 Agree Strongly 176 11.1 11.2 100.0
  Total 1572 98.9 100.0  
Missing System 17 1.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST080 TS staff efficient at job
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 191 12.0 12.2 12.2
  2 Disagree 297 18.7 19.0 31.2
  3 Uncertain 306 19.3 19.6 50.8
  4 Agree 610 38.4 39.0 89.8
  5 Agree Strongly 159 10.0 10.2 100.0
  Total 1563 98.4 100.0  
Missing System 26 1.6    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST115 TS personal counseling at program
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 264 16.6 16.9 16.9
  2 Disagree 502 31.6 32.2 49.1
  3 Uncertain 260 16.4 16.7 65.7
  4 Agree 413 26.0 26.5 92.2
  5 Agree Strongly 122 7.7 7.8 100.0
  Total 1561 98.2 100.0  
Missing System 28 1.8    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST122 TS location is convenient
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 497 31.3 32.0 32.0
  2 Disagree 361 22.7 23.2 55.2
  3 Uncertain 160 10.1 10.3 65.5
  4 Agree 387 24.4 24.9 90.4
  5 Agree Strongly 150 9.4 9.6 100.0
  Total 1555 97.9 100.0  
Missing System 34 2.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=CEST003 CEST032 CEST039 CEST065 CEST087 CEST116

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

 

Statistics
  CEST003 DH need help with drug use CEST032 DH urgent help needed CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems CEST065 DH life out of control CEST087 DM think of ways to solve problems CEST116 DH want life straightened out
N Valid 1569 1565 1562 1574 1559 1558
  Missing 20 24 27 15 30 31

 

 

Frequency Table

CEST003 DH need help with drug use
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 161 10.1 10.3 10.3
  2 Disagree 149 9.4 9.5 19.8
  3 Uncertain 103 6.5 6.6 26.3
  4 Agree 582 36.6 37.1 63.4
  5 Agree Strongly 574 36.1 36.6 100.0
  Total 1569 98.7 100.0  
Missing System 20 1.3    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

CEST032 DH urgent help needed
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 178 11.2 11.4 11.4
  2 Disagree 271 17.1 17.3 28.7
  3 Uncertain 157 9.9 10.0 38.7
  4 Agree 571 35.9 36.5 75.2
  5 Agree Strongly 388 24.4 24.8 100.0
  Total 1565 98.5 100.0  
Missing System 24 1.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 71 4.5 4.5 4.5
  2 Disagree 59 3.7 3.8 8.3
  3 Uncertain 120 7.6 7.7 16.0
  4 Agree 460 28.9 29.4 45.5
  5 Agree Strongly 852 53.6 54.5 100.0
  Total 1562 98.3 100.0  
Missing System 27 1.7    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST065 DH life out of control
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 222 14.0 14.1 14.1
  2 Disagree 412 25.9 26.2 40.3
  3 Uncertain 152 9.6 9.7 49.9
  4 Agree 529 33.3 33.6 83.5
  5 Agree Strongly 259 16.3 16.5 100.0
  Total 1574 99.1 100.0  
Missing System 15 .9    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST116 DH want life straightened out
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 9 .6 .6 .6
  2 Disagree 7 .4 .4 1.0
  3 Uncertain 38 2.4 2.4 3.5
  4 Agree 387 24.4 24.8 28.3
  5 Agree Strongly 1117 70.3 71.7 100.0
  Total 1558 98.0 100.0  
Missing System 31 2.0    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=CEST019 CEST026 CEST031 CEST035 CEST037 CEST062 CEST066 CEST067 CEST077

CEST083 CEST104 CEST127

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

 

Statistics
  CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems CEST031 TP learned to solve problems CEST035 TP made progress toward goals CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use CEST066 TP participate in counseling CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues CEST104 TP provide honest feedback CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance
N Valid 1572 1567 1578 1566 1569 1555 1571 1572 1565 1565 1562 1566
  Missing 17 22 11 23 20 34 18 17 24 24 27 23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frequency Table

CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 66 4.2 4.2 4.2
  2 Disagree 109 6.9 6.9 11.1
  3 Uncertain 164 10.3 10.4 21.6
  4 Agree 675 42.5 42.9 64.5
  5 Agree Strongly 558 35.1 35.5 100.0
  Total 1572 98.9 100.0  
Missing System 17 1.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 41 2.6 2.6 2.6
  2 Disagree 27 1.7 1.7 4.3
  3 Uncertain 126 7.9 8.0 12.4
  4 Agree 652 41.0 41.6 54.0
  5 Agree Strongly 721 45.4 46.0 100.0
  Total 1567 98.6 100.0  
Missing System 22 1.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST031 TP learned to solve problems
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 29 1.8 1.8 1.8
  2 Disagree 54 3.4 3.4 5.3
  3 Uncertain 143 9.0 9.1 14.3
  4 Agree 928 58.4 58.8 73.1
  5 Agree Strongly 424 26.7 26.9 100.0
  Total 1578 99.3 100.0  
Missing System 11 .7    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST035 TP made progress toward goals
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 26 1.6 1.7 1.7
  2 Disagree 40 2.5 2.6 4.2
  3 Uncertain 106 6.7 6.8 11.0
  4 Agree 796 50.1 50.8 61.8
  5 Agree Strongly 598 37.6 38.2 100.0
  Total 1566 98.6 100.0  
Missing System 23 1.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 27 1.7 1.7 1.7
  2 Disagree 34 2.1 2.2 3.9
  3 Uncertain 37 2.3 2.4 6.2
  4 Agree 638 40.2 40.7 46.9
  5 Agree Strongly 833 52.4 53.1 100.0
  Total 1569 98.7 100.0  
Missing System 20 1.3    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 56 3.5 3.6 3.6
  2 Disagree 28 1.8 1.8 5.4
  3 Uncertain 65 4.1 4.2 9.6
  4 Agree 307 19.3 19.7 29.3
  5 Agree Strongly 1099 69.2 70.7 100.0
  Total 1555 97.9 100.0  
Missing System 34 2.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST066 TP participate in counseling
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 22 1.4 1.4 1.4
  2 Disagree 92 5.8 5.9 7.3
  3 Uncertain 98 6.2 6.2 13.5
  4 Agree 837 52.7 53.3 66.8
  5 Agree Strongly 522 32.9 33.2 100.0
  Total 1571 98.9 100.0  
Missing System 18 1.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 23 1.4 1.5 1.5
  2 Disagree 23 1.4 1.5 2.9
  3 Uncertain 88 5.5 5.6 8.5
  4 Agree 831 52.3 52.9 61.4
  5 Agree Strongly 607 38.2 38.6 100.0
  Total 1572 98.9 100.0  
Missing System 17 1.1    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 94 5.9 6.0 6.0
  2 Disagree 161 10.1 10.3 16.3
  3 Uncertain 234 14.7 15.0 31.2
  4 Agree 679 42.7 43.4 74.6
  5 Agree Strongly 397 25.0 25.4 100.0
  Total 1565 98.5 100.0  
Missing System 24 1.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 34 2.1 2.2 2.2
  2 Disagree 70 4.4 4.5 6.6
  3 Uncertain 172 10.8 11.0 17.6
  4 Agree 808 50.8 51.6 69.3
  5 Agree Strongly 481 30.3 30.7 100.0
  Total 1565 98.5 100.0  
Missing System 24 1.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST104 TP provide honest feedback
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 18 1.1 1.2 1.2
  2 Disagree 52 3.3 3.3 4.5
  3 Uncertain 109 6.9 7.0 11.5
  4 Agree 847 53.3 54.2 65.7
  5 Agree Strongly 536 33.7 34.3 100.0
  Total 1562 98.3 100.0  
Missing System 27 1.7    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Disagree Strongly 57 3.6 3.6 3.6
  2 Disagree 96 6.0 6.1 9.8
  3 Uncertain 228 14.3 14.6 24.3
  4 Agree 863 54.3 55.1 79.4
  5 Agree Strongly 322 20.3 20.6 100.0
  Total 1566 98.6 100.0  
Missing System 23 1.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Computations of Variables

Frequencies

 

Statistics
TR_C
N Valid 1513
  Missing 76

 

 

 

TR_C
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 5 3 .2 .2 .2
  6 1 .1 .1 .3
  7 6 .4 .4 .7
  8 10 .6 .7 1.3
  9 51 3.2 3.4 4.7
  10 30 1.9 2.0 6.7
  11 37 2.3 2.4 9.1
  12 65 4.1 4.3 13.4
  13 94 5.9 6.2 19.6
  14 109 6.9 7.2 26.8
  15 110 6.9 7.3 34.1
  16 164 10.3 10.8 44.9
  17 156 9.8 10.3 55.3
  18 184 11.6 12.2 67.4
  19 174 11.0 11.5 78.9
  20 158 9.9 10.4 89.4
  21 123 7.7 8.1 97.5
  22 20 1.3 1.3 98.8
  23 9 .6 .6 99.4
  24 4 .3 .3 99.7
  25 5 .3 .3 100.0
  Total 1513 95.2 100.0  
Missing System 76 4.8    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

Frequencies

Statistics
TS_c
N Valid 1502
  Missing 87

 

 

TS_c
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 7 7 .4 .5 .5
  8 1 .1 .1 .5
  9 15 .9 1.0 1.5
  10 20 1.3 1.3 2.9
  11 25 1.6 1.7 4.5
  12 22 1.4 1.5 6.0
  13 32 2.0 2.1 8.1
  14 44 2.8 2.9 11.1
  15 50 3.1 3.3 14.4
  16 39 2.5 2.6 17.0
  17 53 3.3 3.5 20.5
  18 84 5.3 5.6 26.1
  19 76 4.8 5.1 31.2
  20 90 5.7 6.0 37.2
  21 91 5.7 6.1 43.2
  22 88 5.5 5.9 49.1
  23 119 7.5 7.9 57.0
  24 120 7.6 8.0 65.0
  25 85 5.3 5.7 70.6
  26 88 5.5 5.9 76.5
  27 82 5.2 5.5 82.0
  28 88 5.5 5.9 87.8
  29 69 4.3 4.6 92.4
  30 38 2.4 2.5 94.9
  31 23 1.4 1.5 96.5
  32 20 1.3 1.3 97.8
  33 12 .8 .8 98.6
  34 9 .6 .6 99.2
  35 12 .8 .8 100.0
  Total 1502 94.5 100.0  
Missing System 87 5.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=DH_C

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

 

Statistics
DH_C
N Valid 1509
  Missing 80

 

 

 

