Argument on on medisys assignment. Instead of considering the possibility of directly confronting Jack to solve the matter amicably, she is thinking of approaching the bosses (Donnellon & Margolis, 2009). Merz is of the opinion that the other team members are incompetent and she gives specific reference to Fogel.

/in /by

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on medisys assignment. Instead of considering the possibility of directly confronting Jack to solve the matter amicably, she is thinking of approaching the bosses (Donnellon & Margolis, 2009). Merz is of the opinion that the other team members are incompetent and she gives specific reference to Fogel.

The lawyer representing the Regulatory Affairs team, Karen Baio is of the opinion that the other personnel see her as an obstruction. She finds it difficult to work with Mukerjee, the software design manager and Merz because she cannot tolerate them. Baio does not see any significance to the president’s step to hire Merz. Bret O’Brien is also avoiding Merz because of her constant complains about the timeline. A meeting cannot be functional if there is no cooperation between the key personnel and teams. The meeting can be successful on the condition that the teams work together.

Some of the personnel in the organizations have a lot of responsibilities that are a major cause of constant complains. Such employees may view themselves as being more important or constantly complain over the excessive responsibilities under their jurisdiction. For instance, Merz is solely responsible for the profit and loss issues on IntensCare. Other responsibilities that relate to Merz include evaluating the product road-map, extending technical support to clients, advertising and pricing (Donnellon & Margolis, 2009). She uses this as a basis for downplaying the effectiveness of the other team members. If work is distributed appropriately among employees, such inconveniences will be avoided.

The key issue that raises diverse opinions is the aspect of modular design. The modular design would enable clients to tailor the system to suite their specifications or medical needs. According to Merz, IntensCare should be modular and the modulation should be initiated in the second version of the system. However,&nbsp.she is reluctant to share this thought with fellow team members. The reason for her reluctance is the fact that she is afraid that the engineering team might use her suggestion to ignore the need for modulation (Donnellon & Margolis, 2009).

1) Restate/explain (in your own words) Ludwig-Maximilians’ argument for the conc

/in /by

1) Restate/explain (in your own words) Ludwig-Maximilians’ argument for the conclusion
that Fake News is a variant of Frankurtian Bullshit.
2) Please go back and read Frankfurts On Bullshit. This will help out.
3) This paper will be a little more difficult as Maximilians’ argument is lengthier and not as
straight forward as Singer’s and Rachele’s.
4) Here is a skeleton of Maximilians’ argument for his conclusion. Again, this sketch is a
summary of the main ideas and is presented is a slightly different fashion than what he
does in the article (so make sure to read the article):
(Premise 1) [he explains what Frankurtian Bullshit is]
(Premise 2) [he provides an analysis of fake news in terms of Frankurtian Bullshit ]
(Premise 3)] [he provides clear example of a fake news case and cases that are not fake news]
(Premise 4) [he explains how his analysis of fake news is able do account for the clear case of fake
news and explain away the cases that are not.
(C) Fake news is a version of Frankfurtian Bullshit.
As you read the article, identify the sections where he is brining up these points and in
your paper elaborate on them. Make a coherent presentation for Maximilians’ position.
5) After you have done that, reflect on Maximilians’ conclusion and his reasons for the
conclusion.
Do you agree with Rachels? Why or why not? Please elaborate.
What do you see to be a possible problem with his argument?
Your paper must be written in a standard 12-point font, Times New Roman, double-spaced,
with one-inch margins on all sides. Its pages must be numbered by your word-processor.
Content Instructions
1. The first paragraph must effectively, and clearly, introduce the topic and purpose of the
paper.
2. Do not begin your paper with a sentence like “Since the dawn of time, humans have
wondered about the nature of morality,” or something along those lines. Just get to the
point of the paper. Instead, you can begin with something like “This paper critically
examines ….”. Then you can move into what the topic/purpose of the paper is.
3. Write your paper so that it can be understood by an undergraduate student who has
taken one prior philosophy course.
4. Make sure your sentences are grammatical and words are correctly spelled (read your
paper out loud, or have someone read it out loud to you).
5. Use short simple sentences when possible.
6. Make sure the paper is well structured. In other words, make sure it is easy to follow
what you are saying from paragraph to paragraph.
7. Make sure the paper accurately and thoroughly addresses the main questions of the
prompt.
8. Adequately define and explain technical terms. In other words, would a reader
unfamiliar with the material be able to understand the philosophical terms/jargon you
are using? (if you are not sure, have someone not taking the class read your paper).
9. Overall, make sure the paper gives a sense that you (the author) understands the
material and are able to explain it in a clear and effective way.
LINK to the “Frankfurt Bullshit Video”
https://youtu.be/W1RO93OS0Sk (Need this information for the paper)

You are to write a 1500-2000 word analysis on a community corrections topic. The

/in /by

You are to write a 1500-2000 word analysis on a community corrections topic. The topic can be of your choosing. The analysis must include at least three references to scholarly articles that appeared in academic journals or reports from government and/OR public policy organizations (with proper citation- APA Style). Copies or links to all articles referenced must be submitted with your report.
Your analysis should be narrow in scope (i.e. – the impact of institutionalization) rather than presenting a broad overview and should be presented in the following format:
1. Introduction to the Issue 
2. Overview of the issue 
3. Discussion of the Issue 
4. Summary/Recommendations 
Papers that do not adhere to the requirements listed above will not be considered. 

The post You are to write a 1500-2000 word analysis on a community corrections topic. The appeared first on essaysclick.

Case Study 4 Impressing Others

/in /by

In your files there is a case study entitled “Impressing Others.” Utilizing your reading assignment to support your responses, select three questions found at the end to answer.