Reynolds V. Gentry Finance Corp Case

/in /by
Writing Criteria for Case Analysis Exemplary (A)

90-100%

 Meets Expectations (B)

80-89%

 Developing (C) 

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

70-79%

 Not Acceptable (D)

60-69%

 Failing (F)

under 60%
Content: Is it complete & thorough? Are the prompts addressed? The case analysis (final exam responses) clearly address all aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are clear, based in solid logic, and concise at all times. The work provides multiple textual examples and details that clearly support the ideas presented within it. Creative arguments or evaluations are skillfully used to persuade readers and to substantiate logical points. The case analysis (final exam responses) address all aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are usually clear, based in logic, and concise. The work provides some textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it. Good arguments or evaluations are used to persuade readers and to substantiate points. The case analysis (final exam responses) address most aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are general, lack solid logic and/or wordy. The work provides few textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it. Ordinary arguments or evaluations are used to substantiate points. The case analysis (final exam responses) address few or no aspects of the assignment directions. The ideas contained in it are unclear and illogical. The work provides no textual examples and details to support the ideas presented within it. Arguments or evaluations are not made OR are illogical. The content of the case analysis (final exam responses) are unclear making it difficult to read OR no case analysis (final exam) submitted.
Writing/ Organization:  Following the format clearly outlined in the assignment. The case analysis (final exam responses) are developed in well-organized, logical paragraphs that include consistently effective use of transitions. Thoughtful structure eases the reader through the work. The case analysis (final exam responses) are developed in logical paragraphs that include effective use of transitions. Adequate structure guides the reader through the work. The case analysis (final exam responses) are developed in paragraphs, but includes limited use of transitions. Structure provides limited guidance for the reader. The case analysis (final exam responses) are not developed in paragraphs. Transitions are not present. Poor structure obstructs the reader’s understanding of the assignment. Structure of the case analysis (final exam responses) makes it difficult to read OR no paper submitted.
G.U.M: Grammar, Word Usage, and Mechanics. The case analysis (final exam responses) employ a wide variety of sentence structures, ideas, premises or imagery that effectively engage the reader. Uses a clear authoritative voice to convey the writer’s expertise. Word usage displays an excellent grasp of the vocabulary related to the subject. Paper has no misspellings and/or grammatical errors. The case analysis (final exam responses) employ a variety of sentence structures, ideas, premises or imagery that engage the reader. Uses a clear and appropriate voice to convey the writer’s expertise. Word usage displays a good grasp of the vocabulary related to the subject. Paper has few misspellings and/or grammatical errors. The case analysis (final exam responses) employ a variety of sentence structures, ideas, premises or imagery that engage the reader. Uses a clear voice to convey the writer’s expertise. Word usage displays a good grasp of the vocabulary related to the subject. Paper has several misspellings and/or grammatical errors. The case analysis (final exam responses) employ repetitive (or poor) sentence structure, ideas, premises or imagery that fails to engage the reader. Lacks voice and conveys little, if any, content knowledge. Demonstrates poor grasp of vocabulary related to the subject. Paper has many misspellings and/or grammatical errors. The lack of structure and/or poor word choice, misspellings and/or grammatical errors make it difficult to read, OR no case analysis (final exam) submitted.
The Basics: Formatting of case analysis or final exam responses Submitted on time.

Neat appearance. Appropriate headings.

 Minor formatting flaws. Timely. Appropriate heading. Formatting errors. Submitted one day late. Appropriate headings. Messy, not in proper format, submitted two or more days late, not submitted properly. Submitted three or more days late or not submitted at all. OR Submitted in a format that is Wunreadable.