DH_C
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 6 2 .1 .1 .1
  8 1 .1 .1 .2
  9 3 .2 .2 .4
  10 6 .4 .4 .8
  11 4 .3 .3 1.1
  12 7 .4 .5 1.5
  13 6 .4 .4 1.9
  14 13 .8 .9 2.8
  15 17 1.1 1.1 3.9
  16 40 2.5 2.7 6.6
  17 35 2.2 2.3 8.9
  18 53 3.3 3.5 12.4
  19 52 3.3 3.4 15.8
  20 74 4.7 4.9 20.7
  21 83 5.2 5.5 26.2
  22 91 5.7 6.0 32.3
  23 121 7.6 8.0 40.3
  24 147 9.3 9.7 50.0
  25 148 9.3 9.8 59.8
  26 160 10.1 10.6 70.4
  27 137 8.6 9.1 79.5
  28 113 7.1 7.5 87.0
  29 103 6.5 6.8 93.8
  30 93 5.9 6.2 100.0
  Total 1509 95.0 100.0  
Missing System 80 5.0    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=TP_C

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frequencies

 

Statistics
TP_C
N Valid 1487
  Missing 102

 

 

 

TP_C
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 12 2 .1 .1 .1
  13 1 .1 .1 .2
  19 1 .1 .1 .3
  22 1 .1 .1 .3
  24 1 .1 .1 .4
  25 2 .1 .1 .5
  28 3 .2 .2 .7
  29 2 .1 .1 .9
  30 5 .3 .3 1.2
  31 3 .2 .2 1.4
  32 2 .1 .1 1.5
  33 6 .4 .4 2.0
  34 9 .6 .6 2.6
  35 6 .4 .4 3.0
  36 12 .8 .8 3.8
  37 14 .9 .9 4.7
  38 19 1.2 1.3 6.0
  39 8 .5 .5 6.5
  40 15 .9 1.0 7.5
  41 20 1.3 1.3 8.9
  42 29 1.8 2.0 10.8
  43 40 2.5 2.7 13.5
  44 55 3.5 3.7 17.2
  45 49 3.1 3.3 20.5
  46 70 4.4 4.7 25.2
  47 92 5.8 6.2 31.4
  48 124 7.8 8.3 39.7
  49 118 7.4 7.9 47.7
  50 96 6.0 6.5 54.1
  51 97 6.1 6.5 60.7
  52 92 5.8 6.2 66.8
  53 76 4.8 5.1 72.0
  54 58 3.7 3.9 75.9
  55 63 4.0 4.2 80.1
  56 63 4.0 4.2 84.3
  57 66 4.2 4.4 88.8
  58 62 3.9 4.2 92.9
  59 48 3.0 3.2 96.2
  60 57 3.6 3.8 100.0
  Total 1487 93.6 100.0  
Missing System 102 6.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

FACTOR

 

 

2.Factor Analysis

 

Communalities
  Initial Extraction
CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment 1.000 .468
CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment 1.000 .676
CEST014 TR treatment is not helping 1.000 .583
CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope 1.000 .672
CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment 1.000 .625
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
  Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 3.025 60.495 60.495 3.025 60.495 60.495
2 .812 16.237 76.732      
3 .431 8.627 85.359      
4 .390 7.791 93.150      
5 .342 6.850 100.000      
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Component Matrixa
  Component
  1
CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment .684
CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment .822
CEST014 TR treatment is not helping -.764
CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope .820
CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment .791
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.

 

 

 

Rotated Component Matrixa
 
a. Only one component was extracted. The solution cannot be rotated.

 

Alter Type

Altered Types
Interview Date A33 AMIN
Date started current treatment program A33 AMIN

 

 

DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.

 

 

 

 

Factor Analysis

 

Notes
Output Created 16-JUL-2019 10:51:50
Comments  
Input Data C:\Users\pgibson\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe\TempState\Downloads\Cathys data.sav
  Active Dataset DataSet1
  Filter <none>
  Weight <none>
  Split File <none>
  N of Rows in Working Data File 1589
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing MISSING=EXCLUDE: User-defined missing values are treated as missing.
  Cases Used LISTWISE: Statistics are based on cases with no missing values for any variable used.
Syntax FACTOR

/VARIABLES CEST006 CEST013 CEST014 CEST054 CEST056

/MISSING LISTWISE

/ANALYSIS CEST006 CEST013 CEST014 CEST054 CEST056

/PRINT INITIAL EXTRACTION ROTATION

/CRITERIA MINEIGEN(1) ITERATE(25)

/EXTRACTION PC

/CRITERIA ITERATE(25)

/ROTATION VARIMAX

/METHOD=CORRELATION.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
  Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
  Maximum Memory Required 4248 (4.148K) bytes

 

 

 

[DataSet1] C:\Users\pgibson\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe\TempState\Downloads\Cathys data.sav

 

 

 

Communalities
  Initial Extraction
CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment 1.000 .468
CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment 1.000 .676
CEST014 TR treatment is not helping 1.000 .583
CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope 1.000 .672
CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment 1.000 .625
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
  Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 3.025 60.495 60.495 3.025 60.495 60.495
2 .812 16.237 76.732      
3 .431 8.627 85.359      
4 .390 7.791 93.150      
5 .342 6.850 100.000      
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Component Matrixa
  Component
  1
CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment .684
CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment .822
CEST014 TR treatment is not helping -.764
CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope .820
CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment .791
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.

 

 

 

Rotated Component Matrixa
 
a. Only one component was extracted. The solution cannot be rotated.

