Demonstrates logical progression of ideas.

Action Research Proposal – Introduction and Literature Review

[WLO: 1, 2][CLO: 5]

Last week you evaluated scholarly, peer-reviewed research to inform your own action research proposal. As we discussed last week, knowing what has been successful or unsuccessful in addressing the same or similar issues in early childhood education should inform how you approach your area of focus in designing your intervention and instruments.

The purpose of this week’s assignment is to synthesize the information you have on your topic to make informed decisions for your own intervention and instruments. This week, as noted in the content expectations below, you will generate the first two sections of your Action Research Proposal (Links to an external site.) Introduction and the Literature Review. You have already begun your work on your introduction in Week One and have begun your work in exploring the literature in Week Two. Informed by your Week One and Week Two assignments and instructor feedback/suggestions, you will revise and refine the content to generate your Introduction and Literature Review sections for your Action Research Proposal. Be sure to make any revisions suggested in Week One or Week Two by your instructor.

Next, you will work on your literature review section. The purpose of the literature review is to help you synthesize the information you gathered in Week Two to determine what types of strategies and interventions are currently being used by others who are interested in a similar area of focus and to make an informed decision about your own proposed intervention in your Action Research Proposal. Afterwards, you will state your own position about the intervention you will use in your own study and how the research informed your decision. Please be sure to carefully review the Instructor Guidance, the course Anchor Paper, and course readings for this week to inform the development of this assignment.

*Reminder to Students: Remember to save all copies of your work throughout the course as you will use each assignment as part of the Final Action Research Proposal. For many of the discussions and assignments, you are building on your work each week, so it is appropriate to use content from your discussions in your weekly assignments, generally expanding and extending concepts and sections as you progress from week to week. You will have the opportunity to make revisions to each section of your proposal based on instructor and peer feedback prior to your final version in the Final Action Research Proposal, so be sure to revisit the feedback you have received from your instructor and classmates each week to continuously refine your proposal throughout the course.

  • Content Expectations
    The following content areas are required in this assignment.
    Introduction

    • Context for the Proposed Study: In one paragraph, describe your current professional role and setting. If you are not working in early childhood education at this time, you can use a previous or future role that aligns with your career goals and interests.
    • Purpose and Educational Significance: In one to two paragraphs, explain the purpose of your study and the student outcomes you want to influence. Further, discuss the literature or research that indicates why this is an important area to address in education.
    • Explanation of Problem: In two paragraphs, explain a statement of the problem or situation that led to this interest or why you want to pursue this topic.
    • Population: In one paragraph, describe the target population (age/grade, quantity of participants, students or adults). Explain why you have chosen this population for the study, including details about why this population is appropriate for this study.
    • One Research Question: Develop one research question that aligns with your area of focus and clearly addresses what you hope to answer and influence in this proposed study. The question needs to be answerable and it must appropriately represent the population/participants you identified. Be sure to review the readings related to developing good research questions to inform the development of your questions.
    • Locus of Control: In one paragraph, evaluate whether your idea is within your locus of control. If you are using a past experience or contrived topic because you are not currently working in ECE, please explain locus of control as related to your previous position or anticipated future position.
  • Literature Review
    • Research Summary 1: Choose one of the articles from your Literature Evaluation to explain the intervention, strategies, procedures, and instruments used in the chosen study that have been found to be productive in investigating your topic and area of focus. Explain how this research informs your area of focus.
    • Research Summary 2: Choose one of the articles from your Literature Evaluation to explain the intervention, strategies, procedures, and instruments used in the chosen study that have been found to be productive in investigating your topic and area of focus. Explain how this research informs your area of focus.
    • Application of Findings and Author’s Position: Based on your review of the literature, determine the intervention that you will use to address your area of focus to influence the situation you want to improve. Discuss why you feel this is the best approach for your particular action research study and why you believe it meets the needs you have outlined in your introduction. Explain any changes you will make to the intervention you identify from the literature,  based on your own classroom, school, center, or organizational needs.
  • Research and Resource Expectations
    • A minimum of four scholarly, peer-reviewed sources, in addition to the course textbook. Sources from your Literature Evaluation may be used.
  • Writing and Formatting Expectations
    • Title Page: Must include a separate title page with the following:
      • Title of paper
      • Student’s name
      • Course name and number
      • Instructor’s name
      • Date submitted
    • Academic Voice: Academic Voice is used (avoids casual language, limited use of “I” or first person, it is declarative).
      Purpose and Organization: Demonstrates logical progression of ideas.
      Syntax and Mechanics: Writing displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
      APA Formatting: Papers are formatted properly and all sources are cited and referenced in APA style as outlined
  • Suggested Assignment Length
    • This assignment should be approximately four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages).Research Summary 1

      Intervention:

      Here you are going to give a broad summary of the entire article, using the author’s last names along with the (publication year). You can use a direct quote if you feel it necessary.

