Clinical Field Experience D: Fluency, Comprehension, And Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do

Allocate as least 1 hour in the field to support this field experience.

Consult with your mentor teacher to decide the direction you will take to provide small-group instruction to 3-4 students on a literacy topic in Fluency, Comprehension, and/or Vocabulary.

Part 1: Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do

Complete the “Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do” template to guide appropriate instruction for the 3-4 students identified by your mentor teacher. Within the chart, identify the following to help design your lesson:

  • Fluency/Comprehension/Vocabulary Concept
  • I Do, We Do, You Do
  • Differentiation
  • Assessment

Upon completion of your lesson and with approval of your mentor teacher, facilitate the lesson to the students chosen.

Part 2: Reflection

Using the “Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do” chart, summarize and reflect upon your chart, strategy, and facilitation in 250-500 words. Explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

Submit your “Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do” and reflection as one deliverable.

Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do

Part 1: Fluency, Comprehension, and Vocabulary: I Do, We Do, You Do

Fluency/Comprehension/Vocabulary Concept

Choose one of the fluency, comprehension, and/or vocabulary concept from above and aligning standards.

 

I DO

Describe the direct instruction that you will use to teach your concept.

WE DO

Describe how you will work together to help your students to reach the learning task.

YOU DO

Describe the independent work the students will do based on the concept you taught.

     
Differentiation

Describe differentiation strategies to utilize with the students chosen by your mentor teacher.

Assessment

Describe an informal assessment that will help to monitor effectiveness of the activity.

 

Part 2: Reflection

Final Project CAPSTONE ESSAY

ETHC 101 CAPSTONE ESSAY INSTRUCTIONS

Summary

This assignment is an essay that brings all of the knowledge and skills developed in this course to bear on a single ethical issue. Each student will write an 1800-2000 word essay (not including footnotes, the title page, table of contents, and bibliography) that combines the insights and arguments of the second and third discussion boards into a single carefully-articulated work. Format should be 12pt, Times New Roman font and in Turabian format.

Content

Begin your paper with a brief introductory paragraph that clearly states your goals, thesis, and method. State what metaethical theory you are contrasting to a Christian ethic, the issue in applied ethics you are addressing, the conclusion(s) on that issue that you want to defend.

Next, provide a lengthy and detailed comparative analysis of the two metaethical theories—Christian ethics and another theory—showing which theory is stronger. This will likely reflect what you argued for in your Discussion Board 2 thread and the feedback that you received from the professor and/or classmates who responded to your thread. Here you can go into much more detail than you could in the Discussion Board, which was limited to 600 words. If you use half of your paper on this section, then it will be roughly three to four pages.

Next, proceed to the applied ethics issue that you discussed in your Discussion Board 3 thread. Here you should greatly expand upon your argument. Add detail, nuance, and argumentation, providing a fairly complete and comprehensive argument for how a Christian ethic would approach this issue. Or, if you defended an alternate theory in DB 2, formulate an application based on that theory. You may illustrate the issue with real-life examples, but please do not fill your paper with anecdotes. You should anticipate possible objections to your approach to the issue and respond to them in an objective and informed manner. (For ideas on how others might object to your approach, a good place to begin would be your classmate’s reply to your DB3 thread, but you need not stop there. Your own imagination and the many books and articles that have been published on issues in applied ethics can provide a wealth of possible arguments relevant to every issue.) You are encouraged to use quotes from sources as a way to support your arguments, but quotes should not make up more than one and a half pages of your essay.

Your final paragraph should reflect what you have argued in your thesis. It should recap what you have accomplished and how you have accomplished it.

Research

This paper is not required to utilize any sources outside of those that were used in the class (the two textbooks, the videos, and the PointCast presentations), but use of additional resources is permitted and encouraged. At the minimum the paper should utilize the resources from the class. All resources used must be listed in the bibliography and any resources quoted, paraphrased, or alluded to must be documented via footnotes formatted according to Turabian. Sources such as Wikipedia and online dictionaries do not count as academic sources and should not be used. Biblical references are encouraged, but will not count as an academic source.

