4.2 discussion Pt. 2

I find Anslinger’s statement concerning substance misusers being “criminals first and addicts afterwards (Hari, 2015, p. 141),” interesting because, from my personal experience, the opposite is true. I think that that statement, if it was true, would help justify the targeting and maltreatment of “offenders” in many people’s minds. Unfortunately, we have many privately owned prisons which are nothing more than a business out to make money. “Notably, a for-profit, private prison’s objective is to maximize shareholders’ value, while the societal objective is to minimize crime efficiently” (Mamun 2020). Condemning another person is easy when they are seen as all bad. What is hard, is finding that balance between empathy and compassion, while still holding that person responsible for their actions. Hari recalls, in his book, a prison psychologist saying the many of the individuals imprisoned for drug use experienced trauma in their background (Hari 2015, p. 109). While I don’t find this statement hard to believe, many people have trauma in their background and did not turn to drug use. I say this to make the point that while I have immense empathy for addicts, they, like everyone else, are still responsible for their own actions. Do I believe that drug use should illegal? Absolutely not! Should people have the right to put whatever substance they want into their own body? Yes! Should they, like all other people be held accountable for their actions? Yes again! I do not like the term “drug related crime” simply because it implies that somehow, the drug, whatever that might be, is responsible to some degree for that person’s action. Either we are responsible for our actions, or we are not… Legally and morally speaking, it can’t be both. I do not believe that imprisonment is the answer for addiction, but certainly holding people accountable for the crimes they do commit, regardless of whether or not they are an addict, is a necessity.ReferencesHari, J. (2015).  Chasing the scream: The first and last days of the war on drugs. Bloomsbury.Mamun, S., Li, X., Horn, B. P., & Chermak, J. M. (2020). Private vs. public prisons? A dynamic analysis of the long-term tradeoffs between cost-efficiency and recidivism in the US prison system. Applied Economics, 52(41), 4499–4511. https://doi-org.portal.lib.fit.edu/10.1080/00036846.2020.1736501

January 1 2018

Review on Language Acquisition, Structure, and FunctionYou are a teacher’s assistant at a local university.Prepare a review for the class using a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation for the upcoming final on theories of language acquisition.Include information about the structure and function of language.

psych 315 week 10

In one paragraph, discuss three specific aspects of the ABC model that are particularly important to a crisis interventon involving a victim of rape.

Me according to Kohlberg (Heinz dilemma)

Please read your Kohlberg notes on Canvas and watch the Kohlberg videos.1. Should Heinz steal the drug? yes or no? What is your reason for why he should/should not?2.  Describe what primary stage of Moral Development you are at and give an example from your own life of why you think so.3. Kohlberg tells us that we function mainly in one stage with a foot in the stages  on either side of our main stage.  Sometimes we stretch and function up and sometimes we function lower than normal.  Next tell me what other stages you “have a foot in” and why you think so.Remember to follow the rubric!Rubricessay homework 30ptsessay homework 30ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUnderstanding of material20.0 ptsExceptional – Displays an excellent understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed. Uses course materials and other information to support important points.16.0 ptsMeet Expectations – Displays some understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed. Limited use of course materials and other information to support points.6.0 ptsNeed Improvement – Displays little understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept being discussed. Use of course materials and other information to support points is incoherent or missing entirely.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/Punctuation5.0 ptsNeed Improvement – The assignment has a few major errors and multiple minor errors but almost all sentences are clear and understandable.4.0 ptsExceptional – The assignment has no major grammatical or punctuation errors. Any minor errors do not interfere with understanding of the written work.4.0 ptsMeet Expectations – The assignment has few major errors. There may be multiple minor errors as long as they do not interfere with understanding.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Mechanics5.0 ptsNeed Improvement – Posts long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate.4.0 ptsExceptional – Contributes to discussion with clear, concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling errors.4.0 ptsMeet Expectations – Contributes valuable information to discussion with minor clarity or mechanics errors.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 30.0PreviousNextHow to use Canvas