Strengths And Opportunities For Improvement

Understanding your strengths and your areas of opportunity for improvement is invaluable to your growth. Your strengths are often behaviors, characteristics, and skills that are perceived positively. Doing these things well is advantageous as you work towards your goals. Understanding those behaviors, characteristics, and skills that you need to work on developing is equally important. They can be hurdles as you work towards goals, so they present an opportunity for improvement.

For this assignment, you will assess the strengths you already possess that can help you meet your goals and identify your opportunities for improvement. These elements are part of the Week 5 Final Project: Personal Development Plan and will be shared with your peers in the Reflective Thinking discussion forum next week.

 

Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

  • Read the External and Internal Motivation  (Links to an external site.)webpage article.
  • Review your LCI assessment results. – attached below
  • Review tables 2.1 to 2.4 in Chapter 2 of the textbook for descriptions of each Learning Pattern.
  • Review the grading rubric (Links to an external site.).
  • Review the Week 2 Model Assignment (Links to an external site.). – attached below
  • Review the goals you created in the Week 1 assignment. – also attached below
    • Be sure to review the feedback you received from your instructor on the Week 1 Creating your SMART Goals assignment, and use it to revise your goals, if necessary.

 

In a paper that is at least two pages in length, write about the following (be sure to add details, explanations, and examples to support your ideas):

SMART Goals (one paragraph):

  • Restate the two SMART goals you developed in Week 1.
  • Describe your motivation for pursuing each of these goals.

Three Strengths (one to two paragraphs):

  • Discuss three strengths that you possess that can help you reach your SMART goals.
    • Include examples to support each strength you identify.

Tip: Consider your overall strengths, or how your Learning Patterns can be a strength or an advantage. Even if your score is not Use-First, it could still be perceived a strength depending on the situation.

Three Areas of Opportunity (one to two paragraphs):

  • Discuss three areas of opportunities for improvement (i.e., obstacles or challenges) you must address to reach your goals.
    • Include examples to support each opportunity for improvement you identify.

Tip: Consider overall challenges that you face, or how your Learning Patterns can create challenges or be a disadvantage. Even if your score is Use-First, it could still be perceived as an opportunity for improvement depending on the situation.

Your paper should be at least 2 pages in length, double-spaced and written using Times New Roman 12-point

RESULT DETAILS

Survey Details Name Ronda Kemp

Survey Name Adult Education Form

Survey ID 3

Survey Taken on 13-December-2020

Survey Results you are a “Dynamic Learner”.

Graph

Page 1/4

 

 

Report Unlike measures of personality, multiple intelligences, or learning styles, the LCI provides you with specific information to enable you to use your metacognition (internal self-talk of learning) to take responsibility for making learning work for you.

The importance of completing the LCI lies in the fact that the LCI provides an inward look at learning processes, an outward analysis of an individual’s actions, and a vocabulary for explaining the specific actions the person takes that result in productive or unproductive learning outcomes.

Completing the LCI is the first step to having a better understanding of how you do that. Results appear as four different scores. The most important aspect of the scores is that they tell you whether you use a learning pattern first, use it as needed, or seek to avoid it all together.

For example, if my scale score for Sequence is somewhere between 25 and 35, I use Sequence at a Use First level. That indicates the following:

1. I want clear directions.

2. I need step-by-step directions.

3. I want time to do my work neatly.

4. I like to do my work from beginning to end.

5. I want to know if I am meeting the instructors or my team mates’ expectations.

If my scale score for Sequence is 17 to 7, I avoid Sequence. I tend not to read directions. I don’t plan or live by a schedule. I rarely double-check my work. I find following directions confusing – and maybe even frustrating.

If my scale score for Precise is somewhere between 25 and 35, I use Precision at a Use First level. That indicates the following:

1. I want complete and thorough explanations.

2. I ask a lot of questions.

3. I like to answer questions.

4. I need to be accurate and correct.

5. I like test results.

6. I seek written documentation of my success.

If my scale score for Precise is 17 to 7, I avoid Precision. I rarely read for pleasure. I don’t attend to details. Details are bothersome and boring. I find memorizing tedious and a waste of time. Much of the wordy conversation going on around me simply sounds like, “blah, blah, blah.”