 

 

 

Factor Analysis

Communalities
  Initial Extraction
CEST007 TS time schedules convenient 1.000 .366
CEST011 TS program expects responsibility/self-discipline 1.000 .318
CEST020 TS program organized/run well 1.000 .696
CEST030 TS satisfied with program 1.000 .711
CEST080 TS staff efficient at job 1.000 .621
CEST115 TS personal counseling at program 1.000 .469
CEST122 TS location is convenient 1.000 .089
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
  Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 3.271 46.729 46.729 3.271 46.729 46.729
2 .993 14.187 60.915      
3 .758 10.827 71.742      
4 .713 10.187 81.929      
5 .562 8.031 89.960      
6 .425 6.068 96.028      
7 .278 3.972 100.000      
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Component Matrixa
  Component
  1
CEST007 TS time schedules convenient .605
CEST011 TS program expects responsibility/self-discipline .564
CEST020 TS program organized/run well .834
CEST030 TS satisfied with program .843
CEST080 TS staff efficient at job .788
CEST115 TS personal counseling at program .685
CEST122 TS location is convenient .298
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.

 

 

 

Rotated Component Matrixa
 
a. Only one component was extracted. The solution cannot be rotated.

 

 

Factor Analysis

Communalities
  Initial Extraction
CEST003 DH need help with drug use 1.000 .673
CEST032 DH urgent help needed 1.000 .636
CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems 1.000 .559
CEST065 DH life out of control 1.000 .566
CEST086 DH tired of problems caused by drugs 1.000 .628
CEST116 DH want life straightened out 1.000 .656
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
  Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2.610 43.501 43.501 2.610 43.501 43.501 1.926 32.097 32.097
2 1.108 18.459 61.960 1.108 18.459 61.960 1.792 29.862 61.960
3 .740 12.337 74.296            
4 .584 9.734 84.031            
5 .536 8.928 92.958            
6 .422 7.042 100.000            
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Component Matrixa
  Component
  1 2
CEST003 DH need help with drug use .736 .363
CEST032 DH urgent help needed .719 .346
CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems .684 -.302
CEST065 DH life out of control .470 .587
CEST086 DH tired of problems caused by drugs .700 -.371
CEST116 DH want life straightened out .611 -.532
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 2 components extracted.

 

 

 

Rotated Component Matrixa
  Component
  1 2
CEST003 DH need help with drug use .298 .764
CEST032 DH urgent help needed .297 .740
CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems .709 .238
CEST065 DH life out of control -.049 .750
CEST086 DH tired of problems caused by drugs .767 .199
CEST116 DH want life straightened out .810 .020
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.

 

 

 

Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2
1 .738 .675
2 -.675 .738
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

 

 

Factor Analysis

Communalities
  Initial Extraction
CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings 1.000 .415
CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems 1.000 .459
CEST031 TP learned to solve problems 1.000 .500
CEST035 TP made progress toward goals 1.000 .566
CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling 1.000 .538
CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use 1.000 .245
CEST066 TP participate in counseling 1.000 .572
CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior 1.000 .576
CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment 1.000 .435
CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues 1.000 .496
CEST104 TP provide honest feedback 1.000 .514
CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance 1.000 .366
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
  Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 4.678 38.980 38.980 4.678 38.980 38.980 3.375 28.126 28.126
2 1.004 8.370 47.350 1.004 8.370 47.350 2.307 19.224 47.350
3 .977 8.138 55.488            
4 .803 6.688 62.175            
5 .695 5.796 67.971            
6 .680 5.664 73.635            
7 .627 5.228 78.862            
8 .580 4.829 83.692            
9 .540 4.503 88.195            
10 .526 4.384 92.580            
11 .476 3.970 96.550            
12 .414 3.450 100.000            
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

 

 

 

Component Matrixa
  Component
  1 2
CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings .644 -.017
CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems .646 -.203
CEST031 TP learned to solve problems .631 -.318
CEST035 TP made progress toward goals .736 -.154
CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling .494 .543
CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use .395 .298
CEST066 TP participate in counseling .639 .404
CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior .752 -.104
CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment .590 -.294
CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues .645 -.282
CEST104 TP provide honest feedback .635 .333
CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance .603 .057
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 2 components extracted.

 

 

 

Rotated Component Matrixa
  Component
  1 2
CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings .528 .370
CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems .640 .222
CEST031 TP learned to solve problems .696 .121
CEST035 TP made progress toward goals .683 .315
CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling .073 .730
CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use .140 .475
CEST066 TP participate in counseling .273 .705
CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior .666 .364
CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment .649 .115
CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues .686 .158
CEST104 TP provide honest feedback .312 .646
CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance .450 .405
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

a. Rotation converged in 3 iterations.

 

 

 

Component Transformation Matrix
Component 1 2
1 .803 .595
2 -.595 .803
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.

 

 

4. Reliability Anlysis

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary
  N %
Cases Valid 1513 95.2
  Excludeda 76 4.8
  Total 1589 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

 

 

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
.413 5

 

 

 

 

 

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary
  N %
Cases Valid 1513 95.2
  Excludeda 76 4.8
  Total 1589 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

 

 

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
.413 5

 

 

 

Item-Total Statistics
  Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
CEST006 TR need to stay in treatment 13.61 6.268 .532 .048
CEST013 TR solve problems in treatment 12.64 7.477 .467 .162
CEST014 TR treatment is not helping 14.13 16.359 -.602 .804
CEST054 TR treatment gives you hope 12.55 7.643 .480 .164
CEST056 TR want to be in drug treatment 13.14 5.947 .610 -.033a
a. The value is negative due to a negative average covariance among items. This violates reliability model assumptions. You may want to check item codings.

