The Key Assignment for this course will involve creating polices for the various laws that are covered in the employee handbook. The purpose of the handbook is to equip managers with the information they need to lead their teams.

The Key Assignment for this course will involve creating polices for the various laws that are covered in the employee handbook. The purpose of the handbook is to equip managers with the information they need to lead their teams. For this assignment, you will create a paper of 1000-1500 words. You should also research and utilize 4 academic sources in your assignment.

Include the information below in your assignment. When discussing each act, provide an example of how it might be violated by an employer or employee and the approach that can be used (such as EEOC, diversity, grievances, counseling, documentation, or termination) to address the violation.

  • A policy for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • A policy for the Age Discrimination in Employment act (ADEA)
  • A policy for dealing with different types of harassment.
  • A policy for the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
  • A policy for the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
  • A policy for the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
  • A policy for the Equal Pay Act (EPA)

Develop three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and suggest two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices.

Assignment 2: The Hiring Process and Managing a Diverse Workforce

No plagiarism

Imagine that you are the HR Director at your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar. As the HR Director, you must use different employment law requirements to create methods and policies that support the promotion of a diverse workforce. Select one (1) job opportunity that you have held or with which you are familiar within the same organization for this scenario.

(Note: You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of these assignments. In your original work, you may use aspects of existing processes from either your current or a former place of employment. However, you must remove any and all identifying information that would enable someone to discern the organization[s] that you have used.)

Write a ten to twelve (10-12) page paper in which you:

  1. Develop three (3) recruitment methods for the job opportunity in question, and suggest two (2) ways that each method helps one to avoid discriminatory practices. Justify your response.
  2. Outline an application process that details the organization’s method of accepting all applications, as well as its method of validating applicants’ attainment of the required credentials (e.g., reviewing resumes, collecting transcripts, verifying certifications, etc.) for the job opportunity.
  3. Develop a five- (5) step procedure for the HR Department to use in order to maintain all applicants’ records in case a discriminatory charge occurs.
  4. Decide on three (3) background checks that the HR Department must utilize, and justify the relevance of each background check for the job opportunity.
  5. Choose three (3) employment tests (e.g., drug tests, medical examinations, HIV tests, generic tests, polygraphs, honesty tests, psychological tests, intelligence and skills tests, and physical fitness, etc.) that the HR Department should use. Justify the relevance of each selected employment test to the job requirements.
  6. Formulate a policy for making both the hiring and promotional decisions related to the job opportunity. Specify the major challenges and potential adverse impact of using subjective criteria for assessing soft skills. Next, suggest one (1) plan to mitigate the adverse impact. Justify your suggestion.
  7. Recommend two (2) types of reasonable accommodations for both disabled applicants and applicants needing special religious considerations. Argue two (2) legal reasons for not being able to sufficiently provide such reasonable accommodation for each group.
  8. Select one (1) case in which a court charged an organization with an affirmative action violation and one (1) case in which a court charged the organization with not managing harassment issues more expeditiously. Recommend an action plan geared toward preventing the issues addressed in both cases within your selected organization. Justify your recommendation.
  9. Choose three (3) work-life conflicts that the HR Director should consider within the selected organization. Then, outline a policy geared toward resolving each conflict through the use of related employment laws. Justify your response.
  10. Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

What are the advantages for organizations that offer benefits to domestic partners of employees? Are there ethical issues with either offering the benefits or not offering them? What is your opinion?

Responses to first 15 question should be in your own words and be 75 words or more

