Homelessness in America is a persistent, complex, and widely-occurring problem that incorporates many economic, social, and psychological dimensions

Homelessness in America is a persistent, complex, and widely-occurring problem that incorporates many economic, social, and psychological dimensions. After years of war and economic decline, the ranks of the homelessness have grown to include families with children (35{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}), military veterans (23{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}), children (25{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}), persons fleeing domestic violence (30{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}), and the mentally ill (20-25{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}) (National Student Campaign, 2012). Additionally, the number of homeless young adults, aged 18 to 24, is growing, giving homelessness a new face (Saulny, 2012).

With regard to the problem of homelessness, some people perceive a call for greater human compassion, while others demand more effective social policy and more comprehensive public health services. Still others insist on greater individual responsibility and more respect for the needs of business, reinforced by aggressive criminal justice responses.

Your paper will examine a broad range of private and public responses (e.g., laws, policies, programs, and individual behaviors) to the problem of homelessness in America.

  1. You will examine five to seven such responses in depth from the perspectives of virtue ethics and distributive, commutative, and retributive justice.
  2. You will summarize the responses and identify the consequences of each response for the problem of homelessness.
  3. You will evaluate competing and conflicting views about the appropriateness of private and public responses to the problem of homelessness and present a balanced conclusion about the justness of each response.
  4. Finally, you will draw an overall conclusion about whether, 30 years from now, the next generation of Americans will view today’s responses to homelessness as just.

Start your research by reviewing the PDF document, Recommended Resources for the Final Paper. Use these resources to gain familiarity with various aspects of the homelessness problem and a range of responses to it. Some of the websites list other research based resources that contain in-depth information that can also be utilized in your paper. Also, use the Ashford University Library to find scholarly articles that are relevant to the specific responses to homelessness that are the focus of your paper.

The paper must be eight to ten pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least five scholarly resources (at least two of which can be found in the Ashford University Library) other than the textbook to support your claims. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page. For information regarding APA, including samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, located within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:

  1. Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
    1. Title of paper
    2. Student’s name
    3. Course name and number
    4. Instructor’s name
    5. Date submitted
  3. Must start with a short introductory paragraph which includes a clear thesis statement (your answer to the question: Will the next generation of Americans view as just, today’s response to homelessness?). The thesis statement itself is just that – a statement of what your essay demonstrates. The thesis is not a question, and it is not a summary of the topics discussed. You should avoid using the first person voice, avoid sentences like “This paper will show that…” and avoid asking questions with your thesis. Rather, your thesis should make declarative statements.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  5. Must end with a short paragraph which includes a conclusion. The conclusion and thesis must be consistent.
    1. Your paper must logically develop the thesis in a way that leads to the conclusion, and that development must be supported by facts, fully explained concepts or assertions, and persuasive reasoning.
  6. Must use at least five scholarly resources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University Library.
  7. Must be in your own words. While brief quotes from sources may be used, altogether the total amount of quoted text must be less than five percent of the body of your paper.
    1. When you use someone else’s words, they must be enclosed in quotation marks followed by an APA in-text short citation (author, year, page number) to your source. The in-text citation must correspond to a full APA citation for the source on the reference page at the end of the paper.
  8. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  9. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

select an infectious or chronic disease and provide a brief history and overview of this topic and how it is currently impacting public health today

Students will be required to complete a 7-10 page final paper for this course. The final paper will require the student to select an infectious or chronic disease and provide a brief history and overview of this topic and how it is currently impacting public health today. Since topics may vary, formatting will as well; however, students will need to provide:

� Abstract

� History of the disease

� Symptoms of the disease

� The cause of the disease (and how/when the cause was discovered)

� Method to spread the disease (if chronic disease, populations most affected in the US)

� Methods to contain the disease

� Number of people infected or affected today (number of deaths, if applicable); may also use graphs and tables

o Use descriptive epidemiology concepts

� Public health costs (i.e. local, federal, hospitalizations, nursing, hospice)

� Treatments, in any available

� Current and future educational efforts needed by public health professionals to reduce spread of disease

How a cell phone contributes to driving hazards

The effects of texting while driving have been a matter of great interest lately. 50 percent of drivers between the age of 16 and 24 confessed to having texted while driving. Two thousand young drivers die annually from accidents related to texting. In May 2009, there was a much publicized car crash in Boston where a driver crashed texting his girlfriend. On September 12, 2008, A Union Pacificfreight train and a Metrolink commuter train had a collision in Los Angeles, California. The accident claimed the lives of 25 commuters. Investigations by National Transport Safety Board (NTBS) found out that the Metrolink train operator had been texting while operating the train. The investigation concluded that the engineer might have been distracted by numerous texts he sent while on duty.

How a cell phone contributes to driving hazards

According to a research from the University of Utah, driving while using a phone lowers a driver’s reaction time to levels observed in drunken individuals. Cell phone results in thousands of road accidents and car crashes annually since our brain have difficulty managing several tasks simultaneously. Using a hand held phone while driving increase car crash risks by up to four times.