Page 2/4

 

 

If my scale score for Technical is somewhere between 25 and 35, I use Technical at a Use First level. That indicates the following:

1. I don’t like to write things down.

2. I need to see the purpose of what I am doing.

3. I like to work by myself.

4. I like to figure how things work.

5. I don’t like to use a lot of words.

6. I look for relevance and practicality.

If my scale score for Technical is 17 to 7, I avoid it. I don’t get involved with taking things apart to understand how they work. I hire others to do building and repair work. I don’t venture into the tool aisle. I problem solve with others not alone.

If my scale score for Confluence is somewhere between 25 and 35, I use Confluence at a Use First level. That indicates the following:

1. I don’t like doing the same thing over and over.

2. I see situations very differently than others do.

3. I like to do things my own way.

4. I don’t like following the rules.

5. I enjoy taking risks.

If my scale score for Confluence is 17 to 7, I avoid it. I think taking risks is foolish and wasteful. I would rather NOT make mistakes than having to learn from my mistakes. I am more careful and cautious in how I go about making life decisions.

Patterns Used at the As Needed Range (18-24): Of course, if any of my patterns are in the 18-24 scale range, then I use these patterns as needed. I can use them when I need to. I just don’t feel a great urgency to, especially if they fall into the 18-21 range. These patterns tend to lay dormant until I need to wake them up and let them know that I need to use them NOW! Used as needed patterns don’t drive our learning like “Use First” and “Avoid” patterns. <br />

Page 3/4

 

 

Dynamic

If I use one or two of my patterns at the Use First level and then any other combination of the remaining patterns at either Avoid or Use As Needed then, I am a dynamic learner. This means that I require intentional effort in order to switch between learning patterns. Most people fall into this criteria.

Person A: Sequence- 12 (avoids) Precision-32 (use first) Technical-26 (use first) Confluent-19 (as needed)

Bridge

If I Avoid no patterns nor do I use any at a Use First level, then I am a bridge learner. I learn from listening to others and interacting with them. I am comfortable using all of the patterns. Sometimes I feel like a “jack of all trades and a master of none,” but I also find I can blend in, pitch in, and help make things happen as a contributing member of the group. I weigh things in the balance before I act. I lead from the middle by encouraging others rather than taking charge of a situation. Approximately 1 in 20 people fall into this criteria.

Person B: Sequence-19 (as needed) Precision-24 (as needed) Technical-18 (as needed) Confluent-21 (as needed)

Strong Willed

If I use three or more patterns at the Use First level, I am a strong-willed learner. I am my own team. I prefer to work alone so that I can control the plan, the ideas, the talk, the decisions, the process, and the outcomes. I lead from out in front. Sometimes others find it hard to follow my lead. Approximately 1 in 4 people fall into this criteria.

Person C: Sequence-28 (use first) Precision-28 (use first) Technical-26 (use first) Confluent-21 (as needed)

Each of these patterns operates within our interactive learning process at the same time! In other words, our learning process consists of a pattern of patterns. What makes us successful is being able to identify the expectations of the systems and relationships we work, live and play in while using our learning processes with intention to overcome challenges, including understanding and connecting with our instructors, supervisors, colleagues and ourselves.

Page 4/4

Address the communication issue from the scenario.

Week 2 Assignment – Professional Email Message

Preparation

Assignment Walkthrough

Watch the Assignment Walkthrough video.

Note: The specific book information referenced in the video has changed. Refer to the following assignment instructions for correct page numbers in BCOM, 9th edition. Individual sections may have different policies regarding handing in work early for review. Please check with your professor.

Scenarios

Choose one of these professional scenarios.

Scenario 1

  • Saban is a top-performing industrial equipment salesperson for D2D. After three years of working with his best client, he receives a text message from Pat, his direct manager, assigning him to a completely different account.
  • Pat has received complaints that Saban “gets all the good clients” and “is not a team player.”
  • Saban responds to the message and asks for a meeting with Pat to discuss this change. Pat responds with another text message that reads “Decision final. Everyone needs to get a chance to work with the best accounts, so it is fair. Come by the office and pick up your new files.”
  • Moments later, Saban sends a text message to Karen, his regional manager and Pat’s boss. It simply reads “We need to talk.”

Scenario 2

  • Amber, Savannah, and Stephen work for Knowledge, Inc., a consulting firm. While on a conference call with Tim Rice Photography, an established client, the group discusses potential problems with a marketing campaign. Tim Rice, lead photographer and owner, insists the marketing is working and changes are not needed.
  • Amber reaches over to put Tim on mute but inadvertently pushes the wrong button. She immediately says to Savannah and Stephen that the marketing campaign is not working and that “Tim should stick to taking pretty pictures.” Tim responds, “You know I can hear you, right?”

