Human Sex Paper

REACTION PAPERS: Each student is required to participate in 2 learning activities outside class this semester and then write 2 reaction papers summarizing what you did and learned. The purpose of this assignment is for you to learn something about yourself, your relationships and/or any topic related to human sexuality and sexual health. Due dates are listed in class outline. Papers need to be turned-in during class. Papers may not be left in my mailbox or emailed. You may turn papers in early. NO LATE PAPERS WILL BE ACCEPTED. Each paper is worth 25 points. Papers will be graded on both content and format. This is a college class and I expect to receive college material – including proper grammar and spelling. Papers need to be typed and stapled. Papers need to be 1-3 pages long (either single or double-spaced). Pick-up and save your graded papers until you receive your final grade for the class.

 

SUGGESTED ACTIVITIES FOR REACTION PAPERS:

1. Read an article from a magazine or journal.

2. Read chapters from The Guide to Getting it On.

3. Watch relevant TV programs and documentaries. A great source for documentaires is www.topdocumentaryfilms.com” www.topdocumentaryfilms.com.

5. Take surveys and/or give them to others to take/discuss with you.

6. Attend a relevant lecture, workshop or conference.

7. Read a book related to sexuality or relationships. Look at the list of recommended books I’ve provided. You are not limited to that list.

8. Watch a movie relevant to class. Do look at the list of movies I’ve recommended. You are not limited to that list.

9. Individual “Field Trips” to community agencies, sex toy stores, Museum of Tolerance, or more controversial places like an adult book store, erotic dancing, gay establishment/event, dungeon, or nude beach. In order for these to count it needs to be a new experience for you. 10.Interview persons whose sexuality or sexual experiences/socialization is different from yours. Prepare by making a list of relevant questions.

11.Have a detailed conversation with a friend or someone you’d like to be closer with about each other’s sexuality.

12.Participate in small group discussions with other classmates.

13.Explore non-pornographic sexual websites. See list of recommended websites. You are not limited to these websites.

14.Accept some of my challenges!

15.Anything else that would be meaningful to you. I do encourage you to think about activities or projects that would be personally meaningful. You may create a special project or do some research of your own. Do not participate in activities that are against the law for reaction papers.

REQUIRED FORMAT FOR REACTION PAPERS:

1. All papers should be properly identified with your name and class, and titled Reaction Paper #1 or Reaction Paper #2.

2. Clearly identify what you did and what it was about. List reference. Include your reasons for choosing this activity or topic. For example: a. Title of article, author, source, date. b. Title of TV program/documentary, channel, date. c. List place you visited d. State your project (interview, challenge, etc.)

3. List 5 statements of information or facts you learned (things you learned about topic, person, yourself, etc). Please number your statements and make sure they are clearly visible.

4. Summarize your reactions, feelings and opinions regarding your learning activity. This should be the main part of your paper. I want to know what you got out of the activity and why you responded the way you did. If you are writing about past painful/abusive experiences you do not need to follow required format. There are also a few challenge papers when you don’t need to follow the required format (touching, values, gender). I will remind you of this when I challenge you. Write the paper as an essay. If you are caught plagiarizing (copying someone else’s ideas or research) or allowing someone to copy your work, you will receive an 0 for the paper and you won’t be eligible for extra credit. Your

How would you design the study using a correlational design?

Assignment 1: Discussion Question

By Saturday, October 24, 2015 respond to the discussion question. Submit your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Use the same Discussion Area to comment on your classmates’ submissions, and continue the discussion untilWednesday, October 28, 2015. All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Imagine you were conducting research on the relationship between academic performance (e.g., better grades) and different levels of loudness of music (interval scale) while studying.

  • How would you design the study using a correlational design?
  • How would you design the study using a quasi-experimental design?
  • How would you design the study using an experimental design?

Describe two (2) ways in which a leader could affect groupthink

“Conformity and Groupthink” Respond to one (1) of the following discussion topics:

  • Explain the power of social influence based on the findings of Milgram’s experiment. Provide one (1) example of a situation you have been in where you felt you had to conform to someone or something. Indicate whether you felt you had to conform because of informational or normative influence, and explain the main reasons for your indication.

 

  • According to the textbook, a leader can have a major influence on whether or not groupthink will occur. Describe two (2) ways in which a leader could affect groupthink. Additionally, give one (1) example of a leader in history that has promoted groupthink. Describe at least one (1) way groupthink could have been avoided in your example.

Discussion Reply 1

Response Guidelines

Read your peers’ discussion posts and respond to at least two of them. Does their selected model help your peers’ apply the expectations set for writing in the field of psychology? What did you learn from your Smarthinking experience that could help your peers further develop their writing proficiency? What strategies might help your peers connect writing to their vision and goals for a future career? What strategies or resources have you discovered in your own exploration that would help your peers reach their writing goals?

Be sure to provide substantive responses to help your peers build on their learning and reference any relevant assigned readings, additional resources, or professional literature to support your response.

The article that I have found to be the most informational in my research and that I would like to emulate is by Woo and Leon (2013). The flow that the article has was easy to understand and very informational. The article touched base on the different ways to use environmental enrichment treatments in the treatment of Autistic patients. The article gave a brief history and explanation of certain treatments and then what they used. The discussion section of the article is where they compared their treatment to those of the different treatments that are being used today and why they believe that their treatment was more effective. At the end of the article they had a “future studies” section stating what they felt needed extra work and attention and where they think the study will go.

As far as an actual outline to follow I use the APA Manual and my Easy Guide to APA style book from a previous class. Between those two books I can generally figure out what I need to do. I am still not perfect but much better than I was even a few months ago.

This model is relevant, because it is in the same field and wheel house as what I will be studying and researching in the future. I have used this specific article for multiple papers already because it has such a plethora of knowledge and both of the books are solid guidelines for any psychology student to follow.

The only place that I will be using writing to further my career will be to achieve the funding for my research that I want to conduct and then to share the knowledge that I have gained from my research. At this time I only have one major research project that I want to conduct, and once that has been completed I want to teach others what I have learned and use that knowledge to treat those I researched for.

I have not yet received my review from smart thinking so I will make an addendum to this post in the form of a response to myself here once I have gotten a review from them. As a precursor to it I believe that my strengths are following the proper form for a scholarly paper, using proper in text citation for the citation itself, and having a good flow to my work. My down falls are being able to paraphrase properly and understanding when and where parentheses are used if they are ever used in APA. That one still gets me. In the future I will continue to use the writing center as a resource and I have others read my papers to help in editing. My strategy is that you can never have too many eyes going through your work to make sure it makes sense, has proper flow,  proper punctuation, and is grammatically correct.

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Schwartz, B. M., Landrum, R. E., & Gurung, R. A. (2012). An easyguide to APA style. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Woo, C. C., & Leon, M. (2013). Environmental enrichment as an effective treatment for autism: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioral Neuroscience127(4), 487-497. doi:10.1037/a0033010