 

Reliability

 

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary
  N %
Cases Valid 1502 94.5
  Excludeda 87 5.5
  Total 1589 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

 

 

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
.786 7

 

 

 

Item-Total Statistics
  Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
CEST007 TS time schedules convenient 18.77 24.756 .466 .768
CEST011 TS program expects responsibility/self-discipline 17.70 27.537 .404 .779
CEST020 TS program organized/run well 19.28 21.969 .692 .721
CEST030 TS satisfied with program 18.98 21.960 .703 .719
CEST080 TS staff efficient at job 18.92 23.173 .634 .735
CEST115 TS personal counseling at program 19.31 23.811 .547 .752
CEST122 TS location is convenient 19.51 26.794 .217 .822

 

 

 

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary
  N %
Cases Valid 1509 95.0
  Excludeda 80 5.0
  Total 1589 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

 

 

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
.715 6

 

 

 

Item-Total Statistics
  Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
CEST003 DH need help with drug use 20.01 11.410 .589 .627
CEST032 DH urgent help needed 20.37 11.393 .562 .638
CEST039 DH will give up friends to solve drug problems 19.56 13.620 .453 .675
CEST065 DH life out of control 20.70 13.182 .331 .724
CEST086 DH tired of problems caused by drugs 19.35 14.612 .472 .678
CEST116 DH want life straightened out 19.17 15.947 .388 .703

 

 

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary
  N %
Cases Valid 1487 93.6
  Excludeda 102 6.4
  Total 1589 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

 

 

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach’s Alpha N of Items
.848 12

 

 

 

Item-Total Statistics
  Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
CEST019 TP willing to talk about feelings 45.67 34.574 .546 .835
CEST026 TP made progress with drug/ alcohol problems 45.39 35.893 .557 .834
CEST031 TP learned to solve problems 45.60 36.777 .525 .836
CEST035 TP made progress toward goals 45.45 35.648 .643 .829
CEST037 TP always attend scheduled counseling 45.24 37.964 .405 .844
CEST062 TP stopped or greatly reduced drug use 45.14 37.921 .320 .851
CEST066 TP participate in counseling 45.56 36.038 .544 .835
CEST067 TP progress with feelings and behavior 45.40 35.965 .657 .829
CEST077 TP improved relationships because of treatment 45.94 34.651 .495 .840
CEST083 TP progress with emotional/ psychological issues 45.62 35.837 .545 .835
CEST104 TP provide honest feedback 45.50 36.685 .539 .836
CEST127 TP following your counselors guidance 45.82 35.777 .512 .837

 

 

 

.

 

 

Frequencies

 

Statistics
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122
N Valid 1502
  Missing 87

 

 

 

TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 7 7 .4 .5 .5
  8 1 .1 .1 .5
  9 15 .9 1.0 1.5
  10 20 1.3 1.3 2.9
  11 25 1.6 1.7 4.5
  12 22 1.4 1.5 6.0
  13 32 2.0 2.1 8.1
  14 44 2.8 2.9 11.1
  15 50 3.1 3.3 14.4
  16 39 2.5 2.6 17.0
  17 53 3.3 3.5 20.5
  18 84 5.3 5.6 26.1
  19 76 4.8 5.1 31.2
  20 90 5.7 6.0 37.2
  21 91 5.7 6.1 43.2
  22 88 5.5 5.9 49.1
  23 119 7.5 7.9 57.0
  24 120 7.6 8.0 65.0
  25 85 5.3 5.7 70.6
  26 88 5.5 5.9 76.5
  27 82 5.2 5.5 82.0
  28 88 5.5 5.9 87.8
  29 69 4.3 4.6 92.4
  30 38 2.4 2.5 94.9
  31 23 1.4 1.5 96.5
  32 20 1.3 1.3 97.8
  33 12 .8 .8 98.6
  34 9 .6 .6 99.2
  35 12 .8 .8 100.0
  Total 1502 94.5 100.0  
Missing System 87 5.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

5. Computations

Frequencies

 

Statistics
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE TreatmentReadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST014 + CEST054 + CEST056
N Valid 1513
  Missing 76

 

 

 

TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE TreatmentReadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST014 + CEST054 + CEST056
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 5 3 .2 .2 .2
  6 1 .1 .1 .3
  7 6 .4 .4 .7
  8 10 .6 .7 1.3
  9 51 3.2 3.4 4.7
  10 30 1.9 2.0 6.7
  11 37 2.3 2.4 9.1
  12 65 4.1 4.3 13.4
  13 94 5.9 6.2 19.6
  14 109 6.9 7.2 26.8
  15 110 6.9 7.3 34.1
  16 164 10.3 10.8 44.9
  17 156 9.8 10.3 55.3
  18 184 11.6 12.2 67.4
  19 174 11.0 11.5 78.9
  20 158 9.9 10.4 89.4
  21 123 7.7 8.1 97.5
  22 20 1.3 1.3 98.8
  23 9 .6 .6 99.4
  24 4 .3 .3 99.7
  25 5 .3 .3 100.0
  Total 1513 95.2 100.0  
Missing System 76 4.8    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

Frequencies

Statistics
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116
N Valid 1509
  Missing 80

 

 

DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 6 2 .1 .1 .1
  8 1 .1 .1 .2
  9 3 .2 .2 .4
  10 6 .4 .4 .8
  11 4 .3 .3 1.1
  12 7 .4 .5 1.5
  13 6 .4 .4 1.9
  14 13 .8 .9 2.8
  15 17 1.1 1.1 3.9
  16 40 2.5 2.7 6.6
  17 35 2.2 2.3 8.9
  18 53 3.3 3.5 12.4
  19 52 3.3 3.4 15.8
  20 74 4.7 4.9 20.7
  21 83 5.2 5.5 26.2
  22 91 5.7 6.0 32.3
  23 121 7.6 8.0 40.3
  24 147 9.3 9.7 50.0
  25 148 9.3 9.8 59.8
  26 160 10.1 10.6 70.4
  27 137 8.6 9.1 79.5
  28 113 7.1 7.5 87.0
  29 103 6.5 6.8 93.8
  30 93 5.9 6.2 100.0
  Total 1509 95.0 100.0  
Missing System 80 5.0    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

Frequencies

Statistics
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127
N Valid 1487
  Missing 102

 

 

TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 12 2 .1 .1 .1
  13 1 .1 .1 .2
  19 1 .1 .1 .3
  22 1 .1 .1 .3
  24 1 .1 .1 .4
  25 2 .1 .1 .5
  28 3 .2 .2 .7
  29 2 .1 .1 .9
  30 5 .3 .3 1.2
  31 3 .2 .2 1.4
  32 2 .1 .1 1.5
  33 6 .4 .4 2.0
  34 9 .6 .6 2.6
  35 6 .4 .4 3.0
  36 12 .8 .8 3.8
  37 14 .9 .9 4.7
  38 19 1.2 1.3 6.0
  39 8 .5 .5 6.5
  40 15 .9 1.0 7.5
  41 20 1.3 1.3 8.9
  42 29 1.8 2.0 10.8
  43 40 2.5 2.7 13.5
  44 55 3.5 3.7 17.2
  45 49 3.1 3.3 20.5
  46 70 4.4 4.7 25.2
  47 92 5.8 6.2 31.4
  48 124 7.8 8.3 39.7
  49 118 7.4 7.9 47.7
  50 96 6.0 6.5 54.1
  51 97 6.1 6.5 60.7
  52 92 5.8 6.2 66.8
  53 76 4.8 5.1 72.0
  54 58 3.7 3.9 75.9
  55 63 4.0 4.2 80.1
  56 63 4.0 4.2 84.3
  57 66 4.2 4.4 88.8
  58 62 3.9 4.2 92.9
  59 48 3.0 3.2 96.2
  60 57 3.6 3.8 100.0
  Total 1487 93.6 100.0  
Missing System 102 6.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

Frequencies

 

Statistics
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056
N Valid 1523
  Missing 66

 

 

 

TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 4 38 2.4 2.5 2.5
  5 20 1.3 1.3 3.8
  6 27 1.7 1.8 5.6
  7 37 2.3 2.4 8.0
  8 49 3.1 3.2 11.2
  9 44 2.8 2.9 14.1
  10 66 4.2 4.3 18.5
  11 89 5.6 5.8 24.3
  12 101 6.4 6.6 30.9
  13 129 8.1 8.5 39.4
  14 111 7.0 7.3 46.7
  15 128 8.1 8.4 55.1
  16 189 11.9 12.4 67.5
  17 153 9.6 10.0 77.5
  18 137 8.6 9.0 86.5
  19 109 6.9 7.2 93.7
  20 96 6.0 6.3 100.0
  Total 1523 95.8 100.0  
Missing System 66 4.2    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

 

Appendix B

Data Analysis Output

Frequencies

Statistics

Univariate Analysis

  CSEX Client Gender LIVEHAPY Happy with spouse or primary partner TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127
N Valid 1586 1392 1502 1523 1509 1487
  Missing 3 197 87 66 80 102
Mean 1.44 3.62 22.08 14.15 23.83 49.67
Median 1.00 4.00 23.00 15.00 24.00 50.00
Mode 1 4 24 16 26 48
Std. Deviation .496 1.333 5.650 4.038 4.267 6.514
Minimum 1 1 7 4 6 12
Maximum 2 5 35 20 30 60

 

Frequency Table

 

CSEX Client Gender

  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 Male 891 56.1 56.2 56.2
  2 Female 695 43.7 43.8 100.0
  Total 1586 99.8 100.0  
Missing -8 Blank 3 .2    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