Scenario 3

  • James shows up to work approximately five minutes late one morning, walking silently and quickly to punch in at the time clock near the front desk.
  • Sarah, the front desk manager, says, “Good morning, James,” but James ignores her, punches in, and heads into the shop to his desk. Sarah rolls her eyes, picks up the phone, and dials the on-duty manager to alert her that James just arrived and should be reaching his desk at any moment.

Scenario 4

  • Paul works for the website division of SuperMega retail company. He receives an email late Friday afternoon indicating that a new computer will launch at the end of next June and it will be in high demand with limited stock. The three-page message also indicates that customers will be able to preorder the item 30 days before launch, according to the production company. Paul is asked to create a landing page for consumers who are interested in learning more about the product.
  • By mistake, Paul sets up a page that allows customers to preorder product that afternoon, well in advance of the company authorized preorder period. Late Friday evening consumers begin to preorder the product.
  • Sharon, vice president of product sales at SuperMega, learns of the error Saturday morning and calls Paul to arrange a meeting first thing Monday morning. Sharon explains to Paul on the phone that the company intends to cancel all of the preorders, and Paul responds that the company should honor the preorders because the error was internal and not the fault of consumers. After a heated exchange, Paul hangs up on Sharon when she insists that the preorders will be canceled because of Paul’s error.

Instructions

Write a professional email message (in the form of Figure 5.1 on page 84 of BCOM) from the perspective of a character in the scenario. The email should be addressed to another character regarding the communication issue provided in the scenario.

While the message must take the form of an email, you will submit it as an assignment. It must adhere to the following requirements:

  • Content:
    • Address the communication issue from the scenario.
    • Request a face-to-face meeting to discuss the issue at a specific time.
    • Concentrate on the facts of the situation and avoid using overly emotional language.
    • Assume your recipient is learning about the situation for the first time through your communication.
  • Format:
    • Use a descriptive subject line or heading.
    • Include an appropriate and professional greeting or salutation.
    • Use email form including To:, From:, Subject:, and Signature.
  • Clarity or Mechanics:
    • Focus on clarity, writing mechanics, and professional language and style requirements.
    • Run spelling and grammar check before submitting.

Discussion Two: Integrating Technology Into The Classroom

Discussion Two: Article 1 Review 

Technology is undoubtedly a solidified component of today’s educational process. However, there are those who continue to struggle with the implementation of technology for numerous reasons as addressed in an article written by Harrell & BynumPreview the document (2018). After reading the article, please provide a brief discussion (at least two to three paragraphs) about two of the factors discussed in the article (both external or internal or one of each) as to how you view their impact on the classroom of your content area. Your response may be in agreement or disagreement with the article, providing cited evidence in support of your comments. You may also briefly address any other factor(s) that were not covered in the article (optional). Cite all references and list them (APA format) at the end of your post.

Once your post has been submitted, you will then have access to view others’ posts and replies. You are to reply to at least two other student’s article review posts using tasteful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three sentences).

Be sure to review the Discussion Board Expectations and RubricPreview the document file before posting.

Reference:

Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the classroom.

Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership5, 12–18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov

/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1194723

Due Jan 31 2021

Discussion Two: Integrating Technology into the Classroom

No unread replies.No replies.

Discussion Two: Article 1 Review 

Technology is undoubtedly a solidified component of today’s educational process. However, there are those who continue to struggle with the implementation of technology for numerous reasons as addressed in an article written by  Harrell & Bynum Preview the document (2018). After reading the article, please provide a brief discussion (at least two to three paragraphs) about two of the factors discussed in the article (both external or internal or one of each) as to how you view their impact on the classroom of your content area. Your response may be in agreement or disagreement with the article, providing cited evidence in support of your comments. You may also briefly address any other factor(s) that were not covered in the article (optional). Cite all references and list them (APA format) at the end of your post.

Once your post has been submitted, you will then have access to view others’ posts and replies. You are to reply to at least two other student’s article review posts using tasteful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three sentences).

Be sure to review the  Discussion Board Expectations and Rubric Preview the document file before posting.

Reference:

Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the classroom.

Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership5, 12–18. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov

/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1194723

 

 

 

Lesson Plan Presentation (Weekly)

Submit Assignment

· Due Feb 14 by 11:59pm

· This assignment is a unit of five days of lesson plans, including the evaluated one day lesson plan, that incorporates other disciplines.

· The unit should have at least two other disciplines in addition to your content area embedded within the lesson plans.

