Critical Thinking in Community Health

Critical Thinking in Community Health Paper (30 pts)

Each student will write a paper in which he/she uses his/her critical thinking skills to thoughtfully consider and evaluate a current issue in community health. A list of potential topics is provided at the bottom of this assignment. A student may also suggest a topic of interest to him/her, but must clear the topic with the instructor before starting to write the paper. The paper topic must be different than the topic of his/her PSA group project and different from the topics addressed in the individual and group CTAs. Outside evidence from at least three sources gathered through independent research must be included in the paper. Students must describe the problem at hand, provide multiple perspectives on the issue, draw conclusions from the analysis of the problem/issue and related data/evidence, and be able to identify the implications and/or predict potential consequences of the conclusions.

This paper will be graded using the critical thinking rubric that you used to complete individual CTA 1. This rubric is available on our Canvas site. While researching and analyzing, then writing and revising, be sure to ask yourself:

The purpose of this assignment is to give you practice in making a planning proposal to develop a project to address a health need.

Introduction
The purpose of this assignment is to give you practice in making a planning proposal to develop a
project to address a health need. It will assess your ability to:
Write to a prescribed format following a proposal structure·
Identify, from an outline situation analysis, the health needs of a community·
Formulate a response which addresses those needs, and sets priorities where appropriate, uses·
given reading and your own experience, and is feasible and logical
Move from general concepts to details of costs, staff and timetable·
Give you confidence, having done it once, for future occasions.·
Background to the task
The central government of Kalitopia, in its new long term strategic statement (2025 Vision for
Health), has identified a high number of individuals suffering (or at risk from) cardiovascular
diseases in the country. Cardiovascular diseases are a group of non-communicable disorders of
the heart and blood vessels including1:
coronary heart disease (also known as ischaemic heart disease) – disease of the blood·
vessels supplying the heart muscle
cerebrovascular disease (also known as stroke) – disease of the blood vessels supplying·
the brain
The Ministry of Health is therefore requiring all districts to develop proposals for improving
cardiovascular health services as a matter of high priority. A World Bank Health Project in
cooperation with the ‘Basic Needs Foundation – Kalitopia’ has a component focusing on this, and
the District Health Planning Group for Bulobazi District has been asked to develop an outline
costed proposal to access funding from this project.
Funds have been provisionally earmarked for the project in Bulobazi subject to a satisfactory
proposal being developed to improve cardiovascular health services. These funds are:
Recurrent funding of 50,000 shillings per year in year 1, updated by 10% in year 2 and a·
further 10% in year 3;
Capital funds totaling 100,000 shillings over the three years.·
These funds are additional to the regular health budget (details in the Bulobazi District profile) and
which is not expected to increase over the three years.
The task
You are part of the District Health Planning Group within Bulobazi District. Other members of the
planning group are the District Medical Officer, the Assistant District Commissioner, and a
representative of the community. The District Health Planning Group needs to prepare the planning
proposal for improving cardiovascular health services for the whole District, to be considered at the
next meeting of the project planning team and you have been asked to prepare the first draft. The
proposal will cover a 3 year period from January 2016 to December 2018. The current date is
October 2015.
You, therefore, have to decide, within the resources allocated and based on your knowledge of the
District, what strategies should be planned for the District. This should be written as a planning
proposal, with a completed budgetStructure of the proposal
Your assignment should be written in the form of a project proposal (rather than an academic essay).
The project methodology requires you to use the following headings in submitting your proposal:
1. Situation analysis setting out key issues (no more than 500 words)
2. Statement of the objectives of the project
3. Outline of the proposal (what strategies you propose should be set up, what each strategy
should achieve; and the main activities needed for each strategy)
4. Justification of the proposal (why you have selected your particular strategies)
5. Resource implications (what staff, equipment etc. will be required in addition to the existing
budget for the District). A budget for each of the three years should be included. A blank
budget sheet is Attachment 3. It is recommended that you use this format for your proposal)
6. Implementation schedule for the proposed activities (an outline programme of who will do
what, in what order, and when). A blank Gantt chart (Attachment 4) is available to develop this
implementation schedule, but feel free to use any other format if deemed appropriate.
7. Monitoring & evaluation. Based on your objectives, how you would measure the success of
the project, including selection of criteria for the objectives and indicators for each criteria and
source of information.
The Bulobazi District profile (Attachment 1), including the schedule of unit costs, should be consulted
in preparing the proposal, but some of the information may be redundant. For any costs or
information which you need but are not given, you should make a reasonable assumption and say
clearly that you are making an assumption. Note also that information is not always totally accurate or
consistent and you may need to make judgements about this.Situation analysis. A brief situation analysis and clear outline of the specific
problem to be addressed focusing on aspects relevant to the topic (maximum
500 words).
10%
Objectives. Clear, measurable and feasible objectives related to both health
status and service delivery for the project which arrive from the situational
analysis and government policies.
5%
Outline proposal. Clear description of each strategy for what will be done to
achieve each of the objectives and activities for each of the strategies. All
strategies and activities need to feasible and realistic.
20%
Justification of outline proposal. Ability to argue a case, to apply ideas and
use relevant material from reading and experience which shows why your
strategies are the appropriate means to achieve the objectives.
15%
Resource implications. Logically derived from proposal, clearly thought
through, appropriate and properly listed by strategy and including budget with
clear distinction between recurrent and capital costs.
20%
Implementation. Logical sequence, feasible time scales, and sensible
allocation of tasks.
10%
Equity and gender. Appropriate consideration of equity and gender issues
throughout the proposal.
5%
Monitoring & evaluation. Relevant and sensible criteria, indicators and source
of information indicated.
10%
Presentation. The assignment follows the general guidance for preparing
assignments. The proposal’s format and structure is user-friendly. Any
references used are cited using the expected citation style.
5%