      Strategies:

      In this section, list all of the strategies used within the article #1.

      Procedures:

      In this section, list the procedure that was used to implement the study. Proving specific examples is helpful.

      Instruments

      What instruments were used in the study? How were they used and whom did they get used on to collect data?

      Article information:

      This article informs my action research proposal… here is where you need to connect your findings (article #1) to your problem to create a solution.

      Research Summary 2:

      Intervention:

      Here you are going to give a broad summary of the entire article #2, using the author’s last names along with the (publication year). You can use a direct quote if you feel it necessary.

      Procedure:

      In this section, list the procedure that was used to implement the study from article #2. Proving specific examples is helpful.

      Instruments:

      What instruments were used in the study, from article #2? How were they used and whom did they get used on to collect data?

      Article Information:

      This article informs my action research proposal… here is where you need to connect your findings (article #2) to your problem to create a solution.

       

      Application of Findings and Author’s Position:

      This is where you need to use the solutions that you have found from both of the articles that you have researched. Then use those ideas to design a solution to your problem. Be sure to mention both articles to provided credit to your sources.

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      References

      American Federation of Teachers. (n.d.). Building Parent-Teacher Relationships. In Reading

      Rockets. Retrieved from https://www.readingrockets.org/article/building-parent-teacher-relationships

      Dismuke, F., Parks, N., &Jablon, J. (2017, April). Deepening Families’ Understanding of

      Children’s Learning in Centers. In NAEYC. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/tyc/apr2017/deepening-families-understanding

      Kocyigit, S. (2015). Family Involvement in Preschool Education: Rationale, Problems and

      Solutions for the Participants. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice15(1), 141–157. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1057469&site=eds-live&scope=site

      Mariconda, B. (2003). Five Keys to Successful Parent-Teacher Communication. In Scholastic.

      Retrieved from https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/five-keys-successful-parent-teacher-communication

      Mills, G. E. (2014). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (5th ed.). Boston, MA:

      Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu

      Ozmen, F., Akuzum, C., Zincirli, M., &Selcuk, G. (2016). The Communication Barriers

      between Teachers and Parents in Primary Schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (66), 27–46. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy-

      library.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1149130&site=eds-l

      live&scope=site

      Tran, Y. (2014). Addressing Reciprocity between Families and Schools: Why These Bridges Are

      Instrumental for Students’ Academic Success. Improving Schools17(1), 18–29. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxylibrary.ashford.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1020017&site=eds-live&scope=site

Intervention Planning And Ethical Considerations – Action Research Proposal

Intervention Planning and Ethical Considerations – Action Research Proposal

[WLO: 1, 2][CLO: 4, 5]

This week you will work on the next section of your Action Research Proposal, Intervention Planning. Informed by your review of the literature and your knowledge of problem you want to address through your action research, you will plan how you will design and implement your intervention. Further, based on your proposed intervention and the context of your role and setting, you will analyze the ethical considerations, such as informed consent, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, freedom from harm, and anonymity and confidentiality, that you would need to confront if you were to implement this research in your work setting. Please be sure to carefully review the Instructor Guidance, the course Anchor Paper, and course readings for this week to inform the development of this assignment.

*Reminder to Students: Remember to save all copies of your work throughout the course as you will use each assignment as part of the Final Action Research Proposal. For many of the discussions and assignments, you are building on your work each week, so it is appropriate to use content from your discussions in your weekly assignments, generally expanding and extending concepts and sections as you progress from week to week. You will have the opportunity to make revisions to each section of your proposal based on instructor and peer feedback prior to your final version in the Final Action Research Proposal, so be sure to revisit the feedback you have received from your instructor and classmates each week to continuously refine your proposal throughout the course.