· Be sure to indicate Day One, Day Two, etc. at the top of each lesson plan.

· Give the unit submission a title that reflects the topic covered.

· This assignment must have technology included in at least two days of the five lesson plans.

· One day may be used for final assessment, but this assessment is to be something other than a multiple-choice test. Instead, the final assessment should be a project, essay, etc.

· FYI:  Once we cover the mini grant information, you will be asked to create a mini grant request. This request should be for something (software, hardware, manipulatives, etc.) that could be used to enhance the instruction for your unit. All of this information will be used to develop your Interdisciplinary Instructional Module Initial Draft.

See  rubric Preview the document for evaluation measures.

There will be virtual office hours posted for questions you may have while developing this unit.

 

Discussion Three: Direct vs Constructivist Instruction with the Implementation of Pedagogical Tools

Submit Assignment

· Due Feb 21 by 11:59pm

 

· Points 10

 Virtual Fetal Pig Dissection Lab on youtube

· Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a media recording

Online courses have been steadily increasing in enrollment among colleges as the format appeals to not only adult students who work while completing college but also high school students who are dual credit/dual enrollment students. However, there have been some courses in question of credibility and effectiveness when offered virtually, especially lab-based sciences. Nevertheless, virtual pedagogical techniques, such as virtual dissection, are included among the instruction methods for students at both the secondary and post-secondary levels to make these online courses suitable for learning the course objectives. The video embedded at the end of this post is only one example of a virtual dissection (there are numerous purchasable options) to give you an idea of what is used.

Read the following scenario and respond to the questions from the perspective of a school district science coordinator. Keep in mind that as a leader, one must consider all aspects – students, teachers, administration, and the school district as a whole – when making program decisions. In addition, please address direct versus constructivist methods in your narrative.

Note: Approach this assignment as if this was a real situation and carefully consider how you would/should handle this “change” as a good educator and an effective leader. Additional comments about using virtual simulation software in your area of expertise are welcomed (optional). Creativity is key in this discussion. Use any resource available to you (i.e., colleagues, research, and software) that can assist you in your responses to these questions.

Deciding on Objectives and Assessments (Roblyer & Doering, p. 69)

As the school district science coordinator, you ask the high school biology teachers to begin using a dissection simulation program in the lieu of actual pig dissections as usually done. You believe this method will save both time and money for the district. Several biology teachers are reluctant to make this change. The teachers claim their resistance arises from students not being able to learn as much about anatomy and dissection techniques from a simulation as they can from real-time dissection. However, they agree to pilot the software in a few sections.

1. What would be the expectations of the virtual simulation method in terms of Student Learning Outcomes (SLO)? Include how might they differ, if at all, from the classes not using the virtual simulation.

2. If you were one of the biology teachers, how would you implement the virtual simulation to appropriately address and evaluate these SLO expectations?

3. As district coordinator, what instruments or information would you use to assess the saving time and money objective for the implementation of the virtual dissection?

Once you submit your post, you will then have access to view others’ posts and replies. You are to reply to at least one other student’s post using tasteful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three sentences).

 

Roblyer, M. & Doering, A. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching (5th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Interdisciplinary Instructional Module

Submit Assignment

· Due March 28 by 11:59pm

 

· Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Interdisciplinary Instructional Module

The  Interdisciplinary Instructional Module will be a 2 page narrative explaining the following:

· Unit Lesson Plan for Five Class Days

· Indicated Technology Applications

· Copies of assessments (test, quizzes, projects, etc.) that students will receive should be included in in the 5 lesson plan but not this narrative.

· brief description of idea for Mini Grant Proposal that relates to need of the Unit Lesson Plan

Important Note: Culmination project using a single subject and interdisciplinary activities incorporating state and national curriculum objectives and advanced pedagogy to include technology, meeting the diverse learning styles of students. Prior work submitted will be applicable to this final project.

 

Discussion Four: Educational Software

Due Mar 28 4 by 11:59pm

 

· Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) is a nonpartisan nonprofit dedicated to spreading ideas, usually in the form of short, powerful talks of 18 minutes or less.

Watch a TED Talk given by Sal Khan, the founder of Khan Academy, entitled  Let’s Teach for Mastery – not Test Scores  (Links to an external site.) . Then briefly share your thoughts about Khan’s presentation, referring to specific comments that you find interesting (i.e., “right mindset muscles”, “mastery-based learning”, and “inverting the pyramid”), along with how implementing technology may enable an educator to address these elements of learning within the classroom.