  1. What are your own limits concerning questionable language, jokes, or forwarding e-mails? Do you have the same standards in the workplace? What are your views of those whose standards are either more or less tolerant of questionable language or jokes? How might these differences in perspective cause problems?
  1. Workplace security focuses on protecting the employer’s property, inventory, data, and productivity. Employee theft, excessive time spent surfing the Internet, revealing trade secrets to competition, online gambling, viewing online pornography, sending offensive or harassing e-mails, or using the company’s customer database for personal gain could damage the company. But how far can this protection extend? Shouldn’t we consider employees’ rights, too? How do we create a balance?
  1. What is your opinion of labor unions?
  1. What can organizations do to make sure their hiring officials are not using data collection to discriminate against applicant’s, but rather hiring them based on skills?
  1. Do you think there will ever be equal employment in the workforce?
  1. How far can employers stretch the “green jobs” label before it loses legitimacy? Does Starbucks or McDonald’s policy of rewarding their coffee suppliers who use sustainable growing practices mean that they are green employers? How “green” do they need to be? Is the Society of Human Resource Management adequate by defining “green jobs” as those that meet the need for environmentally responsible production and work processes and the development of green goods and services? This includes “reducing pollution or waste, reducing energy usage, and reducing use of limited natural resources.
  1. Employment branding makes the company name stand out when applicants are researching employers. Essentially, it’s about marketing the company as an attractive employer in the same way that consumer products and services such as cars, beverages, and hotels have distinctive brand images. Identify other employers in your area that seem to have an “employment brand.” Does that image help to recruit workers?
  1. Should companies use stress interviews? Should interviewers be permitted to assess professionalism, confidence, and how one reacts to the everyday nuisances of work by putting applicants into a confrontational scenario? Does becoming angry in an interview indicate a propensity toward outbursts or violence under work stress? Should HRM advocate the use of an activity that could possibly slip out of control?
  1. Few states lost more jobs in the great recession than Michigan where nearly one in every ten jobs disappeared. The country needs a new plan to attack unemployment. It needs to reinvent how to put those unemployed workers to work. Whose responsibility is it to deal with that problem; is it the governments, the businesses or the unemployed person?
  1. What are your thoughts and opinions on employers who request potential new hires or current employee’s social media usernames and passwords? Some employers argue that access to personal accounts is needed to protect proprietary information or trade secrets, to comply with federal financial regulations, or to prevent the employer from being exposed to legal liabilities. But others consider requiring access to personal accounts an invasion of employee privacy.
  1. How can managers be trained to be sincere and honest when evaluating an employee’s performance? Can organizations develop an ethical evaluation process? Should we expect companies to spend training dollars to achieve this goal? What do you think?
  1. Back to the sticky issue of what to say to the employees with lower starting salaries if they find out what their coworkers are earning. What would you do? How can you justify your actions? Should you offer them the same salaries? Can you forbid employees from discussing salaries?
  1. What are the advantages for organizations that offer benefits to domestic partners of employees? Are there ethical issues with either offering the benefits or not offering them? What is your opinion?
  1. Inspire your sales force by rewarding them. What are your opinions about reward strategies to motivate your team?
  1. Executive Compensation. What is your opinion on CEO’s that make way too much while their team/company is failing? What should be done to failing CEO’s, should they be replaced? Should their compensation be reduced? Or both and why?

An employee is upset because a co-worker has been spreading rumors about her. She is threatening to file a lawsuit. If she does, what type of allegation would she be making, and what are the elements of the claim that she will need to prove in order to be successful in her lawsuit?

  1. An employee is upset because a co-worker has been spreading rumors about her. She is threatening to file a lawsuit. If she does, what type of allegation would she be making, and what are the elements of the claim that she will need to prove in order to be successful in her lawsuit?
  1. On page 174 of your textbook, read the story of the flight attendants whose conditional job offer was rescinded for failure to disclose HIV-positive status on the medical questionnaire. What do you think the court should decide and why? Look up the case on the Internet. What did the court decide, and why?
  1. A woman from New Jersey is interviewed for a job in marketing. The job is based in Georgia. She has an MBA. The interviewing manager asks her the following questions: Do you have any children? Does your husband help with the child rearing? Do you plan to have more children in the future? Would your family support you moving to Georgia if we need you to? The woman is not hired for the position. A male from Georgia with a bachelor’s degree in public relations is hired. Does the woman have a legitimate argument for sex discrimination? If yes, what does she have to show in order to make a prima facie case of discrimination? What affirmative defense(s), if any, can the employer assert?
  1. A 350-pound man interviewed for a job as a sales counselor for a weight loss center. He was told by the interviewer that he was the most qualified applicant, but the regional manager had concerns about his weight. He was later informed that he would not be hired now because the company is “image conscious” and his weight would “send the wrong message.” He was told to re-apply for employment after losing seventy pounds. The man sued. What should the court decide? Why? (Goodman v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1455)