Reliability Future of Wireless Network.

/in /by

Need help with my writing homework on Reliability Future of Wireless Network. Write a 1500 word paper answering; 802.11n is a wireless network technology designed by electrical and electronics engineers based on the previous standard and now using a new MIMO (Multiple input and multiple outputs) principles. In this technology, the range is also improved as compared to the previous standards. There are more antennas and new techniques used in this standard that can increase the channel bandwidth. The coding scheme used in 802.11n is the Alamouti coding scheme. This coding scheme was released in 1998 and was designed for a two-transmit antenna system. The installation of 802.11n network technology has reduced the TCO by delivering reliable wireless network that supports a huge range of mobility application without reducing the performance of the whole network. The devices supapplications 802.11n have a builtwhole network’s performance are transmitting. This standard is quite different from the older technologies based on its range of frequency and the use of new technology, MIMO, in which several data streams are transferred from one place to another (Cisco, 2014).

The benefit of new technology is that the user can send more and more data simultaneously. Another technique used in this wireless network technology is channel bonding, which can use two separate channels that do not overlap simultaneously. The advantage of this channel bonding is that the amount of data is also greater than before a user wants to send. When the user transmits data, each technology divides the whole data into small packets, sent to the receiver machine or device. But in 802.11n, the data is also sent in packets, which provides an advantage that more data can be embedded in a single packet than the legacy wireless network technologies (Haskin, 2007).

The 802.11n wireless technology runs in critical modes classified&nbsp.in ad hoc mode and infrastructure mode.

PoL-10-3

/in /by

Submit a professional presentation of the case study (Fortuga).Submit a 24 page PowerPoint presentationThough the rubric states no requirement on references, please use a minimum of 5.Instruction:Please compose a 24 slide presentation to the statement above.Follow the rubric requirements (attached).Sources must be cited with APA format.Plagiarism is unacceptable.

Purpose: This project is to help you apply co

/in /by

MTH 245 DATA ANALYSIS PROJECT (Body Temperature in degrees Farenheit) – 1A and 1B Written Summary 35 The student demonstrates an understanding of key concepts and adequately address all aspects of this analysis assignment. The assignment report is submitted as a formal paper in paragraph form and is well written with full sentences, and is typed and well formatted with appropriate grammar, spelling, and punctuation. * Brief introductory paragraph regarding the background of data. * Specified the shape of the distribution of the data and referenced graph(s) used to make decision. * Discussed the presence or absence of outliers. * Discussed which measure of center was most appropriate (the values of mean, median, and mode) within context. * Interpreted the mean and standard deviation in context of the data. *commented on the assessment of normality (QQ plot) *Commented on which test to use and why (z-test or t-test) Interpret results of statistical analysis using context of data. – separate points below Inferential Analysis – Confidence Interval and Full Hypothesis Test (Significance Test) 20 Stated the practical interpretation for the XX% confidence interval within context. 5 Correct null hypothesis 2 Correct alternative hypothesis 2 Correct p-value 2 Correct decision: {Reject H0, Do not reject H0} 2 Correct basis for decision: (comparison of p-value to α) 2 Correct conclusion in context 3 Compared the results of the CI and hypothesis test-matched or not and why? 2 Statistical Package Output 40 Stem and Leaf Diagram (with appropriate title) 4 Histogram 2 * class limits on horizontal axis 2 * appropriately titled graph and titled axes 2 Box and Whiskers Plot (with appropriate title for graph and data axis) 4 used fences to identify outliers 1 Descriptive Statistics 10 * in table form 1 * number of observations 1 * mean 2 * median 2 * mode 2 * sample standard deviation 2 Inferential Techniques 15 QQ Plot (with appropriate tile for graph and data axis) 5 Interval bounds for two-sided CI for µ 5 Results of statistical test of hypothesis 5 Format 5 * Title page with appropriate title, name, course number and section number * Summary * Statistical software output for graphical summaries * Statistical software output for numerical summaries * Statistical software output for inferential techniques * Complete significance test * Sources/References – if applicable TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 COMMENTS:

Search the PsycINFO database on the library website to choose an empirical resea

/in /by

Search the PsycINFO database on the library website to choose an empirical research article to summarize. This means that the article should have an introduction, method, results, and discussion section. The summary must be typed using 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and include 1-inch margins. You should use APA format and write the summary in paragraph form. Submit the summary directly to your instructor as per their instructions.
The summary must be written in your own words. Include responses to the following points:
– According to the introduction, what information was already known about the topic? Look for references to previous research.
– What was the general research question? What motivated the study (e.g. prior research, a practical problem, theory, etc.)?
– What variables were studied? What were the hypotheses concerning these variables? How were the variables measured and/or manipulated?
– Who were the participants? (e.g. How many? How were they recruited? Were there any special characteristics?)
– What procedures, tasks, or instruments were used?
– What were the main results? Were the results consistent with the hypotheses of the study and the literature described in the introduction? Were there any surprising or unexpected results.
– How did the researcher interpret the results? Can you think of alternative interpretations? Did the authors discuss the limitations of the research? If so, what were they?
– Did the authors give suggestions for future research or applications? Can you provide other suggestions?