When people have conversations, they often have to give the information they get due consideration. This concentration on the information they receive from conversations competes for the brain capacity and can cause impaired decisions.

 

Latest studies show 8 percent of drivers drive while using cell phones; however, this statistics is expected to rise. Phone conversations take driver’s concentration off the road. Not withstanding the use of either handheld or hands-free phones, the driver loses focus on his driving duty impairing the driver’s judgment. Phone conversations leads to driving impairments as shown below;

  1. Inattention blindness: – drivers engaged in phone conversations do not monitor everything they see on their environment. This is a potential cause for harm since the driver is not able to identify a potential danger or respond to emergency circumstances effectively. Research shows that drivers using mobile phones while driving fail to see half of the objects on their driving setting.
  2. Slow reaction time: – drivers using cell phones while driving experienced slow response to emergency situations on the road.
  3. Sticking to lanes: – drivers engaged in phone conversations have problems sticking to their lanes. Using cell phones while driving fast may cause weaving on the lanes leading to crashes.

 

Most drivers admit to the potential harm involved in using cell phones while driving; however, confessed to using phones while driving.

How using cell phones while driving is dangerous

Focus on a problem such as illiteracy, bullying, domestic violence, obesity, and other social issues.  Consider there are ways to prevent, or obliterate this problem.

Start by researching facts, statistics, dates, and any other pertinent information regarding this problem.

For example, if I saw students’ success in freshman composition courses as a problem, I might decide to propose solutions by considering what they are having the most issues with.  Then, I might address those issues by providing the necessary resources to encourage more efficiency and success.

Once you have selected a problem, and researched the facts and other information about it, consider proposed solutions to either address the prevention of the problem, or, to resolve the problem.  Either way, you must consider the time frame for which you are analyzing the context of your topic.  Additionally, your synthesis should revolve around suggestions for your audience along with informative details.

Your paper must point out and attempt to solve particular layers of your topic.  You should not only imagine what might be wrong, but also what can be better than it is.

Consider the following:

PROBLEM

What are the causes of the problem?

What are the most troubling or alarming images associated with the problem?

What are its short-term effects?  Long-term effects?

What other situation (event, attitude) does this problem resemble?

SOLUTION

What action (solution) will best address the causes of the problem?

What might stand in the way of this solution?

How will the solution change the situation?

Does this solution have potential shortcomings or limitations?

REMEMBER: 

“A solution might change the intellectual environment so that physical changes can take place later”

PUBLIC RESONANCE

Who should care about his issue?  Why?

What particular community, place, or group does this issue effect?

How might my reader(s) be involved in this issue?

Why is it important that others hear my opinion about this issue?

KEY ELEMENTS

Problem:  Includes illustrations or examples, and explanation of causes, and a picture of short- and long-term side effects.

Solutions:  Includes an explanation of how that solution will address, confront, or stop the causes of the problem.

Counterargument:  Addresses concerns about or opposing claims to the solution or the articulation of the problem.

Alternative Solutions:  Include any other potential strategies for addressing the problem.  Articulating alternative solutions requires an explanation of why these are less desirable than the main solution being offered.

Concession/ Qualifier:  Acknowledges any possible shortcomings of the solution or concedes value to some opposing claim or alternative solution.

The paper must:

Be a minimum of 5 pages (content, does not include works cited)

Follow guidelines of MLA formatting

Include a works cited page with a minimum of 5 sources

Be submitted with completed checklist, or corrected assignments must be submitted for grading

Be submitted on the last day of class for final grading and overall assessment of the project

 

NOTE:

Refer to checklist for due dates

 

Name

Professor

Subject

Date

How using cell phones while driving is dangerous

The use of cell phones has become more popular since their invention. Everyday millions of people use mobile phones for communication and online research. The growth of mobile phone industry and technology has been instrumental in making these gadgets affordable to majority including children. Studies reveal potential harm in rising use cell phones by drivers.

The use of phones while driving motor cars is very common today. However, this activity is considered dangerous given evidence relating cell phone use to a number of road accidents. Several states in the US have passed regulations forbidding use of phones while driving. Other states on the other hand allow the use of hands free gadgets.

Some researchers believe that using hands free gadgets are not safer than using handheld phones. The work involved in holding a conversation causes increased risk of loss of concentration while driving. Researchers from Carnegie Mellon University found out that listening to phone conversations could cause up to 37{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119} decrease of functions in human being’s parietal lobe. Parietal lobe is a part of the brain that integrates and manages information such as temperature, taste and touch.

According to Andrew Parkes, driver’s phone conversations impair the driver’s concentration more than passenger conversations. A simulation studies report from University of Utah concluded that drivers involved in passenger conversations performed far much better than lone drivers. The report attributed this to the replication of driving task and the traffic in their conversations.

However, the report by the University of Utah has been heavily criticized by other research institutions. Meta-analysis by the University of Illinois appreciated the danger of passenger conversations. According to AAA (formerly American Automobile Association), passenger conversation was responsible for 11{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119} of accidents related to distraction.