  • Content Expectations
    • The following content areas are required in this assignment.
      Intervention Planning and Ethical Considerations:
    • Intervention Description: In one- to two-pages, explain your proposed intervention. Explain why you think your population will benefit from the intervention and how it could result in improvements in the area or variable you want to influence. Ensure your explanation draws on the literature you are using to support this choice of intervention.
    • Intervention Plan: In one to two pages, describe in chronological order how you will implement your intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for these steps. You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your intervention from week to week.
    • Ethical Considerations – Informed Consent and IRB Approval: In one to two paragraphs, discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB Approval if you were to implement your action research study. Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the research of their free will and with an understanding of the study and any potential dangers.
    • Ethical Considerations – Freedom from Harm: In one to two paragraphs, explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to risk.
    • Ethical Considerations – Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one paragraph, explain your planned measures to use anonymity and confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.
  • Research and Resource Expectations
    • A minimum of four scholarly, peer-reviewed sources, in addition to the course textbook, are required. Sources from your literature review may be used.
  • Writing and Formatting Expectations
    • Title Page: Must include a separate title page with the following:
      • Title of paper
      • Student’s name
      • Course name and number
      • Instructor’s name
      • Date submitted
    • Academic Voice: Academic Voice is used (avoids casual language, limited use of “I” or first person, it is declarative).Use Third person
    • Purpose and Organization: Demonstrates logical progression of ideas.
    • Syntax and Mechanics: Writing displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
    • APA Formatting: Papers are formatted properly and all sources are cited and referenced in APA style as outlined
  • Suggested Assignment Length
    • This assignment should be about four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and reference pages)Information that are required for the instructor for the assignment

       

      Week 4 – Assignment

      · Content Expectations

      · The following content areas are required in this assignment. Intervention Planning and Ethical Considerations:

      · Intervention Description: In one- to two-pages, explain your proposed intervention. Explain why you think your population will benefit from the intervention and how it could result in improvements in the area or variable you want to influence. Ensure your explanation draws on the literature you are using to support this choice of intervention.(This is where you need to use your articles to support your ideas)

      · Intervention Plan: In one to two pages, describe in chronological order how you will implement your intervention and provide a hypothetical yet practical timeframe for these steps. You may include a chart that organizes how you would implement your intervention from week to week.(Make a list of steps that you would go through to get this/ these new interventions in place in your center or classroom)

      · Ethical Considerations – Informed Consent and IRB Approval: In one to two paragraphs, discuss how you would approach informed consent and IRB Approval if you were to implement your action research study. Explain how you would ensure that participants enter the research of their free will and with an understanding of the study and any potential dangers.(You need to get permission before conducting research on students or teachers. Make sure this information is clear. There are always dangers, some minor and some major, all need to be listed).

      · Ethical Considerations – Freedom from Harm: In one to two paragraphs, explain how the literature you reviewed and your plan for implementation leads you to believe what you are doing is an appropriate intervention and not exposing your participants to risk.(Another place to use your articles as support. Explain how you will keep participants safe).

      · Ethical Considerations – Anonymity and Confidentiality: In one paragraph, explain your planned measures to use anonymity and confidentiality to avoid privacy invasion and potential harm.(This is a continuation of the Ethical consideration about keeping participants safe. You can do this through keeping participants anonymous; explain how you value participants’ confidentiality. )

      · Research and Resource Expectations

      · A minimum of four scholarly, peer-reviewed sources, in addition to the course textbook, are required. Sources from your literature review may be used.These resources could include our textbook, your articles, past textbooks, etc.

· How is your RTI or MTSS system organized?

1. Clinical Field   Experience B: Response to Intervention or Multi-Tiered System of Support

Allocate at least 7 hours in the field to complete this assignment.

Observe an early childhood classroom that includes children with exceptionalities, paying attention to Response to Intervention (RTI) or Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) preparation and procedures.  Many times RTI in early childhood is done outside of the classroom environment, so observing an inclusive or resource room is acceptable. Additionally, interview the early childhood classroom teacher about his or her RTI or MTSS preparation and procedures.

Your interview should address the following questions:

· Who are the key stakeholders in a RTI or MTSS meeting? What is the role of each individual?

· How do you document assessment results and other data specific to RTI or MTSS? What does your data collection process entail?

· How is your RTI or MTSS system organized?

· How are the assessment results and other data used to develop behavioral and academic interventions? How do you identify and select the interventions? How do you provide support to teachers?

· What are the legal implications of the RTI or MTSS process?

· How can data collection be used to form a Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA) for a student who is having behavior issues?

