Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue.

To prepare:
Select a population health issue of interest(lack of proper nutrition) to you and identify the population(children) affected by the issue.

Locate two scholarly articles, each of which provides a description of an effective health advocacy campaign that addresses your issue. The articles need to focus on two different advocacy campaigns.

Analyze the attributes of the two campaigns to determine what made them effective.

Reflect on a policy you could propose or suggest a change to a current policy to improve the health of the population you selected.

For the Part 1 application (approximately 3 pages )address the following:
Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue.
Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.
Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.
Begin to develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan:
A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution

Select a common element in the articles and compare and contrast this element.

Students will conduct research on a single health topic, locating at least one scientific article and one non-scientific article about the topic. The student will explore the differences and share findings through an essay paper. The purpose of this assignment is to explore the differences in scientific and non-scientific articles related to health. The focus of this assignment is limited to three content areas: nutrition, disease prevention and sexual health. Students will select a single topic that falls within one of the three content areas. The content areas are broad and many topics will be appropriate. You may wish to conduct some research on multiple potential topics before selecting your final topic. Once you have selected your topic you will locate a scientific and nonscientific article both on the same topic. Divide the paper into the following sections. 1) Introduction (2 to 3 paragraphs) This section should introduce your topic and provide a brief summary of the two articles. 2) Themes (1 to 3 paragraphs) In this section discuss any overarching themes that occur in both articles. This section should focus on a specific part of each article not the entire article. These are broad ideas or concepts not the specific details you will cover in the next section. 3) Topic 1 (1 to 3 paragraphs) Select a common element in the articles and compare and contrast this element. Provide details and comprehension about the two sources. This should be a well-organized discussion not just a statement of what each article says. 4) Topic 2 (1 to 3 paragraphs) Select a common element in the articles and compare and contrast this element. This section should focus on a specific part of each article not the entire article. Provide details and comprehension about the two sources. This should be a well-organized discussion not just a statement of what each article says. 5) Topic 3 (1 to 3 paragraphs) The third topic is optional. I encourage you to include a third topic but it is not required. Select a common element in the articles and compare and contrast this element. This section should focus on a specific part of each article not the entire article. Provide details and comprehension about the two sources. This should be a well-organized discussion not just a statement of what each article says. 6) Conclusion (2 to 4 paragraphs) In this section you will provide your conclusions about the reliability and validity of the two different sources. This is also where you can state your opinions. Discuss any advantages or disadvantages you were able to identify between using a scientific and a non-scientific source. End your paper with a purposeful conclusion. Font: Calibri, Arial or Veranda (11 point) References: They are required. You must cite each article within the paper and on a works cited page. You may use APA or MLA styles for your references. Length: 3 to 4 pages double spaced. This does not include the works cited page. Cover Page: Not required Plagiarism:

A critical essay on a named public policy. The essay should include a introduction, discussion, conclusion. There is not a clear outline.

3000 words max
A critical essay on a named public policy. The essay should include a introduction, discussion, conclusion. There is not a clear outline. The writer can criticise in which every style preferable to them. Any public health policy can be chosen- which ever seems appropriate to the writer.
I will take photos of an example essay : fluoridation of tap water in the UK. ( this policy can not be done )
It should be mentioned to what extent – the policy has worked or hasn’t worked as well. How the outcomes of the the policy has been measured. And if a policy has been successful – to what extent. The aim of the policy. The government might change definitions of an outcome. For example: homelessness. It needs to be defined according to their definition.

This link should take you to a list of government policies. If you use this link make sure you select policies in the area of public health (not every link refers to a policy, make sure you pick out a named public health POLICY).

WHAT IS A PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY?

An area (e.g. obesity) can not be the topic of your essay. A public health policy is a piece of legislation/campaign/initiative designed to impact on an area (e.g. obesity). So an example of a public health campaign/policy/initiative designed to tackle obesity is:

The walk for life/run for life campaign designed to get people exercising

The law forcing food manufacturers to label energy content of foods (food labelling)

The traffic light labelling system on food stuffs designed to promote awareness of macronutrient content

The proposed legislation for a sugar tax

Discuss the hazards posed by the interaction of the hazardous materials present at the refinery and adjacent facilities, including the resulting by-products of the incident fire and acid gas release.

Questions:
1. Discuss the hazards posed by the interaction of the hazardous materials present at the refinery and adjacent facilities, including the resulting by-products of the incident fire and acid gas release.
2. As the lead refinery representative on the unified incident command (UIC), what actions should be taken by the UIC to respond to this incident (please consider all receptors).
3. If the polymerization unit is engulfed in the fire, how will this affect your response?
4. All emergency responders participated in the post-incident critique. What corrective actions should be implemented by the refinery to prevent the reoccurrence of this incident?