Remember, your footnotes and bibliography (if you had one) do not count toward the 2000 word limit. You will be penalized if you exceed the limit, so please do not.

Format

Your paper must begin with a title page that includes a paper title, your name, the date, and the course name and number. The second page of your paper must be a table of contents. The last page of your paper must be devoted to your bibliography. The paper must utilize 12 point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, with one inch margins. It must be double-spaced rather than triple-spaced between paragraphs and there should be only one space after the end of each sentence.

Any documentation in the body of your paper must be done via footnotes formatted according to Turabian. If you are not familiar with how to do this, simply look it up online. There are many websites that explain Turabian formatting. Footnotes should be single-spaced 10 point Times New Roman font.

Your paper must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document. If you submit it as a .pdf or anything other than a Microsoft Word document it will not be graded.

Format Example

Title Page

Table of Contents

Body of Paper:

• Introduction

• Metaethic

• Application

• Conclusion

Bibliography

Miscellany

Proofread your work before handing it in! Errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and punctuation will affect your grade. This is a university-level writing assignment. Please write accordingly.

The deadline for this assignment is 11:59pm on Monday of Module 7. Submit your finished paper via the SafeAssign link on Blackboard. SafeAssign is a program that checks your work for plagiarism. Plagiarism is immoral, unchristian, and will not be tolerated. The consequences for plagiarism are significant and SafeAssign makes it easy to detect. If you are not sure what plagiarism is, it is your responsibility to find out. Ignorance is no excuse. Do not plagiarize!

This assignment contributes to achieving and assessing the achievement of all four of the Course Learning Outcomes.

What possible Organizational Behavior topics do you see in this story? Explain.

A 29-year-old and a 68-year-old. How much could they possibly have in common? And what could they learn from each other? At Randstad USA’s Manhattan office, such employee pairings are common. One such pair of colleagues sits inches apart facing each other. “They hear every call the other makes. They read every e-mail the other sends or receives. Sometimes they finish each other’s sentences.”

Randstad Holding NV, a Dutch company, has been using this pairing idea since its founding more than 40 years ago. The founder’s motto was “Nobody should be alone.” The original intent was to boost productivity by having sales agents share one job and trade off job responsibilities. Today, these partners in the home office have an arrangement where one is in the office one week while the other one is out making sales calls, then the next week, they switch. The company brought its partner arrangement to the United States in the late 1990s. But when it began recruiting new employees, the vast majority of whom were in their twenties, it realized the challenges and the potential of pairing different generations together. “Knowing that these Gen Yers need lots of attention in the workplace, Randstad executives figured that if they shared a job with someone whose own success depended on theirs, they were certain to get all the nurturing they required.”

Pairing different generations together at work . . . and making it work!

Randstad doesn’t simply pair up people and hope it works. There’s more to it than that! The company looks for people who will work well with others by conducting extensive interviews and requiring job applicants to shadow a sales agent for half a day. “One question Randstad asks is: What’s your most memorable moment while being on a team? If they respond ‘When I scored the winning touchdown,’ that’s a deal killer. Everything about our organization is based on the team and group.” When a new hire is paired with an experienced agent, both individuals have some adjusting. One of the most interesting elements of Randstad’s program is that neither person is “the boss.” And both are expected to teach the other.

Prepare a 2-page paper answering the following questions.  Remember, use 10-12 pt font and APA format!  Feel free to bring in outside data/sources, but please provide citations and a list of references.

USE A COVER PAGE.

TYPE THE QUESTIONS AND THEN YOUR ANSWERS.

1.  What possible Organizational Behavior topics do you see in this story? Explain.

2.  What do you think about this pairing-up idea? Would you be comfortable with such an arrangement? Why or why not?

3.  What personality traits would be most needed for this type of work arrangement? Why?

4.  What types of issues might a Gen Y employee and an older, more-experienced employee face? How could two people in such a close-knit work arrangement deal with those issues? That is, how could both make the adjustment easier?

