1.)   Typically, juveniles are rehabilitated rather than punished. Do you think that this is too lenient and that juveniles get away with crime? Explain your thoughts. Should there be tougher consequences for juveniles? Why, or why not? Remember to remain professional when discussing this matter. Stick to the topic without getting personal in your own response and in response to others’ comments.

2.)  As a consumer, what do you think you can do to be more aware of fraud such as healthcare fraud? How can you avoid falling victim to fraud when you are trying to do basic things such as seeing your doctor when you are ill?

3.)   Of the disorders discussed, which cluster poses the most problems for the criminal justice practitioner, and why? How would it be difficult for you, and how would you deal with this challenge?  I pick Bipolar disorder

4.) Several states have quit using the insanity defense, limiting the use of mental illness involving criminal intent. Think about this, and discuss pros/cons you see with eliminating the insanity plea. In your personal opinion, do you think that mental illness has a place in the courtroom setting? Why, or why not?

These are discussion board.  only 150 words.  please do own work.  please keep it number

Write a five to six (4-6) page paper in which you:
(Note: Refer to Review Question 8 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 1-3. Select two (2) editorials / essays / columns (by staff or freelance writers) on a current issue of public policy from two (2) different publications (large metropolitan or national newspaper such as Washington Post or the New York Times or national magazines such as Newsweek, Time, and The New Republic.)
Visit the online library at http://research.strayer.edu to read these titles.
1. Apply the procedures for argumentation analysis (located in Chapter 8) to display contending positions and underlying assumptions for the content of Review Question 8.
2. Determine which arguments are the most plausible. Provide a rationale for your views.
(Note: Refer to Demonstration Exercise 1 located at the end of Chapter 3 for criteria 4-6. Examine Box 3.0 – Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Choose one of the following policy issues in the U.S.: gun control, illegal drugs, medical insurance fraud, and environmental protection of waterways, job creation, affordable health care, or Medicare.)
3. Apply the procedures for stakeholder analysis to generate a list of at least five to ten (5-10) stakeholders who affect or are affected by problems in the issue area chosen for analysis. (Note: Refer to the textbook for a step-by-step process on stakeholder analysis.)
4. After creating a cumulative frequency distribution from the list, discuss new ideas generated by each stakeholder. (Note: The ideas may be objectives, alternatives, outcomes causes, etc.; ideas should not be duplicates.) Refer to the following video for a reminder on how to calculate cumulative relative frequency: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBX9aNdOYDg.
5. Write an analysis of the results of the frequency distribution that answers the following questions: (a) Does the line graph flatten out? (b) If so, after how many stakeholders? (c) What conclusions can be drawn about the policy problems in the issue area?