Describe the impact of the studies in terms of the effects on the human participants.

To prepare for this assessment, locate scholarly articles on Milgram’s studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. These two pivotal studies provide the basis for this assessment.

Examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology. Consider the information you located on Milgram’s studies on obedience to authority and Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment on the power of social roles. Include the following in your assessment:

  • Describe what these studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
  • Explain the benefits from these research studies. What knowledge or insight was gained?
  • Describe the impact of the studies in terms of the effects on the human participants.
  • Explain how these (and other) controversial research studies have shaped the principles and standards in the current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Ethics.
  • Develop evidence-based arguments both for and against these types of controversial research studies.
  • Do you think that the information that was obtained was worth the risks to the human subjects? Explain and support your position.

Your submitted assessment should be 5–7 pages in length, excluding title page and reference page, and use references from at least three scholarly resources. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for format and style.

Additional Requirements

  • Include a title page and reference page.
  • At least three current scholarly or professional resources.
  • APA format.
  • Times New Roman font, 12 point.
  • Double spaced.

Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.

Write a 5–7-page assessment in which you examine the controversy related to research and ethics in the field of social psychology.

It is essential to be able to critically analyze the research methods used in studies, in order to weigh the validity of the conclusions or recommendations.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and research skills to locate scholarly information in the field of social psychology.
  • Use valid, scholarly research resources relevant to the field of social psychology.
  • Competency 4: Examine the research methods frequently used in the study of social psychology.
  • Describe the impact of controversial research studies on the human participants.
  • Competency 5: Examine controversial research studies in social psychology from an ethical standpoint.
  • Explain how controversial research studies contributed to the development of ethical standards in the field of psychology.
  • Develop evidence-based arguments for and against controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
  • Describe what controversial research studies revealed about conformity and obedience to authority.
  • Competency 6: Apply critical thinking skills to resolve conflicts and issues in the field of social psychology.
  • Determine whether knowledge gained justifies controversial research studies in the field of social psychology.
  • Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
  • Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.

Use APA format and style.

Statistical Reasoning in Psychology

ASSIGNMENT 04

PS390 Statistical Reasoning in Psychology

Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling, and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double‐spaced pages; refer to the “Format Requirementsʺ page for specific format requirements.

StatCrunch

StatCrunch tutorial videos are available at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=BE055F65E43B4973.

  1. (25 points) A prison psychologist recorded the number of rule infractions for 15 prison inmates over a six-month period to be 5, 4, 2, 4, 3, 5, 2, 0, 4, 4, 5, 5, 3, 4, and 3.
  1. Make a frequency table.
  1. Make a histogram based on the frequency table.
  1. Describe in words the shape of the histogram.
  1. (25 points) Identify and solve this problem by hand.

The head of public safety notices that the average driving speed at a particular intersection averages μ = 35 mph with a standard deviation of σ = 7.5 mph. After a school speed limit sign of 20 mph is placed at the intersection, the first 40 cars travel past at an average speed of 32 mph. Using the .01 significance level, was there a significant change in driving speed?

  1. Use the five steps of hypothesis testing (report results in APA format).
  1. Sketch the distributions involved.
  1. Figure the confidence limits for the 99% confidence interval.
  1. (25 points) You will have to use a combination of StatCrunch and hand calculations (e.g., effect sizes) to solve the following problems.

A social psychologist gave a questionnaire about concern for farm workers to seven participants before and after they attended a film about union organization of farm workers. The results are shown below with high scores meaning high concern. Using the .05 significance level, do these results support the hypothesis that the film affected concern for the lives of farm workers?

Scores on the Concern Measure

Participant       Before             After

A                     17                    20

B                     7                      4

C                     10                    11

D                     13                    15

E                      8                      5

F                      9                      8

G                     11                    14

  1. Use the five steps of hypothesis testing.
  1. Figure the effect size and find the approximate power of this study.
  1. Report results in APA format.
  1. (25 points) You will have to use a combination of StatCrunch and hand calculations (e.g., effect sizes) to solve the following problems.