LIVEHAPY Happy with spouse or primary partner
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 very unhappy 174 11.0 12.5 12.5
  2 somewhat unhappy 131 8.2 9.4 21.9
  3 not sure 168 10.6 12.1 34.0
  4 somewhat happy 500 31.5 35.9 69.9
  5 very happy 419 26.4 30.1 100.0
  Total 1392 87.6 100.0  
Missing -8 blank 197 12.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 7 7 .4 .5 .5
  8 1 .1 .1 .5
  9 15 .9 1.0 1.5
  10 20 1.3 1.3 2.9
  11 25 1.6 1.7 4.5
  12 22 1.4 1.5 6.0
  13 32 2.0 2.1 8.1
  14 44 2.8 2.9 11.1
  15 50 3.1 3.3 14.4
  16 39 2.5 2.6 17.0
  17 53 3.3 3.5 20.5
  18 84 5.3 5.6 26.1
  19 76 4.8 5.1 31.2
  20 90 5.7 6.0 37.2
  21 91 5.7 6.1 43.2
  22 88 5.5 5.9 49.1
  23 119 7.5 7.9 57.0
  24 120 7.6 8.0 65.0
  25 85 5.3 5.7 70.6
  26 88 5.5 5.9 76.5
  27 82 5.2 5.5 82.0
  28 88 5.5 5.9 87.8
  29 69 4.3 4.6 92.4
  30 38 2.4 2.5 94.9
  31 23 1.4 1.5 96.5
  32 20 1.3 1.3 97.8
  33 12 .8 .8 98.6
  34 9 .6 .6 99.2
  35 12 .8 .8 100.0
  Total 1502 94.5 100.0  
Missing System 87 5.5    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 4 38 2.4 2.5 2.5
  5 20 1.3 1.3 3.8
  6 27 1.7 1.8 5.6
  7 37 2.3 2.4 8.0
  8 49 3.1 3.2 11.2
  9 44 2.8 2.9 14.1
  10 66 4.2 4.3 18.5
  11 89 5.6 5.8 24.3
  12 101 6.4 6.6 30.9
  13 129 8.1 8.5 39.4
  14 111 7.0 7.3 46.7
  15 128 8.1 8.4 55.1
  16 189 11.9 12.4 67.5
  17 153 9.6 10.0 77.5
  18 137 8.6 9.0 86.5
  19 109 6.9 7.2 93.7
  20 96 6.0 6.3 100.0
  Total 1523 95.8 100.0  
Missing System 66 4.2    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 6 2 .1 .1 .1
  8 1 .1 .1 .2
  9 3 .2 .2 .4
  10 6 .4 .4 .8
  11 4 .3 .3 1.1
  12 7 .4 .5 1.5
  13 6 .4 .4 1.9
  14 13 .8 .9 2.8
  15 17 1.1 1.1 3.9
  16 40 2.5 2.7 6.6
  17 35 2.2 2.3 8.9
  18 53 3.3 3.5 12.4
  19 52 3.3 3.4 15.8
  20 74 4.7 4.9 20.7
  21 83 5.2 5.5 26.2
  22 91 5.7 6.0 32.3
  23 121 7.6 8.0 40.3
  24 147 9.3 9.7 50.0
  25 148 9.3 9.8 59.8
  26 160 10.1 10.6 70.4
  27 137 8.6 9.1 79.5
  28 113 7.1 7.5 87.0
  29 103 6.5 6.8 93.8
  30 93 5.9 6.2 100.0
  Total 1509 95.0 100.0  
Missing System 80 5.0    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

 

TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127
  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 12 2 .1 .1 .1
  13 1 .1 .1 .2
  19 1 .1 .1 .3
  22 1 .1 .1 .3
  24 1 .1 .1 .4
  25 2 .1 .1 .5
  28 3 .2 .2 .7
  29 2 .1 .1 .9
  30 5 .3 .3 1.2
  31 3 .2 .2 1.4
  32 2 .1 .1 1.5
  33 6 .4 .4 2.0
  34 9 .6 .6 2.6
  35 6 .4 .4 3.0
  36 12 .8 .8 3.8
  37 14 .9 .9 4.7
  38 19 1.2 1.3 6.0
  39 8 .5 .5 6.5
  40 15 .9 1.0 7.5
  41 20 1.3 1.3 8.9
  42 29 1.8 2.0 10.8
  43 40 2.5 2.7 13.5
  44 55 3.5 3.7 17.2
  45 49 3.1 3.3 20.5
  46 70 4.4 4.7 25.2
  47 92 5.8 6.2 31.4
  48 124 7.8 8.3 39.7
  49 118 7.4 7.9 47.7
  50 96 6.0 6.5 54.1
  51 97 6.1 6.5 60.7
  52 92 5.8 6.2 66.8
  53 76 4.8 5.1 72.0
  54 58 3.7 3.9 75.9
  55 63 4.0 4.2 80.1
  56 63 4.0 4.2 84.3
  57 66 4.2 4.4 88.8
  58 62 3.9 4.2 92.9
  59 48 3.0 3.2 96.2
  60 57 3.6 3.8 100.0
  Total 1487 93.6 100.0  
Missing System 102 6.4    
Total 1589 100.0    

 

 

Correlations

 

Correlations
  TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 Pearson Correlation 1 .620** .374** .466**
  Sig. (2-tailed)   .000 .000 .000
  N 1502 1465 1466 1445
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 Pearson Correlation .620** 1 .706** .536**
  Sig. (2-tailed) .000   .000 .000
  N 1465 1523 1476 1456
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 Pearson Correlation .374** .706** 1 .501**
  Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000   .000
  N 1466 1476 1509 1456
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 Pearson Correlation .466** .536** .501** 1
  Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000  
  N 1445 1456 1456 1487
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

 

 

T-Test

 

Group Statistics
  CSEX Client Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 1 Male 831 21.83 5.883 .204
  2 Female 669 22.41 5.339 .206
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 1 Male 852 13.46 4.220 .145
  2 Female 669 15.04 3.603 .139
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 1 Male 838 22.76 4.377 .151
  2 Female 669 25.18 3.707 .143
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 1 Male 833 48.75 6.977 .242
  2 Female 652 50.86 5.659 .222

 

 

 