· What collaborative communities have been provided at the site and also to help support the families?

In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon your interview and explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

With any remaining hours, spend time observing different classrooms with the focus on RTI and interventions.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

 

2. Response to   Intervention Graphic Organizer

Early childhood teachers will have students with a variety of skill levels and behavior needs in the classroom. The data teachers gather from observations and other assessments of the children will allow them to classify these characteristics using RTI or MTSS so that the teacher can best meet each child’s individual learning needs.

Design a graphic organizer depicting the three tiers of RTI. Within each tier, use research to identify and briefly describe five examples of academic interventions and five examples of behavior interventions that align to that tier (for a total of 30 interventions).

In 250 words, reflect upon the evolution of interventions throughout the RTI tiers.  How do you motivate these learners to learn and grow?  Be sure to explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

Submit the Response to Intervention Graphic Organizer and Response to Intervention reflection as one submission.

While APA style format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Differentiation is one of the most important considerations when preparing a lesson plan for all students.

Differentiation is one of the most important considerations when preparing a lesson plan for all students. Differentiation guides the teacher in making the instructional modifications required to meet the diverse needs of all students, plan for varying levels of development, and create opportunities for various approaches to learning and performance.

This lesson will be focused in the content area of geometry.

Part 1: Differentiation Lesson Plan

For this assignment, select a K-8 grade level and state standard in the area of geometry and use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” to design an original lesson plan. Be sure to examine instructional opportunities that can be adapted to meet the diverse needs of students, create learning environments that foster active engagement through supportive, and design assessments that align to learning objectives and support learning needs.

Use the “Class Profile” to differentiate to meet the diverse needs of students.

Part 2: Reflection

In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect on your lesson plan and the differentiation strategies utilized to meet the diverse needs of students. How can technology-enriched learning experiences provide various opportunities to differentiate? How can you collaborate with and incorporate the input, contributions, and knowledge of families, colleagues, and other professionals in order to support the diverse needs of students?

Support your reflection with at least two scholarly resources.

Class Profile

 

Student Name English Language Learner Socioeconomic

Status

Ethnicity Gender IEP/504 Other Age Reading

Performance Level

Math Performance

Level

Parental

Involvement

Internet Available

at Home

Arturo Yes Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Med No
Bertie No Low SES Asian Female No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Low Yes
Beryl No Mid SES White Female No NOTE: School does not have gifted program Grade level Two years above grade level At grade level Med Yes
Brandie No Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level At grade level One year below grade level Low No
Dessie No Mid SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level Grade level One year below grade level Med Yes
Diana Yes Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Donnie No Mid SES African American Female No Hearing Aids Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Eduardo Yes Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Emma No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Low Yes
Enrique No Low SES Hispanic Male No Tier 2 RTI for Reading One year above grade level One year below grade level At grade level Low No
Fatma Yes Low SES White Female No Tier 2 RTI for Reading Grade level One year below grade level One year above grade level Low Yes
Frances No Mid SES White Female No Diabetic Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Francesca No Low SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level High No
Fredrick No Low SES White Male Learning Disabled Tier 3 RTI for Reading and Math One year above grade level Two years below grade level Two years below grade level Very High No
Ines No Low SES Hispanic Female Learning Disabled Tier 2 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level One year below grade level Low No
Jade No Mid SES African American Female No None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level High Yes
Kent No High SES White Male Emotion-ally Disabled None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level Med Yes
Lolita No Mid SES Native American/

Pacific Islander

Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Maria No Mid SES Hispanic Female No NOTE: School does not have gifted program Grade level At grade level Two years above grade level Low Yes
Mason No Low SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Nick No Low SES White Male No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med No
Noah No Low SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Sharlene No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med Med
Sophia No Mid SES White Female No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Stuart No Mid SES White Male No Allergic to peanuts Grade level One year above grade level At grade level Med Yes
Terrence No Mid SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level At grade level Med Yes
Wade No Mid SES White Male No None Grade level At grade level One year above grade level Med Yes
Wayne No High SES White Male Learning Disabled Tier 3 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level Two years below grade level High Yes
Wendell No Mid SES African American Male Learning Disabled Tier 3 RTI for Math Grade level One year below grade level Two years below grade level Med Yes
Yung No Mid SES Asian Male No NOTE: School does not have gifted program One year below grade level Two years above grade level Two years above grade level Low Yes

 

 

 

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.