Individulaized Family Service Plan

Mock IFSP (10 points):

Using the IFSP form provided, you will create an IFSP for a made-up child (you make up the child).

Keep in mind IFSPs are for infants and toddlers aged birth-36 months and IEPs are for students 3-22 so make your outcomes meaningful.

You must fill out the following sections:

Page 1: Name, birthday, date of referral, family language, parent(s) name(s)

Page 2: Name of child, Family concerns and desired priorities [list why the family is seeking services and what they want their child to accomplish with services]

Page 3: Child strengths and family strengths

Page 4: vision and current abilities; hearing and current abilities; health status and current abilities

Page 5: Cognitive, communication and social/emotional all with current abilities

Page 6: Self-help, fine motor, gross motor all with current abilities

Page 7A: one goal, child/family strengths related to this goal, what will be done by whom

Page 7B – 11 you may leave blank.

 

 

 

Isabel Peterson

 

Age: 13 Grade: 8th

Ethnicity: Caucasian Language: English Classification: Autism

Family and Cultural Background:

Isabel lives at home with her mother. Isabel has an older brother and a younger sister who are attending the state university and an older sister who is married and has two children. Mr. Peterson passed away a few years ago; Isabel still cries herself to sleep at night, sobbing that she misses her daddy. Mrs. Peterson works full-time as a housekeeper at an upscale hotel. Mrs. Peterson has been very appreciative of the education provided to Isabel, and has respected school personnel by accepting all of their educational recommendations. However, she had told her other children that she hopes for the day when Isabel can work for the local International Food Store, owned and operated by Mrs. Peterson’s brother, George Hansen. She feels confident that this would provide life-long employment for Isabel, whereas she is not as trusting of a commercial chain store to care as much about the special needs and circumstances of her daughter.

 

Prior School Experience:

Isabel was diagnosed as having ASD shortly after her third birthday. She received early intervention services in the home and the Early Education Center, attended a preschool for students with developmental delays, and progressed through elementary and middle school in classes for students with disabilities and in classes alongside her nondisabled peers.

Other Instructional and Behavioral Information:

 

 

Functional Academics: Isabel can compute additional and subtraction problems with four digits using a calculator; but computes 2-digit multiplication and division problems with 50% accuracy. When asked, Isabel can give the names and values of coins, can count coins to values to $1, and can use the “dollar more” strategy to values of $20. She can read a digital clock to the minute but only an analog clock to the hour.

Isabel can read books on a 2.5 grade level, but her comprehension is on a 1st grade level. She enjoys books about young adults, but gets frustrated because of the reading skills necessary for reading such books. Isabel enjoys writing about events of the day in her electronic diary. Her

 

 

Adapted from Guide to Writing Quality Individualized Education Programs, Gibb & Dyches, 2007

 

writing composition is on a 2nd-grade level; however, she uses a spell checker with 50% accuracy to check her work.

Social/Emotional: Isabel is highly social, and loves to tease her friends in a playful way. When required to complete difficult or “boring” tasks, Isabel often avoids these tasks by talking with her friends, and it often takes 5-10 verbal prompts to get Isabel to begin the task. Once she begins, she almost always completes the task. When she is tired she exhibits extreme emotions. She learns best when she can have fun or play games, is supported in her personal choices, and is given opportunities for social growth.

Communication: Isabel is able to communicate many of her wants and needs, transferring information, using social etiquette, and engaging in conversation for social closeness. She also engages in self-talk to regulate her emotions; however, she often gets “stuck” talking about negative feelings such as anger, frustration, sorrow, and jealousy, and is unable to resolve these issues by herself. Isabel’s intelligibility is not clear, especially for those not familiar with her, and she is unable to repair conversations when they break down.