Examine one case of significant government intervention as it relates to your current industry of employment or an industry in which you are interested in working.

The theory of market economies emphasizes freedom of choice and limited government intervention. The classic argument for government intervention is market failure – the inability of the market economy to correct itself from a dysfunctional state (such as the Great Depression).

Examine one case of significant government intervention as it relates to your current industry of employment or an industry in which you are interested in working.  Examples of intervention programs include, but are not limited to:

  1. Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program, Obamacare/ Affordable Health Care Act
  2. Develop a 16-slide presentation including detailed speaker notes or voiceover including the following:
  3.  Describe the intervention and detail its history.
  4. Analyze the arguments for government intervention as opposed to arguments for market-based solutions.
  5. Examine who may be helped and who may be hurt by the selected government intervention.
  6.  Examine externalities and/or unintended consequences of such intervention.
  7. Determine the cost trend of the intervention program since its implementation.
  8. Evaluate the success or failure of the intervention in achieving its objectives and develop conclusions.

Discuss how different professionals in the healthcare system (nurses, pharmacists, technicians, etc.) are held to this guideline.

1.Introduce an overview of a healthcare system practice guideline, preferably where you work or have worked. (Tenet Healthcare at Miami Florida)
2.Discuss how different professionals in the healthcare system (nurses, pharmacists, technicians, etc.) are held to this guideline.
3.Identify the research/reference used by the system to adopt the guideline.
4.Define the evidence used to define the guideline.
5.Determine the level of evidence used in the EBP identified.
6.Provide an opinion on how well this guideline is followed by professionals in the system.

For patients with billing questions, how would you advise them?

  1. For patients with billing questions, how would you advise them?
  2. What are the resources you can give this patient related to healthcare costs and/or his insurance coverage?
  3. Describe the significant changes in hospital healthcare during the last 5-10 years.
  4. Are your values to act as an agent for the patient or for the hospital more strongly developed?Answer the following questions:
  5. Where do you begin with this project? Who should be involved?
  6. What is some information that you will need before you can offer any suggestions?
  7. Should group decision-making be involved in fiscal decisions such as this one?
  8. Can fiscal decisions be made without value judgments?3. Develop a 10-year career plan for yourself, taking into account the constraints of family responsibilities such as marriage, children, educational endeavors, and aging parents. Consider how you envision your future. Recognize the phases of your career and explain your progress to assist in the development of a long-term master plan.

Do you agree or disagree? In what ways would a stronger president promote effective representation and allow the U.S. to do a better job of meeting the policy challenges it faces? In what ways would a stronger president undermine representation and make the U.S. less effective in meeting the policy challenges it faces? In the end, do you agree or disagree that the U.S. presidency should be strengthened? Why?

  1. The President does a better job than Congress of addressing our most pressing problems—from health care to immigration to financial regulation—because presidents’ concern for their legacy drives them to seek coherent policy solutions.
  2. Thus, the increasing power of the President in our political system has been a good development for American democracy. And, if anything, Congress and all of its pathologies ought to be pushed to the periphery and we ought to further strengthen the role of presidents.
  3. Do you agree or disagree? In what ways would a stronger president promote effective representation and allow the U.S. to do a better job of meeting the policy challenges it faces? In what ways would a stronger president undermine representation and make the U.S. less effective in meeting the policy challenges it faces? In the end, do you agree or disagree that the U.S. presidency should be strengthened? Why?
  4. Either argue that a stronger role for the president would undermine representation and make the U.S. less effective at meeting the policy challenges it faces or argue that a stronger role for the president would promote effective representation and make the U.S. more effective at meeting the policy challenges it faces.