Independent Samples Test
  Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
  F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
                Lower Upper
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 Equal variances assumed 7.311 .007 -1.976 1498 .048 -.580 .293 -1.155 -.004
  Equal variances not assumed     -1.997 1476.642 .046 -.580 .290 -1.149 -.010
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 Equal variances assumed 26.138 .000 -7.733 1519 .000 -1.582 .205 -1.984 -1.181
  Equal variances not assumed     -7.881 1508.375 .000 -1.582 .201 -1.976 -1.188
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 Equal variances assumed 19.900 .000 -11.387 1505 .000 -2.417 .212 -2.833 -2.000
  Equal variances not assumed     -11.599 1499.706 .000 -2.417 .208 -2.825 -2.008
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 Equal variances assumed 11.879 .001 -6.257 1483 .000 -2.104 .336 -2.764 -1.445
  Equal variances not assumed     -6.417 1481.114 .000 -2.104 .328 -2.748 -1.461

 

 

 

ONEWAY TreatmentSatisfaction TreatmentReadiness DesiretoHelp TreatmentParticipation BY LIVEHAPY

/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES

/MISSING ANALYSIS.

 

Oneway

 

Descriptives
  N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum
          Lower Bound Upper Bound    
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 1 very unhappy 163 22.04 6.140 .481 21.09 22.99 7 35
  2 somewhat unhappy 121 22.32 5.774 .525 21.28 23.36 7 34
  3 not sure 164 21.94 5.540 .433 21.08 22.79 10 35
  4 somewhat happy 482 22.43 5.141 .234 21.97 22.89 7 35
  5 very happy 387 22.06 6.047 .307 21.46 22.67 7 35
  Total 1317 22.20 5.648 .156 21.90 22.51 7 35
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 1 very unhappy 162 13.78 4.526 .356 13.08 14.49 4 20
  2 somewhat unhappy 127 14.85 3.797 .337 14.18 15.52 4 20
  3 not sure 164 14.30 3.844 .300 13.71 14.90 4 20
  4 somewhat happy 488 14.40 3.906 .177 14.05 14.75 4 20
  5 very happy 394 13.74 4.139 .209 13.33 14.15 4 20
  Total 1335 14.16 4.049 .111 13.94 14.38 4 20
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 1 very unhappy 160 23.56 4.855 .384 22.80 24.31 6 30
  2 somewhat unhappy 124 24.93 3.978 .357 24.22 25.63 9 30
  3 not sure 163 24.53 4.347 .340 23.86 25.20 11 30
  4 somewhat happy 484 24.08 3.994 .182 23.73 24.44 10 30
  5 very happy 391 22.88 4.367 .221 22.45 23.32 6 30
  Total 1322 23.80 4.308 .118 23.57 24.03 6 30
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 1 very unhappy 159 49.37 8.096 .642 48.10 50.64 12 60
  2 somewhat unhappy 121 50.06 7.002 .637 48.80 51.32 13 60
  3 not sure 160 49.23 5.963 .471 48.29 50.16 33 60
  4 somewhat happy 475 49.59 6.039 .277 49.05 50.14 22 60
  5 very happy 391 49.91 6.699 .339 49.25 50.58 19 60
  Total 1306 49.66 6.596 .183 49.30 50.02 12 60

 

 

 

ANOVA
  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122 Between Groups 49.285 4 12.321 .385 .819
  Within Groups 41936.990 1312 31.964    
  Total 41986.275 1316      
TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 Between Groups 184.026 4 46.007 2.822 .024
  Within Groups 21683.026 1330 16.303    
  Total 21867.052 1334      
DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 Between Groups 620.066 4 155.016 8.544 .000
  Within Groups 23895.814 1317 18.144    
  Total 24515.880 1321      
TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 Between Groups 89.827 4 22.457 .515 .724
  Within Groups 56681.226 1301 43.567    
  Total 56771.054 1305      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regression

 

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method
1 TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127, DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116, TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056b . Enter
a. Dependent Variable: TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122
b. All requested variables entered.

 

 

 

Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .645a .417 .415 4.285
a. Predictors: (Constant), TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127, DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116, TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056

 

 

 

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 18293.523 3 6097.841 332.067 .000b
  Residual 25616.820 1395 18.363    
  Total 43910.343 1398      
a. Dependent Variable: TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122
b. Predictors: (Constant), TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127, DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116, TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056

 

 

 

Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig.
  B Std. Error Beta    
1 (Constant) 5.559 .959   5.798 .000
  TreatmentReadiness COMPUTE Treatmentreadiness=CEST006 + CEST013 + CEST054 + CEST056 .865 .042 .614 20.467 .000
  DesiretoHelp COMPUTE DesiretoHelp=CEST003 + CEST032 + CEST039 + CEST065 + CEST086 + CEST116 -.229 .039 -.173 -5.892 .000
  TreatmentParticipation COMPUTE TreatmentParticipation=CEST019 + CEST026 + CEST031 + CEST035 + CEST037 + CEST062 + CEST066 + CEST067 + CEST077 + CEST083 + CEST104 + CEST127 .196 .021 .226 9.198 .000
a. Dependent Variable: TreatmentSatisfaction COMPUTE TreatmentSatisfaction=CEST007 + CEST011 + CEST020 + CEST030 + CEST080 + CEST115 + CEST122

 

 

 

 

 

Variable Names Treatment

Satisfaction

Desire to Help Treatment

Readiness

Treatment

Participation

Treatment

Satisfaction

1

Desire to Help .374** 1

Treatment

Readiness

.620** .706** 1

Treatment

Participation

.466** .501** .536** 1