Using Strengths To Increase Motivation

Complete the “What is My Level of PsyCap” self-assessment.

Write a 1,400-word paper in which you include the following:

·         Explain why you agree or disagree with your results.

·         Develop strategies to advance your career using your strengths.

·         How can you use goal-setting to increase motivation and improve job performance?

·         How might your engagement as an employee and job satisfaction influence job performance?

·         Discuss at least 5 of the following motivational theories and explain how these can aid in job performance:

o    Extrinsic motivation

o    Intrinsic motivation

o    McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y

o    Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy

o    Acquired needs theory

o    Self-determination theory

o    Herzberg’s theory of motivation

o    Equity theory

o    Expectancy theory

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

 

Review the article, “Differentiating Between Counseling Theory and Process.”

For this Discussion, you analyze the significance of using theories to clinical mental health counseling practice and factors that impact developing theoretical orientations.

To prepare for this Discussion:

 

Review Chapter 4 in the course text Orientation to the Counseling Profession: Advocacy, Ethics, and Essential Professional Foundations. Focus on the role of theory and how it influences counseling practice. Also, review the components of a good theory. Think about how you would use these components to evaluate a new theory.

 

Go to the “Code of Ethics” on the American Counseling Association (ACA) website and review section C.7. Think about your ethical responsibility as a counselor to incorporate theory in your practice and consider why this is important.

 

Review the article, “Differentiating Between Counseling Theory and Process.” Focus on the significance of theory in counseling practice.

What are some of the factors that affect social mobility? Can these be overcome?

We have studied social stratification and how it influences what goes on in many social interactions among people.

  1. What are some of the factors that affect social mobility? Can these be overcome?
  2. Do you believe the structural-functionalist or the social-conflict approach best explains social stratification? Why?
  3. Is it possible for members of a minority group to be racist? Why or why not?
  4. When you think of various groups (race, class, and gender) in society, which ones have the most power and which ones have the least? What and who are some examples? Has this changed over time? Do you think it will change in the future?  Why or why not?

Write your responses in two to three paragraphs. Be sure to incorporate terms, concepts, and theory from your readings to support your comments. Remember to respond to the posts of at least two other students in this class

 

Arrow

Dissertation Table

Page 1 of 5

2016 Dissertation Milestone Table

The table below shows the eight review levels required for dissertation approval. Each review levels is iterative and may be repeated until the documents meet the standards set for that document based on GCU criteria and general accepted standards of scholarly work for doctoral research across disciplines. Use this table to set target completion dates for the major milestones and levels of review. Then track and adjust your plan (if necessary) according to the actual completion dates.

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 1 Review: Prospectus Review and Recommendation

 10 Strategic Points  Research Prospectus

No form Chair and Methodologist

Chair sends Prospectus to Methodologist through LDP email.

Level 2: Proposal Review and Recommendation by AQR Reviewer for Proposal Defense Conference Call

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) with Scored Criteria Tables

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) without Criteria Tables

No Form: Approval Email sent through LDP with AQR Reviewer’s Recommenda tion for Defense Call

Dissertation Committee

Chair loads required documents into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

AQR Reviewer

 

 

Page 2 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 3 Review:

Proposal Defense and Dissertation Committee Approval of Proposal

 Level 2 AQR Approved Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3)

 Updated 10 Strategic Points document

 Dissertation Proposal PowerPoint Presentation for Defense Call

D-35 Dissertation Committee

Level 4 Review: IRB Review and Approval

 Completed GCU D-35 Form

 Approved Research Prospectus

 Updated 10 Strategic Points document

 Committee Approved Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-3) Clean Copy

 Data Collection Instruments

 Site Approvals  Final IRB documents

(updated from Level 2/3 reviews by the Learner/approved by

D-50 IRB Director

Learner loads required documents into IRBNet. Chair approves and submits documents from IRBNet to initiate this review.

 

 

Page 3 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Chair if applicable) Level 5 Review: AQR Review and Recommendation for Dissertation Defense Conference Call

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-5) with Scored Criteria Tables

 Committee Reviewed Dissertation Proposal (Chapters 1-5) without Criteria Tables

No Form: Approval Email sent through LDP with AQR Reviewer’s Recommenda tion for Defense Call

Dissertation Committee

Chair loads required documents into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

AQR Reviewer

Level 6 Review: Dissertation Review and Recommendation by Full Committee for Level 7 Review

 Level 5 AQR Approved Dissertation Manuscript (Chapters 1-5)

 Dissertation PowerPoint Presentation

D-65 Dissertation Committee

 

 

Page 4 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Level 7 Review: Form/ Format Review & Approval

Recommendation of Dissertation for Level 8 Review

 Committee and AQR Approved) Dissertation with all final editing and revisions from Dissertation Defense completed and approved by Chair

 Form and Format Checklist Completed by Learner and Reviewed/Signed by Chair

 IRB Closeout Form

D-75 Chair loads required documents for Form and Format into LDP link, only accessible by the Chair, to initiate this review.

Form & Format Reviewer

Level 8 Review: Dean’s and Final Approval of Dissertation

 Final Dissertation Manuscript for Dean’s Approval and Signature

D-80 Dean, College of Doctoral Studies

Chair submits required documents for Dean’s Review into IRBNet to initiate this review

ProQuest Publication

 PDF of Dean Signed Dissertation Manuscript with

CDS administrative staff

 

 

Page 5 of 5

Review Levels and Final Approval

Document(s) for Review

GCU D Form

Reviewing and/or Approval Authority

Target Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Signature Page Inserted