A team of cognitive psychologists studying the effects of sleep deprivation on short-term memory decay had eight participants stay in a sleep lab for two days. Four participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which they were not permitted to sleep during that period, while the other four participants were allowed to sleep when they wanted to. At the end of the two days, the participants completed a short-term memory task that yielded the results in the table that follows. Using the .05 significance level, did sleep deprivation reduce short-term memory?

Mean Number of Letters Remembered

Sleep Deprived           Normal Sleep

7                                  9

8                                  8

7                                  11

9                                  7

  1. Create the appropriate graph for this problem.
  1. Use the five steps of hypothesis testing.
  1. Figure the effect size.
  1. Report results in APA format

An intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence

The plan recognition problem: An intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence

Schmidt, C. F., Sridharan, N. S., & Goodson, J. L. (1978). The plan recognition problem: An intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence11(1), 45-83.

  • F. Schmidt,
  • S. Sridharan,
  • L. Goodson
  • Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A.

Abstract

Understanding actions involves inferring the goal of the actor and organizing the actions into a plan structure. The BELIEVER system is a psychological theory of how human observers understand the actions of others. The present theory is concerned with single-actor sequences and can account for goal-directed actions that may succeed or fail in accomplishing the goal, as well as actions governed by norms. After discussing how AI can be applied in psychological theory construction, the BELIEVER system is presented by specifying a plan recognition process and its knowledge sources.

Copyright © 1978 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Artificial Intelligence

Volume 11, Issues 1–2, August 1978, Pages 45–83

Applications to the Sciences and Medicine

Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence

  1. Steve Woolgar
  2. Woolgar, S. (1985). Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence. Sociology Sociology, 19, 557-572. doi:10.1177/0038038585019004005

Abstract

In the light of the recent growth of artificial intelligence (AI), and of its implications for understanding human behaviour, this paper evaluates the prospects for an association between sociology and artificial intelligence. Current presumptions about the distinction between human behaviour and artificial intelligence are identified through a survey of discussions about AI and `expert systems’. These discussions exhibit a restricted view of sociological competence, a marked rhetoric of progress and a wide variation in assessments of the state of the art. By drawing upon recent themes in the social study of science, these discussions are shown to depend on certain key dichotomies and on an interpretive flexibility associated with the notions of intelligence and expertise. The range of possible associations between sociology and AI reflects the extent to which we are willing to adopt these features of AI discourse. It is suggested that one of the more important options is to view the AI phenomenon as an occasion for reassessing the central axiom of sociology that there is something distinctively `social’ about human behaviour.

  1. KATHLEEN M. CARLEY

1.    Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

The potential linkages between artificial intelligence and sociology are growing. This growth is due to importation of artificial intelligence techniques into methodological tools for data analysis, a growing interest among researchers in artificial intelligence in the socially situated agent, and a growing interest among sociologists in using artificial intelligence techniques for theorizing about social phenomena. Increasingly, researchers are addressing concerns of traditional importance within sociology, such as the bases for cooperation, the role of structure in affecting individual agency, and interaction using computational models of intelligent adaptive agents. This article provides an overview of the role that artificial intelligence currently plays within sociology.

Carley, K. (1996). Artificial Intelligence within Sociology. Sociological Methods & Research, 25(1), 3-30. doi:doi: 10.1177/0049124196025001001

Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

September 2001, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 155-186

Naming the Unnamable: Socionics or the Sociological Turn of/to Distributed Artificial Intelligence

  • Thomas Malsch

%0 Journal Article

%D 2001

%@ 1387-2532

%J Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

%V 4

%N 3

%R 10.1023/A:1011446410198

%T Naming the Unnamable: Socionics or the Sociological Turn of/to Distributed Artificial Intelligence

%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1011446410198

%I Kluwer Academic Publishers

%8 2001-09-01

%A Malsch, Thomas

%P 155-186

%G EnglishBottom of Form