Once your post has been submitted, you will then have access to view others’ posts and replies. You are to reply to at least one other student’s posts using tasteful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three sentences).

Optional viewing: Sal Khan’s first TED Talk is about how Khan Academy started entitled  Let’s Use Video to Reinvent Education

 

 

Discussion Five: Education Grants

Due April 4

Discussion Five: Education Grants 

Research information via educational literature, library, and/or internet (please use credible sources) about best practices in writing mini-grants as well as find viable mini-grant opportunities for Mississippi educators.

1. Post at least five (5) elements of a mini-grant proposal that may lead to a successful mini-grant submission. Be sure to cite or provide a link to the resource(s). The idea of this discussion is to share helpful information about writing mini-grant proposals.

2. Post at least two (2) current mini-grant applications and/or links to mini-grant applications that are available to teachers in Mississippi of different content areas. This will provide a small collection of potential mini-grant applications for everyone in the class. Be sure to make note of the mini-grant’s deadline.

3. Comment to at least two (2) of your colleagues’ posts of the five positive factors from #1, giving your reflection about at least one of the five that you find critical to a successful submission.

4. Comment to a colleague’s post of one mini-grant application that you would most likely consider for submission. This may be of the same person you respond to from #3 or one of a different colleague.

 

Due

Jan

 

31

 

2021

 

Discussion Two: Integrating Technology into

the Classroom

 

No

 

unread

 

replies.No

 

replies.

 

Discussion Two: Article 1 Review

 

 

Technology is undoubtedly a solidified component of today’s educational process.

However, there are those who continue to struggle with the implementation of

technology for numerous reasons as addressed in an article written by

 

Harrell & Bynum

 

(2018). After reading the article, please provide a brief discussion (at least two to

three paragraphs) about

 

two

 

of the factors discussed in the article (both external or

internal or one of each) as to how you view their im

pact on the classroom of your

content area. Your response may be in agreement or disagreement with the article,

providing cited evidence in support of your comments. You may also briefly address any

other factor(s) that were not covered in the article (opt

ional). Cite all references and list

them (APA format) at the end of your post.

 

Once your post has been submitted, you will then have access to view others’ posts and

replies. You are to reply to

 

at least two

 

other student’s article review posts using

tast

eful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three

sentences).

 

Be sure to review the

 

Discussion Board Expectations and Rubric

 

file before posting.

 

Reference:

 

Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the

classroom.

 

 

Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership

,

 

5

, 12

18. Retrieved from

https://eric.ed.gov

 

 

 

/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1194723

 

 

 

 

Lesson Plan Presentation (Weekly)

 

Submit Assignment

 

·

 

Due

 

Feb

 

14

 

by

 

11:59pm

 

Due Jan 31 2021

Discussion Two: Integrating Technology into

the Classroom

No unread replies.No replies.

Discussion Two: Article 1 Review

Technology is undoubtedly a solidified component of today’s educational process.

However, there are those who continue to struggle with the implementation of

technology for numerous reasons as addressed in an article written by Harrell & Bynum

(2018). After reading the article, please provide a brief discussion (at least two to

three paragraphs) about two of the factors discussed in the article (both external or

internal or one of each) as to how you view their impact on the classroom of your

content area. Your response may be in agreement or disagreement with the article,

providing cited evidence in support of your comments. You may also briefly address any

other factor(s) that were not covered in the article (optional). Cite all references and list

them (APA format) at the end of your post.

Once your post has been submitted, you will then have access to view others’ posts and

replies. You are to reply to at least two other student’s article review posts using

tasteful, thoughtful, and sufficient scholastic statements (minimum of two to three

sentences).

Be sure to review the Discussion Board Expectations and Rubric file before posting.

Reference:

Harrell, S., & Bynum, Y. (2018). Factors affecting technology integration in the

classroom.

Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5, 12–18. Retrieved from

https://eric.ed.gov

/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1194723

 

 

 

Lesson Plan Presentation (Weekly)

Submit Assignment

 Due Feb 14 by 11:59pm

Credibility And Experience

 Read the section on “Drawing on Experience” from Chapter 18 – Developing Voice in the CEL (p. 541). Note especially how the example from Anne Marie Paulin includes her own “moment of revelation” about her own quest for thinness as a way of establishing the personal relevance of the topic she is writing about.

  • Why is credibility important in essays about personal experience?
  • How do writers establish credibility when they are writing about events from their own lives?
  • What qualities in personal experience essays detract from the writer’s credibility?