DETERMINE Consortium and European Commission and the National Social Marketing Centre video programs. Select two EU countries on which to focus. Look at efforts in those countries designed to reduce health inequities and inequality and examine appropriate outcomes for those efforts.

The World Health Organization and European Union (EU) DETERMINE Consortium has acknowledged gaps in health equities within and between member countries. A variety of efforts are underway to help close those gaps.

DETERMINE Consortium and European Commission and the National Social Marketing Centre video programs. Select two EU countries on which to focus. Look at efforts in those countries designed to reduce health inequities and inequality and examine appropriate outcomes for those efforts. Evaluate the performance of the health systems in those countries as reflected in population health data for each of the countries. Be sure to access the CIA country profiles (found within the CIA World Factbook) and WHO websites provided earlier for the most current resources.

Use APA formatting for your writing and to cite your resources. See resources below

Gele, A. A., & Harsl f, I. (2010). Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9, 8 16.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Commission of the European Communities. (2007). Together for health: A strategic approach for the EU 2008-2013 [White paper]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health-eu/doc/whitepaper_en.pdf

Health 2020: the European policy for health and well-being. (n.d.). Retrieved January 16, 2015, from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-policy/health-2020-the-european-policy-for-health-and-well-being

European Commission. (2006). Tackling health inequalities in the EU: The contributions of Various EU-level actors. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_projects/2003/action3/docs/2003_3_15_rep2_en.pdf

Read pages 1 17.

European Commission. (2014). European Commission: Public health. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/index_en.htm

Stegeman, I., Costongs, C., Needle C., & DETERMINE Consortium. (2010). The story of DETERMINE: Mobilising action for health equity in the EU Final report of the DETERMINE consortium. Brussels: EuroHealthNet. Retrieved from https://eurohealthnet.eu/sites/eurohealthnet.eu/files/publications/DETERMINE-Final-Publication-Story.pdf

Wellesley Institute. (2011). The European portal for action on health equity. Retrieved from https://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/news/the_european_portal_for_action_on_health_equity/

Discuss one change in quality of life in post-transition Russia.

Cell phones, video cameras, and other technologies are changing the way we live today. It is difficult to avoid the stories and images of poverty, human rights abuses, disasters, diseases, and other tragedies that plague people in rich and poor countries alike.

It is not just communications technology that is making the world a “smaller” place. Globalization is also exerting a powerful effect on the conditions in which people live and work, (i.e., the social determinants of health) and, thus, on health itself.

The effects of globalization on health in Russia. Discuss one change in quality of life in post-transition Russia. Also, explain one change in mortality in post-transition Russia. Provide examples for both. Expand on your insights utilizing the below references. Use APA formatting to cite the refrence.